I visited Universal's new theme park, Epic Universe. I see why some people wouldn't like it, but I'd happily go back.
I visited Epic Universe, Universal's newest Orlando theme park with five immersive worlds.
The park only has 11 rides, but this felt like enough for me, and I enjoyed the ones I went on.
Overall, the immersiveness and theming of the worlds blew me away and made my ticket a great value.
Universal has officially added another theme park to its Orlando repertoire — and it may be one of its best yet.
Epic Universe officially opened to the public on Thursday, and it's the first major theme park to debut in Orlando in over 20 years.
It was first officially announced in 2015 and is located a few miles away from Universal's other Florida parks: Universal Studios, Islands of Adventure, and Volcano Bay.
I've been impressed by Universal's other parks for years and even used to be a season passholder, so I was thrilled to see Epic Universe for myself.
I visited the weekend before the park's official opening date and paid $164 for a preview ticket. It came with the caveat that some experiences would not be available since the park was still putting the final touches in place before its grand opening.
Here's what my experience was like.
Epic Universe consists of five themed worlds.
Epic Universe has five themed worlds: The Wizarding World of Harry Potter - Ministry of Magic, Super Nintendo World, How to Train Your Dragon - Isle of Berk, Dark Universe, and Celestial Park.
Since they're all part of Epic Universe and only spread across about 110 acres, they're generally within walking distance from each other.
The themed areas feel more impressive than the rides at Epic Universe.
With the massive sculptures and design details, I really felt like I was being transported into each world I visited, which was the highlight of the trip for me.
The park also has 11 rides, and I rode at least one in each world. For comparison, Universal Orlando is a bit smaller and has more than double that number of rides.
When I visited during previews, only the Curse of the Werewolf (Dark Universe) and Mine-Cart Madness (Super Nintendo World) rides were closed.
In terms of worlds, I was most excited to explore the one from the Harry Potter universe.
When I first entered the Harry Potter world, I felt immersed in 1920s France. The world is inspired by Place Cachée, which is shown in the franchise's " Fantastic Beasts" movies.
There were magical statues, signs, and pretty pastel buildings everywhere I looked. While exploring the world, I even tried the series' famous Butterbeer — my first ever — for $10.
It lived up to the hype and was a refreshing drink on a 90-degree day.
Harry Potter and the Battle at the Ministry was my most anticipated ride.
I'm a huge Harry Potter fan who grew up reading the books and watching the movies, so I was most excited about the Battle at the Ministry ride.
In order to get to the screen-based ride, guests go through a "Floo" (a magical transportation system in the wizarding world) station from 1920s France to contemporary London.
Once there, I got into one of the most visually stimulating queues I've ever seen. I felt like I'd been transported into the Ministry of Magic from the Harry Potter movies.
Unfortunately, the single-rider line I was in bypassed several of the themed areas of the queue. The parts I did see were spectacular, though.
All in all, I waited in line for three hours. The ride itself was exciting and filled with recognizable characters.
It felt like a great nod to the Harry Potter world, but I wouldn't wait so long to ride it again unless I could be more fully immersed in the queue.
Super Nintendo World felt nostalgic.
There are several themed Super Nintendo World areas throughout the world, but this is the first one in Florida.
It felt incredibly immersive and nostalgic, with giant character statues and item replicas from popular games I used to play as a kid.
While here, I rode Yoshi's Adventure, a slow-moving train ride, and Mario Kart: Bowser's Challenge.
The latter was my favorite because I got to walk through an impressively themed Bowser's Castle before being transported into my own real-life racing game.
Isle of Berk was a pleasant surprise.
The Isle of Berk world is based on the "How to Train Your Dragon" movies, which I haven't seen in years.
I remember almost nothing about the franchise, so I wasn't particularly excited to visit the world, but I'm so glad I went.
While here, I tried the mac-and-cheese cone from Hooligan's Grog and Gruel. I got pork, bacon, and jam mac and cheese inside a garlic-bread cone, which was really tasty. That and a bottle of water cost around $23.
Later in the day, I came back and rode Dragon Racer's Rally. It didn't look like much and was a pretty short ride, but it was fun to control my "dragon." I like that riders could use handles to make the experience as intense or relaxing as they want.
I didn't have time for the other rides in this land — Fyre Drill (an interactive boat ride) and Hiccup's Wing Gliders (a family-friendly coaster).
Celestial Park was beautiful, and I loved its coaster.
Themed after stars and constellations, Celestial Park has a lot of fun decorations and statues.
Its standout ride is definitely Stardust Racers. It's the biggest roller coaster in Epic, and it was a fun, fast-paced thrill ride I'd go on again.
The other ride in this world is Constellation Carousel, but I didn't have time for it. It seemed to be a typical carousel, and it looked beautiful with its vibrant colors and starry patterns.
I enjoyed Dark Universe more than I thought I would.
Dark Universe's theme is all about classic monsters and creatures, from vampires to Frankenstein. I don't usually gravitate toward spooky things, so I wasn't sure how much I'd like it.
However, I enjoyed Monsters Unchained: The Frankenstein Experiment, a dark ride into the world of Frankenstein, Dracula, Wolf Man, and other iconic creatures.
Later in the afternoon, I headed to Das Stakehaus, one of this world's quick-service eateries, for lunch. I got a "blood" orange chicken sandwich complete with a black bun and a slice of red velvet cake shaped like a coffin. It cost around $27.
The meal was satisfying, and I enjoyed sitting inside the chilled vampire-themed restaurant to get a break from the heat.
In total, I spent about $60 on food and drinks.
Everything I ate and drank at Epic Universe was good and cost typical slightly-high-theme-park prices.
Although I didn't order very much throughout the day, I still spent $60 on food and a drink for one person. My favorite buy was the $10 Butterbeer, and I will definitely get it next time I visit one of the parks.
All in all, I recommend visiting Epic Universe.
I was at Epic Universe from the time it opened at 9 a.m. until around 6 p.m.
My ticket seemed like a solid value, plus it'd cost me about $20 less now that I'm able to use my Florida resident discount.
I think the park is especially great for adults looking for an ambient vacation with a little fun sprinkled in. It's probably not ideal for those seeking thrills, and I've seen some people online criticizing the park as not having enough rides.
That said, the number of rides didn't disappoint me. I didn't even go on all 11, and I still didn't leave feeling like I needed more. Plus, the rides I did go on were enjoyable.
After all, Epic Universe really shines with its world-building and storytelling. If you want to be immersed in stunning lands inspired by pop culture and famous franchises, this park is worth a visit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jason Isaacs approves of Johnny Flynn casting as Lucius Malfoy in 'Harry Potter' series: 'Just please don't make him sing'
The big-screen version of the villainous Lucius Malfoy has spoken. Jason Isaacs, who portrayed the wizard in several films based on J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter saga, approves of Johnny Flynn being cast in the role of the father of Draco Malfoy in the upcoming TV adaptation for HBO. A fantastic actor, a lovely man and, irritatingly, a rather brilliant musician too. Couldn't have handed the snake-topped baton on to anyone better. Just please don't make him sing…#HarryPotter #JohnnyFlynn#KillTheElfEarly — Jason Isaacs (@jasonsfolly) June 9, 2025 "A fantastic actor, a lovely man and, irritatingly, a rather brilliant musician too," Isaacs posted Monday on X. "Couldn't have handed the snake-topped baton on to anyone better. Just please don't make him sing...." The actor is known for starring in the Netflix series Lovesick, which aired from 2014 to 2018, and for the 2020 movie Stardust, in which he portrayed the late David Bowie. Flynn also appeared in the 2020 version of Emma. In the streamer's 2024 drama series Ripley, he played the ill-fated Dickie Greenleaf. As Isaacs noted, Flynn is a singer and songwriter who's released several albums and soundtracks. The younger actor is one of more than a dozen cast members headed to Hogwarts, following the phenomenal success of the movies and books following the adventures of the boy wizard and his friends attending a school of magic. Isaacs has said that he thinks he will be but a memory, if anything at all, once the new show has debuted. "I have to say, I'll milk this, because this time next year, there's gonna be another Lucius Malfoy, and he's gonna be fantastic, and I'll be long forgotten," he said in April on the Awards Chatter podcast. "So I am savoring every round of applause I get." He said he wasn't looking for compliments, but being realistic. "I'm just saying, they are making the TV series, and it will be brilliant," Isaacs said. "And I will be — just like I'm now last season's White Lotus actor — I will be the [previous] iteration of Lucius Malfoy, and that's fine by me. I've had a good run." While the cast includes other showbiz veterans, such as John Lithgow, Janet McTeer, and Nick Frost, it also features several newcomers: Dominic McLaughlin, Arabella Stanton, and Alastair Stout will play Harry and his closest friends Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley. Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Over 30 Million People Watched Tom Felton's Bad Interview — Here's Why He Should Be Embarrassed
Note: This post is an Op-Ed and shares the author's personal views. Tom Felton is facing a ton of backlash right now, but I actually think it's fully deserved, so let's get into it. Warner Bros. Pictures, Jenny Anderson / Getty Images for Tony Awards Productions If you don't know, Tom played Draco Malfoy in the Harry Potter movies, and he's about to return as Draco again for his Broadway debut in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child at the end of this year. However, while attending the Tony Awards on Sunday, he was asked about J.K. Rowling's disgusting anti-trans comments over the years. (For reference, she also just launched an organization to help fund anti-trans legislation, which is described as a "legal fighting fund for women protecting their sex-based rights.") Tom was specifically questioned about how Rowling's controversies and anti-trans views have impacted him and his work. The full question was: "Does the sort of Twitterverse controversy around J.K. Rowling's views impact you at all or impact your work on the world at all?" And his answer now has over 30 million views on Twitter. He immediately responded by saying no, declaring that he hasn't paid attention to Rowling's statements: "No, I can't say it does. I'm not really that attuned to it." He continued, "The only thing that I always remind myself is that I've been lucky enough to travel the world – here I am in New York – and I have not seen anything bring the world together more than Potter. And she's responsible for that, so I'm incredibly grateful." Variety / Twitter: @Variety Related: Dan Rather's Defense Of A Gay Rights Icon Against Pete Hegseth Is Going Viral First of all, it's incredible how bad that response is. It's even more embarrassing when you realize that a PR rep probably prepared it for him. Like, he's had years of media training and should have anticipated that every interviewer's first question would be about J.K. Rowling. And if this response ~wasn't~ prepped, then, well, double shame on him. Anyway, Tom has expressed similar sentiments over the years, like in 2022 when he claimed to "not know enough about the specifics" in reference to Rowling's constant blows against trans people. He continued by saying, "My dog takes up far too much time for me to go into such matters," as if that was a valid excuse. He then backtracked a little, saying, 'I mean, the obvious things to say are that I'm pro-choice, pro-discussion, pro-human rights across the board, and pro-love. And anything that is not those things, I don't really have much time for." However, in that same interview, Tom also talked about how it's okay for people to have differing opinions and that he doesn't "take any pleasure in putting crosshairs on people that may have said things that we disagree with." The issue I have with this, though, is that basic human rights do not warrant differing opinions. It's disheartening for him to suggest otherwise. Like, we can disagree about favorite colors and movies and foods, but not about the existence and support of trans people. Tom's response is a verrrrry different tune from his Harry Potter co-stars. For example, Daniel Radcliffe wrote an op-ed back in 2020 where he correctly stated that trans women are women. He also called out J.K. Rowling specifically, saying, "Any statement to the contrary erases the identity and dignity of transgender people and goes against all advice given by professional health care associations who have far more expertise on this subject matter than either Jo or I." Related: 9 Gay Movies And TV Shows That Are So Criminally Underrated, I Guarantee You've Never Seen Any Of Them Before Emma Watson has done the same, sharing her support for the trans community in 2020. She also tweeted directly to her trans fans and followers, saying, "I and so many other people around the world see you, respect you and love you for who you are." And Rupert Grint has also followed suit, declaring that he "firmly stands with the trans community and echoes the sentiments expressed by many of my peers." All three of these actors' 2020 comments were in response to J.K. Rowling's lengthy essay about trans issues that she published during Pride Month that same year. Since then, Rowling has taken aim at all three Harry Potter stars for speaking out against her. She also "jokingly" implied that Dan, Emma, and Rupert are three actors who instantly ruin any movie for her when they appear in it. And this is why Tom Felton's refusal to acknowledge J.K. Rowling's comments is so gross and disappointing. To me, it says that he won't speak out against bigotry or injustice simply because it benefits him. After all, in addition to starring in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child on Broadway, Tom also implied that he'll have a part in HBO's new Harry Potter TV show. In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, he said, "I'll definitely be sneaking into a background shot as an extra." There's also speculation that he'll have a larger behind-the-scenes role on the production side of the series as well. Many veteran actors who've been cast in this new HBO show have also been asked about Rowling's anti-trans views. For example, Nick Frost, who was recently cast as Hagrid, said, "She's allowed her opinion and I'm allowed mine, they just don't align in any way, shape or form." And John Lithgow, who was literally nominated for an Oscar for portraying a trans woman in the 1982 movie The World According to Garp, said he never expected any criticism after accepting the role of Albus Dumbledore. Then, when asked if that backlash made him question his choice, he exclaimed, 'Oh, heavens no.' In case you're curious, Lox Pratt has been cast as Draco Malfoy, the role Tom Felton originated, and Johnny Flynn has been cast as Lucius Malfoy, Draco's dad (aka the role some people thought Tom might play, as he's now 37 years old). Now, my personal relationship with Harry Potter has changed over the years, especially as a queer person. I'm a fan of the series, and though I sometimes struggle with the notion of separating art from the artist, I've distanced myself more and more from the franchise due to Rowling's comments (which is unfortunate because so many people have found a home in it!). Spencer Althouse I do believe the world of Harry Potter is bigger than Rowling herself, which is why I can understand when some of the stars publicly share praise for what she's built, especially since it helped launch their careers. However, it's possible (and necessary) to stand up for what's right and draw the line between criticism and blind loyalty. That's exactly what Daniel Radcliffe did in 2024, saying: "Jo [Rowling], obviously Harry Potter would not have happened without her, so nothing in my life would have probably happened the way it is without that person. But that doesn't mean that you owe the things you truly believe to someone else for your entire life." Tom Felton, however, is actively choosing to ignore the elephant in the room. It's disingenuous to pretend that Rowling's statements don't affect him, especially since her very comments endanger the lives of people in the trans and queer community, many of whom are his fans. To me, this implies that Tom cares more about collecting a paycheck than standing up for trans rights, which are human rights, and I desperately need him to do better. Looking for more LGBTQ+ or Pride content? Check out all of BuzzFeed's posts celebrating Pride 2025. Also in LGBT: In An Apparent Attempt To Scrub "Gay" Content From The Department Of Defense, The Trump Administration Got Rid Of The Straightest Content Ever
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why are the Harry Potter TV show cast so young compared to the movies?
Harry Potter is coming to the small screen with an all-new cast taking over the iconic roles set out in JK Rowling's original books, but there is a noticeable difference between the actors being enlisted for the HBO series compared to the original movies: their ages. From Petunia Dursley to Severus Snape, Professor Minerva McGonagall to Lucius Malfoy, a number of the cast portraying the adults in the story appear much younger than their movie counterparts were back in 2001. Bel Powley, who has been cast as Harry Potter's menacing aunt Petunia Dursley, for example, is 33 compared to Fiona Shaw's 43 when she began the movies, while 42-year-old Daniel Rigby is 12 years younger than his movie counterpart, Richard Griffiths. The same can be said of Paapa Essiedu, who stars as Severus Snape in the upcoming series and is only 35. His movie counterpart Alan Rickman was 54 when he first took on the role of the potions master in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. So why are the TV series cast so much younger than their movie counterparts? Well there is a good explanation and it all stems from the books. In Rowling's novels the adult characters, for the most part, are much younger than they were depicted in the films. Snape was just 31 during the events of the first book, while Petunia is Lily Potter's older sister and was therefore only 34 — both of which match closer to the ages of the actors in the TV series. Lucius Malfoy is being played by Johnny Flynn in the series, the actor is aged 42 which is slightly older then his character who is 37 in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. The same is true of Vernon Dursley, who is 37 in the first book and is played by a slightly older actor, Rigby. Katherine Parkinson was recently cast as Molly Weasley in the TV series. The character is in her forties in the first book which matches with Parkinson, who is 47. Julie Walters portrayed Molly in the movies, and she was aged 50 when production started on the first film. The biggest age difference between book and TV show characters is with Hagrid and Professor Dumbledore, the former is 63 in the first novel while the latter is 110. It goes without saying that no one expects the series to match Dumbledore's age in the books, and it is 79-year-old John Lithgow who plays him. Meanwhile Nick Frost is ten years younger than his book counterpart The HBO series prides itself on being a more accurate take on the source material than the movies, which is exactly why the cast are so much younger than might have been expected. The Harry Potter TV series will be released in 2027.
