Port, dock workers to join May 20 national strike
A communication from C.D. Nandakumar, president, and T. Narendra Rao, general secretary of the Federation, said here after a two-day meeting of the working committee that a resolution was passed at the top-level meeting urging the government to withdraw its decision to amend the Major Port Authorities Act, 2021 through its (Amendment) Bill, 2025. The amendment empowers Port Authority Boards to make regulations on suspension, reduction in ranks, compulsory retirement, removal and dismissal from service, pensions and gratuities, and other establishment-related matters concerning labour.
In another resolution, the Federation said that the Indian Ports Bill, 2025, introduced to replace the Indian Ports Act of 1908, has raised significant concerns regarding its impact on the Indian federal structure. While the Bill claims to aim at modernising port governance, several provisions centralise powers that traditionally resided with State governments.
The Federation also said that the government aims to divest public ownership by handing over ready-built, valuable assets and facilities, such as cargo-handling terminals, to transnational corporates under the National Assets Monetisation projects.
The situation, it said, has created an unbalanced condition, giving private operators the upper hand in Indian major ports. The control of the vast Indian coast, spread over 7,517 kilometres across nine coastal States, is gradually being crippled by private operators. This is not only detrimental to the economic interests of the nation but may also pose severe threats to national security, as ports are described as the second line of defence, the Federation added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
China Parades Deadliest Superweapons; Hypersonic Missiles, Sea Drones, Battle Tanks On Display
Russia Humiliates Trump With 5% Oil Discount To India Amid Fierce Sanctions Battle And Tariff War Russia has openly taunted the United States by announcing it grants India a 5% discount on crude oil imports, just as Donald Trump's administration announced sweeping tariffs on New Delhi. Moscow's deputy envoy Roman Babushkin hit back at Washington, declaring that US sanctions were 'unjustified and unilateral,' and promising that Russia's market would embrace Indian exports if America blocks them. This bold move comes as India resumes Russian oil purchases after discounts widened, reigniting Washington's anger. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent lashed out, accusing India of 'profiteering' and undermining sanctions by reselling Russian crude. But Moscow insists India's growing oil demand makes the partnership 'perfectly complementary.' In the face of Western pressure, Russia has positioned itself as India's most reliable energy partner, transforming sanctions into opportunity, and delivering a clear message that Washington cannot dictate India's choices. 98.7K views | 16 hours ago
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Daily Briefing: Can a minister be removed?
Good morning, Dream11, Winzo, and MPL are among hundreds of real-money gaming platforms staring at a potential ban after the Lok Sabha passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025. The Bill defines an 'online money game' as any service where users pay a fee, deposit money, or stake value with the expectation of winning monetary or material rewards. Crucially, the government has exempted e-sports platforms, recognising them as legitimate competitive sports. It also plans to promote 'online social games' for recreation and education. The move targets a fast-growing industry, projected to hit $9 billion by 2029, that has faced criticism over money laundering, tax evasion, and addiction. But a blanket ban could cost the exchequer thousands of crores. On that note, let's get to today's edition.👇 On Wednesday, Parliament descended into pandemonium as members tore up papers and threw them towards Union Home Minister Amit Shah. Members of Trinamool Congress (TMC) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came close to a scuffle. The chaos ensued when Shah got up to introduce three Bills, including the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, in the Lok Sabha. The Bill seeks to revise the law for the removal of top executive functionaries, from the Prime Minister to Chief Ministers and other ministers, facing allegations of corruption or serious offences, punishable with a sentence of at least five years, if they are sent behind bars for 30 days. The counter: The Opposition has slammed the Bill as an 'assault on federalism' and 'completely draconian.' Parties argue that it hands excessive power to investigative agencies, which could arrest individuals for 30 days and ensure their removal without a conviction. They warn the law could be weaponised against Opposition-ruled states, with some calling it a diversion from Congress's 'vote chori' allegations. The law: The 30-day custody yardstick for removal of ministers raises questions over due process, since arrest and detention are just preliminary steps in an investigation, and not evidence of guilt. Can an elected legislator be forced to step down? We explain the previously proposed amendments and the Supreme Court's say on the matter. Faizan Mustafa, legal scholar and vice chancellor of Chanakya National Law University, writes that unless investigative agencies become autonomous and bail becomes a norm — not an exception — the Bill is vulnerable to misuse. Read. The process: The Bills have now been referred to a 31-member Joint Committee. Shah requested that they have a report ready before the first day of the next Parliament session. At least two-thirds of MPs present in the House need to vote in favour for a Constitutional amendment to be passed. Partners: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar is on a two-day visit to Russia in the backdrop of the looming US-imposed 50 per cent tariff and breakdown in the India-US trade talks. He told Russia's First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov that New Delhi and Moscow need to tap into the 'full potential of trade and investment ties'. India has also restarted its trade negotiations with the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), comprising Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic. Error: Days after Sanjay Kumar, co-director of a CSDS research programme, Lokniti, put out a post alleging irregularities in Maharashtra electoral rolls, he withdrew the allegations and apologised. Kumar now faces two FIRs. Assault: A 41-year-old man, Rajeshbhai Khimjibhai Sakriya, has been arrested on attempt-to-murder charges after he allegedly attacked Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta during a public meeting at her office. According to a statement from Sakriya's mother, he was upset over the Supreme Court's order on stray dogs, and that he has 'mental issues'. Aviation alarm: A Parliamentary panel has sounded the alarm on aviation safety weeks after the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad. The panel's report has flagged multiple systemic lapses, including unchecked fleet expansion, fatigued workforces, outdated infrastructure, and unresolved safety gaps. Also underlining staff shortage as an 'existential threat' to India's aviation safety system, the panel recommended full autonomy to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). GST overhaul: A Group of Ministers (GoM) is deliberating on the proposal to remove taxes on life and health insurance premiums. Although this would make insurance more affordable, it might increase insurer costs. Most members are in favour of making the tax nil, while some states have raised concerns over revenue loss. Meanwhile, the Centre has formed two new informal groups of ministers (iGoMs) under Amit Shah and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to prescribe reforms in the economic and social sectors, respectively. India's fast bowlers aren't exactly the fittest. But strength and conditioning coach Adrian le Roux has a plan to fix it: clock more running miles than hitting the gym. At the heart of this new fitness regime is the rugby-centric Bronco Test. What does it involve and how does it help? Read Devendra Pandey's report. 🎧Before you go, do tune in to the latest '3 Things' podcast episode. Today's lineup: Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's visit to India, wastewater surveillance, and a rare vote recounting. That's all for today, folks! Until tomorrow, Sonal Gupta
India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
As Modi govt tables bills to prevent ‘rule from jail', why Opposition smells a ploy
With barely two days left before adjournment of the monsoon session of Parliament, Union home minister Amit Shah walked into Lok Sabha on August 20 carrying three slender bills whose implications have ignited a massive political the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025, propose a seismic shift: any Union minister, chief minister or even the prime minister could be forced to vacate office if held in custody for 30 consecutive days on charges punishable with at least five years in On paper, these bills seek to codify a mechanism that ensures that top leaders in India—a country long haunted by criminalisation of politics—cannot govern from prison cells. In spirit, the legislation borrows from service rules for civil servants, who are suspended upon arrest. Extending that logic to elected representatives, the government insists, is a matter of constitutional Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, along with companion legislation for Union territories and Jammu and Kashmir, establishes an automatic removal mechanism. Any minister arrested and detained for 30 consecutive days on charges carrying a minimum five-year sentence would be removed from office on the 31st day, regardless of whether they have been convicted or even faced regular ministers, the removal requires either advice from the prime minister or chief minister by the 31st day, or automatic cessation if no such advice is given. For prime ministers and chief ministers themselves, the bills mandate resignation by the 31st day or automatic removal thereafter. While the removed officials can theoretically be reappointed upon release, the political damage would likely prove RATIONALEThe bills are not arriving in a vacuum. Over the past two years, India has witnessed two high-profile sagas that underscored the absence of such a mechanism. Arvind Kejriwal, while he was the chief minister of Delhi, spent more than five months in jail in 2024 on charges related to the capital's liquor policy. Despite his incarceration, he refused to resign, forcing the Delhi government into an unprecedented arrangement: governance by proxy from a prison ward. He quit only after being granted interim bail, and even then, under Supreme Court conditions that barred him from entering the Secretariat.V. Senthil Balaji, a Tamil Nadu minister, was arrested in 2023 in a money-laundering case. Chief minister M.K. Stalin kept him in the cabinet without portfolio, igniting a bitter standoff with governor R.N. Ravi. Balaji was reinstated when the Supreme Court granted him bail, only to resign months later after the court insisted that his presence undermined constitutional the BJP, these cases are proof that without a clear constitutional remedy, governance risks paralysis and public trust corrodes. From the BJP's vantage point, the legislation is an extension of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's oft-repeated mantra of 'zero tolerance' for corruption. The Statement of Objects and Reasons attached to each bill echoes that tone. Ministers, it says, embody 'the hopes and aspirations of the people' and their conduct should be 'beyond any ray of suspicion'. A minister in custody, it warns, risks thwarting 'the canons of constitutional morality' and diminishing the trust reposed in elected OBJECTIONSIn India's fractious democracy, the timing and manner of the bills' introduction have only deepened mistrust. Critics argue they mark an extraordinary expansion of executive authority, one that risks turning investigative agencies into weapons against political rivals. The choice of timing, they say, is no the BJP and the Election Commission (EC) already under fire over contentious revisions of electoral rolls, the government is accused of trying to divert political attention. Many in the Opposition believe the BJP itself knows that the bills stand little chance of clearing the formidable hurdles of constitutional change—passage by a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament, with at least half the states ratifying them. That, they insist, explains why the bills were rushed in at the fag end of the session, leaving no room for meaningful debate or the three bills were introduced, Opposition benches erupted in protest. When Amit Shah moved to have the legislation referred to a joint committee for scrutiny, several Opposition leaders tore up copies of the bills and flung them towards the Treasury benches, some landing directly before the home MP and senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi called the move 'the best way to destabilise Opposition governments'. 'No ruling party chief minister is ever touched. But unleash biased agencies, arrest an Opposition CM, and by the 31st day, he is gone, without a vote, without a trial,' he India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi, in a formal notice to the Lok Sabha secretary general, argued that the legislation violates principles of federalism, separation of powers and due process. 'This amendment would allow the executive agencies a free run to become the judge, jury and executioner,' Owaisi stated, noting that in a parliamentary democracy, ministers can only be removed through loss of legislative confidence or recommendation by the head of deepest unease stems not from the text of the bills but from India's investigative reality. Over the past decade, the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and other agencies, which report to the central government, have been accused by courts and Opposition parties of selective zeal. In July, chief justice of India B.R. Gavai rebuked the ED for being used in 'political battles'. Earlier this month, another court bench told the agency it was 'crossing all limits' and warned it not to act 'like a crook'.advertisementEven inclusion of provisions for removing prime ministers, which government defenders cite as evidence of even-handedness, rings hollow to critics, who note the impossibility of central agencies arresting a sitting prime minister who controls manner of the bills' introduction has further fuelled Opposition anger. Shah's letter to the Lok Sabha secretary general requesting inclusion of these bills came on the evening of August 19, with the session scheduled to conclude on August 21. The home minister explicitly sought relaxation of Rule 19(A) and 19(B), which require prior notice and circulation of bills to members before Sabha speaker Om Birla accommodated Shah's request, with the understanding that the bills would be referred to a joint parliamentary committee for scrutiny. For critics, the last-minute manoeuvre smacks of opportunism, a way to table a politically potent law without adequate debate, and to force the Opposition into defensive posturing just as the monsoon session wraps PATH TO PASSAGEThe path to passage is complex. Unlike ordinary bills, the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill alters the federal balance by touching Articles 75 and 164. It therefore requires:1. Approval by a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament, with at least 50 per cent of members present and voting.2. Ratification by at least half the contrast, the Union territories and J&K bills are ordinary amendments requiring only a simple majority. But politically, the three are being bundled as a single reform package, amplifying both their symbolic weight and the resistance they are likely to National Democratic Alliance (NDA) currently lacks a two-thirds majority in either House. For the bills to pass, a significant number of Opposition MPs would have to abstain on voting day. Without the support of Opposition parties, the chances of passage remain slim. Even NDA allies, such as the Telugu Desam Party, Janata Dal (United) and smaller partners, may hesitate to back the proposals. As expected, the bills have now been referred to a joint parliamentary if passed, constitutional challenges are almost inevitable. Lawyers argue the bills may clash with the 'basic structure doctrine' established by the Supreme Court, which safeguards federalism and separation of powers from parliamentary India watches this constitutional drama unfold, the central question remains whether these bills represent necessary reform to combat corruption or, as the Congress's Singhvi posted on social media, 'the best way to destabilise the Opposition' through 'arbitrary arrests' when unable to defeat them electorally. The answer may well determine the trajectory of Indian democracy for years to to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
