logo
Why Luxury Brands Are Losing Customers And 6 Ways To Win Them Back

Why Luxury Brands Are Losing Customers And 6 Ways To Win Them Back

Forbes5 days ago
People walk past a Louis Vuitton advertisement in front of the high-end department store Plaza 66 in central Shanghai, China. (Photo by Ryan Pyle/Corbis via Getty Images) Corbis via Getty Images
Luxury brands are quietly putting away their bottles of Taittinger as earnings reports are not quite what they expected. Revenue for Gucci is gruesomely down 26%. Versace's bloodbath is almost as bad at 21.2% with Burberry having slightly less to mop up at 17%. Even Bernard Arnault's empire is showing cracks as LVMH slipped 4%. Prada is faring best among the worst with a modest 2% dip. Unsurprisingly, my favorite harness maker, Hermès, continues to gallop ahead of all the others with 7% gain
While analysts study crystal monitors trying to predict what happened and what's happening next, Julius Baer's Global Wealth and Lifestyle Report 2025 suggests a novel idea. HNWI aren't spending less because they're cash-strapped. They're just bored. Value for money has overtaken heritage and innovation as the top priority for European respondents.
"People are being more selective," notes the Julius Baer research. 'Whereas previously they bought high-end goods in many categories, now they focus on fewer categories and are looking for quality rather than quantity.'
They're trading material for memorable. A promotion used to mean a new car. Now, it's a gastronomic tour of Italy. Luxury is evolving from goods-based signifiers to an all-encompassing lifestyle, with the well-heeled crowd now looking for more excitement than a relaunch of the Chanel on The Pavement collection.
McKinsey's State of the Consumer 2025 agrees: more than one-third of global consumers are trading down in some categories to splurge in others. Nineteen percent plan to cut back on non-discretionary spending so they can spend more freely elsewhere. Even among inflation-worried consumers, over one-third still plan to splurge, but these high rollers are mostly in Brazil, China, and the UAE. Apparently, luxury brands assuming they would always be automatic beneficiaries of discretionary spending has gone the way of Anna Wintour's editor-in-chief title.
Qatar, Doha, Villaggio shopping mall, Fendi. (Photo by: Giovanni Mereghetti/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Julius Baer data shows spending still remains high in the Middle East, APAC, and Latin America, while Europe and North America have become more conservative. Even still within these regions, specific categories outperform others.
Business class flights are showing dramatic regional variations. London saw prices surge 28.3% while Milan dropped 16.4%. Mexico City skyrocketed 86.6% while Hong Kong fell 10.6%. Zurich climbed 15.3% but Singapore managed only 6.4% growth. These disparities reflect changing corporate policies as business travel rebounds and leisure travelers occupy previously vacant premium seats. This creates opportunities for luxury brands to partner with travel experiences rather than compete with them for wallet share.
"Health as wealth" continues as a theme, according to Julius Baer, with almost universal interest in longevity among survey respondents. High-net-worth individuals increasingly view healthcare spending as an investment. Luxury brands positioned to capture this trend through wellness partnerships, longevity-focused products, or health-adjacent services can benefit from this spending reallocation.
Geographic nuances matter more than ever. While European luxury spending shows value-for-money priorities, Middle Eastern consumers increased luxury goods spending across multiple categories: 65% spent more on hotels, 62% on fine jewelry, 60% on fine wine, 58% on high-end women's handbags, and 57% on high-end watches.
Meanwhile, in the APAC region, 65% of luxury consumers are increasing healthcare spending, 64% boosting smartphones, 63% spending more on fine jewelry, and 55% increasing fine dining expenditures. Global luxury brands here should consider investing in more co-hosted one-night only fine dining experiences with celebrity chefs, where their best customers are invited to remember the good life also includes a Montblanc pen. Luxury Spending Is Still Out There, Just Not Where Some Luxury Brands Are Looking
The luxury consumer is still passionately pursuing luxury, but they've just reallocated their splurge to places that feel more meaningful, more personal, and more worth it. Brands stuck in status-quo strategy are the ones losing relevance by the quarter. Consumers have changed, and the industry is only now realizing just how far behind it's fallen. Here are six mistakes some luxury brands are making—and exactly how to fix them. 1. Some Luxury Brands Confused Global Reach with Geographic Relevance
The collapse of Chinese tourism revealed a glaring vulnerability in luxury's growth model. Brands overly dependent on tourist-driven sales were hit hardest, while those that had invested in cultivating loyal local clientele weathered the storm with far less turbulence. Hermès's continued global ascent is the result of blending geographic diversification with hyper-local intimacy.
Now's the time to stop treating 'emerging markets' as afterthoughts. The Middle East isn't slowing down as regional consumers are spending across categories with intent. Latin America is quietly becoming one of the most promising engines of growth. If luxury leaders want to future-proof their market position, they must stop chasing passport stamps and start building real roots.
How to Fix It:
Geographic independence doesn't mean global presence. It means local relevance. This means boots-on-the-ground marketing, localized partnerships, and customer service that meets regional expectations. Treating non-Western markets like satellite outposts is a relic of colonialism, which has fallen entirely out of favor. 2. Some Luxury Brands Chased Social Media Instead of Building Trust
Consumers say they don't trust social media for product recommendations, yet nearly 30% in the U.S., UK, and Germany say they've bought luxury brands discovered through it, according to McKinsey. Friends and family remain the most trusted influence source worldwide.
Hermès reads this paradox better than anyone. They don't chase influencers or celebrity noise. Instead, they cultivate desire through scarcity, word-of-mouth, and surgical restraint. Demand is engineered through discipline, not hype.
While competitors flail with declining sales in China and Japan, Hermès grew across regions. Gucci's wholesale channel dropped 42% year-over-year. LVMH, hit by waning Asian tourism, contracted too. Meanwhile, Hermès remained as irresistible as ever simply by saying less.
How to Fix It:
To win in this new era, luxury brands must marry social discovery with trust-rich signals. Awareness might come from a feed, but purchase intent still comes from belief. 3. Some Luxury Brands Raised Prices Without Raising Value
Globally, consumer 'consideration' for luxury brands is down 25%, with younger demographics leading the retreat. Years of unchecked price hikes (often 10% or more annually) have eroded aspirational appeal. Entry-level and core products feel gouged.
Hermès knows how to keep their customers. Their 41.4% operating margins come not from pricing games but production discipline. Every price increase is tied to something real: craftsmanship, materials, detail.
How To Fix It:
If you're going to charge more, earn it . Tie pricing to quality upgrades or experience enhancements. Consumers know the difference between a luxury markup and a cash grab. 4. Some Luxury Brands Still Thinking Luxury Means Objects
The Julius Baer Lifestyle Index, which tracks the cost of premium goods and services across 25 global cities, fell 2% in USD from 2024 to 2025. Historically, luxury prices rise at double the pace of average inflation.
This decline signals is a consequence of consumers pushing back against price hikes that outpaced value. There's only so long you can charge more just because you can, which was the strategy for certain luxury brands now re-evaluating their greed. Hotels, fine dining, and healthcare led regional spending increases, however, while traditional luxury goods were flat or negative.
Interestingly, these variance are geography based. In APAC, 65% of HNWIs increased healthcare spend, 63% spent more on women's fashion, and 55% dined finer. In North America, hotel and fine dining rose sharply at 43% and 35% respectively. The Middle East outpaced them all with 65% spent more on hotels, 60% on fine wine.
Take note: the newest competitor isn't another fashion house. Consider that a Hermès client might now opt for a longevity clinic over a new Kelly. A Porsche prospect might trade the keys for a curated Arctic expedition. The new competition is now a passport stamp, a health optimization protocol, an F1 Grand Prix.
How to Fix it:
Expand the definition of luxury beyond goods. Build partnerships with travel, wellness, or cultural experience providers. Curate memories, not just merchandise. 5. Some Luxury Brands Are Misreading Gen Z's Contradictions
As with any rebellion, the kids are leading it—specifically, Gen Z, according to McKinsey.
Despite 40% of them worrying about their financial future (and half of U.S. Gen Zers having less than a month of savings), they remain the most willing to splurge and take on debt. Thirty-four percent buy on credit, a figure 13 points higher than older generations.
They prioritize apparel (34%) and beauty (29%), happily pay for convenience, and measure identity through achievement. Gen Zers are 73% more likely to define success through career milestones, and 36% more likely to prioritize wealth creation.
Spending by this generation is growing twice as fast as prior generations and is on track to eclipse boomers globally by 2029. By 2035, they'll inject $8.9 trillion into the global economy.
By the way, Gen Z is telling us exactly where they're headed: they're willing to pay for time, ease, and moments that matter. Their premium-spending behavior shows they'll trade cash for convenience.
According to McKinsey, nearly 40 percent of German, UK, and US Gen Z consumers used grocery delivery within the week, pumping up food delivery's share of global food service spending from 9% in 2019 to 21% in 2024.
How to Fix it:
Treat Gen Z as both strivers and spenders. Create ecosystems that reward convenience and tap into their self-identity. They'll splurge. But only when it feels like a good investment in their own narrative. Brands that meet them with seamless, sensory-rich experiences will win their money and their loyalty. 6. Some Luxury Brands Are Ignoring the Experiences Consumers Already Value
The current state of luxury is ripe for creative problem solving, such as cross-category partnerships that continue to keep the brand top of mind. A customer who skips the car upgrade to splurge on luxury travel is a target customer, not a lost prospect. The $40,000 they didn't spend on a new vehicle might now be fueling private villas, spa buyouts, or bespoke retreats. But if a McLaren were waiting at one of those hotels for a weekend test drive, that 'no' to the car becomes a 'not yet.'
Today's luxury winners aren't selling products—they're building ecosystems. Smart partnerships with high-end travel, wellness, and experience providers put brands in the path of the splurge while elevating their cultural relevance.
How To Fix It:
Think like your customer. Partner across categories where splurge spending is already happening—hospitality, wellness, premium travel, even health optimization. Don't compete with their lifestyle—integrate into it. A Crisis Luxury Brands Caused Themselves
NEW YORK - FEBRUARY 09: General view of atmosphere at the opening of the first Hermes Men's Store on Madison Avenue on February 9, 2010 in New York City. (Photo byfor Hermes) getty
The luxury industry's current crisis is a fundamental reordering of consumer priorities. Splurge spending only been reallocated. Today's consumers are recalculating value, shifting spend toward experiences, authenticity, and personal meaning and away from old-school status signaling.
Hermès, as usual, offers the clearest blueprint for how to win in this new landscape. While competitors raced toward accessibility, Hermès doubled down on exclusivity. While others chased tourist dollars, Hermès built local resilience. And while many leaned on manufactured hype, Hermès cultivated genuine desire. Most critically, they understood one key truth: luxury isn't a category, it's a lifestyle. And lifestyle spending isn't confined to handbags and watches.
For luxury CMOs, the path forward starts by abandoning outdated assumptions about consumer loyalty and category dominance. Today's buyer makes intentional trade-offs across categories. They're not just buying objects, they're curating moments.
The real paradox isn't that consumers stopped splurging. It's that too many luxury brands stopped paying attention to where and why the splurges happen. The brands solving this riddle will emerge stronger from this downturn. The ret will keep bleeding market share while hoping for a reversion that's never coming.
We're entering the era of the individual. The luxury consumers' new passionate pursuit of luxury will be characterized by what that consumer believes most true for them, and not what luxury brands dictate it to be.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Tariffs Might Be Impacting the U.S. Trade Deficit
How Tariffs Might Be Impacting the U.S. Trade Deficit

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Tariffs Might Be Impacting the U.S. Trade Deficit

Key Takeaways The U.S. trade deficit fell for the third month as President Donald Trump's tariff policies began taking hold. Census Bureau data showed that both imports and exports declined in June. Economists said that the recent decline mainly reflects normalization in international trade as businesses work through the imported inventory they stocked up on ahead of tariff announcements. While imports from China fell, trade from nearby countries picked up to fill the Donald Trump has said that one of the goals of higher tariffs was to close the U.S. trade deficit with other nations. So far, things appear to be moving in that direction, as the trade deficit in June declined to its lowest level in nearly two years. According to Census Bureau data released Tuesday, the U.S. trade deficit in goods and services was $60.2 billion in June, down more than 16% from May. It's the lowest trade deficit since September 2023. However, tariffs may not be affecting the trade deficit in the way some expected so far. Economists from Wells Fargo said some of the data indicate an 'unwinding of behavioral effects." After Trump unveiled his tariff plans earlier this year, businesses rushed to import products before higher import taxes could be applied, sending the trade deficit soaring. Now, with the tariffs largely set, the trade deficit is beginning to fall back to normal levels. 'Businesses pulled forward demand in Q1, resulting in a massive import surge. With a surplus of product and inventory on hand, imports fell in all three months of the second quarter, ' wrote Wells Fargo economists Shannon Grein and Tim Quinlan. Imports From China Decline, as Do U.S. Exports Still, imports of Chinese products declined by nearly 7% in June despite a trade truce that lowered tariffs. Since the start of the year, the share of imports from China has been more than cut in half, though trading with countries like Indonesia, Malaysia and Taiwan has increased, the data showed. 'Other trading partners in Asia have mostly filled the void, increasing their share by roughly the same amount,' said Matthew Martin, senior economist at Oxford Economics. While overall imports were lower by 3.7% in June, U.S. exports also took a step back. 'Exports are not poised to record strong growth going forward, but stronger foreign currencies and an opening up of foreign markets may bolster U.S. exports—though admittedly this will take time to play out,' wrote Nationwide Financial Markets Economist Oren Klachkin. Read the original article on Investopedia

MEXC Pushes into Southeast Asia With Deal Valuing Indonesian Exchange at $200 Million
MEXC Pushes into Southeast Asia With Deal Valuing Indonesian Exchange at $200 Million

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MEXC Pushes into Southeast Asia With Deal Valuing Indonesian Exchange at $200 Million

Licensed crypto exchange Triv, based in Indonesia, has received a strategic equity investment from MEXC Ventures, the investment arm of global crypto platform MEXC. The deal values Triv at $200 million and reflects MEXC's growing focus on Southeast Asia, as Indonesia's crypto market enters a new phase of institutional participation and regulatory clarity. Leo Zhao, investment director at MEXC Ventures, told Decrypt the investment was 'structured as pure equity, not tokens or convertible instruments,' and is part of the group's broader expansion strategy in Southeast Asia. 'Triv's regulatory track record, user base, and infrastructure made it a high-conviction candidate,' he said, adding that the deal reflects MEXC's push to support 'local champions with strong compliance profiles' as institutional adoption grows across the region. MEXC Ventures declined to disclose the investment amount, citing a confidentiality agreement with Triv. The deal follows a major shift in Indonesia's crypto tax policy, which took effect as the month opened. Under a new finance ministry regulation, sellers of digital assets on domestic exchanges will now pay a 0.21% final income tax, at double the previous rate, while those using overseas platforms face a steeper 1% levy, per a Reuters report. Buyers, however, are no longer subject to value-added tax. Tokocrypto, a local exchange, said in the aforementioned report that the changes reflect Indonesia's shift in classifying crypto as a financial asset rather than a commodity, signaling a more formal regulatory phase for one of Southeast Asia's fastest-growing crypto markets. These measures are part of a broader transition in oversight from the commodities regulator BAPPEBTI to the Financial Services Authority (OJK), signaling a more institutional phase of market development. 'Natural fit' for expansion Zhao said the decision to back Triv stemmed from its 'proven market leadership' and alignment with local regulations, calling the Indonesian platform a 'natural fit for a long-term strategic partnership.' He noted that the timing reflects MEXC's wider ambitions to grow in high-potential, regulated markets across Southeast Asia. Founded in 2015, Triv is one of Indonesia's longest-running digital asset platforms. The exchange is fully licensed to offer spot trading, staking, and derivatives, and claims over 3 million registered users. It also operates a crypto media division, CryptoWave, and supports more than 1,000 digital assets including Bitcoin, Ethereum, meme coins, and synthetic U.S. stock products. Toncoin Jumps After '8-Figure' Investment by MEXC Ventures Triv said the deal would help expand products, boost liquidity, and strengthen infrastructure amid rising compliance demands. It will retain operational independence. MEXC Ventures signaled more regional investments may follow. The partnership would allow Triv to scale while maintaining its identity, Zhao said. 'For Triv's users, partnership with MEXC means enhanced services and reliability coupled with the core values and independence that have earned their trust over the last nine years,' he told Decrypt. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Jim Cramer on Apple: 'Own it, Don't Trade It'
Jim Cramer on Apple: 'Own it, Don't Trade It'

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jim Cramer on Apple: 'Own it, Don't Trade It'

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the stocks that Jim Cramer spoke about. During the episode Cramer discussed the company's earnings and he commented: 'Now, we also heard from Apple, whose sales and earnings came in substantially better thanks to surprisingly strong iPhone sales. Even though Chinese business improved, people always want to write off, Apple's a no-growth company, best days behind them. But they just put up 10% revenue growth. A reminder that this remains one of the greatest companies on earth. You know what I say? Own it, don't trade it.' brandon-romanchuk-NOFyRmSQfUQ-unsplash Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) designs and sells smartphones, computers, tablets, wearables, and accessories. The company also provides cloud, support, and digital content services. Cramer mentioned the company in a June episode. He remarked: 'Apple's pulling off something amazing, moving about 20% of their iPhone manufacturing to India, but the rest are still coming from China. Still, the White House doesn't care. They want those phones made in America, so they're threatening a 25% tariff on the ones from India… What a shame. Apple is a huge employer in China, and China's a huge market for Apple, but the White House is making them leave, and they're not even getting any credit for it. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on thebest short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store