Mark Zuckerberg crashes Trump's classified Oval Office briefing, asked to leave: report
Earlier this year, top Air Force generals arrived at the Oval Office for a classified briefing on the 'F-47,' America's sixth-generation stealth fighter jet, named in honour of Trump as the 47th US president. But the secure meeting reportedly took an unexpected turn when Meta CEO walked in unannounced, according to an NBC News report cited by The Independent.
Zuckerberg's sudden entrance raised eyebrows, as White House officials were concerned the tech mogul lacked the security clearance required for such a high-level defence discussion.
Though Zuckerberg was eventually asked to step out, the incident rattled military leaders. 'They were mystified and a bit unnerved by the lack of privacy,' one official told NBC, suggesting that they even questioned whether sensitive information had been compromised.
The scene, insiders say, is emblematic of the 'bizarro world' atmosphere inside the Trump White House, where formality has been replaced by chaos and walk-ins are common.
President Trump, who has reportedly nicknamed the Oval Office 'Grand Central Terminal' after New York's bustling transit hub, has embraced a freewheeling, drop-in style for meetings. Cabinet secretaries, advisers, and even business leaders are said to wander in and out — often staying around for unrelated meetings just in case decisions are made.
'He likes to schmooze and bounce things off whoever is around,' a White House aide told The Independent.
That includes billionaire guests like Zuckerberg, who allegedly visited for a separate meeting but found himself in the room during one of the most secretive defence briefings of Trump's presidency.
One person who's been present at these chaotic meetings told NBC: 'No one wants to miss the decision.'
The reported culture shift is a stark contrast to past administrations, where Oval Office access was tightly managed. Even senior officials are said to now linger at the White House, hoping to have the president's ear — or at least catch a key moment.
The report didn't clarify whether Zuckerberg overheard any classified material, but the optics have raised questions about protocol, national security, and Trump's governing style.
The Pentagon and Secret Service have not officially commented on the incident.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
34 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
AP Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal is back in news. Mount Rushmore with the four presidents' faces is the center of new political debate over potential expansion. Then-President Donald Trump stands at Mount Rushmore National Memorial on July 3, 2020, near Keystone, S.D. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security efforts. Ogles also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US history. Also Read: Big Beautiful Bill Passed: What's in Trump's megabill and when will it go into effect? These Republicans voted against it The Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in response. In the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural damage. Also Read: Michael Madsen Net Worth: Actor's cause of death, financial success, movies list, iconic roles and career Mount Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted on. What are the main reasons experts oppose adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Experts say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure unsafe. Has anyone else supported adding Trump to Mount Rushmore? Yes, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Ogles Cites Trump's Achievements Interior Department Response to Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Live Events Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Technical and Cultural Challenges Can Mount Rushmore Have More Faces? Mount Rushmore Rock's Poor Quality Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Political Support and Resistance FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill could leave 12 million without healthcare and America drowning in debt
Republicans in the US Senate have narrowly passed Donald Trump's mega-bill on tax and spending after hours of stalemate and negotiation. But Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is likely to increase the debt of America, according to estimates from Congressional Budget Office. The megabill could also impact 12 million Americans as they might lose health coverage. Two Sharp with ET: HDB IPO stuns on debut, Trump bill triggers $3T debt alarm Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads 12 million Americans might lose health coverage Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads ( Originally published on Jul 01, 2025 ) Senate Republicans narrowly approved President Donald Trump's giant tax and spending cuts package today after a days-long grind. The vote was 50-50, and Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. The bill will now go to the House of 'big, beautiful bill' must pass in the House before heading to the president's desk. GOP leaders are racing to try to get the bill to the White House by July 940-page proposal covers tax cuts, healthcare, food aid, clean energy, immigration enforcement, student loans, military spending, and more. According to a New York Times report, the bill could leave 12 million more Americans uninsured over the next bill could cut health insurance coverage for nearly 12 million Americans and add $3.3tn (£2.4tn) in debt, according to new estimates, reports BBC. The bill would result in deeper health care cuts and leave more people without insurance, according to a report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).New estimates from CBO also revealed that over the same period, federal spending on Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare would be cut by $1.1 trillion. More than $1 trillion of the cuts would be made to Medicaid. The legislation would also cut federal spending on Medicaid, Medicare and ObamaCare by $1.1 trillion, with more than $1 trillion coming from a decade, the bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt, according to the CBO. The version passed by the House would have added $2.4 trillion. The public debt currently stands at approximately $29 trillion, and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that the government will need to borrow an additional $21 trillion over the next decade. This outlook has fueled concerns that the proposed Republican legislation could significantly worsen an already bleak fiscal the bill is estimated to add $3.3 trillion to the national debt, that figure excludes increased borrowing costs. When those are factored in, the total impact could approach $4 trillion.'Our fiscal house is basically on fire,' Democratic Senator Gary Peters said in remarks on the Senate floor on Sunday. 'But if our Republican colleagues jam through this bill, it's not going to pour water on that fire. It's going to pour gasoline on those flames.'Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill would extend tax cuts passed by Republicans in 2017. The bill proposes cuts to certain programmes in order to pay for the tax healthcare, the spending bill proposes a work requirement on most adults in order to qualify for benefits. It also reduces the amount of taxes that states can charge medical providers, the funds from which are used heavily to finance Medicaid programs.
