
Iranians fear return to war one month after ceasefire with Israel
'I don't think this ceasefire will last,' said Peyman, a 57-year-old resident of Shiraz in southern Iran, one of numerous cities hit last month as Israel unleashed an unprecedented bombing campaign against its longtime rival.
The Israeli offensive targeted key nuclear facilities and military sites, killing top commanders, nuclear scientists, and hundreds of others, while also wreaking havoc in some residential areas. The attacks triggered the fiercest fighting in history between the two adversaries, ending with a ceasefire announced on June 24.
Israel has signaled it could return to fighting if Iran attempts to rebuild its nuclear facilities or take any action deemed threatening, such as moving to develop a nuclear weapon — an ambition Tehran has consistently denied. Iran, in turn, has vowed to deliver a harsh response if attacked again.
Nuclear diplomacy with the United States — which briefly joined the war with strikes on Iranian nuclear sites — has stalled, deepening uncertainty about what lies ahead.
'I am scared the war will start again,' said Hamid, a 54-year-old government employee who gave only his first name. 'It will lead to the death of more innocent people and the destruction of the country's infrastructure.'
During the war, Israel struck major Iranian cities including the capital Tehran, hitting military sites, government buildings, and the state television headquarters. More than 1,000 people were killed in Iran, according to authorities. Retaliatory missile and drone attacks killed 29 people in Israel.
Many residents fled Tehran, seeking refuge elsewhere in the country, even though few regions were untouched by the blasts and smoke-filled skies.
Nearly a month later, a series of fires that broke out across Iran — including one at a major oil facility — have triggered speculation, which officials were quick to dismiss, denying any acts of sabotage.
'This war really frightened me,' said 78-year-old housewife Golandam Babaei from western Kermanshah province. She lived through the Iran–Iraq War of the 1980s, a painful memory for many of her generation.
'I kept telling myself, please God, do not let the past repeat itself,' Babaei told AFP.
The war with Israel, although much shorter and fought mostly with air strikes and missiles rather than ground forces, revived grim memories of the conflict with Iraq. That war, triggered by an Iraqi invasion in 1980, killed an estimated 500,000 people on both sides. It featured chemical warfare and prolonged front-line bombardments, scarring Iranians in the then-nascent Islamic Republic born out of the 1979 revolution.
For decades since, Iran had largely managed to keep conflicts away from its own soil. But after the recent 12-day war with Israel, some Iranians feel a renewed sense of vulnerability.
'I kept thinking I don't want to flee again. We have nowhere to go. I cannot run to the mountains like in the past,' said Babaei.
For Ali Khanzadi, a 62-year-old war veteran, the conflict with Israel highlighted a stark difference compared to the 1980s when 'we didn't have any advanced military equipment' to fight the Iraqis.
Khanzadi, who was wounded in battle in 1983, said the war with Israel, while shorter, had a more sinister dimension. Unlike in the past, modern military technology means 'they can kill a child in his sleep remotely using a drone,' he said.
In the face of Israeli threats and attacks, Iranian authorities have repeatedly invoked national unity. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said the offensive was aimed at toppling the its clerical system, and urged Iranian diplomats and military leaders to proceed with 'care and precision' as the country cautiously moves forward.
Tehran has said it remains open to nuclear diplomacy with the United States, which the war had derailed, but officials have demanded unspecified US guarantees to resume negotiations.
Ordinary Iranians appear to share fears that conflict could erupt again.
'I hope that this will not happen,' said Hamid.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
29 minutes ago
- Arab News
Gaza famine a death sentence delivered by global inaction
Famine in Gaza is no longer a speculative threat, nor is it merely a rhetorical tool to shame the international community into action. It is now a brutal, undeniable fact. The situation has evolved from a humanitarian crisis into a full-blown catastrophe and the numbers speak for themselves. According to the UN, 96 percent of Gaza's population faces acute food insecurity. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification warns that at least 500,000 people are living under 'catastrophic' conditions — one step before mass starvation. These are not projections. They are the present realities. Gaza, already strangled by an 18-year blockade, is now walking barefoot into famine under the shadow of total siege and relentless bombardment. The current Israeli assault, which began in October 2023, has not only flattened entire neighborhoods and displaced more than 1.7 million people, it has also systematically targeted the infrastructure that makes survival possible: bakeries, food distribution centers, water facilities and even the UNRWA aid warehouses that once formed the backbone of humanitarian relief. Hospitals are collapsing. Children are dying — not only from bombs, but from hunger. Videos and photographs released by health workers in Khan Younis and northern Gaza show toddlers with protruding ribs, skeletal arms and lifeless eyes. Mothers have been filmed weeping as they try to feed their children with boiled grass and stale bread mixed with animal feed. These are not isolated cases — they are the norm in a place where malnutrition is spreading faster than any ceasefire can catch up. In previous conflicts, Gaza's suffering was often buried under the weight of geopolitical calculations and narratives of moral equivalence. This time, the truth has become too grotesque to ignore. The UN has repeatedly stated that Gaza is on the brink of famine. In June, the World Food Programme declared that 100 percent of Gaza's population is 'food insecure' — a statistic unprecedented in modern times. In March, famine was declared in northern Gaza by multiple humanitarian agencies, citing more than 30 children dying of starvation in just two hospitals. The rest of the deaths go undocumented, with bodies buried under rubble or in makeshift graves. To continue treating Gaza's starvation as a 'pressure tactic' used by Palestinian officials or international nongovernmental organizations is to participate in a lie that masks a genocide in progress. What we are witnessing is not a food crisis born of natural disaster or logistical failure. It is manufactured. It is the deliberate denial of food, water and medicine as a weapon of war — what international law classifies as collective punishment and, in some interpretations, genocide. Let us call it what it is: engineered starvation. And it is working. The scenes unfolding in Gaza are reminiscent of the worst famines in modern history: Ethiopia in the 1980s, Sudan's Darfur and the besieged cities of Syria. But there is one critical difference: never has the international community had such real-time access to the suffering — drone footage, eyewitness testimonies, satellite images — and still failed to meaningfully intervene. We cannot say we did not know. We know everything and yet we are doing nothing. Or worse — we are enabling. Standing with Gaza is no longer a political choice or a symbolic gesture — it is an existential test of our humanity. Hani Hazaimeh The Biden administration continued to send military aid to Israel, including bombs and surveillance technologies, despite multiple reports from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and even former UN officials calling for arms embargoes. European leaders offer lukewarm appeals for 'humanitarian pauses' while failing to impose any meaningful consequences. This is no longer about political alliances, strategic partnerships or counterterrorism narratives. Standing with Gaza is no longer a political choice or a symbolic gesture — it is an existential test of our humanity. In the face of children starving to death on live television, neutrality becomes complicity. Silence becomes endorsement. What is more, supporting Gaza today is not a matter of political affiliation or ideological alignment. It is not reserved for Muslims, Arabs or left-leaning activists. It is a universal moral imperative. Every human being who still believes in dignity, in life, in the right of a child to eat and sleep safely, has a role to play. This is not about Hamas. This is about humanity. The flood has reached its limit. The time for cautious statements and deferred action is over. The international system, including the UN Security Council and major humanitarian agencies, is facing a crisis of legitimacy. If these bodies cannot prevent the slow death of an entire population by hunger, what are they for? What is the value of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights if it cannot be applied to Gaza? What purpose does international law serve if starvation tactics are used with impunity? There must be steps taken — now. First, an immediate and unconditional ceasefire is the only way to begin halting the famine. Second, the complete and unrestricted entry of humanitarian aid must be guaranteed by a binding international resolution, not vague promises. Third, accountability must follow. War crimes, including the deliberate starvation of civilians, must be investigated and prosecuted, no matter the perpetrator. Finally, there is a role for all of us as individuals. Speak up. Do not allow this atrocity to continue in your name. History will remember what we did — or did not do — when Gaza cried out not for help but for bread. In 2025, the world is being tested not just by war but by its own conscience. Will we choose humanity or will we rationalize genocide with politics and diplomatic fatigue? Gaza is dying, not in silence but in full view of the world. Let history record that we saw — and that some of us refused to look away.


Arab News
30 minutes ago
- Arab News
From Tuwaiq to Qasioun: building a bright future with hearts before hands
It has been nearly 15 years since my last trip to Damascus as chairman of the Saudi-Syrian Businessmen Council. Since then, bilateral business and investment activities have been suspended due to the geopolitical situation. Last week, it was a delight to witness the tremendous success of the first investment forum between the two countries, held under the new Syrian leadership and its government. Led by Investment Minister Khalid Al-Falih on the Saudi side, more than 20 government agencies and more than 100 private sector companies from Saudi Arabia participated in the forum. These represented various sectors, including energy, infrastructure, financial services, healthcare, agriculture, and communications and information technology. Approximately 47 agreements worth SR24 billion ($6.4 billion) were signed, covering a wide range of fields, including energy, real estate, finance, logistics, healthcare, and tourism. In his speech, Al-Falih emphasized that the forum reflects the belief that the private sector is a key partner in achieving shared investment goals between the two countries. He encouraged Saudi and international investors to explore opportunities in the Syrian Arab Republic and contribute to its strategic projects, thereby fostering mutual benefits across vital sectors. It is worth noting that the timing of the forum was ideal, especially following the lifting of global sanctions on Syria and the release of the revised investment law. The updated law aims to enhance the investment climate by offering investors more guarantees and incentives, streamlining procedures, and improving transparency. One of the signed agreements was between the Saudi Tadawul Group and the Damascus Securities Exchange, aiming to enhance cooperation in financial technologies, dual listings, data exchange, and the creation of investment funds to boost investment in Syria. Subject to regulatory approval, we at BMG plan to reopen our offices in Damascus, establish a country fund, take family businesses public, and offer advisory services for dual listings between the two exchanges. The new chairman of the Saudi-Syrian Businessmen Council, Mohammed Abu Nayan, who is also the chairman of ACWA Power, said during the forum that Syria and Saudi Arabia are one nation, and that 'we came to Damascus as long-term partners, not just traders. We, as the private sector, are committed to investing in Syria, and we have already begun.' With the direct blessing and endorsement of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa, the path to Syria's economic prosperity has already been laid. Between the iconic Mount Tuwaiq in Riyadh and Mount Qasioun in Damascus, a bright future will be built — by hearts before hands. • Basil M.K. Al-Ghalayini is chairman and CEO of BMG Financial Group.


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Sudan's paramilitaries launch parallel govt, deepening the crisis
CAIRO: A paramilitary group and its allies in Sudan said they formed a parallel government in areas under the group's control, which are located mainly in the western region of Darfur where allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity are being investigated. The move was likely to deepen the crisis in Sudan, which plunged into chaos when tensions between the country's military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, exploded into fighting in April 2023 in the capital, Khartoum and elsewhere in the country. The RSF-led Tasis Alliance appointed Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, the commander of the paramilitary group, as head of the sovereign council in the new administration. The 15-member council serves as head of the state. The RSF grew out of the notorious Janjaweed militias, mobilized two decades ago by then-President Omar Bashir against populations that identify as Central or East African in Darfur. The Janjaweed were accused of mass killings, rapes and other atrocities. In the current war, the RSF has been accused of numerous atrocities. The Biden administration slapped Dagalo with sanctions, saying the RSF and its proxies were committing genocide. The RSF has denied committing genocide. The alliance spokesman Alaa Al-Din Naqd announced the new administration in a video statement from the Darfur city of Nyala, which is controlled by the RSF and its allied Janjaweed. Mohammed Hassan Al-Taishi, a civilian politician who was a member of a military-civilian sovereign council that ruled Sudan following the 2019 overthrow of Al-Bashir, was named as prime minister in the RSF-controlled government. Rebel leader Abdelaziz Al-Hilu, who commands the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) which is active in the southern Kodrofan region, was appointed as Dagalo's deputy in the council. The SPLM-N is a breakaway faction of the SPLM, the ruling party of neighboring South Sudan. The announcement came five months after the RSF and its allies signed a charter in February in Kenya's capital, Nairobi, with the aim of establishing a parallel government in RSF-controlled areas. At the time, many countries, including the US, rejected the RSF efforts and condemned the signing by the paramilitary group and its allies of what they called 'transitional constitution' in the Kenya-hosted conference. The Foreign Ministry of the internationally recognized government in Khartoum condemned the announcement in a statement. It called it a 'fake government' and urged the international community to not engage with the RSF-led administration. The RSF-led move was likely to deepen the division in Sudan. Yasir Arman, a rebel leader, said the move is likely to prolong the conflict and divide Sudan between two rival administrations.