logo
Power generation hits 4-year high in April

Power generation hits 4-year high in April

Express Tribune22-05-2025

Listen to article
Pakistan's power generation in April 2025 surged to 10,513 gigawatt-hours (GWh), reflecting a robust 22% year-on-year (YoY) and 25% month-on-month (MoM) increase — the highest monthly generation recorded in the past 48 months, according to data published by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA). "Power generation in April'25 surged by 22% YoY, highest in 48 months, to 10,513 GWh," wrote Arif Habib Limited (AHL). Despite this sharp rise, generation remained broadly aligned with the regulatory reference level, helping produce a positive Fuel Cost Adjustment (FCA) for the month, the first since June 2024.
"Shift to expensive fuel mix resulted in the first positive FCA after June 2024," said Research Head of Optimus Capital, Maaz Azam.
The uptick in generation is largely attributed to soaring electricity demand, spurred by rising temperatures and reduced reliance by industries on captive power generation. Analysts believe the shift was also influenced by lower grid tariffs, which made national grid electricity more attractive compared to captive sources. "The rise in generation is attributed to increased demand, driven by a reduction in tariffs," said Research Head of AHL, Sana Tawfiq.
Cumulative power generation during the first 10 months of the fiscal year 2025 (10MFY25) reached 100,661 GWh, showing a marginal decline of 0.4% YoY from the same period last year.
In terms of source-wise contribution, hydropower (hydel) led the mix with 2,306 GWh (22% share), up 11% YoY, followed by re-gasified liquefied natural gas (RLNG) at 2,157 GWh (21%) and nuclear at 1,882 GWh (18%). A notable highlight was the 59% YoY growth in local coal-based generation, which rose to 1,540 GWh, supported by increased utilisation and favourable fuel costs. Conversely, generation from imported coal and natural gas declined by 32% and 26% YoY, respectively, reflecting deliberate cost-cutting and fuel optimisation strategies. Wind and solar energy maintained a combined share of 9.2%, consistent with seasonal patterns, while residual fuel oil (RFO) re-entered the generation mix with 83 GWh at a steep cost of Rs28.77/kWh.
From a policy perspective, a significant development in March 2025 was the imposition of a Rs791/mmbtu levy on gas-based captive power plants (CPPs), raising their effective gas tariff to Rs4,291/mmbtu. According to estimates by AKD Securities, this translates into a staggering generation cost of around Rs42/kWh for off-grid captive units operating at 35% thermal efficiency. This steep cost differential prompted many industrial users to switch to relatively cheaper grid electricity, which averaged around Rs28/kWh (excluding taxes and duties).
While the fuel cost of power generation rose by 8% YoY to Rs9.92/kWh in April 2025, driven by a heavier reliance on expensive fuels like RLNG and RFO, the average cost of generation actually fell on a MoM and YoY basis. It dropped to Rs8.95/kWh, down 5% YoY and 8% MoM, compared to Rs9.75/kWh in April 2024—reflecting improved fuel mix efficiency and lower reliance on imported fuels.
According to Optimus Capital Management, the total generation of 10,513 GWh in April was slightly below the reference level of 10,550 GWh, a shortfall of just 0.4%. However, changes in the fuel mix were stark. Hydel power dropped by 28.6% versus its reference (3,228 GWh), while coal-fired generation soared by 48.6%, with imported coal usage jumping 115.1% and local coal rising 22.5%. Meanwhile, RLNG generation grew by 42.1%, and nuclear generation fell by 22.3%.
The cost impact of this fuel mix shift was significant. RLNG's contribution to fuel cost jumped to Rs4.98/kWh, up from a reference of Rs3.31/kWh. Local and imported coal together contributed Rs3.30/kWh, while nuclear (Rs0.38/kWh) and hydel (zero marginal cost) remained low-cost contributors. The net result was a positive FCA of Rs1.27/kWh, calculated against a reference fuel cost of Rs7.68/kWh. This marked change in fuel mix, particularly the increased reliance on RLNG and coal, alongside stable generation levels, led to the country's first positive FCA adjustment in 10 months, a noteworthy development for both consumers and the broader energy sector.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nepra's KE MYT decision: Power Div. submits review motion
Nepra's KE MYT decision: Power Div. submits review motion

Business Recorder

time18 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Nepra's KE MYT decision: Power Div. submits review motion

ISLAMABAD: The Power Division on Monday submitted the much-talked about review motion challenging the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority's recent Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) determinations for K-Electric (KE) for 2024-25 to 2029-30. The government is urging Nepra to revise key assumptions, performance benchmarks and profit margins in line with real-world data and standards applied to other power utilities. According to Power Division, Nepra allowed KE several cost items and profit margins that are more generous than those granted to other utilities across the country. As a result, electricity bills for Karachi consumers are set to rise disproportionately, and public finances will bear an unnecessary burden. Total financial impact is in excess of Rs 300 billion of the intervention identified for review by GoP in KE MYT. Power Minister, Sardar Awais Khan Leghari, in his tweet said that the power sector of Pakistan cannot afford any inefficiencies encouraged through tariff structure of any company, irrespective of whether it is private or public. 'Our review supports a sustainable and healthy environment in the distribution system of Pakistan in a responsible manner. Power Division hopes that the review process is carried out in a transparent and fair manner,' he added. The key concerns in the Review Petition are as follows: Supply (fuel and fuel related costs): Nepra set KE's fuel-cost rate at Rs. 15.99/kWh, whereas other utilities buy power at lower rates from the national grid. This gap shifts about Rs. 28 billion (FY 2024) and Rs. 13 billion (FY 2025) of extra costs onto the federal budget rather than onto KE customers. Recovery Loss Allowance: KE was permitted to include 'recovery losses' in its tariff even though its own records show it recovers more than the level Nepra allowed. No other utility received this special allowance. This adds roughly Rs. 36 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35 billion in FY 2025 to KE's revenue that consumers end up paying. Cumulative impact over a 7-year period is more than Rs 200 billion. Working Capital Allowance: NEPRA permitted KE a 24 percent markup on working capital, a much higher percentage than in its previous tariff and higher than any other power distributor. This increased KE's allowable revenue by about Rs. 2.4 billion in FY 2024 and is projected to total around Rs. 15 billion over the control period of 7 years Higher Allowed Distribution Loss: Nepra set KE's allowed loss at 13.90 percent, instead of the 13.46 percent KE had planned. Losses are electricity that is generated but not billed, due to leaks or theft, or kunda. Around 7 percent of all such leakages can be attributed to theft. By permitting a higher loss level, KE passes on an extra Rs. 3.1 billion in FY 2024, rising to about Rs. 21 billion over the control period. 'Law & Order' Margin: KE received a special 2 percent margin to offset security costs in Karachi—a perk not granted to any other utility, even those operating in equally or more volatile regions. Moreover, Law & Order in Karachi has improved considerably over the last few years, and thereby there exists no reason for such a margin. This margin adds approximately Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period to KE's revenue requirement. Retention of 'Other Income': KE is allowed to keep money from fines imposed on its contractors, interest on bank deposits, and profits from side businesses. In effect, consumers have already paid for the assets that generate these incomes, so these funds should reduce KE's costs to customers, not pad its revenue. Effectively, it is being proposed that any such gain on assets that has been financed by consumers needs to be shared with consumers. Transmission (Moving Power from Grid to KE): High transmission loss Target & skewed sharing; NEPRA allowed KE a 1.30 percent loss target, even though KE's historical losses are closer to 0.75 percent. KE keeps 75 percent of any savings if it performs better than 1.30 percent, passing only 25 percent of savings to consumers. This encourages inefficiency and keeps bills high. Financial impact is about Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024, rising to roughly Rs. 28 billion over the control period. Excessive Return on Equity (RoE): KE was granted a 12 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 24.46 percent in rupee terms). Other national utilities (like NTDC) receive only 15 percent RoE in rupees. This difference costs consumers around Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024 and approximately Rs. 37 billion over the control period. Distribution (delivering power to homes & businesses)- High distribution - RoE disparity: KE's distribution arm was allowed 14 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 29.68 percent in rupees). By comparison, other Discos like FESCO get only about 14.47 percent RoE in rupees. This adds roughly Rs. 3.7 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35.6 billion over the control period to KE's revenue. Distribution Loss & Special Allowance: KE was granted an extra 2 percent 'law & order' margin on top of its allowed losses, even though Karachi's security situation is similar to or better than other regions. KE also keeps 25 percent of any savings if it performs better. These practices cost consumers about Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period. Working Capital Markup: A 23.91 percent markup was approved for KE's distribution working capital—far higher than any other utility. This adds about Rs. 0.8 billion in FY 2024 and roughly Rs. 10 billion over the control period to KE's revenue requirement. Generation (KE's Own Power Plants), Payments to Idle Power Plants (Take-or-Pay): Nepra approved capacity payments to several KE power plants (BQPS-I, KCCP, KGTPS, SGTPS) even though these plants will run at minimal or no output because KE sources cheaper power from the national grid. Consumers and the government pay for capacity that is not used. This costs about Rs. 12.7 billion in FY 2025 and roughly Rs. 82.5 billion over the multi-year period. Favorable indexation &RoE for KE's plants: Under a hybrid 'take-or-pay' model, KE's plants keep full inflation adjustments (indexed to U.S. CPI or USD/PKR), while independent power producers (IPPs) do not receive equally generous terms. RoE for KE's plants was set at 17 percent (using PKR 168/USD), higher than typical IPP terms, costing Rs. 7 billion in FY 2024 and about Rs. 57.3 billion over the control period. This will result in overall higher bills for Karachi customers; KE's allowed costs, profit margins, and extra allowances will cause Karachi consumers' electricity bills to rise significantly compared to other regions. Several KE cost items—especially the inflated fuel benchmark and payments to idle plants—are effectively covered by the government, stretching public finances. The determinations are unfair treatment & efficiency discouraged: Granting KE advantages not given to other utilities creates a 'two-tier' system. This discourages KE from boosting efficiency, and it undermines transparent, consistent tariff-setting nationwide. The Government maintains that all utilities should be treated equally. KE should not receive special cost or profit allowances unavailable to other power companies and tariffs must reflect actual costs and reasonable returns. Extra allowances for inefficiency and high profit rates must be removed to keep bills affordable. For regulatory accountability Nepra should revise assumptions, benchmarks, and profit margins so they align with real performance data and the standards used for other utilities. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Nepra's KE MYT decision: PD submits review motion
Nepra's KE MYT decision: PD submits review motion

Business Recorder

time21 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Nepra's KE MYT decision: PD submits review motion

ISLAMABAD: The Power Division on Monday submitted the much-talked about review motion challenging the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority's recent Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) determinations for K-Electric (KE) for 2024-25 to 2029-30. The government is urging Nepra to revise key assumptions, performance benchmarks and profit margins in line with real-world data and standards applied to other power utilities. According to Power Division, Nepra allowed KE several cost items and profit margins that are more generous than those granted to other utilities across the country. As a result, electricity bills for Karachi consumers are set to rise disproportionately, and public finances will bear an unnecessary burden. Total financial impact is in excess of Rs 300 billion of the intervention identified for review by GoP in KE MYT. Power Minister, Sardar Awais Khan Leghari, in his tweet said that the power sector of Pakistan cannot afford any inefficiencies encouraged through tariff structure of any company, irrespective of whether it is private or public. 'Our review supports a sustainable and healthy environment in the distribution system of Pakistan in a responsible manner. Power Division hopes that the review process is carried out in a transparent and fair manner,' he added. The key concerns in the Review Petition are as follows: Supply (fuel and fuel related costs): Nepra set KE's fuel-cost rate at Rs. 15.99/kWh, whereas other utilities buy power at lower rates from the national grid. This gap shifts about Rs. 28 billion (FY 2024) and Rs. 13 billion (FY 2025) of extra costs onto the federal budget rather than onto KE customers. Recovery Loss Allowance: KE was permitted to include 'recovery losses' in its tariff even though its own records show it recovers more than the level Nepra allowed. No other utility received this special allowance. This adds roughly Rs. 36 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35 billion in FY 2025 to KE's revenue that consumers end up paying. Cumulative impact over a 7-year period is more than Rs 200 billion. Working Capital Allowance: NEPRA permitted KE a 24 percent markup on working capital, a much higher percentage than in its previous tariff and higher than any other power distributor. This increased KE's allowable revenue by about Rs. 2.4 billion in FY 2024 and is projected to total around Rs. 15 billion over the control period of 7 years Higher Allowed Distribution Loss: Nepra set KE's allowed loss at 13.90 percent, instead of the 13.46 percent KE had planned. Losses are electricity that is generated but not billed, due to leaks or theft, or kunda. Around 7 percent of all such leakages can be attributed to theft. By permitting a higher loss level, KE passes on an extra Rs. 3.1 billion in FY 2024, rising to about Rs. 21 billion over the control period. 'Law & Order' Margin: KE received a special 2 percent margin to offset security costs in Karachi—a perk not granted to any other utility, even those operating in equally or more volatile regions. Moreover, Law & Order in Karachi has improved considerably over the last few years, and thereby there exists no reason for such a margin. This margin adds approximately Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period to KE's revenue requirement. Retention of 'Other Income': KE is allowed to keep money from fines imposed on its contractors, interest on bank deposits, and profits from side businesses. In effect, consumers have already paid for the assets that generate these incomes, so these funds should reduce KE's costs to customers, not pad its revenue. Effectively, it is being proposed that any such gain on assets that has been financed by consumers needs to be shared with consumers. Transmission (Moving Power from Grid to KE): High transmission loss Target & skewed sharing; NEPRA allowed KE a 1.30 percent loss target, even though KE's historical losses are closer to 0.75 percent. KE keeps 75 percent of any savings if it performs better than 1.30 percent, passing only 25 percent of savings to consumers. This encourages inefficiency and keeps bills high. Financial impact is about Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024, rising to roughly Rs. 28 billion over the control period. Excessive Return on Equity (RoE): KE was granted a 12 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 24.46 percent in rupee terms). Other national utilities (like NTDC) receive only 15 percent RoE in rupees. This difference costs consumers around Rs. 4 billion in FY 2024 and approximately Rs. 37 billion over the control period. Distribution (delivering power to homes & businesses)- High distribution - RoE disparity: KE's distribution arm was allowed 14 percent RoE in U.S. dollars (about 29.68 percent in rupees). By comparison, other Discos like FESCO get only about 14.47 percent RoE in rupees. This adds roughly Rs. 3.7 billion in FY 2024 and Rs. 35.6 billion over the control period to KE's revenue. Distribution Loss & Special Allowance: KE was granted an extra 2 percent 'law & order' margin on top of its allowed losses, even though Karachi's security situation is similar to or better than other regions. KE also keeps 25 percent of any savings if it performs better. These practices cost consumers about Rs. 14 billion in FY 2024 and up to Rs. 99 billion over the multi-year period. Working Capital Markup: A 23.91 percent markup was approved for KE's distribution working capital—far higher than any other utility. This adds about Rs. 0.8 billion in FY 2024 and roughly Rs. 10 billion over the control period to KE's revenue requirement. Generation (KE's Own Power Plants), Payments to Idle Power Plants (Take-or-Pay): Nepra approved capacity payments to several KE power plants (BQPS-I, KCCP, KGTPS, SGTPS) even though these plants will run at minimal or no output because KE sources cheaper power from the national grid. Consumers and the government pay for capacity that is not used. This costs about Rs. 12.7 billion in FY 2025 and roughly Rs. 82.5 billion over the multi-year period. Favorable indexation &RoE for KE's plants: Under a hybrid 'take-or-pay' model, KE's plants keep full inflation adjustments (indexed to U.S. CPI or USD/PKR), while independent power producers (IPPs) do not receive equally generous terms. RoE for KE's plants was set at 17 percent (using PKR 168/USD), higher than typical IPP terms, costing Rs. 7 billion in FY 2024 and about Rs. 57.3 billion over the control period. This will result in overall higher bills for Karachi customers; KE's allowed costs, profit margins, and extra allowances will cause Karachi consumers' electricity bills to rise significantly compared to other regions. Several KE cost items—especially the inflated fuel benchmark and payments to idle plants—are effectively covered by the government, stretching public finances. The determinations are unfair treatment & efficiency discouraged: Granting KE advantages not given to other utilities creates a 'two-tier' system. This discourages KE from boosting efficiency, and it undermines transparent, consistent tariff-setting nationwide. The Government maintains that all utilities should be treated equally. KE should not receive special cost or profit allowances unavailable to other power companies and tariffs must reflect actual costs and reasonable returns. Extra allowances for inefficiency and high profit rates must be removed to keep bills affordable. For regulatory accountability Nepra should revise assumptions, benchmarks, and profit margins so they align with real performance data and the standards used for other utilities. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Stocks close bearish amid tax hike concerns
Stocks close bearish amid tax hike concerns

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

Stocks close bearish amid tax hike concerns

The Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) endured a volatile session on Monday as investor interest remained muted ahead of the federal budget announcement. The KSE-100 index reached the intra-day high of 1,018 points before hitting the low of 899 points and closing at 118,878, a drop of 813 points, or 0.68%. Analysts attributed the bearish activity to reports of proposed tax hikes on banking and saving schemes as well as additional petroleum levies. Moreover, the inflation rate accelerated last month, reversing the decline recorded in previous months. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 3.5% year-on-year in May on account of a jump in food prices, which further dampened market sentiment. Ahsan Mehanti of Arif Habib Corp commented that stocks closed under pressure in the pre-budget session. Reports of higher taxes on income from banking and saving schemes and petroleum levies in the FY26 budget impacted sentiment. Mehanti added that concerns over geopolitical tensions and rupee fluctuations also played the role of catalysts in bearish close at the PSX. At the end of trading, the benchmark KSE-100 index recorded a decrease of 813.29 points, or 0.68%, and settled at 118,877.81. In its review, Topline Securities stated that the stock market exhibited volatility, with the index fluctuating within a wide band, primarily influenced by global market trends. Local equities faced selling pressure amid uncertainty surrounding the upcoming budget and the government's proposed 2-3% hike in tax rate on passive income. The KSE-100 index reached the intra-day high of 1,018 points and intra-day low of 899 points, eventually closing at 118,878, a drop of 813 points, it said. Topline noted that the upward momentum was supported by notable gains in Pakgen Power, National Foods, Meezan Bank, the National Bank of Pakistan and Bank AL Habib, which added 201 points to the index. Conversely, losses in Systems Limited, Engro Holdings and Pakistan Petroleum dragged the index down by 341 points. In its commentary, Arif Habib Limited (AHL) said that Monday marked another session when the KSE-100 closed below 120,000 points. Some 29 shares rose while 71 fell, with Pakgen Power (+10%), National Foods (+9.93%) and Meezan Bank (+0.72%) contributing the most to index gains. On the flip side, Systems Ltd (-4.98%), Engro Holdings (-1.76%) and Pakistan Petroleum (-1.78%) were the biggest drags, it said. Pakistan's inflation rate accelerated in May, driven by a jump in food prices and reversing the decline seen in the last few months. The CPI rose 3.5% year-on-year, above AHL expectations of 3.04%. "The KSE-100 continues to tread water below 120,000 and several key support levels below 120k appear to be inevitable," AHL commented. JS Global analyst Mubashir Anis Naviwala commented that the PSX opened on a positive note and rallied to the intra-day high of 120,591 points. Later, selling pressure dragged the index down to close at 118,878, lower by 813 points. "Looking ahead, we expect market pressure to persist in the near term; however, this may present a buying opportunity in select sectors. Investors are advised to accumulate fundamentally strong stocks in the cement, automobile and fertiliser sectors on dips," the analyst added. Overall trading volumes decreased to 497.9 million shares compared with Friday's tally of 580.3 million. The value of shares traded was Rs23.5 billion. Shares of 464 companies were traded. Of these, 193 stocks closed higher, 231 fell and 40 remained unchanged. Dewan Cement was the volume leader with trading in 40.4 million shares, gaining Rs0.60 to close at Rs12.67. It was followed by Invest Bank with 31.9 million shares, gaining Rs0.84 to close at Rs2.31 and K-Electric with 30.9 million shares, falling Rs0.23 to close at Rs5.09. Foreign investors sold shares worth Rs1.97 billion, the National Clearing Company reported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store