logo
BJP Vs BJP: Constitution Club Poll Contest Between Heavyweights Rudy, Balyan Reaches Final Stage

BJP Vs BJP: Constitution Club Poll Contest Between Heavyweights Rudy, Balyan Reaches Final Stage

News1816 hours ago
Last Updated:
BJP's Rajiv Pratap Rudy and Dr. Sanjeev Balyan compete for Secretary (Administration) at the Constitution Club of India. The vote on August 12 will decide the outcome.
This is no ordinary election. At stake is the coveted post of secretary (administration) of the Constitution Club of India — a position that commands influence in the only members' club exclusively for current and former MPs.
This time, the battle lines are drawn between two vastly different BJP heavyweights — the suave and seasoned Rajiv Pratap Rudy, who has been at the club's helm for more than 25 years, and Muzaffarnagar's former MP Dr Sanjeev Balyan, who is contesting for the first time.
Rudy's supporters hail him as the man who transformed the club from a crumbling property into a modern facility boasting a spa, restaurants, a swimming pool, gym, and sports amenities. But his challenger, less than a decade into club membership, is campaigning hard on promises to put members first — amid murmurs that bureaucrats have been given too much leeway under his opponent's watch.
What makes this contest fascinating is that it is not just a matter of governance — it's a reflection of caste alignments, personal loyalties, and intra-party manoeuvring. Rudy, a Thakur from Bihar, is banking on his long-standing rapport with senior leaders including friends across party lines from the Congress, NCP, and DMK. Balyan, a Jat from western Uttar Pradesh, is relying on his grassroots connections especially in the Hindi heartland and southern states.
In a twist of political fate, Nishikant Dubey — once a close ally of Rudy — is now openly campaigning for Balyan. He is joined by BJP floor strategist CM Ramesh, who, insiders said, has been instrumental in mobilising support even from opposition members with backing from Telangana Congress leaders reportedly on Chief Minister Revanth Reddy's instructions including MPs from TDP, BRS, DMK and AIADMK.
'Nobody can doubt the ability that Ramesh has in mobilising. He has successfully done so even during the abrogation of Article 370," the team members said.
Balyan's campaign seems to be of a military precision: senior leaders have been assigned 20 MPs each to bring to the voting booth, and outreach has extended to members from Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, and Jammu and Kashmir. Shrikant Shinde of the Shiv Sena and Lahu Krishna from the TDP are some MPs who have been assigned states to focus on.
Dubey is also making use of his friendship and connection with party persons across the platform. It is even learnt that CM Omar Abdullah has promised that his party will support Balyan's candidature in this contest.
'Top brass of the NDA government have also in a way indicated which side they would want to support in this election," a source said.
While one of the top five ministers in the central government said it will be better for him not to vote because it would be difficult to pick sides, one of the most vocal ministers said he will definitely cast his vote, and that there should be no confusion over his choice.
Parliament premises have turned into a stage for this high-stakes duel. Rudy is usually seen near the Makar Dwar, where opposition MPs pass, while Balyan prefers Hans Dwar, frequented by ruling party MPs.
Rudy's strategy is call-heavy — phone outreach, personal messages, and targeted conversations with influential members. Balyan's is more on-the-ground — meeting MPs at their homes and offices, securing promises of travel arrangements for former MPs so they can vote in person.
Postal ballots have become another battleground. Rudy's camp claims a strong lead through absentee votes, but Balyan's team insists that physically present voters will tilt the numbers in their favour, rendering some postal ballots redundant.
The 'Thakur versus Jat' caste contest has only added another layer to the fight. Both leaders are leveraging their identities alongside their political capital to court votes. Members said this election has the feel of a mini-general election, with state satraps, cross-party friendships, and even promises of travel support in play.
Monday marks the last day of campaigning before Tuesday's crucial vote on August 12. The stakes are sky-high — 1,250 active MPs, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, JP Nadda, Sonia Gandhi, and Rahul Gandhi, will decide the outcome.
The Constitution Club, founded by the Constituent Assembly, has always been more than a social space — it is a political hub where influence is forged and alliances are tested. This year's election, pitting old-guard experience against fresh-field energy, has become a political thriller playing out in real time.
Will Rudy's decades of dominance hold? Or will Balyan's aggressive, personalised outreach rewrite the script? By Tuesday evening, the votes will reveal whether the BJP's internal clash leaves the Constitution Club's balance of power unchanged or forever altered.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt. land: Revenue quasi-judicial authorities to face action if their decisions are not in good faith
Govt. land: Revenue quasi-judicial authorities to face action if their decisions are not in good faith

The Hindu

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Govt. land: Revenue quasi-judicial authorities to face action if their decisions are not in good faith

Revenue quasi-judicial authorities now cannot go scot-free if they issue any orders with mala fide intentions with respect to government land. The government has initiated the process of disciplinary action against a few such authorities who allegedly pronounced orders with vested interests to favour those who encroached upon government land. Disclosing this to the Legislative Assembly on Monday, Revenue Minister Krishna Byre Gowda said an amendment to Section 196 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act had provided for initiating such an action if such authorities had not acted in 'good faith.' He explained that earlier, the only option was to file an appeal before the higher authorities. Revenue courts headed by tahsildars, Assistant Commissioners, Deputy Commissioners, and Regional Commissioners have quasi-judicial powers. The Minister referred to the issue while replying to BJP member Sathish Reddy, who tabled a call-attention notice on encroachment of government land in his constituency of Bommanahalli in Bengaluru. The MLA alleged that despite courts ruling against the encroacher, the Assistant Commissioner had issued an order favouring the encroacher. Soon after this, the village accountant, the revenue inspector, and the police inspector concerned had tried to protect the rights of the encroacher, he alleged. He expressed concern that a total of five acres of government land including burial ground had been encroached upon. Responding positively to this, the Revenue Minister said he would direct the Deputy Commissioner to conduct a probe within seven to 10 days into the episode. Expressing shock over the order issued by the AC, he said generally the quasi-judicial authority is protected. But they should not get protection if they go against the spirit of the law, he added.

Overacting, sasta performance: Kangana Ranaut mocks Opposition's poll body march
Overacting, sasta performance: Kangana Ranaut mocks Opposition's poll body march

India Today

time13 minutes ago

  • India Today

Overacting, sasta performance: Kangana Ranaut mocks Opposition's poll body march

Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi and MP Mahua Moitra were detained by Delhi Police on Monday while leading the INDIA bloc's 'Vote Chori' protest march to the Election Commission of India. As the opposition continues to press for accountability, the BJP and its leaders, including Kangana Ranaut, have dismissed the protests as political theatrics aimed at discrediting the electoral to the protests, actor and BJP MP from Mandi, Kangana Ranaut, took to Instagram Stories to mock Rahul Gandhi and Mahua Moitra's a news report on the detentions, she wrote, 'Overacting wala lousy expression to gain sympathy (He is overacting with lousy expressions because he wants to gain sympathy),' suggesting that Rahul's actions were dramatised to garner public sympathy. In another post, Kangana took a swipe at Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, who reportedly fainted during the protest inside Parliament. Sharing a clip of the incident on her Instagram Story, Kangana wrote, 'Sasta performance, very bad. Cut. (She is giving cheap performance which is very bad),' further criticising the opposition's protest as theatrics. Meanwhile, during today's protest, Delhi Police stopped the opposition's 'Vote Chori' protest just metres away from the gates of Parliament on Monday. As some leaders attempted to breach barricades during the hour-long demonstration, police detained several MPs and took them to the Parliament Street Police Station. All detained leaders were released after being stopped from marching to the Election Commission along with fellow opposition MPs, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi on Monday criticised the state of democracy in the country."See the condition of India's democracy. 300 MPs wanted to meet the Election Commission to present a document, but they were not allowed. They are scared. What if 300 MPs come and their truth is revealed?' Rahul Gandhi said. 'This fight is not political anymore. This fight is for the Constitution and for One Man One Vote... We have clearly shown in Karnataka, it was Multiple Man, Multiple Vote... The entire opposition is fighting against this. It will be very difficult for the Election Commission to hide now," he added.- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Rahul Gandhi

Saved you once: Chief Justice recalls contempt warning while junking lawyer's plea
Saved you once: Chief Justice recalls contempt warning while junking lawyer's plea

India Today

time26 minutes ago

  • India Today

Saved you once: Chief Justice recalls contempt warning while junking lawyer's plea

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition by Mumbai-based advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay seeking action against alleged illegal activities of political parties, calling it non-maintainable. The bench also rebuked Upadhyay for his courtroom conduct, with Chief Justice of India BR Gavai recalling a prior contempt warning from his Bombay High Court petition sought directions to State Election Commissions (SECs) to curb alleged illegal activities by political parties that, he claimed, could endanger the "sovereignty, integrity, and unity of the country." The petition also sought directions for the registration of an FIR against MNS leader Raj Thackeray and his workers for allegedly assaulting citizens over the use of the Hindi bench in its order said, "The public interest litigations are necessary but in the name of PILs, we cannot allow publicity interest litigations," while dismissing the plea. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and Atul S Chandurkar took strong exception to the petitioner approaching the top court directly, bypassing the High Upadhyay insisted on the maintainability of his petition, the Chief Justice questioned why he had not first approached the Bombay High Court.'Can't this be raised before the Bombay High Court? This is nothing but a publicity interest litigation. Though PILs are necessary to protect citizens' rights, this petition concerns policy matters of the Union or ECI and does not justify a direct approach to the Supreme Court under Article 32,' the bench court permitted Upadhyay to withdraw the petition with the liberty to approach the appropriate High Court instead. 'Take a flight and go and file there tomorrow,' the Chief Justice briefly rose during the hearing when the Chief Justice addressed Upadhyay's courtroom conduct. Reminding him of a prior contempt episode during his tenure as a judge of the Bombay High Court, Chief Justice Gavai warned, 'I have saved you once after finding you guilty. I don't want to issue contempt. Don't make these gestures. Don't remind me of Bombay days. Recollect what saved you that time. Don't make me remind you of what happened there.'Sources familiar with the earlier incident said that Upadhyay had been cautioned by a Bombay High Court bench led by Justice Gavai after he insisted on being heard against the court's advice. A show cause notice for contempt was reportedly considered but later dropped following intervention by another the Monday hearing, Upadhyay, maintaining that the relief sought in his plea could not be granted by the High Court, eventually agreed to withdraw the is not the first time the bench has issued such guidance. Just days earlier, it directed Sunil Shukla, President of the Uttar Bhartiya Vikas Sena, to approach the High Court first for similar petition had urged the Supreme Court to instruct all SECs to adopt a coordinated framework to monitor and prevent unlawful conduct by political parties. However, the top court reiterated its position that such matters must first be addressed before appropriate High Courts.- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Supreme Court

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store