
California City's Housing Market 'Exploding'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Bay Area home prices are keeping steady despite inventory reaching levels unseen in years, according to the latest data, but the growing number of active listings suggests that the region—including San Francisco—could face significant price drops this year.
Active listings in the San Francisco metropolitan area jumped by 40 percent in May compared to a year earlier, adding much needed inventory to the city after it faced a crippling supply shortage during the pandemic homebuying frenzy. But buyers waiting on the sidelines of the market are staying put, as demand dwindles in the face of elevated mortgage rates and sky-high prices.
Why It Matters
The U.S. housing market, which has become increasingly less affordable for homebuyers since the pandemic, is at a breaking point: inventory is rising all across the country, while demand is kept low by historically high prices and elevated mortgage rates.
But slowly, many markets are turning in favor of buyers, as growing numbers of active listings are sitting idle on the market. Should prices finally fall in San Francisco, one of the most expensive markets in the entire country, this would mark a significant victory for aspiring homebuyers.
What To Know
Last month, there were 7,080 homes for sale in the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont metro area, 40 percent more than a year earlier—the most of any month on record based on Realtor.com data going back to 2016. Active listings were also up 30 percent from May 2019, before the pandemic.
In the entire state of California, inventory jumped by an even higher 51 percent year-over-year in May, the second-highest May since 2016 behind May 2019.
While pent-up demand in the state should be enough to find a buyer for each and every one of these homes for sale, this is not what is happening in San Francisco and across California. Pent-up demand still exists, but many buyers just cannot afford to make an offer at the current price levels, especially considering that mortgage rates are still hovering around the 7 percent mark and home insurance premiums are rising across the state.
Historic Victorian-style homes stand in front of the San Francisco skyline, with the City Hall rotunda visible, in California on June 27, 2023.
Historic Victorian-style homes stand in front of the San Francisco skyline, with the City Hall rotunda visible, in California on June 27, 2023.
PHILIP PACHECO/AFP via Getty Images
Pending sales in the West, a region that includes California, fell by 8.9 percent in April from March, according to data from the National Association of Realtors (NAR), reporting a collapse in demand at what is traditionally the busiest time of the year for the housing market.
In San Francisco, according to Redfin's latest data, home sales were down by 5.4 percent in April compared to a year earlier. And yet, the median sale price of a home in the City By the Bay in the same month was 3.6 percent higher than a year earlier, at $1,450,500.
According to real estate analyst Nick Gerli, CEO and founder of Reventure App, inventory is rising and prices are falling in the San Francisco metro area because of "a historic downturn in homebuyer demand," he said.
"Housing inventory in San Francisco is exploding," he wrote on X.
"Starting 3 years ago, the buyers exited the Bay Area Housing Market, and have not come back." Gerli added. "The typical value of a house in San Francisco is $1.18 million as of April 2025 according to Zillow. The only other large metro that's more expensive is nearby San Jose."
"Those valuations don't work at 7% mortgage rates. And according to Redfin, roughly 75% of buyers in the Bay Area use a mortgage to facilitate the transaction. Thus the frozen market, with declining prices, and skyrocketing inventory."
Put simply, Gerli said, "people can't afford to buy in San Francisco's market given the sky-high prices."
What People Are Saying
Real estate analyst Wolf Richter wrote in a recent report: "The problem is demand in California. It has essentially collapsed. New listings aren't that high. But because the inventory of homes for sale doesn't sell, and new listings are added to it, the total piled up."
Real estate analyst Lance Lambert wrote in a recent report: "More California housing markets are climbing out of that inventory deficit. And if the current trajectory holds, California could soon be out of its Pandemic Housing Boom era inventory hole."
Gerli wrote on X: "Watch out for potentially sizable price drops in the second half of 2025 in northern California."
Allison Fortini Crawford, a San Francisco and Marin County Realtor with Sotheby's International Realty, told the San Francisco Chronicle: "Buyers are out there. But they are very picky. They are nervous and hesitant because we do have the stock market on a yo-yo."
What Happens Next
What normally happens when inventory rises and sales don't follow suit in a market is a growing downward pressure on prices. But prices are not budging yet in San Francisco.
This is in part because housing inventory, while higher than it has been in a while, remains low overall for the city. According to Gerli, only 0.7 percent of all the owned houses are on the market in the San Francisco metro right now—a low figure compared to other U.S. cities "indicating that while prices are falling, the market could still be viewed as 'tight' in some pockets."
But in a market like San Francisco, "even small upward deviations in that [relative inventory, which indicates how many homes for sale are listed compared to normal] can cause a quick correction in prices," Gerli said.
Gerli's Reventure App expects a 4.7 percent drop in home values in San Francisco in the coming 12 months. "And it could decline further if the current inventory trends hold," he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Russian Economy Faces Collapsing Oil Profits, Non-Viable Refineries
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia's sanctions-hit economy has been left reeling by falling fossil fuel revenues and a slump in profitability in the country's oil refineries. Figures released by Russia's state statistics agency Rosstat showed nearly a halving of profits from oil and gas, which are essential to the government balancing the books. The figures come as Russia's finance ministry reported an increase in its budget deficit and amid warnings about the impact of a new round of European Union sanctions on Moscow. Newsweek has contacted Russia's finance ministry for comment. Russian ruble notes are seen besides dollar bills in this image taken on January 11, 2025. Russian ruble notes are seen besides dollar bills in this image taken on January 11, It Matters Russia's economy has been impacted by a fall in global oil prices, the strengthening of the ruble and tougher sanctions imposed because of Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Fossil fuels are at the heart of Russia's economy and fund Putin's plans for record military spending. Increasing sanctions appear to be having an impact on the key revenue generator, which could be used as leverage to stop Russian aggression. What To Know Rosstat reported that profits from Russian oil and gas companies in the first quarter of 2025 fell to 789.5 billion rubles ($10 billion) compared with 1.445 trillion rubles ($18 billion) for the same period in 2024, The Moscow Times reported. The outlet added that the profitability of oil refineries making petroleum products had slumped in figures that come hard on the heels of data from Russia's Finance Ministry. It reported the country's oil revenues had fallen by 35 percent to 512.7 billion rubles (about $6.55 billion) in May compared with the same month the previous year. Amid a global slump in the price of Russia's key export, the country's Urals grade has dropped from $66 a barrel at the start of the year to $52 by the end of May. As Russia faces a slump in oil revenues, its finance ministry said on Tuesday that Russia's budget deficit had increased by 168 billion rubles ($2.18 billion) in May. This is five times higher than for the same period in 2024 and nearly equal to the entire deficit planned for the full year—3.8 trillion rubles ($49.4 billion), or 1.7 percent of GDP. It also brings the total deficit for the first five months of 2025 to 3.4 trillion rubles ($44.2 billion), or 1.5 percent of GDP. Vasily Astrov, from the Vienna Institute for Economic Affairs, told Newsweek on Wednesday that monthly budget figures should not be over-interpreted because of the extreme volatility of spending. Before the war, Russian government spending was evenly spread throughout the year but since 2023 has been front-loaded early in the year for military expenditures. Astrov said that last year, because of this front-loading in the first few months, many predicted a catastrophic budget deficit for the full year, which did not materialize. But it is extremely likely that the deficit for the full year 2025 will exceed the official 1.7 percent target and could end up as high as 3 percent of GDP, Astrov added. However, Russia's dependence on energy revenues has declined substantially over the past few years—from 40 percent before the war to around 30 percent last year, and will be even smaller this year, Astrov added. Dwindling oil and gas profits are eating into Russia's National Wealth Fund which could be exhausted by 2026 if current economic trends persist, the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA) and the Gaidar Institute have warned. As of June, the fund held 2.8 trillion rubles ($36.4 billion) in liquid assets, its lowest level since 2019, a decline from the prewar peak of $113.5 billion because of growing budget deficits, infrastructure investments and state bailouts. What People Are Saying Tymofiy Mylovanov of the Kyiv School of Economics on X: "Russia's oil exports fell 29 percent in the final week of May.. the sharpest weekly drop in since full scale invasion. EU sanctions are biting hard, disrupting loadings, payments, and insurance." European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Tuesday: "Oil exports still represent one-third of Russia's government revenues. We need to cut this source of revenues," Vasily Astrov, senior economist at the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies told Newsweek: "It is extremely likely that (Russia's) deficit for the full year 2025 will exceed the official 1.7 percent will end up somewhere between 2-3 percent of GDP." What Happens Next On Tuesday, the European Union proposed its 18th round of sanctions against Moscow to pressure it into accepting a 30-day unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine, which could add to turbulence in Russia's economy. The measures include targeting banks and vessels of Russia's sanctions-busting shadow fleet of vessels that transport oil. The reduction of a price cap for seaborne Russian oil from $60 to $45 per barrel could also cause further pain for the country's budget, analysts have predicted. However, the package requires the backing of all EU members and could be thwarted by vetoes from Slovakia and Hungary, which are considered Moscow's closest allies in the EU.


San Francisco Chronicle
35 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Mayor Lurie made ‘painful' cuts in his S.F. budget proposal. The hurt is far from over
San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie said he made 'painful decisions' when assembling his recent budget proposal that would slash nonprofit contracts and shrink the City Hall workforce. But the hurt is far from over. Lurie recently told the Chronicle that he is still eyeing a more ambitious overhaul next year as he tries to erase a deficit that's projected to reach as much as $700 million in the 2028 fiscal year. Complicating Lurie's plans to rein in city spending is the fact that the Trump administration has already moved to claw back federal funds from San Francisco and could try to take more money away. And a Tuesday report from the city controller's office warned that proposed Medicaid cuts advanced by Congressional Republicans could further hurt city revenue — as could a potential recession. Lurie's city spending plan would eliminate about $185 million in grants and contracts over two years and cut about 100 filled jobs from the government payroll. The proposal would help Lurie close a massive budget shortfall, but unions and nonprofits quickly decried what they view as an unwarranted assault on community groups that provide crucial services to residents and businesses. Despite the early resistance, however, Lurie's inaugural budget blueprint does not represent a massive reorganization of the San Francisco bureaucracy, nor does it compare to the layoffs the city last experienced during the Great Recession. Next year could be a different story. In an interview with the Chronicle last week, Lurie indicated that he sees the current budget negotiations as a prelude to his plans for 2026. This year, his budget proposal was all about 'right-sizing,' he said. For next year, he has a different word in mind: 'restructuring.' 'This was a really focused budget on delivering core services (and) right-sizing our government,' Lurie said. 'And it does not mean the work is over. It was never going to be that way. … We have a lot of work to do ahead of us.' It's not yet clear what Lurie's promised restructuring will look like. The mayor's budget plan this year already proposed combining two city departments beset by scandals into one agency. And a February executive directive that Lurie issued on permitting reform said the city should explore how it might merge 'key permitting functions' into one department. Just how difficult Lurie's budget calculus will be in the coming year depends heavily on what happens at the national level. San Francisco's nearly $16 billion budget relies on more than $2 billion in operating revenue from the federal government, the vast majority of which comes in the form of Medicaid reimbursements. Funding changes under consideration in Congress could hurt the city, but it's how much it might lose. The controller's Tuesday report said the proposed federal budget bill 'represents the biggest set of cuts to Medicaid since inception and could result in thousands of San Francisco residents disenrolling from the Medi-Cal program and reduced funding for the Department of Public Health.' Lurie has proposed setting up a $400 million reserve that the city could tap into to offset any major funding cuts from President Trump or Congress. The controller found that the reserve amount was 'commensurate to risk.' Another unknown is the extent to which any national economic downturn could harm San Francisco's budget, and Lurie's ability to bring city spending in line with revenue. The controller's report noted that, while unemployment in the city is stable and office attendance has risen, technology and hospitality companies continue to lay people off. Trump's tariffs and immigration crackdowns could further strain the economy. Regardless of what happens nationally, Lurie has said he is already trying to end 'the era of soaring city budgets' and wants city officials to 'start living within our means.' His proposed cuts represent a reckoning for nonprofits after years of flush city budgets that saw millions flow to third parties in exchange for providing crucial social services. Now, many of those organizations are reeling from deep cuts that could force layoffs and the shuttering of programs. Some San Francisco legal aid organizations are facing deep cuts that they say could lead to more homelessness and less access to legal services for the needy. One legal aid organization's director is going on a hunger strike to protest the cuts. The Latino Task Force, Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, the Chinatown Community Development Center and dozens of others are facing cuts that will impact services. The People's Budget, a coalition of city advocacy groups that every year proposes changes to the mayor's budget, has a 'walkthrough' of all the groups they have heard from that are losing funding. Anya Worley-Ziegmann, lead coordinator for the San Francisco People's Budget Coalition that advocates for nonprofits facing cuts, said in a statement that Lurie's budget proposal threatens 'essential services for food security, workforce development, legal aid, and children and families facing homelessness.' 'We cannot balance the budget on the backs of working class and marginalized communities while at the same time claiming to be a city that cares for all its residents,' Worley-Ziegmann said. Lurie also is being slammed by fiscal conservatives who believe he should have made deeper cuts to the city's 33,000-person workforce and take on the city's 'nonprofit industrial complex,' a moniker critics have given to the large contractors that do work on behalf of the city. A previous Chronicle analysis found that San Francisco has an unusually high amount of public sector workers per capita, especially among public health and library employees. Marie Hurabiell, founder of the neighborhood advocacy group Connected SF, praised Lurie for taking on the city's nonprofits and contractors as well as his effort to 'right-size' the budget after years of what she said was 'overspending' related to the pandemic. But she said those changes will only get San Francisco to the level of spending it had before COVID, and there are many more cuts to be made to downsize the government so it better reflects the city's relatively small population. One way to do that is by doubling down on accountability, she said. 'For years there's been a lot of money flowing and our services have not been great,' she said. '(Lurie) is probably trying to be very thoughtful and methodical (about future cuts), but I'm hoping he will be more impactful.' The existing job cuts in Lurie's proposed budget also drew some criticism from the executive committee of the San Francisco Democratic Party, which is controlled by moderates who generally share Lurie's politics. Committee members said in a statement that Lurie's budget overall 'demonstrates bold leadership during a time of unprecedented fiscal challenge.' But party leaders said they were 'very concerned about the proposed reduction of city jobs currently held by San Francisco employees.' 'Cutting these roles not only disrupts lives and livelihoods but also risks weakening the long-term capacity of government to meet the needs of its residents,' the statement read. Party chair Nancy Tung said the committee doesn't have a position on where budget cuts should come from if those 100 jobs were preserved. But she said the committee hoped Lurie and supervisors would be able to find a way to prevent any city employees from being laid off. She also acknowledged that the city's financial condition had put Lurie in a tough spot and praised him for issuing a hiring slowdown on his first day in office. 'I don't envy where the mayor is in terms of having to do this,' Tung said. 'I also know that this is very hard for him, too. He is trying to do it as humanely as possible.' Tom Li contributed reporting.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Musk fight reveals fragility of relationship between Silicon Valley and White House
The falling out between President Trump and Elon Musk is just the latest reminder that the relationship between the new White House and the titans of technology has turned out to be complicated. The CEO of Tesla (TSLA) was among several big names from Silicon Valley awarded prime seats for the president's Jan. 20 Capitol inauguration, alongside Meta (META) CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook, Amazon (AMZN) chair Jeff Bezos, and Google (GOOG) CEO Sundar Pichai. In the five months since, the president has either confronted all of their companies in court or applied pressure on those firms with his own words. Musk and Trump made their break official last week in a series of social media posts that featured insults and threats hurled by both men. The other executives and their companies had already been grappling with a tougher-than-expected stance on their industry. Zuckerberg, for example, was not able to convince Trump to stop an antitrust trial against Meta from going forward this spring. The president has since threatened Cook's Apple with 25% duties on overseas-made iPhones and criticized the iPhone maker's ramped-up production in India. Meanwhile, the company is defending against an antitrust lawsuit led by the Justice Department, filed during President Joe Biden's administration. Trump's Justice Department has also pushed ahead with a Biden-era recommendation for a judge to break up Pichai's Google empire. Trump even called Bezos to complain about Amazon after it was reported that the online retail giant was considering displaying the cost of tariffs next to prices on its site. Trump said Bezos "solved the problem very quickly.' Yet Amazon still faces a lawsuit from Trump's Federal Trade Commission that is due to start in February 2027. The FTC, which brought the case during Biden's term in office, told a judge in the spring that it needed to push the original October 2026 trial date due to Amazon's litigation delays. One of the biggest questions facing the tech world as Trump took office was how aggressive Trump's antitrust enforcers would be following four years of a Biden administration marked by legal fights with many of Silicon Valley's biggest names. By sustaining many of these cases and probes against Big Tech, Trump has parted ways with traditional Republican-style enforcement, legal experts say. "This isn't the Bush administration," Trump's FTC chair Andrew Ferguson told a group of American CEOs this spring in Washington, D.C., referring to one of the weakest US antitrust enforcement periods in modern history. Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Anat Alon-Beck expects the Trump administration will continue to rein in Big Tech, especially given bipartisan support for the idea that Big Tech currently has too much power. There have been some positive developments for the tech firms too. Big Tech has gained the benefit of a relaxed regulatory environment, especially in the industry of artificial intelligence, making fundraising and complying with securities laws easier. In an executive order titled 'Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,' the president rescinded Biden's executive order on AI safety and directed federal agencies to remove regulatory obstacles to US global AI dominance. "So they have to take what they can get from the current administration," Alon-Beck said. One tech giant that does have an early win from Trump is Microsoft. President Trump's antitrust cops ended what had become an uphill government effort to unwind Microsoft's (MSFT) $69 billion acquisition of video game maker Activision Blizzard that also began during the Biden administration. The decision came when the FTC voluntarily dropped a lawsuit that Biden's FTC boss, Lina Khan, first filed against the tie-up in December 2022. But Microsoft may not emerge unscathed, either. Bloomberg has reported that Trump officials at the FTC are also broadening a probe into Microsoft and its relationship with AI upstart OpenAI ( The probe was first launched by Khan, a key architect of a new movement seeking to expand the legal theories that can give rise to antitrust claims. In June of last year, multiple news organizations reported that the probe also involved a DOJ investigation into chipmaker Nvidia's (NVDA) competitive conduct. The probe was to address concerns over the company's dominance in the market for microprocessors that power AI. The Trump administration has not indicated it has dropped the investigation. And in April, Nvidia said in a regulatory filing that the president had kept in place Biden's export restrictions on the company's H20 AI chips to China. As for Musk, Trump this past weekend said he had no desire to repair the relationship, which he said was over. He warned there would be 'serious consequences' if Musk financed candidates to run against Republicans who voted in favor of the president's domestic policy bill. But on Monday, Trump made some conciliatory comments about Musk and Tesla. "I'd have no problem with it," Trump said at a White House event on Monday when asked if he would be willing to speak with Musk. "I'd imagine he wants to speak with me." He added, "I wish him well, very well actually." The Tesla CEO has also conceded that he regrets some of his social media posts about Trump, saying on Wednesday that they "went too far". Wedbush technology analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note on Monday that he doesn't expect Trump and Musk to fully patch their soured relationship but would not be surprised if it improved in the months ahead. At the end of the day, Ives wrote, "Trump needs Musk to stay close to the Republican party and Musk needs Trump for many reasons," including a federal framework for autonomous vehicles. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data