Mortgage innovation and affordability changes are huge positives - here's what it means for homebuyers
Halifax has recently announced that the stress rates used in their affordability calculation will be lowered. Typical customers will see an increase of around 13 per cent in the maximum amount they can borrow - potentially around £38,000 more, which is clearly good news for future homebuyers.
One of the hurdles of getting on the property ladder after you've saved (or been gifted) a deposit is passing a lender's affordability assessment, which can be a challenge. However, recent 'encouragement' from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has led to lenders like Halifax relaxing these assessments and opening up possibilities to more borrowers.
Here we analyse what lenders are doing and what it means for you as a homebuyer - as well as clarifying what an affordability assessment actually is!
Affordability assessments 101
When you're borrowing hundreds of thousands of pounds, a lender wants some comfort that you'll be able to make your monthly repayments, now and in the future.
As part of your application, they'll review your credit history to get an idea of the type of borrower you are. Missing payments, exceeding credit card limits and defaulting on agreements are behaviours that can restrict your access to products. Responsible financial behaviour is always important.
To get an understanding of your current financial situation, lenders will want to see evidence of your income and expenses, your payslips and bank statements. They'll also want to understand any ongoing financial commitments you have like loans, credit card balances and childcare costs.
Then they'll perform various 'stress tests' to see if repayments are manageable in different scenarios - such as interest rates unexpectedly rising higher.
'Affordability assessments vary between lenders. The focus goes deeper than just your headline salary and looks at your overall financial resilience' advises Sonya Matharu, founder and adviser at The Mortgage Atelier.
The stricter the assessment, the more challenging it will be to borrow the amount you want. But now we're starting to see some lenders make changes.
Incoming changes
Santander recently reduced its mortgage affordability stress test rate which, according to them, will mean homebuyers can borrow between £10,000 and £35,000 more than previously, depending on their earnings and other factors.
Miranda Hickey, mortgage adviser at Meet Margo, shares that 'Atom Bank now consider up to 6x salary on 'prime' and 'near prime' mortgages, which applies to customers with light adverse credit history. Additionally, Precise Mortgages has recently announced improved affordability on their 2- and 3-year fixed rates.'
This is worth noting if you've had some credit blips in the past and you think that a mortgage is out of reach because of them.
We've also seen Nationwide change their criteria and lower rates significantly.
'They've dropped the minimum annual income for sole applicant to £35k on their Helping Hand product which, if you fix for five years, gives you six times income as a first time buyer,' advises Joanna Connolly, broker at The Mortgage Mum. 'April Mortgages, which is relatively new to the market, has introduced 25 per cent more affordability on their products.'
Atom Bank, Precise Mortgages and April Mortgages are lesser-known lenders and you can only access their products through a mortgage broker - but they could have the right product for you, so don't immediately discount them.
Innovation in the mortgage market
We're starting to see new types of mortgage products too.
There are now those that help you reduce the mortgage that you need, like Gen H's New Build Boost scheme for anyone buying a new property through Persimmon homes. With this scheme, you can put down a 5 per cent deposit, get an 80 per cent LTV mortgage and Gen H will give you a 15 per cent equity loan - making it more possible that you'll pass an affordability assessment.
Products exist too that allow you to purchase a property with just a one per cent deposit, such as Accord's mortgage product for houses and flats worth up to £500,000 - with just a £5,000 deposit.
It's even possible to buy a home with no deposit at all. Unsurprisingly, with no deposit your options are limited. One lender stepping into that gap is Skipton Building Society with their Track Record mortgage product.
'This is for those who are able to show a track record of affording their full rent but whom haven't been able to save for a deposit' advises Annie Ryan, mortgage and protection advisor at Barfield Financial.
For this type of product, the risk of negative equity - borrowing more than the property is worth - is high and needs to be at the forefront of your mind, to start overpaying as soon as possible.
Future outlook
It seems that lenders are trying to do what their name suggests...lend. They're changing affordability assessments and thinking creatively about how they can lend responsibly, but also lend more.
If you'll be applying for a mortgage in the next couple of years, it's important to get the right information early on.
Trying to navigate the mortgage market isn't easy. Having an advisor on your side, testing out what's possible for you even before you're ready to apply, can be priceless. It'll also save you setting your heart on a property outside of your reach - or advising you when matters might have changed in your favour.
Ms Matharu shares one such incident as a final reminder that change works both ways: 'When I re-ran the numbers for a client using the exact same data from October 2024, their borrowing potential changed dramatically. Same profile. Same income. A completely different outcome. It's a reminder that borrowing potential isn't fixed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Preparing for BNPL regulation: What firms need to do now: By Ben O'Brien
The arrival of formal regulation for Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) products is no longer a question of if, but when. With the Treasury's May 2025 consultation response, the direction is this: by mid-2026, third-party BNPL lenders will fall within the scope of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This change brings with it a full set of regulatory requirements—covering affordability, creditworthiness, redress, disclosures, and governance. While many firms are familiar with the general framework, the pace and detail of implementation demand serious attention. Risk leaders now face a critical window to build a strategy that aligns commercial goals with regulatory readiness. Scope of the new BNPL regime From mid-2026, third-party BNPL providers must be authorised by the FCA and comply with its rules on affordability, creditworthiness, consumer duty, complaints, disclosures, and more: Mandatory, proportionate affordability and creditworthiness checks Firms must demonstrate verifiable checks at the point of decisioning, aligned to individual circumstances, not just product type. Firms must demonstrate verifiable checks at the point of decisioning, aligned to individual circumstances, not just product type. Access to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) BNPL customers can now escalate complaints to FOS, increasing the importance of auditable redress processes and timely resolution. BNPL customers can now escalate complaints to FOS, increasing the importance of auditable redress processes and timely resolution. Tailored disclosure requirements for digital-first products The FCA will introduce a bespoke regime focused on real-world comprehension — not just information delivery. Firms will need to test and evidence understanding. The FCA will introduce a bespoke regime focused on real-world comprehension — not just information delivery. Firms will need to test and evidence understanding. Extension of Section 75 protections to BNPL agreements Providers will be jointly liable for qualifying claims, requiring clear merchant oversight, governance controls, and capital planning to manage new exposure. While third-party BNPL is the initial focus, merchant-offered BNPL products remain outside the perimeter for now. This exemption, based on Article 60F(2) of the Regulated Activities Order, is under review and could be revisited if scale or harm increases. What this means for compliance and risk leaders The FCA isn't looking for surface-level compliance. It expects firms to demonstrate that processes are working and that consumers are genuinely protected. Affordability frameworks must evolve Checks must be proportionate and verifiable, with models recalibrated to reflect customer circumstances. Even low-value lending must evidence the potential for harm reduction. Complaint handling will need to be FOS-ready This includes robust audit trails, clear redress pathways, MI reporting on themes, and training on FOS processes. Joint liability introduces new exposure Providers must enhance governance around merchant partnerships, define liability clearly in contracts, and plan for potential claims in their capital models. Joined-up governance is essential Effective programmes will require close collaboration across credit, compliance, legal, product, and ops teams—with clear ownership under SM&CR. Disclosures must reflect real-world understanding It's not just about format. The FCA expects firms to test, monitor, and evidence comprehension—particularly for vulnerable customers. Making best use of the Temporary Permissions Regime The FCA will launch a Temporary Permissions Regime (TPR) to support the transition. Providers must be ready to act quickly when the window opens. Prepare for registration Ensure that internal records, model documentation, and business models are clearly aligned with regulatory expectations. Conduct a readiness assessment Review decisioning processes, affordability checks, complaints management, and financial crime controls. Plan for dual-track execution Meet TPR requirements while simultaneously building toward full authorisation. Engage early with the FCA Establish open communication lines to reduce ambiguity and show proactivity. Plan for contingencies Prepare wind-down plans, customer messaging, and backup procedures in case of registration delays or rejections. Innovation and consumer protection can coexist The decision to exclude some legacy Consumer Credit Act requirements reflects the unique nature of BNPL: short-term, interest-free, and often accessed via digital channels. This creates space for a more relevant, user-centric approach to disclosures but it also raises the bar. Risk and compliance teams should work with product, legal, and design leads to ensure communications are: Integrated into real customer journeys Mobile-friendly and accessible Prompted by user behaviour Supported by outcome-based testing and complaints data Those who treat disclosures as a compliance task may struggle. Those who invest in relevance and usability will have stronger customer engagement and defensibility. Merchant carve-out and the risk of market distortion The decision to exclude merchant-led BNPL from the regulatory scope has sparked debate. Without oversight, merchant-offered credit could create competitive asymmetry and raise consumer protection concerns. Risk leaders should: Monitor merchant product developments and prepare for potential perimeter expansion Review all third-party merchant partnerships for regulatory dependencies Revisit financial promotions and credit broking arrangements, particularly where merchants promote BNPL products without broking permissions Regulatory costs and anticipated market impact The Treasury's impact assessment estimates: An Equivalent Annual Net Direct Cost to Business (EANDCB) of £2.3 million A Net Present Value of -£20.1 million over the assessment period over the assessment period Authorisation application fees: £5,000 to £25,000 Annual supervision fees: £10,000 to £50,000 Technology upgrades: £500,000 to £2 million per provider for systems supporting affordability, reporting, and complaints per provider for systems supporting affordability, reporting, and complaints Section 75 exposure: Estimated at 0.5% to 1.2% of transaction values With the UK's BNPL market valued at £20 billion annually, sector-wide exposure to Section 75 alone could exceed £100 million. Consolidation is expected. Government modelling suggests 20–30% of providers may exit the market post-regulation. But with global BNPL volumes growing rapidly, those who remain stand to benefit from a stronger, more trusted marketplace. How leading firms are responding Some providers have already started adjusting: Klarna Following regulatory scrutiny in Sweden, Klarna UK introduced income verification, real-time spend tracking, and risk-based onboarding. Monzo Flex Built affordability into product design from the outset, with integrated credit reporting and real-time tracking. PayPal Adopted a cross-functional compliance strategy with specialist teams, training, and documentation of governance processes. The clock is ticking and the gap between those who prepare and those who delay will widen fast. For risk leaders, this is a chance to go beyond baseline compliance, strengthening frameworks, improving customer outcomes, and shaping the future of BNPL in a regulated environment.
The Independent
11 hours ago
- The Independent
How much the average house price has changed in your region
Halifax reports a 0.4 per cent drop (£1,150) in average UK house prices between April and May, but property values have increased by over £7,000 in the last year. The annual rate of house price growth slowed to 2.5 per cent in May, down from 3.2 per cent in April, contrasting with Nationwide 's report of a 0.5 per cent increase in property values. Halifax indicates the housing market is largely stable, with average prices down only 0.2 per cent since the start of the year, absorbing the spring stamp duty surge. Tom Bill from Knight Frank notes that demand was front-loaded due to April's stamp duty deadline, leading to downward pressure on house prices. Halifax states the average house prices around the country include East Midlands (£244,754), Eastern England (£334,720), London (£542,017), North East (£175,174), North West (£240,823), South East (£391,253), South West (£304,519), West Midlands (£260,118), Yorkshire and the Humber (£213,983).
Coin Geek
14 hours ago
- Coin Geek
UK updates enforcement guide for heightened transparency
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... The United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the final revisions to its Enforcement Guide on Tuesday after a consultation on proposed measures to streamline the guide and increase transparency. The updated enforcement guide's main highlight is that the FCA has formally upheld the existing 'exceptional circumstances' test for announcing investigations into regulated and listed firms while adding three new conditions under which investigations will be announced. Under the existing 'exceptional circumstances' test, the FCA considers a public announcement about an investigation desirable if it will maintain public confidence in the financial system or the market, protect consumers or investors, prevent widespread malpractice, help the investigation itself, for example, by bringing forward witnesses, or maintain the smooth operation of the market. In its final update, published on June 3, the FCA identified three additional situations, or 'circumstances,' where 'there was broad support for increased transparency': The first was where, in an investigation of suspected unauthorized financial services or offenses relating to unregulated activity, an announcement would help warn consumers and/or aid in the investigation; The second relates to cases where the investigation has been disclosed publicly by the subject or an affiliated entity, regulatory body, government, or public body; The final new situation relates to 'anonymized announcements,' which do not name or identify the subject of the investigation, which could help educate the public on misconduct being investigated by the FCA. According to the regulator, this updated guide will help it achieve 'greater transparency' in its enforcement investigations and provide firms and consumers with a more user-friendly document. 'We will continue to improve the pace and focus of our investigations, increasing the impact of our work for the benefit of consumers and markets, and therefore the wider economy,' said the FCA. It added that the updated enforcement guide, including the three new exceptional circumstances, will only apply to investigations launched on or after June 3. Who it affects and what it means for digital assets The FCA policy statement and revised enforcement guide are relevant to all firms under the regulator's oversight, including those authorized by or registered with FCA, those carrying out designated activities, and relevant securities issuers. Currently, this does not apply to the majority of digital asset companies operating in the U.K., as the sector remains largely unregulated in the country. However, this may be soon to change. In recent months, the U.K. Treasury and FCA have upped the tempo of work towards a digital asset regulatory framework that they hope to finalize later this year. While the details of the framework are not yet clear, it's almost certain that the vast majority of the digital asset space, including exchanges, dealers, and agents, will fall under the jurisdiction of the FCA, with the possible exception of 'systemic stablecoins,' which will likely fall under the Prudential Regulation Authority, the U.K.'s bank and insurance sector regulator. This means that by 2026, the FCA enforcement guide and its exceptional circumstances test for announcing investigations will be extremely relevant for most digital asset companies operating in the country. The consultation The FCA first published its enforcement guide in 2007. Since then, it has grown significantly, with the regulator consulting on proposed measures to update and streamline the guide in February 2024 and November 2024. The consultation included proposals for a new investigation publicity policy to provide a 'measured increase in transparency' under a new 'public interest' test. However, following significant criticism of the proposed public interest test—also referred to as the 'name and shame' policy—from industry participants and lawmakers, the FCA decided to stick with the exceptional circumstances test while adding a few more circumstances to the list. In terms of the next steps, the FCA said it would continue to monitor relevant data and stakeholder feedback while assessing the revised enforcement guide's impact, including on public and industry confidence in its enforcement work. Watch: Richard Baker on engineering a smarter financial world with blockchain title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""> Enforcement Guide Financial Conduct Authority Regulation United Kingdom
