
At Penn, mixed reactions to Lia Thomas' records being rescinded
More: Lia Thomas, Title IX and $175M: Why Penn struck a deal with Trump
Daniela Lopez, a nursing student from New Jersey, said she felt empathetic toward Thomas, who began transitioning in 2019 and graduated from Penn in 2022.
"They should be allowed to compete," Lopez said of transgender athletes. "On top of everything else, every controversial issue in this world, I think this shouldn't be a big concern."
But Vanessa Placencia, a senior psychology major from Texas, believes Thomas and other transgender athletes should not be allowed to compete in women's sports.
"I think the other girls (whose records, broken by Thomas, were restored) were appropriately prized," said Placincia. "I never thought it was fair (that Thomas competed on the women's team)."
Placincia said she's lost modeling work to transgender women, and believes it was due to "unfair physical advantages." "They're taller, and it's affected me," she said. "I've been told I'm not tall enough but they get hired. I don't want to see them taking jobs from women."
"I am all for being respectful," she said, "but also, be fair."
She added that she's "pro-Trump": "I think he did the right thing and I think he's doing a good job."
The university had said in a July 1 statement that it would comply with an executive order. J. Larry Jameson, the university's president, said it is a "complex issue," adding he was pleased to reach the agreement.
"Our commitment to ensuring a respectful and welcoming environment for all of our students is unwavering," Jameson said in the statement. "At the same time, we must comply with federal requirements, including executive orders, and NCAA eligibility rules, so our teams and student-athletes may engage in competitive intercollegiate sports."
Connor Johns, a sophomore finance major and a wide receiver on the Penn Quakers football team, said that "as an athlete, I don't think it's fair for (transgender athletes) to compete on women's teams, because it discounts all the hard work women have done to compete." He added, though, that Penn was following the rules governing college sports at the time by allowing Thomas to compete.
Thomas began transitioning in 2019, complying with the NCAA and Ivy League rules then in place. The NCAA updated its policy on transgender athletes in 2022, taking a sport-by-sport approach that it said "preserves opportunity for transgender student-athletes while balancing fairness, inclusion and safety for all who compete."
Still, Johns said he believes that once the university allowed Thomas to compete on the women's team, it should have stood by the decision. The reversal, he said, sends a message that the university's administration is influenced by external forces.
"You can't backtrack," he said. "It seems like they were pressured into this decision, but they should get it right the first time."
The decision to rescind Thomas' records "shows student-athletes and students in general that the university can't stand by its decisions," he said.
Penn alum Amy Lipton said she found Penn's decision "problematic, for a number of reasons," including that Thomas was in compliance with existing NCAA rules when she competed.
Lipton, a finance professor emerita at St. Joseph's University just outside Philadelphia, graduated from Penn's Wharton School of Business in 1988. During her time at St. Joseph's, she was a member and for a time co-chair of The Alliance, a group supporting LGBTQ students and faculty.
"Also, as Columbia (University) has learned the hard way, making a deal with this (Trump) administration seems to be a bottomless pit," she said, referencing that school's challenges over accusations of antisemitism and liberal bias. "While they say perhaps it will lead to getting grant money back, the government may very well come back and say, 'Well, we also want this and we also want that.'"
The government will now release $175 million in funding for the school that it had frozen in March, Madison Biedermann, an Education Department spokeswoman, told USA TODAY.
Prospective students and faculty may now find Penn's assertion that it is a welcoming institution "somewhat disingenuous," Lipton added. "Nothing about this, or the agreement to go with the government's interpretation of what male means and what female means seems to be welcoming to people who might identify as LGBTQ."
Contributing: Jordan Mendoza, USA TODAY

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Elon Musk urges release of Epstein files weeks after accusing Trump of being named in them
Elon Musk has again urged the release of the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files, weeks after accusing President Donald Trump of being in them. The tech billionaire issued a one-word reply to MAGA activist Scott Presler on X on Thursday, who wrote: 'Release the unredacted Epstein files.' 'Yes,' Musk responded. Renewed calls to release files related to the disgraced financier's sex-trafficking case come just weeks after the explosive fallout between Musk and Trump, during which the Tesla CEO claimed the 'real reason' the documents remained sealed was because the president was implicated. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk tweeted on June 5. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' He followed up shortly after: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' About six weeks later, Musk said he regrets some of the posts about Trump, claiming they 'went too far.' On Monday, Trump reignited his feud with Elon Musk, threatening to unleash the Department of Government Efficiency against the world's riechest man and suggesting he might have to 'go back to South Africa.' The veiled threat was in response to Musk escalating his anti-Republican rhetoric and his scathing criticism of the president' showpiece tax bill. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump said. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' This is a breaking story. More to follow.
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump said he told the New York Times about Musk's alleged drug use, presidential biographer claims
President Donald Trump said he 'dropped a dime' on Elon Musk's alleged drug taking to the New York Times, according to biographer Michael Wolff. As the feud between Trump and Musk reignited this week, Wolff claimed the president has been calling contacts to badmouth his former 'first buddy.' 'I was tracking some Trump phone calls on Monday night. And it's sort of worth explaining here that over a long period of time, I've gotten to know and cultivated a lot of people who Trump regularly speaks to,' Wolff told the Daily Beast Podcast host Joanna Coles during Thursday's episode. Wolff, who did not speak to the president himself, claimed Trump made the comments on Monday after Musk threatened to form a new political party if the Big, Beautiful Bill passes. 'And he's like calling people to say, 'Do you think Elon is crazy? I think he's crazy,'' Wolff said. 'He was on about, you know…how many drugs [Musk] takes, you know…He takes drugs all the time. The New York Times wrote about it. They said he takes drugs,'' Wolff continued. 'And then [Trump] went on to say…you know, actually, we dropped a dime to The New York Times on Elon for taking…on Elon's drug taking.'' Wolff said that Trump is 'claiming credit' for the report. White House communications director Steven Cheung dismissed the claims and fired back with one of his signature takedowns of the Trump biographer. 'Michael Wolff is a lying sack of s*** and has been proven to be a fraud,' Cheung said in a statement to The Independent. 'He routinely fabricates stories originating from his sick and warped imagination, only possible because he has a severe and debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted his peanut-sized brain.' Musk denies claims that he takes drugs and was high while in the White House. 'To be clear, I am NOT taking drugs! The New York Times was lying their a** off,' he said in a post on X at the time. 'I tried *prescription* ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then.' Tensions between Musk and Trump have boiled over once again after the Tesla CEO launched fresh attacks on the president on his social media platform. The president even said he would 'take a look' at deporting Musk after his renewed criticism of the tax and spending megabill. His threats followed Musk's promise to bankroll primary challenges against Republican lawmakers who vote to pass legislation. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk wrote on X. Trump also hinted he might also turn the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which Musk spearheaded, on his former friend. 'We might have to put Doge on Elon,' he said. 'You know what Doge is? Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon.'


Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
America needs an honest reckoning over its spy agencies
The question of how far America has set back Iran's nuclear programme clearly matters. That can be far less certain of any of the answers America is coming up with. While the strikes on Iran showed the supremacy of American air power, they also may have revealed a weakness in its national security. According to Donald Trump, the country's spy agencies failed before the assault in a critical mission, assessing the threat posed by Iran's nuclear programme. Mr Trump's claim should heighten doubts now about intelligence reports and White House statements regarding the effectiveness of the air assault. Should anyone trust the conclusions? Which ones? Is the president getting it wrong himself?