Microsoft announces big bonanza for Windows 10 users as their software support ends; check what needs to be done
Microsoft has officially issued a critical 60-day warning to Windows 10 users, urging those who have not yet upgraded to Windows 11 to take immediate action to ensure their devices continue receiving vital security updates. This alert was displayed starting August 16, 2025, signaling the approach of the end of official support for Windows 10, on October 14, 2025.
The end-of-support milestone means that after October 14, Windows 10 devices will no longer receive monthly security patches, technical support, or feature updates from Microsoft. Although devices will continue to function, the lack of new security updates exposes them to increasing cyber threats and vulnerabilities.
To help users manage this transition, Microsoft has introduced an Extended Security Updates (ESU) program, allowing Windows 10 users to enroll and receive critical monthly security updates beyond the official support period, up to October 2026.
This program can be accessed via an 'Enroll Now' option appearing within the Windows Update settings, with option for paid plans—such as a $30 option extending coverage across up to 10 devices, or linking their devices to Microsoft's cloud, wherein, users have the option to sync their Windows 10 device with Microsoft's cloud platform, Windows 365, giving them access to Windows 11 Cloud PCs hosted on Microsoft's servers. For those managing larger amounts of data, a Windows 365 subscription plan is available. Microsoft stressed that it recognizes the complexities involved in transitioning to a new PC or operating system and is providing this extended support as a bridge, enabling users to maintain device security while preparing for an eventual upgrade to Windows 11. Nevertheless, the company strongly encourages users to update to the latest Windows 11 versions to maintain optimal security and receive new features.
This support end for Windows 10 is part of Microsoft's broader lifecycle policy, which typically provides ten years of support for major operating systems. Windows 10, initially released in 2015, is reaching the end of this cycle as planned.In addition, Microsoft has also issued warnings about upcoming end-of-support dates for certain Windows 11 versions. For example, Windows 11 version 22H2 (Enterprise and Education editions) will also reach end of servicing on October 14, 2025, while Windows 11 version 23H2 (Home and Pro editions) is scheduled to end support on November 11, 2025. Users on these versions must similarly plan to upgrade to stay protected against cyber risks.As the deadline approaches, it is crucial for Windows 10 users—whether individuals or organizations—to take timely action by either upgrading to Windows 11 or enrolling in the Extended Security Updates program. Failure to act will leave devices vulnerable to security breaches and operational issues.FAQ's on the upgrade
Q: When does Microsoft end support for Windows 10?
A: Microsoft will officially end support for Windows 10 on October 14, 2025. After this date, no further security or feature updates will be released.
Q: Will my Windows 10 PC stop working after support ends?
A: No, Windows 10 PCs will continue to operate, but they will no longer receive security patches, making them vulnerable to cyber threats.
Q: What should I do if I'm still using Windows 10?
A: Microsoft recommends upgrading to Windows 11 for continued support, or enrolling in the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program for critical updates beyond October 2025.
Q: Will Windows 11 also face end-of-support deadlines soon?
A: Yes, some Windows 11 versions like 22H2 will reach end of servicing on October 14, 2025, requiring timely upgrades by users to maintain security.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India's Online Gaming Bill 2025: Regulation or disguise for prohibition?
Reuters Representative image In the past decade, India has become one of the world's fastest growing online gaming markets, with nearly half-a-billion users and a projected addition of 250,000 jobs by 2025, as reported by EY India's New frontiers: Navigating the evolving landscape for online gaming in India in 2023. It has become a mainstream industry that caters to employment generation, innovation and tech, while also propelling India's global digital the introduction of Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill 2025, there appears to be speculation among stakeholders. By proposing a blanket ban on online money gaming while selectively encouraging e-sports and casual games, GoI's intent seems inclined more towards prohibition than regulation in disguise. This approach may fail to address the sources of harm while undermining the domestic gaming ecosystem that India has progressively built. It is undeniable that the Bill's intentions are well placed, as it attempts to address problems of addiction, consumer protection and prevention of money laundering. However, in practice, it may inadvertently create an illegal betting economy and encourage the gambling industry. This may undermine India's domestic gaming sector and its digital Make in India ambitions. The areas of concern include: Disadvantages Indian innovator e-Sports and casual gaming sectors are dominated by international giants, whereas India's domestic gaming companies are in the skill-based money games space. Out of India's 488 mn gamer base, more than 155 mn are engaged with real-money gaming (RMG) sub-segments like fantasy sports and other transaction-based games, making it the largest segment in the country's gaming economy. This could distort the market under the guise of consumer protection. Moreover, by equating legitimate businesses with gambling, the Bill risks setting a dangerous precedent that not only undermines judicially recognised distinctions between games of skill and games of chance, but also violates the constitutionally guaranteed right to trade and occupation under Article 19(1)(g), thereby affecting multiple stakeholders who have built a value chain around this sector. Overlooks money mechanics in casual gaming The Bill overlooks real-money mechanics in casual gaming, social gaming and video gaming. If addiction and overspending are the concern, the real danger lies in in-app purchases, microtransactions and loot boxes, which are key features embedded in such games. These monetisation models rely on psychological nudges that resemble gambling mechanics. Players routinely spend on skins, upgrades and loot boxes, which use triggers that encourage repeat spending, as suggested by the 2023 IAMAI and the Netherlands have classified loot boxes as gambling and imposed bans. Meanwhile, Japan enforces strict disclosure norms without prohibiting the mechanic altogether. India should analyse these models and adapt them while keeping in view indigenous ecosystems. Prohibition doesn't work Instead of reducing harm, prohibitions create black markets that are harder to regulate and far riskier for users. In states where RMG is banned, such as Telangana, over 3,900 betting platform-related violations were documented in 2025. Additionally, 25 celebrities and influencers faced charges for endorsing prohibited betting platforms. Moreover, prohibition risks discounting the judgement of adult gamers. Many view RMG as a form of entertainment or relaxation and should have the right to make that choice under a regulated regime. Regulation must avoid paternalism, providing safeguards without underestimating user agency. Skill vs chance Courts have reiterated that games like rummy and fantasy sports involve a substantial degree of skill and cannot be equated with gambling. By putting all online money games into the same category, the Bill ignores judicial precedent, stifles skill-based industries and chills investor confidence in a fast-growing digital sector. By equating the two, it erases this intelligible difference and treats legitimate skill-based industries as if they were indistinguishable from betting or lotteries. Weak framework While the Bill hints at the creation of a central regulatory authority, this stands in stark contradiction to MeitY's 2023 amendment to the IT Rules 2021, which had envisioned industry-led self-regulatory bodies with GoI oversight. The sudden pivot to a stringent central authority reflects a dichotomous approach. Instead, GoI could have institutionalised responsible gaming measures, mandated transparency and created safeguards for vulnerable groups such as minors. Such a model would align better with global best practices and balance innovation with consumer forward, GoI must: Create a transparent system that mandates disclosure of odds, pricing and spending limits on loot boxes and in-app purchases. Initiate age-appropriate safeguarding protocols with verification mechanisms and parental oversight in cases of minor gamers. Adopt a self-regulatory model where compliances are monitored by an independent regulator. Together, these measures can construct a transparent, user-friendly and accountable ecosystem. To attain Aatmanirbhar Bharat, GoI must strive to make India a hub of a world-class gaming ecosystem. User protection must go together with technological innovation to uphold the essence of Viksit Bharat. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Swiggy, Tencent backer Prosus gets Rajinikanth fan to script India AI play India's F&O boom puts spotlight on retail protection through education Can new shipping laws bury the ghost of British legacy? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre Stock Radar: Bajaj Auto showing signs of reversal after falling over 30% from highs; medium term should 'buy the dip' F&O Radar | Deploy Bull Call Ladder in JSW Steel stock to benefit from bullish outlook Time for risk-takers to come out of hibernation? 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 27% Buy, Sell or Hold: Motilal Oswal initiates coverage on JSW Cement; Emkay Global sees over 30% upside in Gravita India
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
93% of Indian business leaders plan to use AI agents in next 12-18 months : Microsoft
93% of Indian business leaders intend to use AI agents to extend workforce capabilities in the next 12-18 months, Microsoft 's Work Trend Index (WTI) 2025 report on Wednesday, it showed India's workforce is rapidly moving towards an 'AI-first' how Indian companies are ahead of their global counterparts in adopting generative AI tools, the report has pointed out productivity, creativity, and security have emerged as the biggest drivers of on a global survey of 31,000 professionals across 31 countries, the report also noted that more than three in four knowledge workers in India already use AI at work. Sectors such as IT services, finance, and manufacturing are among the fastest adopters of AI, it report said India's most forward-looking organizations – what Microsoft calls Frontier Firms – are leading the charge in reimagining work. These firms also report that they can take on more work and offer opportunities for more meaningful work, while being less concerned about AI replacing jobs."Already, 59% of leaders are using AI agents to automate workstreams or business processes across entire teams, the highest share globally. 90% of Indian business leaders say this is a pivotal year to rethink core strategies and operations," Microsoft said in a statement on WTI a move toward dynamic, AI-integrated teams, organizations are also preparing for a new generation of roles such as Agent Bosses, AI Workflow Designers, and Software Operators, it said. Case in point, the report said 51% of leaders cite upskilling as their top priority over the next 12–18 months, with 63% of managers expecting AI training to become a core responsibility within five years.'For us, AI is a massive force multiplier. With respect to Copilot , which is a UI for AI, we've seen tech's growth in the last six months. There's a real opportunity for us to build the AI stack, because every industry, every function, would get invented and reinvented with AI,' Puneet Chandok, President of Microsoft India and South Asia, the same time, the report highlighted that AI's role is not about replacing humans but augmenting them.'AI has moved from this hype and buzzword to real impact. I don't think the human-in-the-loop model will come away. AI will augment humans. It will not replace humans. And I think this interplay of human judgment, human creativity, human context, along with AI agents, is where the magic will happen,' Chandok asked about the recent SharePoint cyberattack, Chandok emphasised Microsoft's approach to embedding security directly into its AI offerings.'Our Security Copilot is constantly working at looking at threat intelligence. We see around 7,000 password attacks every minute and millions of signals being picked up every hour. Our ability to apply AI for security ensures we are more secure, and security for AI makes sure that platforms like SharePoint and the data you're using remain protected,' he said.
Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Can US Navy's $5B sea drones really stop China? Crashes and chaos raise doubts
During a U.S. naval test off the California coast last month, which was designed to showcase the Pentagon's top autonomous drone boats, one vessel stalled unexpectedly. As officials scrambled to fix a software glitch, another drone vessel smashed into the idling boat's starboard side, vaulted over the deck, and crashed back into the water – an incident captured in videos obtained by Reuters. The previously unreported episode, which involved two vessels built by U.S. defense tech rivals Saronic and BlackSea Technologies, is one of a series of recent setbacks in the Pentagon's push to build a fleet of autonomous vessels, according to a dozen people familiar with the program. Weeks earlier, during a separate Navy test, the captain of a support boat was thrown into the water after another autonomous BlackSea vessel it was towing suddenly accelerated, capsizing the support boat, according to four people familiar with the matter. The captain was rescued and declined medical attention. The incident was first reported by Defense Scoop. Both incidents stemmed from a combination of software failures and human error, including breakdowns in communication between onboard systems and external autonomous software, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter, who requested anonymity to share sensitive information. The Navy, Saronic and BlackSea declined to comment on the incidents. The videos showing the drone crash were verified by two Reuters sources, the landscape matching terrain imagery, the GARC-096 name ID and structure of the boat matching file imagery of Global Autonomous Reconnaissance Craft (GARC). U.S. military leaders, seeing the outsized impact of maritime drones in the Ukraine war, have repeatedly said they need autonomous swarms of aerial and maritime drones to hinder a potential advance by China across the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan itself has begun acquiring its own maritime drones. The drones being developed in Ukraine, which often look like speedboats without seats, and are capable of carrying weapons, explosives and surveillance equipment, are primarily remote-controlled and cost close to $250,000 – making them optimal for kamikaze missions that have effectively neutralized Russia's Black Sea Fleet. The US, meanwhile, is aiming to build an autonomous naval fleet that can move in swarms and without human command – a more ambitious task at a higher price point; as much as a few million dollars per speedboat. The recent test failures highlight the challenges facing the Navy's effort to deploy the nascent technologies, said Bryan Clark, an autonomous warfare expert at the Hudson Institute. It will need to adapt its "tactics as it better understands what the systems can do and what they can't do." But the Navy's problems go beyond getting the boats to work: its autonomous maritime drone acquisition unit has also been rocked by the firing of its top admiral, and a top Pentagon official voiced concerns about the program in a candid meeting with Navy brass last month, Reuters found. Since the most recent incident, the Pentagon's Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), which had acquired technology for the tests, has indefinitely paused a contract – valued close to $20 million – with L3Harris, one of the companies providing autonomous software used to control some of the vessels, according to two people familiar with the matter. The Pentagon did not respond to questions about the cause of the accidents or the L3Harris contract being paused, which has not been previously reported. A Pentagon spokesperson said it conducted drone tests as part of a "competitive and iterative approach, between operators and industry." L3Harris declined to comment on the contract and directed questions to the DIU. The DIU declined to comment. "L3Harris stands behind the safety, integrity and capability of our autonomy command-and-control product," said Toby Magsig, who oversees L3Harris' autonomous software products. To accelerate its drone effort, the Pentagon in 2023 launched the $1 billion Replicator program, through which branches like the U.S. Navy and the DIU planned to acquire thousands of aerial and maritime drones, along with the software to control them. The first systems from this program are due to be announced this month. The Navy has committed at least $160 million to BlackSea, which is producing dozens of its Global Autonomous Reconnaissance Craft boats a month, according to procurement records. Saronic, which was recently valued at $4 billion in a funding round backed by Andreessen Horowitz and 8VC, makes the competitive sea drone Corsair, but is yet to announce a major contract. Federal procurement records show the company has generated at least $20 million from prototype agreements. "These systems will play a critical role in the future of naval warfare by extending fleet reach, improving situational awareness, and increasing combat effectiveness," acting chief of naval operations Jim Kilby said during a visit to BlackSea's facility in June. Since returning to office, President Donald Trump has made fielding swarms of drones a top military priority. Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passed last month included almost $5 billion for maritime autonomous systems. But, so far, the Navy's approach has faced skepticism under the new administration. In April, the Navy's key drone boat procurement unit – known as Program Executive Office Unmanned and Small Combatants (PEO USC) – touted a successful demonstration of the software used to control BlackSea's vessels in a post on LinkedIn, hailing it as "a major step forward in advancing #maritime autonomy." In response, Colin Carroll, then-chief of staff to Deputy Secretary of Defense Steven Feinberg, suggested the program was duplicating other efforts within the Pentagon. 'I have a feeling that there are changes in this program's future,' he replied to the LinkedIn post. Carroll, who is no longer with the Pentagon, declined to comment further. The PEO USC was recently placed under review, according to four people familiar with the matter, due to a series of setbacks, and could be restructured or shut down. This comes two months after the Navy said it had sacked the unit's leader, Rear Admiral Kevin Smith, due to a loss of confidence in his leadership after the Naval Inspector General substantiated a complaint against him. Reuters was unable to contact Smith. During a meeting last month, Feinberg grilled Navy officials about their autonomous vessel capabilities, including those being fielded by the PEO USC, according to three people briefed on the meeting. Feinberg was unimpressed by some of the capabilities being acquired by the Navy and questioned whether they were cost-effective, the people said. A Pentagon spokesperson said, "we're not going to comment on private internal meetings" and directed questions about PEO USC to the Navy. The Navy declined to comment on the meeting or the acquisition unit being put under review. Spokesperson Timothy Hawkins said the PEO USC stands by its mission, including its role as acquisition authority for the maintenance and modernization of unmanned maritime systems. The turmoil comes as shipbuilders and software providers are angling to secure even larger autonomous maritime projects, such as unmanned submarines and cargo-carrying ships. Last week, the PEO USC started accepting proposals for the Modular Attack Surface Craft, to acquire medium and large vessels capable of carrying containers, surveillance equipment, and conducting strikes. T.X. Hammes, an autonomous weapons expert and Atlantic Council fellow, said the Navy is in uncharted waters, trying to overhaul decades of tradition at high speed. "You've got a system that's used to building big things, taking years to make a decision, and now suddenly you're asking them to move fast," he said.
