logo
‘Crazy idea': Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns

‘Crazy idea': Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns

TORONTO - A month after Ontario's government extended strong mayor powers to a swath of new municipalities, some leaders are promising never to use the measures — but a chorus of small-town councillors warn that local democracy is under threat.
As of May 1, another 169 mayors in the province can now veto bylaws, pass new ones with just one-third of council in favour and hire or fire municipal department heads unilaterally.
Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack said last month that the province decided to more than triple the number of mayors who can access the powers in an effort to build housing faster and streamline local governance.
The measures were first introduced in 2022 and initially only applied to the mayors of Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario's two most populous cities.
Several municipalities are taking active steps to reject the powers now that they have been granted more widely.
Mark Hunter, one of 10 city councillors in Stratford, recently got unanimous support for his motion to reject the new powers. Hunter said it was symbolic and designed to show that municipal democracy shouldn't be 'subject to provincial whim.'
'What it effectively does is get rid of majority rule in our council,' he said.
'It's the expectation of the residents in our community that their representatives are able to fully represent them and this change puts some level of diminishment on that.'
Hunter said his fellow councillors can have strong disagreements at council, but lively discussions result in better decisions for the community. Anything that diminishes that discussion is worse for residents, he said.
Councillors aren't concerned about Stratford's current mayor abusing his power, said Hunter, but they are worried about what could happen in the future.
'It's another example of concentrating power in fewer hands. Unfortunately in human history, that doesn't always work out so well,' he said.
David O'Neil, a councillor in Quinte West, said he is also concerned about strong mayor powers, adding they represent 'a real misdirection' by the province.
'I think this decision is on par with the crazy idea of building a tunnel under the 401,' O'Neil said, referring to Premier Doug Ford's promise to add a tunnel under the major Ontario highway.
He added he is skeptical that strong mayor powers would lead to new housing being built in his community, and thinks the province should waive development fees if it wants to see more housing built.
Zack Card, another councillor for Quinte West, said he believes the expansion of the strong mayor powers will 'erode the democratic traditions of municipal councils in Ontario.'
'I believe effective councils work collaboratively and with an understanding that all voices carry equal weight. Tipping that balance could potentially hinder governance and make solving issues within our communities more difficult,' Card wrote in an email.
Neither O'Neil nor Card would speak to the recent dismissal of the municipality's chief administration officer, which was described on the municipality's website as a 'mayoral decision' pursuant to the legislation, made on the first day the powers were available.
Quinte West Mayor Jim Harrison said in an email to The Canadian Press that 'the decision was made in close collaboration and consensus with council, utilizing strong mayor powers to move forward.'
Less than a week after the decision, he told a council meeting that he wasn't planning to make use of the strong mayor powers.
O'Neil suggested his concern is more future-oriented: it's unclear what could a different sort of mayor do with these powers five, 10 or 20 years down the road.
David Arbuckle, executive director of the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario, said unilateral power threatens a local government's administrative authority and staffers' ability to give non-partisan, evidence-based advice.
'It's changed the dynamic where (a city staffer) now has to be mindful of the fact that they could be hired or fired by the mayor at any point in time,' Arbuckle said in a recent interview.
'The advice they're bringing forward may not be as neutral as possible because ultimately they are now responding to one individual.'
Corey Engelsdorfer, a councillor from Prince Edward County, said he's worried the powers will exacerbate existing divisions on his council and, should they be used, could 'sideline' constituents even as the community experiences a boom in development.
The traditional model of majority rule is already divisive, Engelsdorfer said — especially when it comes to housing decisions — so decisions being made with even less support could lead to even more public cynicism.
'The way we build homes is by working together as a council and not by one person or a third of council pushing through what they want to push through,' he said.
'I always hear Premier Ford say that these changes cut red tape, but democracy to me is not red tape. I don't think it's something that needs to be in place at all.'
Mayor Steve Ferguson said in an interview that he was working to defer several of the strong mayor powers, including personnel decisions, back to council.
The council also unanimously passed a resolution asking the province to rescind strong mayor legislation, Engelsdorfer said.
Despite the concerns, Matti Siemiatycki, director of the University of Toronto's Infrastructure Institute and a professor of geography and planning, said the uptake of the powers has been 'fairly underwhelming.'
Before last month, there were only 46 so-called strong mayors in Ontario. Only a few made use of their powers.
High-profile examples include Hamilton Mayor Andrea Horwath advancing affordable housing development on two municipal parking lots in April 2024, and Mississauga's former mayor Bonnie Crombie passing bylaws to build fourplexes in October 2023.
But Siemiatycki said he fears there's greater risk for strong mayor powers to go unchecked in smaller municipalities, where there is less oversight and, often, less journalistic scrutiny.
'We've seen an erosion and a decline of the local presses across Canada, and it's no more visible than in small communities,' he said.
'If you're concentrating powers, what's really needed is external oversight bodies. And the media is one of those, so smaller communities might struggle to have that accountability and people being aware of what's happening.'
Siemiatycki said while he sympathizes with the province's desire to tackle a housing and infrastructure crisis, he agrees with the councillors who have raised concerns.
'It doesn't necessarily mean you'll go further just because you're aiming to go faster,' he said.
'The thing that's more sustainable over the long term is acceleration through processes that have very clear accountabilities and timelines to them.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 1, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Surprising Aussie benefit of Trump trade
Surprising Aussie benefit of Trump trade

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Surprising Aussie benefit of Trump trade

Aussies households are tipped to slow their spending on the back of US President Donald Trump's tariff policy even though they will likely benefit from cheaper goods and it helped deliver a rate cut in May. In a speech made at the Economic Society of Australia Business Lunch, RBA assistant governor Sarah Hunter said Australia was one of the countries that could benefit from cheaper goods in the short term as weakening growth outweighs rising costs for businesses. 'Overall weaker global growth would put near-term downward pressure on the prices of globally traded goods,' she said. 'For countries that are not imposing higher tariffs, such as Australia, this could flow into import prices, making products cheaper and lowering inflation.' But the Trump tariffs are unlikely to lift anaemic household spending, with Australians tipped to moderate their purchases, while business investment is tipped to stall. 'Greater uncertainty about the future can lead households and businesses to save instead of spending and investing, and this is likely to be the case for Australian households and businesses too,' Ms Hunter said. 'Though the magnitude of these effects is itself very uncertain, this does suggest that global uncertainty may weigh substantially on domestic activity if uncertainty remains elevated.' Ms Hunter said there were various forecasts the RBA had made surrounding the global environment, with the base case showing slower economic growth in Australia, a slightly weaker labour market and the price of tradeable goods to dampen. 'Together, these two outcomes mean that inflation is forecast to be a little lower than the February statement of monetary policy, settling around the midpoint of 2 to 3 per cent target range,' she said. Ms Hunter said the overall economic uncertainty on the back of the Trump policies also added to the 25 basis point rate cut in May. 'These were provided to the Monetary Policy Board to help inform their decision-making; taking all the information into account and considering the risks to the outlook, they decided to cut the cash rate by 25 basis points,' she said. Going forward, Ms Hunter said the central bank would continue to watch the data. Mr Trump announced on April 2 a global tariff policy on just about every trading partner on the basis of evening up the US trade deficit. At a minimum, every country, including Australia, faced a 10 per cent tariff, while 'cheating' countries faced higher tariffs Mr Trump eventually paused the majority of his tariff policy for 90 days due to the damage that was being done to his own economy and money markets. He also faced a challenge in the federal courts over his use of power. Sector-specific tariffs such as the 50 per cent on steel and aluminium imports to the US and a 30 per cent 'reciprocal tariff' on China are still in effect.

Australia central bank says higher US tariffs a drag on global economy
Australia central bank says higher US tariffs a drag on global economy

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Australia central bank says higher US tariffs a drag on global economy

SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australia's central bank said on Tuesday that higher U.S. tariffs would drag on the global economy and put near-term downward pressures on prices of traded goods, though the exact impact is hard to assess given the policy uncertainties. In a speech in Brisbane, Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) Assistant Governor Sarah Hunter said the central bank will closely monitor how trade policies evolve globally, with the higher uncertainty expected to lead to declines in investment, output and employment. "But the unpredictability and unprecedented nature of the current situation makes it hard to be precise on the size of the impact," said Hunter. "Going forward we will be monitoring carefully which assumption is closest to how things unfold." The expected hit to Australia's economy and the labour market was one reason that the RBA cut interest rates to a two-year low of 3.85% last month and opened the door to more policy easing in the months ahead. It also considered a severe downside scenario for global trade and a trade peace scenario where tariffs would be rolled back. "Benchmarking against the scenarios in the May SMP (Statement on Monetary Policy) will help us identify the scenario that best reflects current conditions and the outlook, enabling the Board to adjust policy settings accordingly," said Hunter. The RBA also judged the tariffs would be disinflationary for Australia as Chinese producers, in the face of higher U.S. tariffs, try to redirect their products to other markets. "For countries that are not imposing higher tariffs, such as Australia, this could flow into import prices, making products cheaper and lowering inflation," said Hunter. Headline consumer price inflation held at 2.4% in the first quarter and a key trimmed mean measure of core inflation slowed to 2.9%, taking it back into the RBA's target band of 2% to 3% for the first time since late 2021. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Vermont exempts some home kitchen businesses from licensing fees
Vermont exempts some home kitchen businesses from licensing fees

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Vermont exempts some home kitchen businesses from licensing fees

MONTPELIER, Vt. (ABC22/FOX44) – Vermonters looking to sell at the state's over 60 farmers markets will have an easier time getting started. Governor Phil Scott on Monday signed House Bill 401 (H. 401), which eases the limits for how much some small food businesses can sell before being required to pay a licensing fee. Those fees can be as high as $350 for some bakeries in the state. Five farmers markets to visit in Vermont this weekend The bill passed the Vermont House May 20 without a floor vote, after passing the Senate a week earlier. It was sponsored by over 30 representatives, including Democrats, Republicans, and independents. H. 401 defines the new category of 'cottage food operators', which covers people who make in their home kitchen any of a wide variety of foods that do not easily spoil, including dry herbs and nuts, candy, dry coffee and tea, jams, and granola. According to current law, all food businesses that make above $10,000 a year in sales are required to pay a fee. With this new bill, this limit is $30,000 a year for this kind of food operation, or about $575 a week. Read the full text of the bill hereDownload Also included are certain types of home-canned goods. H. 401 allows the Commissioner of Health to add other items to the category later, which could expand the exemption to include even more of the vendors at local markets. Group in South Burlington buys land for regenerative farm The bill cites the goal that 'Vermonters have more access to the local food marketplace as bothproducers and consumers', along with higher supply-chain costs and the demand for local products made in Vermont by visitors to the state. H. 401 will take effect on July 1 of this year. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store