logo
Warning Issued Over 'Explosion' of Neo Nazi Clubs in US

Warning Issued Over 'Explosion' of Neo Nazi Clubs in US

Newsweek6 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A warning has been issued over the increasing number of neo-Nazi clubs in the United States.
According to the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism (GPAHE), there has been an "explosion" in the number of active chapters of neo-Nazi Active Clubs (ACs) in the U.S. and other countries. The group is raising alarm about this trend, calling it a "growing transnational threat."
Why It Matters
Active Clubs are a transnational network of sports clubs that were founded by the white supremacist Robert Rundo and the Russian neo-Nazi Denis Kapustin in 2020. Rundo is one of the founders of a U.S. far-right organization called the Rise Above Movement (RAM) and was sentenced to jail in 2024 for conspiracy to riot at Californian political rallies in 2017. Kapustin is a far-right figure who runs the Russian Volunteer Corps and has reportedly espoused Adolf Hitler's views.
The decentralised groups engage in physical training with the purpose of being able to attack political opponents and also spread propaganda about white nationalism.
Carrying shields, covering their faces, and holding upside down U.S. flags, marchers with the Alt-Right Neo-Nazi group "Reclaim America," march in Washington, D.C., on May 13, 2023.
Carrying shields, covering their faces, and holding upside down U.S. flags, marchers with the Alt-Right Neo-Nazi group "Reclaim America," march in Washington, D.C., on May 13, 2023.
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin
The growth of ACs comes amid growing concerns about the rise of white supremacist incidents more broadly. According to the Anti-Defamation League, more than 750 white supremacist incidents took place from 2020 to 2024.
They found that there were 282 events organized or attended by white supremacists in 2023, a 63 percent increase from 173 in 2022.
What To Know
The number of ACs in the U.S. has increased from 49 in October 2023, to 78 in June 2025. This is a percentage increase of 59.2 percent.
Of these, GPAHE found that at least 19 clubs representing 42 states target teen boys aged 15 to 18. Some of these groups posted neo-Nazi propaganda on social media, as seen by GPAHE, including a quote by Adolf Hitler.
GPAHE also found that globally, the number of Active Clubs has increased by 25 percent since 2023. This means that 187 chapters of the movement are now operating across 27 countries.
GPAHE tracked ACs on social media to come to these findings. They found that the groups recruit on Telegram and TikTok.
What People Are Saying
GPAHE said the movement "represents a growing transnational threat, especially as it adapts to evade platform moderation and targets young recruits."
What Happens Next
Social media platforms can adopt policies to remove the groups presence from the internet while the government can also enact policies to clamp down on the neo-Nazi movement. However, there must be political will for this to happen. In the mean time, the extent to which these groups continue to flourish remains to be seen.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia hits Kyiv with record attack after Putin-Trump call
Russia hits Kyiv with record attack after Putin-Trump call

Business Upturn

timean hour ago

  • Business Upturn

Russia hits Kyiv with record attack after Putin-Trump call

Russia has launched its biggest air assault on Ukraine since the war began, unleashing 539 drones and 11 missiles, with the capital city Kyiv as the main target. This historic strike came just hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke with U.S. President Donald Trump. According to The Washington Post , the skies over Kyiv were filled with smoke and explosions as Ukraine's air defence systems scrambled to respond. The scale and speed of the attack shattered records, even surpassing another massive strike just days earlier. 'Kyiv was the main direction of the strike,' Ukraine's air force confirmed. This marks Russia's second record-breaking strike in one week, signalling a clear and dangerous escalation in the war. Sunday's previous high was 537 drones and missiles — now surpassed by this latest wave. While the details of the Trump-Putin conversation remain unclear, the immediate aftermath shows no signs of diplomatic progress. In fact, the timing of the attack has fueled criticism of Trump's approach to foreign policy. One social media user wrote: 'Diplomacy doesn't work with Putin… he's shown it over and over.' Emergency responders in Ukraine are now assessing the extensive damage across Kyiv, as fears grow that even larger attacks could be ahead. The strike shows that urban centers remain Russia's key targets, with civilian areas under increasing threat. This sudden surge in violence raises urgent questions about the effectiveness of the current U.S. and NATO strategy and whether Trump's administration is prepared for the growing scale of this conflict. Donald TrumpputinrussiaTrumpVlamdir Putin

NATO-Ukraine: A mutual investment in Euro-Atlantic security
NATO-Ukraine: A mutual investment in Euro-Atlantic security

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

NATO-Ukraine: A mutual investment in Euro-Atlantic security

Shortly after the NATO summit in The Hague, Ukraine faced one of the largest Russian airstrikes targeting Kyiv — a brutal reminder of the ongoing war and the urgent need for strengthened defenses. In this context, President Volodymyr Zelensky held a significant and constructive conversation with President Trump about the latest frontline developments, including Russian missile terror and opportunities for enhanced air defense. They agreed to work jointly on strengthening Ukraine's skies and defense industrial cooperation, especially in drones and critical technologies. Trump was well-informed and attentive, and both sides reaffirmed their commitment to a just and lasting peace. Every NATO summit is a vital indicator for Ukraine of how well the alliance is able to adapt to new challenges and continue to serve as the most effective security guarantee for European countries. It is also an indicator of how much NATO member states perceive Ukraine as 'one of their own' and understand that, just as the alliance invests in Ukraine's security and defense, we invest in Euro-Atlantic security and defense. In essence, this is a mutual investment in Euro-Atlantic security. Traditionally, every alliance summit is also an indicator of NATO's willingness to heed Russia's fabricated concerns over the alliance's enlargement policy. Expectations for the NATO summit in The Hague were modest — both within member states and among partner countries like Ukraine. Yet it injected new energy into transatlantic relations. It reinvigorated the alliance, evincing the complete failure of Russia's plans to dismantle NATO from within. Much of this success is due to Secretary General Mark Rutte's ability to find common ground with diverse leaders and act as a reliable bridge between Europe and the U.S. Rutte has emerged as the unifying figure the alliance needed at this critical juncture. As a result, the summit delivered clear answers to all the key questions. First, predictions by those who claimed the U.S. would withdraw from NATO almost immediately after Trump took office have proven premature. By clearly affirming America's commitment to Article Five of the Washington Treaty, Trump confirmed the U.S. role as the leader of the alliance. Some may find his approach overly harsh, but desperate times call for desperate measures. The demand for Europe to take greater care of its own security is, above all, a matter of common sense. Regardless of what skeptics say, Article Five remains functional. Neither the Soviet Union nor Russia has ever dared to test it, making claims of its ineffectiveness incorrect. What we can affirm is that the only time in NATO's history that Article Five has been invoked was in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the U.S. — not in reaction to any Soviet or Russian assault on an alliance member. Second, the goal of making NATO 'stronger, fairer, and more lethal' through a commitment to increase defense spending to 5 percent is not just about getting European NATO members to take more responsibility for their own security. It also represents a long-awaited recognition of Ukraine as an integral part of Euro-Atlantic security. This is evident in the summit declaration, which embedded continued support for Ukraine into member states' new defense target. The step signals the beginning of a new security mindset within the alliance — a slow but growing realization that supporting Ukraine is not only a moral duty toward the victim of the most brutal aggression in Europe since World War II but also a vital security interest for the alliance's member states, particularly in Europe. Of course, embedding long-term support for Ukraine into the new defense spending plans of NATO countries did not remove our urgent defense needs from the agenda — especially regarding additional air defense systems. Here, it's worth highlighting the very warm meeting between Presidents Zelensky and Trump. Although it focused on joint efforts for peace, the issue of protecting Ukrainian cities from Russia's terrorist drone and missile strikes was underscored separately. It is important to call things by their name. The prolonged drone terror against Ukrainians is primarily the result of close cooperation between Tehran and Moscow, established at the beginning of the large-scale war. As Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni rightly noted, the determination shown toward Iran must also be applied to Russia. Third, Russia's brazen and persistent efforts to convince the world that Ukraine's NATO aspirations 'forced' it to invade — and that once Ukraine abandons this goal, Russia will magically become constructive and reasonable — have once again failed. In NATO capitals, there is a growing understanding that Russia's ultimate goal in its war against Ukraine is not to eliminate Ukraine's NATO ambitions, but to destroy Ukraine as a state and nation and to restore the Russian empire in a new form. In other words, preventing Ukraine from joining NATO is not Putin's final goal — it is merely a tool to achieve it. Yes, there is still much work ahead to make this clear in every single capital, but we are undoubtedly on the right path. This is evidenced by the fact that NATO has not revised any of its previous positions on Ukraine's future membership. Although these formulations were not repeated in the communiqué, perhaps we should begin interpreting this omission as NATO acknowledging the irreversibility of Ukraine's Euro-Atlantic path — as a self-evident truth that no longer requires constant reiteration in every alliance statement. Of course, the answers provided in The Hague are not final. NATO's adaptation to the new Euro-Atlantic reality is ongoing. Despite the reaffirmed U.S. commitment to Article Five, Europe must assume greater responsibility, show more initiative, and truly begin to build up its defense capabilities. Doing this with Ukraine — whose armed forces are uniquely hardened by a modern war with Russia, along with its dynamic defense industry and technology — will make the process significantly easier and faster. Even without being a NATO member and without the involvement of NATO troops, Ukraine has for a long time been independently implementing the NATO's Strategic Concept of neutralizing Russia as the 'most significant and direct threat' to allies' security. 'You are among friends' — this phrase was used more than once in The Hague to welcome Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The results of the Hague summit are paving the way for a day when the Ukrainian president will be greeted with, 'You are among allies.' Andriy Yermak is head of the Office of the President of Ukraine and Alyona Getmanchuk is head of the Mission of Ukraine to NATO-designate.

Russian strikes kill four people in Ukraine's Donetsk
Russian strikes kill four people in Ukraine's Donetsk

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Russian strikes kill four people in Ukraine's Donetsk

MOSCOW - At least four people have been killed in Russian glide bomb and drone attacks in the eastern Ukrainian Donetsk region, authorities said on Sunday. In the industrial city of Kostiantynivka, two civilians died when a bomb was dropped on a construction site, the Donetsk regional prosecutor's office said. Ten minutes later, a drone hit a car in which a married couple was sitting. The authorities published photos on Telegram showing the 39-year-old woman and her 40-year-old husband who were killed. Some 15 residential buildings and power lines were damaged in the attacks, authorities said. Ukrainian air defenses had already recorded more than 160 drone and missile attacks in the country on Sunday morning, with police saying an 8-year-old boy died when a drone hit a car in the north-eastern region of Kharkiv. A 4-year-old boy and a 40-year-old man were also injured in the attack. _____ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store