Madras HC Chief Justice constitutes larger Bench to hear dispute over removal of flagpoles from public places
Justice N. Anand Venkatesh adjourned a writ petition filed by Communist Party of India (Marxist) State secretary P. Shanmugam by a month, after advocate N.G.R. Prasad, assisted by R. Thirumoorthy, informed him of the constitution of the larger Bench, which shall hold the hearing at the Madurai Bench of the High Court since the single judge's order was passed there.
Mr. Shanmugam had filed the present petition challenging the Revenue department's latest instructions to the Collectors to remove the flagpoles in accordance with the single judge's order. He had questioned the necessity for the government officials to exhibit such urgency when a Division Bench of the High Court had referred the matter to a larger Bench for an authoritative pronouncement.
The petitioner stated the Division Bench had agreed with his submissions that the single judge's order to remove flagpoles was against the principles of natural justice since political parties had not been heard before passing such an order. He also contended that it was the democratic right of political parties, especially those striving for the working class, to display their flags in public places.
In his affidavit, he had argued that government officials need not show urgency in implementing the single judge's order just because there was some delay in the constitution of the larger Bench. When his case was listed for admission on Wednesday (July 16, 2025), Justice Venkatesh had adjourned it by a day. Subsequently, on Thursday, he was informed of the larger Bench having been constituted by the Chief Justice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Day before INDIA bloc meeting, Rahul's remarks spark Congress-CPM war of words
On the eve of the online INDIA bloc meeting Saturday, allies Congress and Communist Party of India (Marxist) clashed over Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi's remarks that he is 'fighting the CPI(M) ideologically'. At a public meeting in Kerala's Kottayam, Gandhi said: 'I fight the RSS and Communist Party of India (Marxist) ideologically and I fight them in the realm of ideas… My biggest complaint with them is that they don't have feelings for people. You can give whatever speeches, if you do not have feelings for people, you are not ready to connect and hug people, you will not be a leader.' The CPI(M) said that Gandhi's statements were absurd. 'In his absurd and condemnable comment equating the RSS and the CPI(M), Rahul Gandhi forgets who is fighting the RSS in Kerala- the CPI(M), which has lost countless dedicated workers in resisting saffron terror. Meanwhile, in Kerala, the Congress and the RSS continue to echo each other in expressing anti-communist sentiments. As soon as he steps into Kerala, Rahul Gandhi speaks that language too,' said the Left party in a statement. Saturday's INDIA block meeting, meanwhile, will see the participation of the TMC which had initially decided to skip it. The TMC has said its MP Abhishek Banerjee will join the online meeting. The AAP is not attending the meeting, maintaining that it is no longer part of an alliance formed ahead of last year's general elections against the BJP. In a statement on Friday, AAP Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Singh said: 'The INDIA alliance coalition was formed for the Lok Sabha elections. Post that, we contested alone in the Haryana and Delhi, as well as the Punjab bypolls. We are now contesting alone in the upcoming Bihar elections as well. The AAP is not part of the INDIA alliance. However, we will oppose the government whenever we feel it is wrong.'
Hans India
3 hours ago
- Hans India
Nayi Brahmin Community Protests High Court Ruling, Demands Protection of Traditional Livelihood and Identity
Gadwal: In a passionate press meet held by the Nayi Brahmin Seva Sangham in Ayija town, representatives of the traditional barber community (Nayi Brahmins) expressed deep concern and emotional anguish over a recent High Court judgment that stated that any individual from any caste is allowed to take up the traditional occupation of barbering. Key Concerns and Objections Raised by the Nayi Brahmin Community: 1. Historical and Generational Livelihood: The leaders emphasized that barbering has been the sole livelihood of Nayi Brahmins for generations, and their ancestors dedicated their lives to the service without diversifying into other professions. They questioned the intent behind the court's verdict, asking: 'How do we justify the sacrifices made by our forefathers who never abandoned this profession?' 2. Cultural and Ritual Importance: The community highlighted their indispensable role in both auspicious and inauspicious Hindu rituals—from birth ceremonies to funeral rites. They posed the question: > 'Can any ritual from birth to death take place without the presence of a Nayi Brahmin?' 3. Religious Significance in Temples: Citing traditions, they pointed out that Nayi Brahmins are the first to awaken the deity in temples with Mangala Vaidyams (auspicious instruments like Nadaswaram and Melam). They questioned whether such sacred traditions could be altered. 4. Pioneers of Surgical Practices: The leaders took pride in their ancestral mastery of shaving with surgical blades, calling themselves 'descendants of Dhanvantari' (the deity of medicine), and questioned whether other communities could truly understand or replicate their skill with such reverence. 5. Economic and Cultural Threat: The community alleged a coordinated attempt to displace them by enabling people from other castes and even religions to open "modern salons" and importing workers from other states, which threatens the livelihood of local, impoverished Nayi Brahmin families. 6. Lack of Alternatives and Economic Backwardness: Many in the community, they said, lack access to quality education and healthcare due to insufficient income, and despite willingness, cannot switch professions. They described a grim reality of being stuck in a dying livelihood. 7. Neglect in Governance and Politics: They pointed out the lack of political representation and unfulfilled promises from previous governments—no permanent temple jobs, no minimum wages, no financial support—leaving the community both economically and politically powerless. 8. Warning to Authorities: In a stern message, the leaders warned that if others encroach upon their traditional occupation, the Nayi Brahmin community nationwide would unite to organize mass protests and demonstrations. They cautioned the authorities not to test their patience, hinting at a rise in community assertion and rights mobilization. > 'So far, you've seen our patience. In the coming days, you'll witness our courage and unity,' said Seva Sangham President Shekhar Pandey, joined by District Publicity Secretary Somashekar. The press meet reveals a deep sense of betrayal and cultural erosion felt by the Nayi Brahmin community. Their emotional appeals underscore a larger question that India is grappling with — how to balance tradition and social mobility. While the High Court's ruling aims at breaking caste-based occupational boundaries and promoting equality, communities like the Nayi Brahmins feel excluded from development and abandoned economically after dedicating generations to a single caste-based profession. This issue highlights: The tensions between social justice and heritage preservation. The urgent need for economic rehabilitation, skill development, and representation for backward communities if traditional occupations are opened up. A rising sense of identity politics among small, often-overlooked caste groups. Unless addressed with sensitivity and inclusive policymaking, such verdicts, even if constitutionally sound, may deepen social unrest. The Nayi Brahmin Seva Sangham's message is loud and clear: they seek respect for their legacy, protection of their livelihood, and a dignified place in modern India. They are not just protesting a legal ruling—they are demanding recognition, rehabilitation, and representation.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Baby hits out at Rahul Gandhi for equating CPI(M) with RSS
Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary M.A. Baby on Friday hit out at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for 'equating the CPI(M) and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) as his ideological enemies.' Speaking at the Oommen Chandy Smriti Sangamam at Puthuppally on Friday, Mr. Gandhi said he fights the RSS and the CPI(M) ideologically and accused both for 'having no feelings for the people.' In a video posted on his X page, said it was quite unfortunate that the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha would make such a comparison in 'a casual and sweeping manner.' 'It is unfortunate that he made such a comment in Kerala where the CPI(M) has been in the forefront of fighting the RSS ideologically as well as politically and where they have killed around 100 comrades of the CPI(M). I don't know whether Mr. Gandhi knows the record of the Congress in fighting the RSS in Kerala. The very fact that he in a way equated the CPI(M) and the RSS betrays the absence of a correct understanding of the role of the CPI(M) in Kerala or India. Rahul only needs to recall how Manmohan Singh could not form a govt. in 2004 without the support of the CPI(M) and other left parties as the Congress didn't command a majority in the Lok Sabha after the 2004 election,' he said. Mr. Baby said 'it appears that the moment Mr. Gandhi steps into Kerala, he becomes a former MP from Wayanad, where he had to fight the Left candidate and not the RSS.' 'I hope and wish that he would be more serious while speaking against the CPI(M). Of course, the CPI(M) can be criticised. We will be compelled to criticise the Congress also, as we have done for their economic policies. We continue to criticise the Congress in a friendly manner, but we will never equate the congress and the BJP when we criticise,' he said.
