Australian judge William Gummow to stay on Hong Kong's top court for 3 more years
Gummow will remain on the Court of Final Appeal (CFA) as a non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction until July 2028, the Judiciary announced on Friday.
Non-permanent Hong Kong judges Frank Stock and Patrick Chan have also extended their terms by three years, with their new appointments beginning on September 1 and October 21, respectively.
Their appointments were approved by Chief Executive John Lee, following a recommendation by Chief Justice Andrew Cheung, the top judge of the CFA.
Since its establishment in 1997, the CFA has periodically invited judges from other common law jurisdictions to serve on its panel.
The practice has long been seen as a vote of confidence from the international community in Hong Kong's judicial system, bolstering the city's reputation as a global financial and business hub.
However, in recent years, the presence of overseas judges has come under scrutiny amid a wave of resignations following the introduction of the national security law in June 2020. The UK has also considered pulling its judges from Hong Kong's top court.
Last month, Hong Kong's legislature approved the appointment of 73-year-old William Young from New Zealand as a non-permanent judge on the Court of Final Appeal, joining five other overseas judges from the UK and Australia. His profile has yet to appear on the court's official website.
'Cosmetic'
In April, Australian judge Robert French resigned from Hong Kong's top court, saying the role of overseas non-permanent judges on the CFA had become 'increasingly anachronistic and arguably cosmetic.'
He was the sixth foreign judge to depart Hong Kong's highest court since the start of last year.
French said he continued to respect both local and overseas judges who remain on the bench for their integrity and independence. He also rejected claims that foreign judges were 'complicit' in enforcing the national security law or that their presence lent it 'spurious legitimacy.'
Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
4 days ago
- RTHK
Australia to ban under-16s from YouTube
Australia to ban under-16s from YouTube Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the under-16 ban may not be implemented perfectly, but it was still the right thing to do. File photo: Reuters Australia will use landmark social media laws to ban children under 16 from video-sharing platform YouTube, a top minister said on Wednesday, stressing the need to shield them from "predatory algorithms". Communications Minister Anika Wells said four-in-ten Australian children had reported viewing harmful content on YouTube, one of the most visited websites in the world. "We want kids to know who they are before platforms assume who they are," Wells said in a statement. "There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children." Australia announced last year it was drafting laws that will ban children from social media sites such as Facebook, TikTok and Instagram until they turn 16. The government had previously indicated YouTube would be exempt, given its widespread use in classrooms. "Young people under the age of 16 will not be able to have accounts on YouTube," Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters on Wednesday. "They will also not be able to have accounts on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and X among other platforms. "We want Australian parents and families to know that we have got their back." Albanese said the age limit may not be implemented perfectly – much like existing restrictions on alcohol – but it was still the right thing to do. A spokesman for YouTube said Wednesday's announcement was a jarring U-turn from the government. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens," the company said in a statement. "It's not social media." On paper, the ban is one of the strictest in the world. But the current legislation offers almost no details on how the rules will be enforced –prompting concern among experts that it will simply be a symbolic piece of unenforceable legislation. It is due to come into effect on December 10. Social media giants – which face fines of up to Aus$49.5 million for failing to comply – have described the laws as "vague", "problematic" and "rushed". TikTok has accused the government of ignoring mental health, online safety and youth experts who had opposed the ban. Meta – owner of Facebook and Instagram – has warned that the ban could place "an onerous burden on parents and teens". (AFP)
HKFP
5 days ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong slams countries over ‘smears' against bounties targeting overseas activists
The Hong Kong government has said it 'strongly opposed and disapproved of smears with distorted facts' after countries such as the US, Canada, and Australia criticised the city's fresh bounties targeting overseas activists. In a statement on Sunday, the Hong Kong government said that 'such foreign government officials and politicians, as well as anti-China organisations, turned a blind eye to illegal acts of criminals' and 'also deliberately smeared and spread irresponsible remarks, in an attempt to mislead the public.' On Friday, Hong Kong national security police announced bounties for information leading to the arrest of 19 overseas activists for their link to political group the 'Hong Kong Parliament,' accusing them of committing subversion under the Beijing-imposed national security law. A bounty of HK$200,000 each was offered for 15 members of the group, while the remaining four were already wanted for HK$1 million each. 'The 'Hong Kong Parliament' is an organisation which aims to subvert state power; its objectives include promoting 'self-determination', promulgating the so-called 'Hong Kong Constitution', and overthrowing or undermining' the governments in China and Hong Kong, the statement also said. 'No country or organisation should harbour criminals nor try to exonerate these people with different excuses.' Criticism against bounties The Sunday statement was issued after senior US, Canadian, and Australian officials levelled criticism against the bounties. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday condemned the move by the Hong Kong authorities, calling the bounties 'transnational repression.' 'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational repression,' Rubio said in a statement. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil,' he added. In Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand and Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree issued a joint statement on Saturday condemning the bounties. 'This attempt by Hong Kong authorities to conduct transnational repression abroad, including by issuing threats, intimidation or coercion against Canadians or those in Canada, will not be tolerated,' the statement read. 'The actions taken by Hong Kong threaten the sovereignty of Canada and security of the people in this country,' the statement continued. The Canadian officials also said the bounties were 'being amplified in an inauthentic and coordinated way, through an online network of accounts that are targeting Chinese-speaking communities.' Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on Saturday on X: 'Australia strongly objects to Hong Kong authorities issuing arrest warrants for pro-democracy advocates in Australia. Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy.' The Hong Kong government on Saturday also issued a statement opposing remarks by UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who described the bounties as 'another example of transnational repression.' A total of 34 people residing overseas are currently placed on a wanted list by Hong Kong national security police. Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs.
HKFP
6 days ago
- HKFP
Australian judge William Gummow to stay on Hong Kong's top court for 3 more years
Australian justice William Gummow has extended his term as a visiting foreign judge on Hong Kong's top court for another three years, following a wave of resignations by his peers after Beijing's national security law came into force. Gummow will remain on the Court of Final Appeal (CFA) as a non-permanent judge from another common law jurisdiction until July 2028, the Judiciary announced on Friday. Non-permanent Hong Kong judges Frank Stock and Patrick Chan have also extended their terms by three years, with their new appointments beginning on September 1 and October 21, respectively. Their appointments were approved by Chief Executive John Lee, following a recommendation by Chief Justice Andrew Cheung, the top judge of the CFA. Since its establishment in 1997, the CFA has periodically invited judges from other common law jurisdictions to serve on its panel. The practice has long been seen as a vote of confidence from the international community in Hong Kong's judicial system, bolstering the city's reputation as a global financial and business hub. However, in recent years, the presence of overseas judges has come under scrutiny amid a wave of resignations following the introduction of the national security law in June 2020. The UK has also considered pulling its judges from Hong Kong's top court. Last month, Hong Kong's legislature approved the appointment of 73-year-old William Young from New Zealand as a non-permanent judge on the Court of Final Appeal, joining five other overseas judges from the UK and Australia. His profile has yet to appear on the court's official website. 'Cosmetic' In April, Australian judge Robert French resigned from Hong Kong's top court, saying the role of overseas non-permanent judges on the CFA had become 'increasingly anachronistic and arguably cosmetic.' He was the sixth foreign judge to depart Hong Kong's highest court since the start of last year. French said he continued to respect both local and overseas judges who remain on the bench for their integrity and independence. He also rejected claims that foreign judges were 'complicit' in enforcing the national security law or that their presence lent it 'spurious legitimacy.' Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020 following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts – broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs.
