Germany's far-right AfD sets sights on next election after sharp rise
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) is hoping to win the country's next election, co-leader Alice Weidel said on Monday, one day after the party secured a historic second-place finish on the back of an unprecedented showing in eastern Germany.
Weidel led the AfD to the best result for a far-right party in Germany's post-Nazi history on Sunday, doubling its share of the vote from 2021 to reach a stunning 20.8%.
In comments just hours after final results came in, Weidel said the party's ambition is to become the strongest force in the next Bundestag - the country's lower house of parliament - after the next election, replacing the centre-right Christian Democrats (CDU).
"We have been able to form a very good platform here, a strategic platform that has the best prerequisites to overtake the CDU within the next few years," said Weidel.
The next German election is scheduled for 2029.
Weidel and her fellow co-leader Tino Chrupalla have already confirmed they plan to remain as co-chairs of the party's faction in the Bundestag following the successful campaign, which came despite the AfD being under investigation by domestic intelligence services as a suspected right-wing extremist group.
As conservative leader Friedrich Merz has ruled out working with the party - a stance known in Germany as the "firewall" - the AfD is set to become the largest opposition group in the Bundestag, offering it more speaking time and an additional platform to communicate its anti-immigrant views.
Merz, whose bloc made up of the CDU and its Bavarian sister party the Christian Social Union (CSU), finished top on 28.5% of the vote, is set to replace outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz of the Social Democrats (SPD), but he will likely need to work with the SPD to form a viable coalition in parliament.
Chrupalla earlier hailed the AfD's performance as "sensational," arguing that the result showed residents of eastern German in particular, where the party topped the polls, no longer accept the firewall.
"East Germans have clearly shown that they no longer want a firewall," Chrupalla told local radio station rbb inforadio.
Sunday's election showed a clear divide along old Cold War lines in the reunified Germany, with the AfD having won overwhelmingly across the formerly communist German Democratic Republic.
In the former East German states of Brandenburg, Thuringia, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, the party reached between 32.5% and 38.6% of the vote share.
Results also showed the AfD doing far better in rural areas and small towns across the country, including in the west, while performing more poorly in big cities such as Berlin.
That might account for some of the party's strength in eastern Germany, which is more sparsely populated.
The AfD's domestic surge has coincided with its increasing visibility on the international stage, with tech billionaire Elon Musk offering his support on numerous occasions during the election campaign.
Congratulations came in from far-right circles across the world following Sunday's results.
"The people of Germany voted for change in immense numbers," Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán wrote in a post on X, days after he hosted Weidel for a meeting in Budapest.
"I want to congratulate Alice Weidel on doubling AfD's share of the votes," he added.
Weidel also said she missed a congratulatory call from Musk overnight.
"This morning, when I turned on my phone or looked at it, I received missed calls in the night from the United States, including from Elon Musk, who congratulated me personally," Weidel said at a press conference in Berlin.
Reaching the symbolic mark of 20% represents a significant breakthrough for the AfD, which was founded in 2013 as a eurosceptic party but shifted its attention toward migration policy following former chancellor Angela Merkel's historic decision to keep Germany's borders open during the 2015 migration crisis.
While the party saw a marked dip in the 2021 election, which was dominated by the coronavirus pandemic, the latest result suggests its long-term upward trend is continuing - and the AfD's leaders are happy to play the long game.
"You have to have a little courage to be calm. We have that," Chrupalla said on Monday, adding that the AfD would continue to develop and professionalize its programme.
"And then we will get another 5 to 6% in the next election," said Chrupalla.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
London's ‘Little America' is no more. What's taking its place?
From the Eagle Bar on the top floor of the new Chancery Rosewood Hotel in Mayfair, the views across London are unobstructed, save for a gilded aluminum eagle, its wings spread wide, which crowns the midcentury modern building that once housed the U.S. Embassy to the United Kingdom. The Americans pulled up stakes in 2018, relocating the embassy to a giant fortified cube on the south bank of the Thames. They left behind the eagle, along with a collection of monuments and memorials in the adjoining Grosvenor Square — relics of what was once an American citadel in its ancestral land. John Adams lived on the square. Gen. Dwight Eisenhower had his wartime office there. A statue of Franklin Roosevelt gazes across the patchy lawn. Diplomats threw star-spangled election night parties, while hopeful travelers lined up outside for visas. During the Vietnam War, protesters clashed with police under the trees. Now, Grosvenor Square is being recast for a post-American age. The Chancery plans to open to guests in early September, its Persian Gulf owners having converted the Brutalist landmark, designed by Eero Saarinen, into a Rosewood luxury hotel, with junior suites starting at 1,400 pounds (nearly $1,900) a night. The square, which lies in front of the hotel and has a different owner, is closing this week for a 13-month refurbishment. The project will add lush plantings that celebrate biodiversity and link the 6-acre expanse, which has fallen into a state of neglect, more closely to its 18th-century Georgian roots. The owner, Grosvenor Property, insists it is preserving the legacy of a place once known as 'Little America.' But Grosvenor Square attests to how much the world has changed, not least since President Donald Trump returned to the White House. Start with the fact that the embassy was bought by investors from Qatar, whose government recently gave the Trump administration a Boeing 747 as a replacement for Air Force One. 'If you're trying to attract people, if you're trying make money, highlighting America's prominence is not the way to do it,' said Leslie Vinjamuri, the director of the U.S. and Americas program at Chatham House, a research group in London. 'It's a good time to take a step back, to play it down a bit.' Ties between Britain and the United States ebb and flow, she noted, in a 'special relationship' that is neither as serene nor as harried as often portrayed. A new global crisis could swiftly bring these old allies back together. But Trump's acrimonious dealings with Europe have indisputably changed the mood. 'There is just a sense of pulling apart between the U.K. and the U.S.,' said Vinjamuri, who will leave London this month to become CEO of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Trump, who has a soft spot for the royal family and other totems of imperial Britain, complained bitterly about the sale of the embassy. He blamed it, wrongly, on his predecessor President Barack Obama. (The decision was made during the George W. Bush administration because of security concerns.) 'We had the best site in all of London,' Trump said in 2018. The new location, in a redeveloped industrial section of London known as Nine Elms, was 'lousy,' he said, spurning an invitation to a ribbon cutting. Indeed, since the days of Charles Dickens and Oscar Wilde, Grosvenor Square has been synonymous with posh London. The Grosvenor family laid it out in the 1720s to anchor the expansion of its property empire into West London. With grand dimensions and an elegant oval shape, it attracted wealthy residents, who were given keys to their own private Eden in the capital. (It became a public park after World War II.) It also attracted Americans, starting with Adams, who lived on the northeast corner from 1785 to 1788 as America's first envoy to Britain. After Eisenhower quartered himself there, it was nicknamed 'Eisenhower Platz.' The Roosevelt statue was paid for with donations from ordinary Britons as a gesture of gratitude to the United States for its aid in the war. Nothing sealed the American connection like the opening of Saarinen's chancery in 1960, a hulking nine-story building that was the first purpose-built embassy of any country in London. In its early days, it was reviled by some critics as a jarring intrusion on the genteel Georgian symmetry of the square. 'It had this sense of America being big and bold, and in a British context, a sense of 'Wow, how American,'' said Matthew Barzun, the last U.S. ambassador to have an office in the building. Barzun, who witnessed ups and downs in the trans-Atlantic relationship over Syria and Brexit, said the old embassy was designed to be 'light and open and welcoming.' But after the terrorist bombings of embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, 'we added more and more fences and bollards,' he said. 'You start out building things to keep people out,' Barzun said, 'but you end up trapping people in.' Converting a diplomatic fortress into a sleek, five-star hotel was a design and engineering test for Qatari Diar, a real estate company backed by Qatar's sovereign wealth fund. The Qataris brought in Rosewood, a luxury hotel chain that was started in Dallas and is now owned by a Hong Kong conglomerate. 'Creating warmth was the biggest challenge,' said Michael Bonsor, the hotel's managing director, as he offered a sneak peek. 'You have this juxtaposition of one of the most secure, fortified buildings in London, where Marines used to run around with machine guns. It wasn't the most hospitable building in the world.' Dapper and discreet, Bonsor could have been a diplomat if he hadn't gone into hospitality. He said the hotel would make nods to its past, but would avoid becoming a Cold War-style theme park. In addition to the eagle, which is a protected landmark, the hotel has reinstalled statues of Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan that once flanked the building (the statues are wrapped in tarp to protect them during construction). Inside, the Chancery has retained some of Saarinen's design elements, notably his exposed-concrete ceiling. But prizewinning British architect David Chipperfield has reconfigured the building to add an atrium with cascading chandeliers. Two palatial penthouses are named after Elizabeth and Charles, monarchs not presidents. The hotel said their scale would appeal to guests from the Middle East. Across the street, the proprietors of Grosvenor Square are similarly aware of the tug between past and present. While they will retain the FDR statue, as well as a memorial to victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, they plan to add serpentine paths and extensive plantings to soften the square's stark appearance. 'The austere design, which was important during the Cold War period, has had its day,' said Cordula Zeidler, a heritage and design expert who advised Grosvenor Property. 'Having more plantings is both a Georgian concept and something people want today.' James Raynor, the newly named CEO of Grosvenor, acknowledged the complicated political backdrop to the project. But he said, 'I don't think we should be altering it for the long term on the basis of short-term noise.' In turbulent times, Raynor even holds out hope that the 18th-century square can still serve as a 21st-century bridge. 'Will the park by itself change the diplomatic relationship between the countries?' he said. 'I doubt it. But it will allow us to recognize what the two countries have done for each other.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
We need guardrails for artificial superintelligence NOW — before it's too late
America's 'AI race with China' is a headline we see more and more. But we're actually in two high-stakes races with China in artificial intelligence. First: a competition for commercial dominance that is reshaping economies, military power and global influence. The second race, though less visible, has the potential to be even more existential: a sprint toward artificial superintelligence. What's ASI? Unlike current AI models trained to perform relatively narrow tasks, ASI refers to a hypothetical future version of AI that exceeds human intelligence across every domain — creative, strategic, even emotional. It could be capable of autonomously improving itself, outpacing our ability to control or predict it. This technology doesn't yet exist, but leading experts, industry leaders and lawmakers believe its emergence could be possible within the next decade. That's the problem: It may not feel urgent — until it's too late. Which is why the time to act is now. President Donald Trump and his team are in a unique position to secure America's preeminence on both fronts by winning the commercialization race and negotiating what may be the most consequential diplomatic deal since the nuclear-arms treaties of the Cold War. China's advancements in commercial AI have dramatically closed America's lead on the rest of the world. How? Beijing bought, stole and downloaded US technology, leading to breakthroughs that resemble a modern-day Sputnik moment. Chinese firms are unveiling AI models that are both cheaper and more sophisticated than we knew possible (remember our reaction to DeepSeek?). China's state-directed pursuit extends far beyond economic ambitions. The Chinese Communist Party openly seeks a technological dominance that's anchored in its own core principles: surveillance, censorship, and control. A Chinese-led AI era risks embedding these authoritarian pillars into the digital fabric of global civilization and everyday life. An unregulated race toward ASI presents an even deeper danger. Influential forecasts — notably AI 2027, a predictive framework developed by key experts — warn that the emergence of ASI could pose unprecedented risks to humanity. Yes, these risks are still theoretical, but they're also not so far-fetched. In the hands of an adversary, an ASI system has the potential to destroy global electrical grids, develop incurable super-viruses or empty every bank account in the world. That may sound like the latest plot in Tom Cruise's 'Mission Impossible,' but it's also the plausible consequence of unchecked superintelligence in the wrong hands. Most top AI leaders believe ASI could materialize within this decade and pose unprecedented risk. Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI, told his researchers: 'We're definitely going to build a bunker before we release [artificial general intelligence].' So, if bunkers are the recommended precaution for AGI, what should we prepare for ASI? Vice President JD Vance appears to be grappling with these risks, as he reportedly explores the possibility of a Vatican-brokered diplomatic slowdown of the ASI race between the United States and China. Pope Leo XIV symbolizes precisely the kind of neutral, morally credible mediator capable of convening such crucial talks — and if the Cold War could produce nuclear-arms treaties, then surely today's AI arms race demands at least an attempt at serious discussion. Skeptics naturally and reasonably question why China would entertain such negotiations, but Beijing has subtly acknowledged these undeniable dangers as well. Some analysts claim Xi Jinping himself is an 'AI doomer' who understands the extraordinary risk. Trump is uniquely positioned to lead here. He can draw a clear line: America will outcompete China in commercial AI, no apologies. But when it comes to ASI, the stakes are too high for brinkmanship. We need enforceable rules, verification mechanisms, diplomatic pressure and, yes, moral clarity — before this issue gets ahead of us. During the Cold War, Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan all knew that competing militarily didn't mean refusing to negotiate guardrails. Reagan's mantra — 'trust but verify' — is just as relevant for ASI as it was for nuclear arms. This is President Trump's opportunity. He can drive the AI economy forward, infusing American founding principles into global AI adoption, while leading a parallel effort to prevent catastrophe. Done right, this would be the most consequential diplomatic initiative since the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. And it wouldn't come at the cost of American strength; it would cement it. We've reached a crossroads. The commercialization of AI can secure America's future, but the weaponization of superintelligence could end it. Chris Stewart was a member of Congress from Utah from 2013 to 2023. Mark Beall is president of the AI Policy Network.
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk
President Trump said he assumes his relationship with Elon Musk has ended and that he has no desire to repair it after the pair publicly fell out last week. "I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken," Trump said of the billionaire in a phone call with NBC News' Kristen Welker. The big picture: Trump's comments also came with a warning to Musk when the president said the Tesla CEO could face "serious consequences" should he fund Democratic candidates in the next election running against Republicans who vote for Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The billionaire, who contributed more than $290 million to Republicans in the 2024 election but has since said he'd cut back on political spending, posted last week that politicians "who betrayed the American people" should be fired in November. Trump declined to elaborate on what the consequences would be for Musk. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a Sunday interview on ABC's "This Week" that it would be a "big mistake" for Musk to go after Republicans who vote for the bill. Driving the news: Trump said he has no plans to speak to the Tesla CEO during the Saturday phone interview with Welker. Asked if he thought his relationship with Musk was over, Trump said he "would assume so." He accused the once-close administration ally of being "disrespectful to the office of the President." Catch up quick: The alliance between Trump and the former chainsaw-wielding face of DOGE exploded last week as Musk continuously campaigned against the massive tax-and-spending package, blasting it as a "disgusting abomination." Speaking to reporters during an Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Thursday, Trump said he was "very disappointed" in Musk, who he claimed was very familiar with the inner workings of the legislation. While Trump talked, Musk fired back in real-time on X, claiming in one post that Trump would have lost the election without him. Zoom in: In one post that appears to have been deleted, Musk accused the president of being "in the Epstein files." Trump told NBC that it's "old news."
