When was India's defense shield S-400 purchased, which government took the initiative?
The Indian military on Saturday refuted all Pakistan's claim that its hypersonic missiles fired from JF-17 fighter jets destroyed India's S-400 air defence system in Adampur. Pakistan's state-run PTV earlier reported that Pakistan Air Force's hypersonic missiles destroyed the S-400 system in Adampur.
S-400 has not only protected India from immediate threats but has also strengthened India's strategic power on the global stage. It has become an important part of India's defense in depth strategy.
India's defence armour S-400 air defence system was purchased from Russia in 2018. This was initiated by the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, when India ignored the pressure of US and signed an agreement to buy five units from Russia. The deal was done for about $ 5.43 billion.
The S-400 air defense system has become an important and strong shield in India's security shield. This system has become an impenetrable security for Indian borders amid air-based challenges from countries like Pakistan and China. Recently, incidents of drones sent from Pakistan being shot down in the air have come to light, in which the role of S-400 has been important. In such a situation, it is important to know when this system was made, which government bought it and why did India need it? Along with this, we will also know how and for how much it was bought.
The S-400 air defence system was developed by Russian government-controlled company Almaz-Antey. Its production began in the 1990s and it was first inducted into the Russian army in 2007. The system became operational during the reign of then-President Vladimir Putin and quickly became the centre of Russia's military power. The system is an upgraded version of the S-300, which has the ability to track and destroy enemy missiles, drones and fighter jets from a distance of 400 kilometres.
Why was there a need for S-400?
India has always faced a dual challenge from Pakistan and China. There is a constant threat of drone, suicide and missile attacks from across the border from Pakistan. At the same time, tension and infiltration incidents are increasing on the LAC (Line of Actual Control) with China. India needed an air defense system that can detect the threat from a distance and neutralize it in seconds. The S-400's multi-tracking capability, high-range missiles and fast reaction time make it suitable for India's needs.
How was the S-400 purchased?
Talks between India and Russia regarding S-400 started in the year 2015. At that time Narendra Modi's government was at the center and the deal was given priority under the supervision of National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. India signed an agreement with Russia in 2018 to buy 5 units of this system. During this time, America warned of imposing strict sanctions (CAATSA), but India gave priority to strategic strength and made a deal with Russia.
How much was S-400 purchased for?
India bought 5 S-400 units from Russia for around $5.43 billion (about Rs 39,000 crore). This defense agreement is one of the most expensive deals in India's history. The cost of one unit is more than $1 billion. Its delivery started in December 2021 and so far India has received three units. The remaining two units will also be delivered to India soon.
How does S-400 work?
The S-400 has four different missile series with ranges of 40, 120, 250 and 400 kilometres. Its multi-function radar, automatic command post and tracking system can simultaneously track 36 targets and target 72. It can also recognise altitude, speed and technologically advanced targets.
There were many attempts from Pakistan to send drones in the border areas of Punjab, Jammu and Rajasthan, which India shot down in the air. In these incidents, S-400 identified the drones from a distance and destroyed them. This system has been specially deployed in those areas where there is a high risk of infiltration or drone attacks from Pakistan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
4 minutes ago
- Mint
India plans compliance reforms, seamless GST refunds, PLI fixes to woo investors
New Delhi: The government is working on a plan to substantially ease compliance burdens and eliminate policy bottlenecks as well as procedural hurdles to attract investments, after India's talks for a trade agreement with the US stalled over the latter's demand for greater market access to the politically-sensitive agriculture and dairy sectors. The government has asked 37 of its ministries to submit a detailed report on the key compliance requirements that are creating roadblocks for manufacturers, exporters, investors and small enterprises, hurting their ability to conduct their businesses smoothly, three government officials directly involved in the ongoing consultations said on the condition of anonymity. One of the key areas under discussion to strengthen the domestic manufacturing base is reforming the GST reimbursement mechanism on the lines of the income tax refund, where an assessee gets refunds soon after the verification of their returns in an automatic, seamless manner, the first of the three officials cited earlier said. During discussions with officials from various ministries and separately with exporters and manufacturers, a critical concern that was flagged was the absence of an automatic refund mechanism after disputes flagged with a red alert notice are resolved, the second person said. 'Traders currently have to apply afresh to claim refunds even after the dispute is settled and the red alert is removed, creating an unnecessary compliance burden." Queries sent to the ministries of commerce, finance, external affairs, the prime minister's office, and the GST secretariat remained unanswered till press time. There remain a few challenges for GST refunds, particularly for exporters and MSMEs (micro, small and medium enterprises), such as delays in refunds, and procedural complexities that need to be addressed, Hemant Jain, president, PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said. 'For traders, these delays directly translate into higher financial costs, reduced competitiveness, and uncertainty in fulfilling orders. Removing these hurdles will not only improve the ease of doing business but also bolster India's trade efficiency and export growth, especially with rising geopolitical uncertainties," Jain added. As talks with the US for the bilateral trade agreement (BTA) hit a stalemate, president Donald Trump imposed an additional 25% punitive tariff on India for buying Russian oil and weapons, taking the total import duty on Indian goods to 50%. The government is leveraging this trade crisis to fast-track ease-of-doing-business reforms, including a single-window clearance system inspired by passport services, and simplified procedures for land acquisition and contract management, according to a Mint report on 9 August. As of 30 June, total direct and indirect tax arrears in India amounted to over ₹54.53 trillion, the government informed Parliament on 5 August. In a written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha, minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary stated that pending indirect tax arrears stood at more than ₹7.01 trillion, while direct tax arrears were over ₹47.52 trillion. 'The delay in processing GST refunds has been a significant concern for businesses, particularly exporters and manufacturers, as it affects their working capital and cash flow," said Abhash Kumar, trade economist and assistant professor of economics at Delhi University. 'Other proposals include easing incentives reimbursement norms, softening rules for opening bank accounts for Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card holders, and removing redundant approvals for foreign investors," said the third person. The government is also keen on simplifying the claims procedures under the production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme, designed to boost domestic manufacturing. 'Easing procedural challenges in claiming incentives under the PLI scheme is a key focus for the government. The aim is to make the process hassle-free, encouraging more investments that will boost the manufacturing sector and create employment opportunities," this person added. The priority is to maintain the momentum of manufacturing to boost employment and sustain domestic consumption, this person said. Perhaps due to the cumbersome process of claiming incentives under the PLI scheme, many beneficiaries are hesitant to come forward and claim their dues. As a result, as of June 2025, only ₹21,534 crore of the allocated ₹1.90 trillion had been disbursed, with companies producing just 37% of the targeted goods. The PLI schemes, covering sectors such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, food processing, and specialty steel, have attracted investments totaling ₹1.76 trillion and generated over 1.2 million direct and indirect jobs. The disbursement has been uneven across sectors. For instance, the electronics and pharmaceutical sectors received about 70% of the total incentives for FY25, amounting to ₹5,732 crore and ₹2,328 crore, respectively. In contrast, the telecom sector has seen a slower uptake, with only 21 out of 42 eligible firms receiving a total of ₹1,162 crore in incentives as of 31 March. As the government discusses a comprehensive policy reset to boost manufacturing and attract investment, it is also consulting export promotion councils and manufacturers to rework India's export strategy, according to a Mint report dated 2 August. This development follows a deadlock in the BTA negotiations between India and the US, which have been ongoing since June, Mint reported on 11 June. The new export plan focuses on diversifying into key markets where India has or is close to finalizing free trade agreements (FTAs), including the UK, with which India recently signed an FTA, and the European Union, where talks are in the final stages with a deal expected before year-end. Other target markets include the UAE, Australia, Japan, and South Korea, all of which have existing FTAs with India. The measures are an attempt to protect India's economic growth, which some economists fear could slip by 20 to 30 basis points to around 6.2% in the current fiscal year if the new tariffs are enacted. 'The impact on GDP may not be dramatic, but we could see growth closer to 6.2–6.3% in FY26," said Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda. Key sectors such as textiles, which accounts for $10.91 billion in exports to the US, engineering goods ($19.16 billion), agriculture ($2.53 billion), gems and jewellery ($9.94 billion), leather ($948.47 million), marine products ($2.68 billion), and plastics ($1.92 billion) could face serious trouble if the 50% US tariff continues for along. Exports in these categories could fall by as much as 40% if the 50% tariff remains in place for an extended period. India exported goods worth $86.5 billion to the US in FY25, accounting for 20% of the country's total merchandise exports of $433.56 billion during the year. India's total agricultural exports to the US stood at $2.53 billion in FY25, up 19.3% from $2.12 billion in FY24.
Mint
4 minutes ago
- Mint
Split with US: Fallout worries top officials
The Centre is increasingly concerned about the potential impact of worsening relations with the US on the large Indian diaspora, particularly in the tech sector, people aware of the discussions said. Senior officials told a parliamentary panel that they were concerned about the fallout on Indian professionals and students in the US including job losses and tighter immigration policies. This comes at a time when India and the US have differed over market access for various American goods, and the US has objected to India's purchase of Russian oil. The concerns were flagged by the government, represented by senior officials such as foreign secretary Vikram Misri, commerce secretary Sunil Barthwal, and India's chief negotiator for the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) with the US Rajesh Agarwal, during a recent meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs. The officials told the committee, chaired by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, that the trade logjam may impact Indian professionals working in the US, said one of the three people cited above. The Indian diaspora contributes significantly through remittances, which extending India's soft power and acting as a crucial buffer against global economic uncertainties. While the absolute number of Indian students and workers in the US is not available, it is estimated to be in the hundreds of thousands. Queries emailed to the ministries of external affairs, commerce, and Tharoor remained unanswered. The officials' alert comes as new data highlights a cooling job market for foreign workers in the US. Registrations for Indian H-1B visas for 2026 dropped by 27% to 358,000, and were more than 54% lower than the prior year. Only 120,141 of these registrations were selected to move forward, well above the annual 85,000 visa cap. The H-1B programme is a critical pathway for Indian tech workers seeking jobs in the US. "Strained trade ties could bring tighter visa rules, higher compliance demands, and caution in hiring, especially in tech and professional services," said Sonal Arora, country manager, GI Group Holding, a global staffing solutions provider. 'But with their adaptability, strong professional networks, and proven expertise, Indian professionals are likely to adjust quickly, find new opportunities, and continue playing a key role in strengthening economic and cultural connections," said Arora. The US has recently ramped up pressure on India in trade talks, imposing a 25% tariff on certain Indian goods in late July and a second 25% tariff on August 6 as a penalty for India's continued purchase of Russian oil. The second tariff is set to take effect just as a US negotiating team arrives in New Delhi for another round of talks on 25 August. India's remittances have more than doubled from $55.6 billion in 2010–11 to $118.7 billion in 2023–24. According to the Reserve Bank of India's Sixth Round of Remittances Survey, these inflows have financed around half of India's merchandise trade deficit and have generally remained higher than gross FDI, making them a stable source of external financing. After a pandemic-induced dip of 3.6% in 2020–21, remittances rebounded strongly between 2021–22 and 2023–24, growing at an average annual rate of 14.3%. Also, the remittances sent back home by Indians working abroad registered a 14% rise in FY25 to a record $135.46 billion. Indians working abroad sent home a record $129.4 billion in 2024. The RBI said the inflows, classified under 'private transfers," accounted for more than 10% of total inflows. The government also informed the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs that the US has negotiated tough terms with all countries with which it has finalized bilateral trade deals. Citing agreements with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the EU, officials noted that while the additional tariffs on these countries have been adjusted or reduced, they have not been fully removed despite the substantial concessions obtained from them. As India remains firm on its stance of not bringing non-negotiable issues to the negotiating table, the US imposed a 25% duty on 30 July, effective from 7 August, and announced an additional 25% duty as a penalty for buying oil from Russia on 6 August. The new 25% duty is set to come into force from 27 August, just a few days after a US team of negotiators is scheduled to begin the sixth round of negotiations from 25 August in New Delhi.
The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Russia-Ukraine conflict: Donald Trump eyes three-way meeting with Putin, Zelensky
U.S. President Donald Trump said Wednesday he would seek a three-way meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin immediately after his Alaska summit with the Russian leader aimed at ending the three-year war in Ukraine. Mr. Trump spoke after what he described as a "very good" call with European leaders, including Mr. Zelensky -- even as Russian forces made their biggest advance into the Ukrainian president's country in more than a year. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Mr. Trump told reporters as he was questioned about the face-to-face in the Alaskan city of Anchorage with his Russian counterpart, set for Friday. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there." The high-stakes summit comes with Mr. Trump struggling to broker an end to the conflict, and Mr. Zelensky and his European allies earlier urged the Republican to push for a ceasefire. The stepped-up Russian offensive, and the fact Mr. Zelensky has not been invited to Anchorage, have heightened fears that Trump and Putin could strike a deal that forces painful concessions from Ukraine. The U.S. leader promised dozens of times during his 2024 election campaign to end the conflict on his first day in office but has made scant progress towards securing a peace deal. He threatened "secondary sanctions" on Russia's trading partners over its invasion of Ukraine but his deadline for action came and went last week with no measures announced. - 'Severe consequences' - Mr. Trump warned Wednesday that he would take a follow-up meeting off the table if he felt Putin was acting in bad faith. "There may be no second meeting because, if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting," Mr. Trump said. According to an AFP analysis of battlefield data from the U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War, Russian forces made their biggest 24-hour advance into Ukraine in more than a year on Tuesday. As the war rages on in eastern Ukraine, Mr. Zelensky flew to Berlin and joined Chancellor Friedrich Merz on an online call with other European leaders, and the NATO and European Union chiefs, in which they talked to Trump and urged a united stance against Russia. The consensus was for Mr. Trump to secure a ceasefire, and Mr. Trump said Russia would face "severe consequences" if it didn't halt its offensive. But Mr. Zelensky also voiced doubt about Moscow's intentions, saying: "I have told my colleagues -- the U.S. president and our European friends -- that Mr. Putin definitely does not want peace." Mr. Trump on Monday played down the possibility of a breakthrough in Alaska but said he expected "constructive conversations" with Mr. Putin. "This is really a feel-out meeting a little bit," Mr. Trump said. But he added that eventually "there'll be some swapping, there'll be some changes in land". Merz said Ukraine is ready to negotiate "on territorial issues" but stressed that legal recognition of Russian occupations "would not be up for debate". After the call, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said Europe, the United States and NATO had "strengthened the common ground for Ukraine" while NATO head Mark Rutte declared: "The ball is now in Putin's court." - 'Wool over our eyes' - The Russian foreign ministry had earlier branded the frantic round of diplomacy "politically and practically insignificant" and an attempt at "sabotaging" US and Russian efforts to end the conflict. Despite the upbeat comments by European leaders, Russia's offensive in eastern Ukraine was gaining speed and seizing ground Wednesday. Russia has made rapid advances this week in a narrow but important section of the front line in Ukraine. The AFP data analysis showed that the Russian army took or claimed 110 square kilometers (42.5 square miles) on August 12 compared to the previous day. It was the most since late May 2024. Ukrainian soldiers in Kramatorsk, an eastern city about 20 kilometers (12 miles) from the front, said they had low expectations for Trump's meeting with Putin. Artem, a 30-year-old serviceman, said the war would likely continue for "a long time." "Putin is massing an army, his army is growing, he is stockpiling weapons, he is pulling the wool over our eyes."
