Reform UK wins more council seats in Norfolk
There were only 14 votes in it between Fry and the Liberal Democrat candidate Crystal Colwell. Turnout for the ward, which covers one of the most deprived estates in the Borough, was 17%. The result for Reform was more convincing in North Lynn, with Moore winning by 125 votes. Although the turnout there was lower - at 13%.Moore, a businessman and life coach who lives in King's Lynn, joined Reform 12 months ago."I'm a realist. I want to help the people I'll represent and make a difference," he said."It's a mistake to go into a place and tell them this is what they need."Until I speak with members of the community I won't know what I'm going to focus on."The Tories denied that the party was on the retreat in west Norfolk, saying it just had not been possible to find candidates to field.Reform has a total of 11 councillors across the various local authorities in Norfolk.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Epping hotel controversy: 13 councils to jump on ruling to remove asylum seekers
A wave of local authorities are vowing to block asylum seekers being housed in hotels after Epping Forest District council won a shock victory in the High Court following weeks of protests Nigel Farage has claimed that all councils controlled by Reform UK will "do everything in their power" to block asylum hotels being set up in their areas after yesterday's controversial Epping ruling. Ministers are bracing for further legal challenges from councils across the country after the Essex local authority won a High Court injunction to evict asylum seekers from the Bell Hotel. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could "interfere" with its legal obligations, while lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a dangerous "precedent", leaving authorities with few options for providing emergency accommodation for migrants. The shock ruling followed weeks of at-times violent protests outside the hotel, after a man from Afghanistan was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Now, the Reform UK leader has vowed his party would seek to block any hotels being used for asylum processing in the council areas it currently controls - and a Tory council has already pledged to follow Epping Forest council's lead. Which councils are planning to block asylum seekers? The following Tory and Reform councils and mayoral areas have indicated that they are going to take action over asylum seekers staying in local accommodation: Broxbourne Derbyshire Doncaster Durham Greater Lincolnshire (mayoralty) Hull & East Yorkshire (mayoralty) Kent Lancashire Lincolnshire North Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire Staffordshire West Northamptonshire What has Nigel Farage said? In a column for the Telegraph this morning, the Reform UK leader urged people to hold "peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels" and "put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out". He added: "I can say today that the English local councils controlled by the party I lead, Reform UK, will be doing everything in their power to follow Epping's lead." What will the government do? Number 10 has already announced plans to move asylum seekers from hotels into houses of multiple occupancy into other forms of accommodation by the end of this parliament - but the new ruling is likely to give the Home Office a headache as to what to do in the meantime. Security minister Dan Jarvis told Times Radio today: "We're looking at a range of different contingency options following from a legal ruling that took place yesterday, and we'll look closely at what we're able to do." Epping Forest council had successfully argued that the use of the Bell Hotel for asylum seekers was not a permitted use of the hotel for planning purposes. Asked whether other migrant hotels have the proper planning permission, Mr Jarvis said: "Well, we'll see over the next few days and weeks. Other local authorities will be considering whether they wish to act in the same way that Epping (Forest) District Council have."I think the important point to make is that nobody really thinks that hotels are a sustainable location to accommodate asylum seekers. That's precisely why the Government has made a commitment that, by the end of this Parliament, we would have phased out the use of them."
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer has now reached Sunak-levels of unpopularity: how long can he last?
Loyalty, it used to be said, was the Conservative Party's secret weapon. It was loyalty to the leader, as well as the party, that got them through a series of crises and scandals that less disciplined parties could not withstand. Even when that loyalty was fractured in an unprecedented and dramatic fashion – in the removal of Mrs Thatcher as leader in 1990 – the party quickly united behind the new leadership and pulled off an unlikely general election triumph in 1992 as a result. But that mantle of loyalty, so fruitlessly squandered and devalued by a generation of Tory MPs in the last three decades, has now been handed to the Labour Party. And as this Government's approval ratings plumb the depths of popularity that sealed Rishi Sunak's fate just before the electorate kicked him out of office, Keir Starmer is going to have to rely on party loyalty more than ever. Consider this: until Jeremy Corbyn's arrival as Labour leader in 2015, no Labour leader had been formally challenged since 1988, when Tony Benn took a tilt at Neil Kinnock, who saw off the Left-wing upstart by securing nearly 90 per cent of the party's support. The 2016 challenge to Corbyn occurred in unique circumstances and was the lesser of the radical solutions Labour MPs had considered in response to the hard Left's unforeseen takeover of the party. For the three decades between those two events, Labour leaders were considered untouchable. And despite Starmer's many difficulties, that remains the case today. There are certainly plenty of MPs who would rather he resigned before the next election, allowing a more convincing successor to try to hold on to the party's governing majority; this would also allow the Prime Minister a chance to seize his place in history as only the second Labour Prime Minister to retire undefeated. But there is zero chance of a formal challenge to his leadership. It's just not the done thing in the Labour Party, especially not to a man who has just won a three-figure majority from a position of near electoral extinction at the previous election. But that doesn't mean that there will be no briefing against him by malcontents, and also by apparently loyal ministers whose grievance is hidden behind a mask of loyalty. The Parliamentary Labour Party is nervous. Well, of course it is. It would be weird if it were not. Languishing nearly ten points behind Reform in almost every poll is not the ideal place for any Government elected barely a year ago, albeit on a wave of apathy rather than enthusiasm. And so journalists eager for salacious gossip will listen attentively as unhappy backbenchers relate dreadful anecdotes about how unpopular the Government is on the doorsteps of their constituencies, and of how the antidote could be for Starmer to be replaced. Much of this briefing will be done anonymously, some of it won't. The Liverpool MP Ian Byrne is not the shrinking violet that many of his colleagues are, and has been outspoken in his criticism of the Government. What is less predictable is the end result of all this unhappiness. In the absence of a formal challenge to Starmer at this year's (or next year's) party conference, his detractors will be hoping that the polls will simply pile up too much bad news to withstand. This is the Labour way, to cross one's fingers and hope for the best, rather than to plot any specific course of action. It's what happened under Gordon Brown, who never once looked in danger of winning the next general election, and who was constantly briefed against by MPs and cabinet colleagues in the forlorn hope he would stand aside and give the Government a fighting chance of re-election. Will this summer's discontent produce a more substantial, not to say more electorally beneficial result? There are certainly plenty of Labour backbenchers who maintain a belief that Starmer can yet turn things around in time for the next election, though what this faith is based on remains unspecified. But the eye-watering levels of disapproval revealed by the latest polling makes Starmer's position all the more vulnerable. Not only is he facing the public perception that he has no concrete principles of his own, and that he is too willing to reverse direction in the face of parliamentary rebellions from his own side. He is also facing unprecedented rival challenges to his party's position as the country's chief recipient of Left-wing support. Aside from the imminent launch (or relaunch) of Jeremy Corbyn's new party, Starmer faces an erosion of his party's support from the Greens and even the Liberal Democrats. All of this is in the context of an insurgent Right-wing party led by Nigel Farage that looks set to displace the Conservatives and present a real populist challenge to the political establishment. Is Starmer up to the challenge? It is the key question that will be asked by Labour backbenchers and activists as the year draws to a close and the next set of local and devolved elections hove into view. Much of their judgment will await those results in May. Unless Starmer has plans to unveil a whole new side to his personality, one that reveals a previously hidden talent for strategic policy and communications, that judgment will be damning.
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Bolivia's Quiroga would grant resource ownership rights, eyes US trade
LA PAZ, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Bolivian presidential candidate Jorge "Tuto" Quiroga said he would dole out ownership stakes in key natural resources like lithium if elected in October as part of sweeping economic reforms, and signalled a willingness to improve ties with the United States. Quiroga, 65, emerged as the leading conservative contender after placing second in the August 17 election, with roughly 28% of the vote in a crowded field of eight candidates. He will face centrist Senator Rodrigo Paz in a runoff on October 19. "We're going to change everything, hydrocarbons, mining, lithium, tax," Quiroga told Reuters in an exclusive interview from his home in La Paz, his first with foreign media since securing a spot in the second round. Quiroga said his conservative Alianza Libre, or Freedom Alliance, coalition is preparing constitutional reforms and already building congressional alliances to push through legislation quickly. Among his proposals is a plan to grant Bolivians individual ownership rights over natural resources - including the battery metal lithium and natural gas - via a mutual fund structure. "The lithium will belong to each and every citizen," he said. "Not to the state, not to my government, but to individuals as shareholders." Bolivia holds vast reserves of lithium and natural gas, but production has lagged under nearly two decades of state control. Quiroga said Sunday's legislative results marked a turning point. Preliminary counts suggest his pro-market coalition and Paz's Christian Democrat party will control 82 of the 130 seats in the Lower House — enough to pass laws requiring a two-thirds majority. Quiroga expressed an openness to work across party lines to turn around the economy, which has been hurt by high inflation and government spending that has drained hard currency reserves. Bolivia's gas exports, the key source of foreign income, have halved in the 10 years to 2025 as producers have failed to find new gas fields. Quiroga briefly served as interim president from 2001 to 2002 and has long been a prominent opposition figure. Known by his childhood nickname "Tuto," he has campaigned on promises of radical change, including deep spending cuts and privatization of state-run firms. Critics say his proposals may alienate Bolivia's Indigenous majority, which remains wary of the traditional right. Quiroga has run several times, never making a runoff. He lost twice to former president Evo Morales. Speaking from his apartment in a La Paz neighbourhood dotted with embassies, he said that the second round would be an opportunity for people to tune in. "They can judge who has the capacity, credibility, and strength to deliver the dramatic change Bolivia needs," he said. Quiroga also said he would seek to thaw long-frosty ties with Washington, after years of Bolivia's alignment with China, Iran and Russia. However, he emphasized a pragmatic approach. "I will not have ideological lineups of any kind," he said. He supports pursuing a free trade agreement with Washington, though acknowledged it may be "impossible" under the Trump administration. Quiroga said if elected he would pursue legal action against former president Morales, who dominated Bolivian politics for two decades but now is wanted on alleged child abuse and terrorism charges. Morales denies the allegations and says they are politically motivated. "He has real charges. With me, the rule of law applies," Quiroga said.
