
Ukrainian prisoner reveals what helped him survive 860 days in Putin's hellish j
Valerii 'Yarylo' Horishnii told Metro they include a massacre at a notorious prison camp where the guards were said to have been 'laughing and drinking coffee' while watching inmates being burnt alive.
The special forces soldier has gathered testimony that includes a jailer at the Olenivka prison allegedly telling prisoners 'you're f**** up today' before an explosion which killed 53 of his comrades and injured 139 others.
Horishnii, who was injured and then captured in the last-stand defence of Mariupol, spoke openly about the 'hell on earth' he experienced during two years and four months in Vladimir Putin's detention system.
He was routinely beaten with fists, kicks and rubber batons, given electric shocks and held in a notorious torture chamber called 'Isolation.'
The Azov Brigade fighter, 28, who was part of a UK delegation which raised the case of Ukrainian prisoners, managed to survive through 'love and prayer', before going into shock for days after his release.
At one point, he was housed in a cell next to Shaun Pinner, who served with the British military before becoming an Azov fighter.
Incredibly, Horishnii has finished his rehabilitation since his release in September and is considering returning to active service.
'I was kept going by love and prayer', he said.
'Love towards my family, country, comrades and regiment.
'There were times when people felt desperate but we always supported each other. I prayed every day for those who were on the outside, for those fighting on the frontline and my family.
'I was scared that I would be released and find some of my family had died from the Russian missiles striking civilian infrastructure every day.
'I asked God to be released as soon as possible.
'I guess he heard my prayers.'
Horishnii was part of a Ukrainian delegation that visited London in March to highlight the fate of his country's prisoners of war, and the need for their urgent exchange.
The Senior Sergeant of the 12th Special Forces Brigade 'Azov' has also shared his testimony with the United Nations, holding up pictures of his mistreated friends.
He is fortunate to still be able to tell his story.
Horishnii narrowly missed death when Ukrainian prisoners of war were held in a facility which was blown up on July 28, 2022.
'My position was on the north of the frontline as we defended Mariupol from the very first day of the full-scale invasion back in February 2022,' he said. 'On March 18, 2022, we were relocated to the city centre after the Russians broke through on the western side.
'There were Russian troops, tanks and artillery running amok.
'The next day we were clearing a house of Russian troops when they fired an RPG at us. Both of my legs, my genitals and my left hand got hit.
'I still have some shrapnel in my body but fortunately it didn't do any permanent damage or hit any arteries.
'I was transported to one of the bunkers at the Azovstal factory where there was a hospital under the ground, and I remained there for the rest of the time I was there.
'On May 16, 2022, we got an order from our president and our commander-in-chief to go into Russian captivity.
'Our wounded were literally rotting and we had no medicine.
'We knew the Russians were lying when they said there would be representatives from the Red Cross and the United Nations present, and we would be tortured, but we had no other option.'
Horishnii and other Ukrainian prisoners were first transferred to a notorious prison in Molodizhne, near Olenivka in Donetsk oblast.
'There was little food there but we were not tortured and we could move around, read books and talk to each other,' he said.
'After I was moved from Olenivka, there was a massacre where 53 Azov prisoners of war were killed and 139 others injured.
'Some of my cellmates who were there at the time told me how one day before this happened they had been moved into a separate barracks specifically for Azov servicemen.
'They saw some people on the roof of the barracks, who were wearing black ski masks and they looked like military engineers, planting something. A few hours later a Russian guard came up to them and said, 'you're f***** up today.'
'The next thing they heard Russian artillery nearby, they think the Russians tried to hide the sound of the explosion with artillery.
'Then there was a very big explosion on the roof and everything started burning right away, possibly because of the presence of oil.
'The Azov servicemen who were still alive were trying to help each other and give each other medical care.
'They remember that some of the Russian guards who had not been told of the massacre in advance were very scared, they were running around looking for their vests and helmets.
'But some who knew what was going to happen were laughing and drinking coffee. The head of the prison was there, drinking coffee and looking at those guys who were burning alive and he was laughing.'
The prison's former head was killed in a blast from an explosive device planted under his car in December 2024, according to Ukrainian media.
Sergei Yevsyukov is said to have died in Donetsk amid a series of attacks on pro-Kremlin figures in occupied territory.
The search for justice continues in one of the war's many grim chapters perpetuated by Putin's forces.
Three years on from the attack, the incident is front of mind in Ukraine after the country's parliament established July 28 as an occasion to remember those tortured or killed in captivity.
'The Russians said it was a Ukrainian HIMARS missile but our investigation points to an explosion on the roof,' Horishnii said of the prison atrocity.
'We have passed our evidence to the British ICRC and to parliamentarians. UN representatives were not allowed to go in and investigate at the time, which I guess the Russians would have been happy to do if it was a Ukrainian missile.'
In remarkably composed terms, the veteran recalled how in captivity the cell became a 'comfortable zone', because at least he knew that once inside he would not be tortured.
'In the other prisons we were beaten, given electric shocks and hit with rubber batons,' he said.
'The beatings continued every day I was in captivity. You have to stay on your feet the whole day, you are not allowed to sit.
'Every day the cell door opened it was very stressful, you would have to run with your head very low and your hands tied behind your back.
'As you did this you would be punched and kicked and they used rubber batons and stun guns.
'As crazy as it sounds, the cell becomes a comfortable zone because when the door closes you know that you would not be tortured.
'For two years we did not see any sun, any sky, we were always in cells located underground.'
Horishnii described the Russian brutality in the detention system.
'In a prison in the city of Makiivka, in the Donetsk region, the treatment was pretty much ok, even though we were not being in accordance with the Geneva Convention as it was a regular prison not intended specifically for prisoners of war,' he said.
'But all the other places were like hell on earth.
'I was in six places in total and you couldn't even call one a prison, it was a former youth hub for arts in Donetsk that the Russians had turned into a torture chamber called 'Isolation'.'
A detailed analysis of the Olenivka massacre was published in June by the Centre for Human Rights in Armed Conflict.
The Russian Federation planned and carried out the attack using artillery, and orchestrated the carnage to make it appear that the Ukrainian service members had been killed by Western weapons, the centre found.
The findings have been submitted to the International Criminal Court, which is expected to begin formal proceedings, according to Azov.
For Horishnii, the war continues, even after surviving Russian captivity.
'For the first four or five days after being released I was like a robot, I couldn't feel any emotion, I was just in shock,' he said.
'Then on the seventh day I started realising I did not have to comply with any orders such as singing the Russian anthem every day, I was a free person, a free human being.
'I cannot put into words how I felt when I saw my sister and parents, other than to say I was super happy.
'At least a hundred and fifty people have died in those torture chambers, and these are only the official figures so there will be many more, and the Azov prisoners of war are rotting.
'My legs were literally rotting because there was no nutritious food, regular beatings and no medical care.
'The International Red Cross and the UN cannot reach our prisoners because Russia does not allow it.
'If Russia is allowed to escape justice for its war crimes and treatment of prisoners then in my opinion it shows the international laws do not work.'
Thousands of Ukrainians are currently being held in captivity in Russia and occupied Ukraine, facing torture, enforced disappearance and denied contact with the outside world, according to Amnesty International.
The treatment amounts to war crimes and crimes against humanity, the campaign group said in a report published earlier in the year.
'As for me, I have gone through the rehabilitation process and under the Geneva Conventions and laws of Ukraine, I could just retire with an ideal scenario like living in the mountains, having some children and playing a guitar by the lake,' Horishnii said.
'But the war is still going on and it is hard for me to just leave.
'I had more than 100 friends killed in Mariupol and I can't just leave our struggle, so I'm thinking about going to go back to active duty, continuing my service as a reconnaissance scout and instructor.'
The soldier added: 'Our trip to the UK has given us a lot of encouragement. More Trending
'I would like to thank the UK government and citizens for helping us, your support is priceless.'
The UK is part of the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, which is being established to hold the perpetrators of war crimes to account in Ukrainian courts.
On a visit to Lviv in May, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said setting up such a body was a 'key manifesto commitment' in the interests of 'accountability and justice.'
Do you have a story you would like to share? Contact josh.layton@metro.co.uk
MORE: Commander's last message from Mariupol steelworks where they 'need a miracle'
MORE: Young girl's single wish for New Year will break your heart
MORE: Ukrainian band of brothers will return to fight after marathon finish line
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Statesman
33 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Kemi Badenoch's position on Israel is discrediting the Conservative Party
Photo byandWhen Kemi Badenoch became leader of the Conservative Party, she very sensibly aimed not to rush into early statements of detailed policy. Unfortunately, her appointment of Priti Patel as shadow foreign secretary was its own statement. Following her unauthorised 2017 trip to Israel while secretary for international development, Patel has been a disgraced figure. While there, accompanied by the peer Stuart Polak of the Conservative Friends of Israel, she met the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu without UK government officials or the British ambassador. Afterwards, she advocated a change in UK policy which, in breach of long-established humanitarian practice, would have included the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) in its aid delivery. This episode could not have been a starker example of impropriety. It merited her dismissal but Theresa May was too weak to wield the axe. Instead, Patel was allowed to resign. And yet, Badenoch saw fit to appoint her to the shadow cabinet. Patel is now in a position to perpetuate her views at a critical moment in world events. Badenoch has shown no indication of knowing anything about Israel and Palestine, and has not made any profound statements on this, the one foreign issue, other than Ukraine, that has dominated global news since she was elected. All she utters is uncritical support for Israel. The Conservative Party used to have a world-view. It supported enlightened international cooperation, and institutions such as the UN along with its accompanying treaties, rules and conventions. More broadly, it was the UK that pledged to support a homeland for the Jewish people, and a future for the Palestinians next door. To their shame, while successive governments have forever delayed implementing that commitment, the Israelis each and every day have violently stolen ever more Palestinian land. Palestine is the only populous legally undisputed land in the world not allowed to call itself a state. It does not belong to Israel, and Israel's determination to annex it does not mean it is disputed. The illegality of Israeli encroachment is cast-iron in international law, a belief that has been the policy of Conservative and Labour governments for decades. Badenoch, however, seems to share the view of those like Patel who do not believe in their own policy. They can never bring themselves to say explicitly that settlements are illegal. The charge sheet against Israel is growing every day: disproportionate force, indiscriminate bombing, mass displacement, food deprivation, the replacement of the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA with mercenaries, the killing of tens of Palestinians each day as they desperately scramble for food, state-backed support for settler terrorists, and the banning of journalists from Gaza. Badenoch and her front bench have done nothing to condemn any of it. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Jonathan Sumption on Israel and Gaza: A question of intent] Amid all this, Priti Patel has refused in the Commons to condemn settler violence – all she would say was that settlers are a barrier to a two-state solution. And when extremist Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir were sanctioned in June, she declined in her response even to mention their names. The likes of Suella Braverman, meanwhile, have branded pro-Palestine demonstrations 'hate marches'. Contemptibly, any pro-Palestinian voice within the Conservative Party is almost systematically accused of anti-Semitism and put into its complaints procedure, which silences and bullies. And as Michael Gove increases his hold on appointments to the leader's office, what could be more warped than his recent recommendation that the IDF be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize? It has now reached the point where Conservative comment has become so extreme it has discredited their entire foreign policy and is making them despised more widely. The party is increasingly becoming defined by its lack of humanity. The world is watching the extermination of an entire country. Palestine is being annihilated. Meanwhile the Conservative Party is covering itself in shame, and will stand no chance of re-election unless it states a clear policy based on international law, and promotes the UK's historic understanding of the region. This issue is and always has been about land. Israel's extremist government has only one objective, and that is to make all of Palestine theirs. All other talk, horrendous though the facts may be, is second to that. As leader, Kemi Badenoch could redeem herself speedily by stating loudly what all should be saying to Israel: 'Get out of Palestine, it isn't your country.' [See also: Keir Starmer alienates left and right on Gaza] Related

Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Wrexham MP addresses concerns around asylum seekers
MP for Wrexham I receive communication from constituents about a wide range of issues. One of the concerns expressed is around asylum seekers. This is also a topic which sees substantial disinformation and misinformation across media and social media. Language and terminology is really important and I want to address some of the common questions that I receive on this subject. 'Asylum' means 'protection given by a country to someone fleeing from persecution in their own country' (House of Commons Library). A person seeking asylum is often awaiting refugee status. If they do not qualify for refugee status, they may still be granted leave to remain in the UK for humanitarian or other reasons. 'Why are hotels and luxury apartments being used to house immigrants when there is a housing crisis in the UK?' This is an example of a question I have received from a constituent recently. It is worth noting that there are 3,253 asylum seekers in Wales and 107 in Wrexham according to figures as of March this year. Where hotels are used, the accommodation is dormitory style, all facilities are closed and not available, food is provided but not choice of menu. To be clear, there are no asylum hotels in Wrexham and those seeking asylum are in dispersed accommodation. This means the Home Office gives contracts to the private sector not councils to find accommodation. This accommodation is a flat or room in an HMO for example. Asylum seekers do not have access to the welfare system or any benefits. They receive a weekly subsistence payment rate of £49.18 per person for people living in self-catered accommodation or £8.86 a week for those in full-board accommodation like a hotel. The weekly amount is credited to a pre-paid debit card which can use be to pay for goods or withdraw cash. According to the House of Commons Library, in 2024, asylum seekers and refugees made up around 16% of immigrants to the UK. It is important to understand that most people who migrate to the UK do so legally for work or family reasons. There is a shortage of skilled workers in the UK, as we have seen in the NHS. Work is ongoing to address this. The small boat crossings must be addressed along with the problems in the asylum system where the backlog is unacceptable. The UK Government has recently made an agreement with France and this new pilot scheme will see small boat arrivals being detained and returned to France. An equal number of migrants will then be able to come to the UK from France through a new legal route. Those coming into the UK must be fully documented and go through a stringent security check as opposed to uncontrolled entry such as small boats. In addition to the asylum process, the UK has operated various routes for people seeking humanitarian protection in the past. The three recent examples of this are the Afghan, Syrian and Ukrainian resettlement programmes. Like other countries, the UK follows the 1951 Refugee Convention that a refugee should not be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom and that there are minimum standards for how refugees should be treated including a right to housing, work and education. As ever, if you have any queries or concerns or you have an issue that you would like me to try and assist you with, please do not hesitate to contact me on 01978 788854 or

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Politicians fleeing the stage as old certainties collapse
The Deputy First Minister, however you view her politics, has been held in high regard by many as a hard-working minister and committed MSP. In more stable times, a career in politics would have offered a variety of long-term attractions. Today, though, the appeal of a quieter life beckons, as the retreat into private life provides respite from the manifold crises which present themselves in politics, economics, international affairs and society writ large. READ MORE: What Kate Forbes's exit means for future SNP leadership hopefuls Of course, there have always been wicked issues to consider. But in this era, it is the confluence of many fissures and dilemmas at once which generates the kind of environment in which things unravel rather more sharply. Simply put, there isn't a roadmap for how to get out of the mess, or to escape the dogmas which got us here in the first place. As a result, the rate of attrition increases. Jackie Baillie says that it is notable that the SNP's 'former rising stars are abandoning the stage'. This is true. And it is also not exactly controversial to suggest this indicates that independence is not on the horizon, or that there exists a compelling and inspiring strategy around the issue that might entice lifelong nationalists to stay the course a little longer. But this is to miss the wider point: it is a tale that can be told of the UK establishment too. Between Margaret Thatcher coming to power in 1979 and Tony Blair leaving office in 2007, only John Major came in between. That is close to three decades of relative stability as far as the leadership of the British state is concerned. Over those years, we saw the miners' strike; great showdowns between strikers and police; riots over the poll tax; mass protests against war in Iraq; Black Monday and much else. At the same time, those upheavals also entailed a level of state coherence and political infrastructure which doesn't exist in the same way now. The Conservative Party, the essential instrument of ruling class power, pursued a strategy and vision for British capitalism as a whole, coinciding with the Reagan administration in the United States. This set about dismantling the trade union movement and embarking on a process of privatisation, deregulation and financialisation known as neoliberalism. READ MORE: From rising star to Deputy First Minister – Kate Forbes' career as she stands down Yes, there were challenges. But at the same time there was a plan for how to resolve the immediate questions posed around how to secure new economic growth and to discipline the working class into the bargain. But this arrangement could only ever overcome the accumulation of problems bound up with the system for a relatively short period. As Martin Wolf of the Financial Times writes: 'Indubitably, a serious government would be devoting vast intellectual resources to the question of how to raise the growth rate. None has, including this one. A starting point, in my view, must be recognition that the Thatcher experiment failed: it did not transform the underlying performance of the economy for the better. This must now be admitted. 'Too much of the post-Thatcher performance was unsustainable. This was, in good part, because it was the fruit of a global credit bubble, in which the UK was a leading actor.' Thus, after the 2008 financial crisis, the condition of politics changes. As it bled into society through austerity and bailouts for bankers, the rotation in leadership advances at pace. By the time David Cameron leaves office in 2016 after the Brexit referendum – itself an outgrowth of the divisions over the future among a once united status quo – the rot has set in. We then have Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, and Rishi Sunak in quick succession. (Image: Lucy North/PA Wire) That's four Tory prime ministers in a span of eight years. One of these, Truss, lasts only 49 days. This is abnormal and a reflection of the deep-seated problems built up in a period where living standards went into decline, as the wealth of the super-rich grew to unfathomable levels. Gone too are old certainties, like the permanence of the European Union, or indeed the Conservative Party itself. Keir Starmer has been in the job for a year and is already widely reviled. Doubtless the chatter around his replacement will increase, as a hapless Kemi Badenoch attempts to revive the fortunes of a once semi-invincible organ of the British establishment in the face of new challenges in the shape of Reform. Labour also face a test from their left too, in the form of the nascent new lefty party. The political system is cracking up under the pressures of a failed economic model and the projects of blame displacement and scapegoating attendant to it. This further shreds the social fabric, creating a polarised and angry populace, increasingly alienated from official politics. Authoritarianism, then, is an inevitable but futile resource from which those in power will increasingly draw upon. READ MORE: 'Totally gutted': SNP politicians and members react as Kate Forbes to stand down All of this is set against a global backdrop in which the norms, rules and conviviality once handed down as tablets of stone have been shattered. The post-war order is over, and finished for good, alongside many of its institutions. This is a new, multipolar age for which the vast majority of politicians are simply not trained for and do not understand. These epochal shifts combine with the fact that there is no obvious route to meaningful economic growth or an end to domestic volatility. It is little wonder, then, that many are asking themselves why on earth they should take up such a poisoned chalice at all.