More than a coat of paint: Rethinking corrosion protection in Oman
According to the Association for Materials Protection and Performance (AMPP), corrosion-related economic losses consume between 3% to 5% of GDP in Gulf countries, owing to the region's aggressive combination of high heat, humidity, salt spray, and dust. For Oman, that translates to hundreds of millions of Omani rials annually, with the oil and gas, desalination, and marine infrastructure sectors bearing the brunt of the damage.
Globally, corrosion is estimated to cost over $2.5 trillion each year—but experts believe that up to 35% of these losses are preventable with proactive measures such as improved coatings, local standards, and QA/QC procedures.
As Oman strengthens its industrial and coastal infrastructure, there is a growing opportunity to build local expertise in corrosion protection.
While many coatings are currently imported, industry assessments across the Gulf show that over 60% of failures stem from application issues—such as poor surface preparation—rather than flaws in the coatings themselves. This highlights a valuable area for improvement: by enhancing training, certification, and local application standards, Oman can ensure that even the most advanced coatings perform to their full potential.
Despite the presence of global industry players like Jotun Paints, which operates a manufacturing facility at Rusayl Industrial Estate, and Hempel, which supplies protective coatings to marine and offshore platforms, coating selection across Oman is still too often driven by availability and price rather than performance and environmental fit.
Globally, the anti-corrosion coatings market is projected to reach $42 billion by 2028, with the Middle East accounting for a growing share—particularly in oil, gas, and maritime sectors (Statista, 2024). Yet in Oman, many assets are still coated with systems that offer a service life of just 3 to 5 years, especially if not applied under optimal conditions.
In contrast, high-performance systems—such as zinc-rich epoxy primers paired with polyurethane topcoats—can extend protection to 7 to 10 years or more, provided they are installed correctly.
Oman's geography presents a compelling case for home-grown solutions. Its coastal regions—Suhar, Duqm, Salalah—are prime development zones, but also among the most corrosive environments in the country. Without proper protection, even newly built infrastructure can begin to degrade within months, driving up operating and maintenance costs and compromising safety.
Oman's coatings sector may still be developing, but its potential is vast. With targeted investment in accredited testing facilities, specialised training for certified applicators, and Gulf-adapted coating standards, the country has a real opportunity to lead the region in climate-resilient corrosion protection.
Experts from AMPP suggest that such measures could recover up to 30% of corrosion-related losses—a substantial return on relatively modest interventions, and a smart step toward long-term savings. While technologies like cathodic protection and real-time corrosion monitoring play vital roles, coatings remain the most accessible, scalable, and cost-effective defense—especially for large, exposed assets such as pipelines, oil tanks, cranes, and marine infrastructure.
In Oman's next chapter of industrial growth—from hydrogen hubs to coastal mega-projects—high-performance coatings are more than just a protective layer. They are a strategic enabler. When selected and applied with care, coatings don't just preserve structures—they protect progress, fuel resilience, and extend the value of every investment.
In the end, a coat of paint isn't just where protection begins. It's where Oman's leadership in corrosion innovation can take shape.
2025 © All right reserved for Oman Establishment for Press, Publication and Advertising (OEPPA) Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
28 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
'No sales, no salary': How UAE residents without fixed base pay rely on commission
From real estate agents to retail staff and recruitment consultants, some UAE residents are employed under commission-only contracts. This practice, while legal in the country, often leaves these employees navigating financial uncertainty, unclear legal protections, and mental strain. Aisha M, a 29-year-old real estate broker in Dubai, said her income varies so widely that budgeting feels almost impossible. 'Some months, I make three times what a salaried person earns. Other months, I have to ask my landlord to wait for rent,' she said. 'There's no base pay, so if I don't close a deal, I earn nothing.' Aisha explained that commissions are usually paid out in the first week of the following month, but even that depends on the employer's internal processes. 'If I sell a unit in the last 10 days of July, I might not see the money until September. You have to be careful, always follow up.' Despite the instability, Aisha says she's not ready to give it up. 'When it's good, it's very good. But you live in a kind of emotional and financial rollercoaster. Every month, it's like starting from zero.' According to the UAE's Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021, commission-based pay is legal if it's clearly stated in the employee's registered contract with the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation (MOHRE). The law allows for various pay structures, including commission-only, provided they're mutually agreed upon and formally documented. However, there is no officially defined minimum wage in the UAE. The law broadly states that pay must 'meet the basic needs' of the worker, but does not set a numerical threshold. 'No sales, no salary' Tariq Mahmoud, 35, works in electronics retail. He has a commission-only contract with a company that sells high-end appliances. 'I spend 8 to 10 hours a day on the floor. If I don't make a sale, I go home with nothing. My wife has a fixed job, or else we wouldn't have survived.' He points out that during low seasons, sales drop sharply. 'Some months, I make just Dh500. There's no hourly wage, no overtime, and no safety net.' The hardest part, he says, is how commission payments are delayed. 'The commission is based on closed sales, but the company often takes time to process payments. If there's a return or customer complaint, they can even cut your pay retroactively.' Still, he acknowledges the upside. 'It keeps you hungry, sharp. If you're aggressive, you can outperform salaried colleagues. But there's a mental toll. You're always anxious about clients, numbers, the system.' Noura, a 27-year-old resident of Dubai, works in banking sales now, pushing financial products and credit cards. Before that, she spent three years in real estate under a commission-only setup. She said her experience taught her that everything depends on the employer. 'In real estate, some months I worked hard but didn't get paid on time, or at all. Now, in banking, even though I'm still on commission, the structure is more formal. There's a payment schedule, clear reporting, and a fallback if something goes wrong.' Noura said people often underestimate how risky commission-only roles can be. 'You have to really trust the company before you accept this kind of job. Ask people who work there. If payments get delayed or if you're left chasing your commission every month, it affects your whole life.'
Khaleej Times
28 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Dubai: Rents for studios, 1BHKs rise after crackdown on illegal partitions
Rental rates for studio and one-bedroom apartments in several areas of Dubai are rising, driven by increased demand following a government crackdown on illegal partitioning of apartments and villas. Before the crackdown, many tenants were living in overcrowded spaces, often crammed into single rooms or partitioned units. Since authorities began enforcing regulations, landlords and property owners have tightened their leasing practices, opting to rent only to families and corporate tenants. 'Rental prices have seen a slight increase, particularly for studios and one-bedroom apartments, as demand for these units has risen. Overall, the Dubai Municipality's action has brought more transparency to the market,' said Swapna Tekchandani, consultant at Property Zone Real Estate. Humaira Vaqqas, property consultant at Range International Properties, noted that some areas have experienced an oversupply of larger units as evicted tenants moved out, placing slight downward pressure on rents for those properties. 'There is a higher demand for smaller, legal units — studios and 1-bed apartments demand spike, leading to stable or slightly increased rents in legal small-unit buildings. There is a market adjustment over time, as illegal units are removed, the supply of affordable options shrinks, pushing up legal rent prices in budget-friendly areas. Landlords often pass the cost of compliance, renovations, and missed income on to future tenants by demanding higher rents,' she added. The crackdown by Dubai Municipality and the Dubai Land Department began in June, targeting illegally modified properties in areas such as Al Rigga, Al Muraqqabat, Al Satwa, and Al Raffa, citing safety concerns related to unapproved structural changes. According to Ayman Youssef, managing director of Coldwell Banker, this enforcement is expected to drive demand for rental units in specific areas. 'The simple reasoning behind this is that previously 4 to 5 people were sharing a unit, but now those people will require individual units.' Up to 20% rent hike in Al Nahda, Sharjah Youssef added that many evicted tenants are likely to relocate to more affordable areas on the outskirts, such as Al Nahda, or even to other emirates like Sharjah and Ajman, where rents remain comparatively lower. Swapna noted that Sharjah has traditionally offered spacious units that were often shared among multiple occupants. 'Following the crackdown, many of these units are now being rented out to single tenants, contributing to an overall increase in rental prices. In Al Nahda, however, prices were already on the higher side due to its prime location and proximity to Dubai,' she added. Vaqqas observed that short-term leasing is becoming more common in the wake of the displacement. She pointed out that many former tenants from Dubai have moved to Sharjah – particularly Al Nahda, Al Majaz, and Rolla – due to more lenient sharing regulations and lower rents. 'Reports suggest Sharjah's Al Nahda saw 10 to 20 per cent rent increases in some buildings within months of the Dubai crackdown. Availability issues are on the rise after this crackdown; cheaper apartments are getting booked faster, especially near the Dubai border for easy commuting,' said Range International Properties' consultant. Overall, Vaqqas emphasised that the crackdown has had a positive effect for both landlords and tenants, encouraging legal rental practices and improving living standards.
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
India Must Ignore Trump's Trade Tariff Trap
By Nantoo Banerjee US President Donald Trump is becoming increasingly unpredictable, if not crazy, with his freakish combination of styles to deal with countries and issues – from trade to diplomacy. The 25 percent import tariff on India since last Friday may not considerably hurt India's export trade with the US, but it threatens to develop a crack, or maybe even distrust, in the well-developed India-US diplomatic relations over the past several years. And, that should be a bigger concern before the democratic institutions in both India and the US. Trump is most unlikely to remain as the effective US president after the November 2028 election though he is selling 'Trump 2028' caps suggesting there may be loopholes to the president's two-term limit. He seems to be hell-bent on creating enough confusion around the so-called US allies for the next president to repair them easily. India is not a trade surplus country. Its global merchandise trade deficit has been growing year after year. In 2024-25, the country's trade deficit jumped to $282.83 billion from $241 billion in the previous fiscal year. The Indian government does not seem to be quite concerned. The US too is a big trade deficit country. Last year, the US recorded a historic $1.2-trillion goods trade deficit. Ironically, behind the ballooning trade gap of both the US and India is China. India's goods trade surplus with the US may have doubled over the last decade, rising from $20 billion in 2015 to $40 billion in 2025, but its trade deficit with China has more than doubled during this period, reaching a record high of $99.2 billion in 2024-25. According to the UN COMTRADE database on international trade, China had slashed down imports from India to merely $18 billion, last year. India neither protested nor took action to drastically cut imports from China. If China's anti-India import policy does not hurt the sentiments of the import-insensitive Indian government, the dumping of a mere 25 percent import tariff on India by President Trump on certain select items such as textiles, telecom, gems and jewellery, oil and gas, and food and agriculture with effect from this month should not unduly concern India. Unfortunately, the Indian government and the local media have always been more focussed and sensitive on US policies than Chinese practices. While the US trade policy has always been linked with its foreign policy, India's trade policy seems to totally ignore China's highly aggressive foreign policy that seeks to surround India with its growing military presence all around the country. The so-called Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India) continues to import more and more from China. India imports a very large range of low-cost products from China, including electronics, fashion apparel, toys, and industrial machinery despite concerns over their potential impact on India's domestic industries and employment. Massive imports from China are primarily responsible for growing unemployment in India. India has been a major importer of Chinese smartphones, laptops, televisions, and other low-cost electronic devices such as clothing and textiles including activewear, casual wear, and children's fashion, to meet the country's growing local demand. India's significant portion of toy imports come from China. The current size of India's toy market is worth over $1.2 billion. Chinese manufacturers offer a wide variety of affordable and innovative toys. India also imports a wide range of other low-cost products from China, including household goods, kitchenware, baby carriages, and consumer products. The influx of cheap Chinese imports is challenging India's domestic manufacturers, potentially impacting their competitiveness and production. Leave alone the domestic job loss. Trump's trade tantrums apart, India could import a lot more from the US, instead of China, especially in areas where the US has a competitive advantage. A shift in India's trade approach could be driven by factors such as diversification of supply chains, reducing dependence on China, and potentially leveraging the US's technological and manufacturing prowess. The country's reliance on China, particularly in areas like electronics and pharmaceuticals, creates strategic vulnerabilities. India should import more from the US where it has an intrinsic strength that could help India reduce its dependence on China and build more resilient supply chains. The US continues to be a major global exporter of goods across various sectors, including machinery, electronics, and pharmaceuticals. In fact, India could utilise the services of many top US companies which are present in India and doing very good business in the country as well as exporting their wares to influence US trade and business decisions. A number of prominent US multinational companies have significant manufacturing operations in India. They include Ford (exporting engines from its Chennai plant, and making software development), General Electric (GE), Honeywell, Apple, Cisco, Cognizant and Cummins to mention a few. These US giants have chosen India for its skilled workforce and growing market. GE has a long-standing relationship with India. It manufactures various products and technologies across different sectors. Honeywell has a strong manufacturing footprint in India, focusing on aerospace, building technologies, and performance materials. Cummins, a global power technology leader, manufactures engines and related components in India. Apple Inc. has so far ignored the Trump threat to expand India operations and export back to the US. The 3M, a diversified science company, has invested in manufacturing in India to serve both the domestic and export markets. The Boeing company has been expanding its manufacturing activities, leveraging the country's growing aerospace industry. Boeing is using India's capability to outsource products and services with a network of some 300 Indian suppliers. The business is worth $1.25 billion annually. Boeing's engineering and technology centre in Bengaluru is one of its largest outside the US. Apple has also ramped up its manufacturing in India, partnering with such global leaders such as Wistron and Foxconn to produce iPhones. The US e-commerce giant Amazon has invested big in India, creating its own infrastructure and supply chain to support the growing online marketplace. Cisco, a global US leader in networking and cybersecurity, has a strong presence in the country, which covers manufacturing and research and development among others. Whimsical Trump's bid to strongly disturb the matured India-US economic and diplomatic relations may have something to do with his age. President Trump will reach 80 in next June. This may somewhat explain his growing capricious nature in dealing with the complex international issues and markedly strange utterances and suggestions slamming India and Russia as 'dead economies' after tariff stand-off and the US drilling oil in Pakistan which is 85 percent import dependent to meet its energy needs. Having road-tested a hardball tactic in his first term (January 20, 2017 to January 20, 2021), President Trump seems to have taken it to new levels. Earlier this year, a global survey found that India was the most upbeat of any nation about what a second Donald Trump presidency would mean for the country. The survey panel must be having second thoughts now. For India, it must strongly avoid falling into a Trump trap and continue to play cool. (IPA Service)
