German Central Council of Jews: More people should visit Auschwitz
Josef Schuster, the council's president, said: "Anyone who has been to Auschwitz does not question why the memory of the Shoah [Holocaust] must be kept alive. Anyone who has been to Auschwitz understands why the memory of the Shoah can have no parallels."
On January 27, 1945, Soviet soldiers liberated the German concentration and extermination camp in Nazi-occupied Poland.
The 80th anniversary of the date falls on Monday, with delegations from more than 40 countries expected to attend the central ceremony at the memorial on the site of the former Nazi camp in modern-day Poland.
Germany, the perpetrator nation, is expected to be more prominently represented than ever before, with a large delegation, including President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Bundesrat President Anke Rehlinger.
The Nazis had deported around 1.3 million people to the camp. Approximately 1.1 million were murdered, including about 1 million European Jews. Since 1996, the day has been a national day of remembrance in Germany.
Schuster said that the commemoration of the liberation of Auschwitz is never routine, but this year it should prompt even more reflection.
He explained that there are fewer and fewer witnesses of the Shoah, as the Holocaust in known in Hebrew, and more people in Germany have no familial connection to the time of Nazism.
The 80th anniversary is a "milestone in the remembrance of this rupture in civilization," Schuster said.
Survey: Half of Germans support mandatory visits
Half of Germans over the age of 18 would support mandatory concentration camp memorial visits, according to a survey conducted by the YouGov polling institute to mark the anniversary.
In the poll published on Sunday, 42% were opposed to the idea of mandatory visits, and 8% did not provide an answer.
Currently, such a requirement exists only in certain federal states, such as Bavaria and Saarland.
Last year, the centre-right coalition in the lower house of parliament, or Bundestag, called for a nationwide mandate that pupils should visit a concentration camp memorial at least once during their schooling as part of a motion to combat anti-Semitism.
Of those surveyed by YouGov on behalf of dpa, only just over half, or 52%, had visited a former concentration camp at least once. One in four has been to Auschwitz.
YouGov surveyed 2,194 Germans over the age of 18 between January 17 and 20 for the survey.
In the age group of 18 to 29 years, a particularly high number — 61% — reported having been to a former concentration camp at least once. Among those over the age of 70, the figure drops to only 42%.
A total of 76% of respondents feel well informed about the Holocaust, while only 16% feel poorly informed.
A proportion of 22% believe there should be more remembrance in Germany of the mass murder of Jews in Europe under the Nazis.
In contrast, 19% feel that there is too much commemoration, with 48% of far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) voters holding this view. A slight majority of 52% are satisfied with the current level of remembrance efforts.
Vice Chancellor Habeck calls for new approach
Germany needs a new approach to its culture of remembrance, Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck said on Sunday.
Writing in Berlin's Tagesspiegel newspaper, Habeck, the lead candidate for the Greens in the February 23 elections, paid tribute to the work done on the commemoration of Nazi-era crimes over past decades.
"But we stand today before the renewed task of keeping the culture of remembrance alive, so that it keeps us awake, under new conditions, with new challenges," he wrote.
"In many respects we are living through a period of transition," Habeck wrote.
He noted that few of the perpetrators of Nazi crimes were still alive, and that only a few victims could still bear witness. Memory and horror were increasingly less connected with the parents or grandparents of people today.
"In addition, our country has long become a home for millions of people with a migration background, who have no biographical link to German responsibility for the Nazi past," Habeck wrote.
History was also being distorted, with few checks on this process. "A new approach is needed to justify the need for remembrance and to explain the 'Never Again' message," he wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
8 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump says he didn't know an offensive term he used in a speech is considered antisemitic
WASHINGTON — President Trump says he didn't know the term 'shylock' was considered antisemitic when he used it in a speech to describe unscrupulous moneylenders. Trump told reporters Friday after returning from an event in Iowa that he had 'never heard it that way' and 'never heard that' the term was considered an offensive stereotype about Jews. Shylock refers to the villainous Jewish moneylender in Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice' who demands a pound of flesh from a debtor. The Anti-Defamation League, which works to combat antisemitism, said in a statement that the term 'evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible.' Joe Biden, while vice president, said in 2014 that he had made a 'poor choice' of words a day after he used the term in remarks to a legal aid group. Trump's administration has made cracking down on antisemitism a priority. His administration said it is screening for antisemitic activity when granting immigration benefits and its fight with Harvard University has centered on allegations from the White House that the school has tolerated antisemitism. But the Republican president has also had a history of playing on stereotypes about Jewish people. He told the Republican Jewish Coalition in 2015 that 'you want to control your politicians' and suggested the audience used money to exert control. Before he kicked off his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump drew widespread criticism for dining at his Florida club with a Holocaust-denying white nationalist. Last year, Trump made repeated comments accusing Jewish Americans who identify as Democrats of disloyalty because of Democratic leaders' criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Critics said it perpetuated an antisemitic trope about Jews having divided loyalties and there being only one right way to be Jewish. On Thursday night in his speech in Iowa, Trump used the term while talking about his signature legislation passed by Congress this week. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing some from, in some cases, a fine banker and in some cases shylocks and bad people,' he said. When a reporter later asked about the word's antisemitic association and his intent, Trump said; 'No, I've never heard it that way. To me, a shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. I've never heard it that way. You view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' The Anti-Defamation League said Trump's use of the word 'underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.' Price writes for the Associated Press.
Hamilton Spectator
8 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Ontario is pausing its curriculum overhaul. Here's what that will mean for students
Ontario's surprise decision to postpone curriculum changes — including mandatory instruction on the Holodomor, the Holocaust and Black Canadian history, as well as an overhaul of kindergarten — has drawn disappointment from advocates, but teachers' unions say it gives educators much-needed time to prepare meaningful lessons. 'This provides a valuable opportunity to get it right,' said Martha Hradowy, president of the Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation, said of the one-year delay. She noted the timing of the announcement was not ideal and created 'some uncertainty,' but the pause 'allows for better planning, clearer communication and more comprehensive professional development.' The elementary teachers union also received no advance notice. 'We were surprised — pleasantly so,' said ETFO president Karen Brown. 'We're not opposed to a revised and updated curriculum; educators want that, and they want what's best for their students. But they need time to prepare. I'm glad (the ministry) is listening.' Both Hradowy and Brown said in the absence of any concrete guidelines from the government, teachers had been expressing concerns they would not be ready under the original timeline. Curriculum changes set to take effect this fall were introduced more than a year and a half ago. The province planned to revise Grade 10 history to include enhanced mandatory instruction on the Holodomor , the Holocaust, and Black Canadian histories and to add financial literacy to Grade 10 math. Kindergarten's play-based approach , introduced in 2010, was to be revamped in favour of a 'back-to-basics' focus on reading, writing and math. But last Friday, tacked on to the end of a news conference about the province taking over four school boards due to alleged financial mismanagement, Education Minister Paul Calandra announced curriculum changes would be shelved for a year. He said the delay would allow time to develop 'a more central, consistent' approach and give teachers the opportunity to properly prepare. 'Students cannot afford to wait,' Josh Landau, director of Ontario government relations at the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, told the Star. 'In a time where antisemitism has risen to levels not seen in recent memory, there remains a troubling lack of understanding about the Holocaust, its impacts and the persistent dehumanization of Jews that reverberates even today.' Calling the delay a setback, Tiffany Ford, executive director of education non-profit P.E.A.C.H. , said 'these updates are crucial for providing Ontario students with a more inclusive and accurate understanding of history. While we understand the ministry is managing multiple priorities, we urge the government to uphold its commitment to these curriculum changes.' Debbie King, chair of the Black trustees' caucus at the Ontario Public School Boards' Association, said she was hopeful the pause would give teachers more support and time to prepare, but in the meantime 'educators should not fear reprisal or other potential consequences for supplementing or extending the existing curriculum with applicable content and materials in culturally responsive ways. 'Many school boards have already begun meaningful work in this area,' she added, 'but sustained and system-wide progress requires co-ordination, collaboration and commitment.' Roma Dzerowicz, project manager of the Holodomor National Awareness Tour — a mobile classroom experience about the 1932–33 famine-genocide that killed millions in Ukraine — said she was shocked by last Friday's announcement. 'We are disappointed,' she said, adding she had been contacting school boards as late as last week about potential visits to dovetail with the enhanced curriculum. A Ukrainian Canadian Congress spokesperson noted there just wasn't enough time to prepare educators to teach 'complex and historically significant topics like the Holodomor, with which many might not be familiar.' Valentina Kuryliw, who serves as chair of the Holodomor Education Committee, added that while the delay was 'unfortunate,' it was 'prudent.' Brown said she understands the frustration voiced by advocates, but emphasized the importance of providing teachers with the proper training and tools: 'You do not want our members doing a disservice to the Black community because the teacher who's delivering the curriculum is fumbling through the knowledge. No one wants that.' The heads of both teachers unions are urging the ministry to release details of the new curriculum as soon as possible, and not wait another year. Brown said many questions remain — particularly about the revised kindergarten program and how young students will be assessed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Trump Approval Rating: Down 4 Points In Latest Survey
President Donald Trump's net approval rating is three points below where it was at this point during his first term, according to the latest survey, though a second survey released earlier this week shows a significant improvement in Americans' view of his job performance linked to a cease-fire agreement between Israel and Iran. President Donald Trump speaks to the press before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White ... More House on Friday April 25, 2025. The Washington Post via Getty Images July 2 -16 net approval rating: Trump's approval rating stands at 40% in a Yahoo/YouGov poll of 1,597 U.S. adults conducted June 26-30 (margin of error 3.2), a four-point decrease from the groups' March poll, while 56% disapprove. Trump's -16 net approval rating is three points worse than it was at this point during his first term, according to YouGov data, while former President Barack Obama had a +14 net approval rating and former President Joe Biden had a +7 approval rating halfway through their first years in office. June 30 -3: Trump's disapproval rating improved from 53% to 50% in Morning Consult's weekly poll compared to its survey last week, while his approval rating increased from 45% to 47% (the survey of 2,202 registered voters was conducted June 27-29 and has a two-point margin of error). The rating was Trump's best since May and coincides with an uptick in respondents' approval of his handling of national security issues since last week, following a cease-fire agreement between Israel and Iran. June 23 -16: Trump's approval rating dipped one point, to 41%, in a Reuters/Ipsos survey of 1,139 U.S. adults taken June 21-23 from its June 11-16 survey, with 57% disapproving (the latest poll has a 3-point margin of error). The poll also found a plurality, 45%, of U.S. adults surveyed do not support the airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend, while 36% support them and 19% said they were unsure. June 17 -13: An Economist/YouGov poll found 54% of voters disapprove of Trump's job performance, while 41% approve (the survey of 1,512 U.S. adults was conducted June 13-16 and has a 3.3-point margin of error). The survey also found Trump's approval rating is underwater when it comes to his handling of Iran, with 37% approving and 41% disapproving, while 60% of respondents, including 53% of 2024 Trump voters, say the U.S. should not get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran, as Trump has repeatedly threatened U.S. military intervention. June 17 -17: Trump's net approval rating improved two points in the latest Pew Research survey taken June 2-8, compared to the group's last poll in April, with the latest survey showing 41% approve and 58% disapprove (the survey of 5,044 U.S. adults has a 1.6-point margin of error). June 16 -6: Trump's net approval rating dipped two points in Morning Consult's latest weekly survey of 2,207 registered U.S. voters (margin of error 2), with 46% approving and 52% disapproving of his job performance, numbers the pollster notes are on par with his ratings in April and early May, during a downward spiral that coincided with his shock tariffs. June 16 -12: Trump's approval rating remained stagnant at 42% in a Reuters/Ipsos poll taken June 11-16, compared to the groups' May poll, but his disapproval rating increased two points, to 54%, in the latest survey of 4,258 U.S. adults (margin of error 2). June 16 -4: Trump's approval rating declined one point, from 47% to 46%, in the latest Harvard CAPS/Harris survey, compared to the groups' poll taken last month, while 50% of respondents said they disapprove of his job performance (the online survey of 2,097 registered voters was conducted June 11-12 and has a 2.2-point margin of error). Trump's approval rating in the Harvard CAPS/Harris poll has dropped every month since February, when he had a 52% approval rating. Trump's approval rating for nine separate issues also declined from May to June, with less than half of voters saying they approve of each of them, with tariffs and trade policy receiving the lowest marks (41%) and immigration receiving the highest (49%). June 15 -10 net approval rating: More than half, 55%, of voters said they disapprove of Trump's job performance and 45% said they approve in an NBC survey of 19,410 U.S. adults conducted May 30-June 10 (margin of error 2.1). June 11 -16: Trump's approval rating dipped three points, to 38%, in Quinnipiac University's latest poll conducted June 5-9 among 1,265 registered voters (margin of error 2.8), compared to its previous poll in April, when he had a 41% approval rating, while his disapproval rating dropped one point, to 54%. The survey also found more voters, 57%, have an unfavorable opinion of Musk, while 53% have an unfavorable opinion of Trump, though more than half, 53%, oppose Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that was the source of Musk's rant against Trump last week. June 9 -10: A CBS/YouGov poll conducted June 4-6 found 45% approve of Trump's job performance, while 55% disapprove (the poll of 2,428 U.S. adults has a, 2.4-point margin of error). In a separate, one-day YouGov survey conducted June 5, amid Trump's feud with Musk, the majority of 3,812 U.S. adults (52%) said they side with neither Musk nor Trump, while 28% said they side with Trump, 8% said they side with Musk and 11% said they aren't sure. June 9 -4 net approval rating: Trump's approval rating improved one point, to 47%, in Morning Consult's weekly poll, while 51% disapprove of his job performance for the third week in a row (the survey of 1,867 registered U.S. voters has a 2-point margin of error). Trump's feud with Musk doesn't appear to have dented his approval ratings in the first two polls that overlapped with their public spat—though it's unclear how Americans perceive his response to protests in Los Angeles over his aggressive deportation push, as no reliable polling has been released since the protests began over the weekend. June 4 -4: For the first time in two months, less than half (49%) of U.S. adults surveyed by the Economist/YouGov disapprove of Trump's job performance, compared to 45% who strongly or somewhat approve, representing a significant improvement from the groups' April 19-22 poll, when Trump had a net -13 approval rating (the latest poll of 1,610 U.S. adults conducted May 30-June 2 has a 3-point margin of error). June 2 -5: Trump's approval rating dropped from 48% to 46% in this week's Morning Consult poll compared to its previous survey, while his disapproval rating was stagnant at 51% (the May 30-June 2 poll of 2,205 registered voters has a 2-point margin of error). The share of registered voters who say they identify with Trump's Make America Great Again movement has increased sharply during Trump's second term, according to NBC polling. A total of 36% of 1,000 registered voters polled March 7-11 said they consider themselves part of the MAGA coalition, compared to a 23% average in NBC's March polling and 27% in the network's 2024 polls (the most recent poll has a 3.1-point margin of error). 43%. That's Trump's average approval rating so far during his second term, higher than his 41% average approval rating throughout the duration of his first term, according to Gallup. In the fifth month of his term, Trump launched a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, leading to a cease-fire agreement during Iran and Israel. Congress also approves his signature policy legislation that would enact some of his most significant campaign promises, including an extension of his 2017 tax cuts and tighter border controls, while his mass deportation push has prompted protests and numerous lawsuits. Trump's approval rating has declined since the start of his term, coinciding with his wide-ranging 'Liberation Day' tariffs he announced on April 2 against nearly all U.S. trading partners, though he has largely backed off most of the levies. Other big moments in Trump's presidency include the leak of U.S. military attack plans to Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg and his efforts to slash the federal workforce with the help of the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency. He's hosted several world leaders for explosive Oval Office sit downs, including South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, who Trump argued with over false claims that white farmers in the country were victims of a genocide, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in February. Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated the Ukrainian president in front of the media.
