
Candy projected to be at the center of this year's Easter spending despite rising prices
Candy projected to be at the center of this year's Easter spending despite rising prices Majority of Americans who celebrate the holiday, approximately 92%, do so with the assistance of candy, a National Confectioners Association report says.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Easter egg ideas that aren't candy
Create an easter egg hunt without the sugar crash.
Inflation, tariffs and a volatile stock market may be causing the average American consumer anxiety daily, but they still aren't stopping people from indulging in a sweet Easter this year.
Even in the face of looming economic uncertainty, Easter spending is expected to go up in 2025, according to a recent National Retail Federation (NRF) report. Shoppers plan to spend a total of $23.6 billion on Easter this year, up from last year's $22.4 billion and approaching the record high of $24 billion in 2023.
The biggest area of spending is not eggs, despite the volatile marketing resulting in high prices, but candy, which is projected to account for $3.3 billion in spending.
It seems that while Americans may be willing to reach for cheaper alternatives to eggs for dyeing, they are not about to let a year pass without getting their hands on a Peep or Cadbury Cream Egg.
Easter shoppers plan to make candy their number one purchase this year
The NRF's survey found that the largest intended spending category was candy, accounting for 92% of planned purchases. The general category of "food" followed at 89%, trailed by gifts at 65%, decorations at 51% and clothing at 49%.
The overwhelming majority of Americans who celebrate the holiday (92%) do so with the assistance of candy, according to another report by the National Confectioners Association (NCA). The top sweet treats bought for the holiday include chocolate eggs or bunnies, jelly beans, candy-coated eggs and marshmallow candy.
Chocolate reigns supreme despite rising costs
The most-loved and most-purchased category of candy around Easter is chocolate. According to the NCA, 89% of people who make Easter baskets include chocolate and candy, with the most popular items of all being chocolate bunnies and chocolate eggs.
These themed chocolate treats account for 29% of Easter Basket items, with 90 million chocolate bunnies being sold per year, according to an April WalletHub report. Other favorites include jelly beans (25%) and Peeps (14%), according to WalletHub.
The NCA also settled a time-honored debate in their survey, reporting that 77% of Americans prefer to eat their chocolate bunny's ears first, while only 16% go feet-first and a lonely 6% start at the tail.
Don't expect stocking up on chocolate to be cheap this year, however. On top of prices that are anticipated to rise due to trade tariffs, chocolate makers were already battling with rising cocoa prices.
As of April 16, the price of cocoa is $8,400 per ton, up from prices that hovered in the $2,000 range at the same time in 2023. Cocoa prices have been marching steadily upward in recent years due to droughts and dry weather, resulting in crop shortages. Cocoa requires tropical conditions to thrive, meaning the U.S. relies heavily on importing the commodity, and 70% of the world's supply is grown in West Africa. Last year alone, the Ivory Coast and Ghana produced almost 3 million tons.
Changing temperatures and drier conditions have and continue to impact the prices of the raw materials central to making chocolate. And, even with Donald Trump's targeted "reciprocal" tariffs on many countries currently paused for 90 days, the blanket 10% tariff still has the potential to drive prices up even further.
If the previously scheduled tariffs were to resume at the same planned rate after the pause, the biggest producers of cocoa, Côte d'Ivoire, Ghana, Indonesia and Ecuador, would be hit with 21%, 10%, 32% and 10%, respectively.
How much are Easter candy favorites this year?
When it comes to beloved Easter candy, the size variety means a lot of price variety. While prices will vary from store to store, state to state and city to city, online price tags show that some affordable options are out there.
At Walmart, for example, a chocolate bunny can range from as little as $1.36 to more than $12, depending on size and brand. Target offers a similar price range of $1.49 to a little over $12, while Walgreens ranges from $1.50 to just shy of $13.
At Walmart, Peeps range in price from $1.47 to $13, versus $2.69 to $8.00 at Target and $1.12 to $7.50 at Walgreens, again depending on size.
Jelly beans of different brands, varieties and bag sizes run from $1.64 up to $14 at Walmart, $2.99 to $13 at Target and $1.99 to $15 at Walgreens.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped
There's little left for us to say that can further embarrass the Tesla Cybertruck, a vehicle that was supposed to be the culmination of Elon Musk's genius. And maybe this is what Musk's genius looks like. The luckless EV has faced eight recalls so far, and its trademark stainless steel panels, when they aren't flying off, have demonstrated that they're better at serving as a shiny canvas for spray paint than as the armor of an "apocalypse-proof" tank. But somehow, its already dire sales are now even worse than expected. In the entire first quarter of 2025, Tesla has managed to sell just 7,100 Cybertrucks in the US, according to registration data from S&P Global Mobility cited by the Wall Street Journal. It's an astounding and rapid plummet, when in the fourth quarter of 2024, Tesla sold close to double that amount, with roughly 13,000 Cybertrucks. A lot changed between those two quarters — like Musk embarking on a spectacular speedrun to destroy his and Tesla's image, mainly by leading the Trump administration's charge to gut the federal government. These actions, and Musk's personal espousing of far-right politics, sparked worldwide protests against him and his automaker. It has yet to recover, with Tesla's total sales in the US dropping nine percent in the first three months of this year. There are other factors at play, too, like the success of its Chinese competitors and its aging vehicle lineup, but the imploded brand reputation looms largest. And more than any other of its vehicles, the Cybertruck for one reason or another has embodied the public's souring sentiment on Musk, becoming prime targets for vandalism. They're also notoriously unreliable, sold for nothing less than $100,000 before cheaper $70,000 versions were desperately rolled out, and launched with a range over 150 miles shorter than what Musk promised. In all of 2024, the company sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks. The most recent quarter's tally makes Musk previous boast that the automaker would sell up to half a million Cybertrucks per year even more ridiculous. Is it any wonder that buyers are staying away? So few people want to buy these things that in May Electrek reported that Tesla was sitting on an inventory worth $800 million of 10,000 unsold Cybertrucks — an embarrassment as much as it is a logistical headache. Dealerships have resorted to dumping their glut of the unorthodox pickup trucks in deserted parking lots. The pain isn't likely to stop anytime soon. Trump's tariffs, which factored into Musk's fallout with the president, will drive up the costs of car parts. The administration also plans to axe tax credits for purchasing EVs, demolishing a huge incentive for American consumers to buy from automakers like Tesla. More on Tesla: Terrifying Footage Shows Self-Driving Tesla Get Confused by the Sun, Mow Down Innocent Grandmother Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge sides with city of Austin in Statesman PUD case
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A Travis County Civil Court judge sided with the city of Austin, potentially moving forward the Planned Unit Development (PUD) on the former Austin-American Statesman property. According to an attorney for the Save Our Springs Alliance (SOS), the judge 'did not provide a reason' for the ruling against the organization. The PUD was approved in 2022 for a development that would include a 275-room high-rise hotel, six towers of residential units and office space. From 2022: Some concerned about required park space in Statesman PUD conversation According to the city, PUD zoning is meant 'to preserve the natural environment, encourage high quality development and innovative design, and ensure adequate public facilities and services' and 'must be superior to the development that would occur under conventional zoning and subdivision regulations.' However, PUD zoning also 'provides greater design flexibility by permitting modifications of site development regulations.' The lawsuit that was rejected in court Tuesday claimed that Austin City Council violated the Texas Open meetings Act and the Austin City Charter when it approved the PUD for 18.86 acres along the south shore of lady Bird lake. SOS claimed that the city did not provide adequate public notice regarding 'major changes to City standards.' The attorney for SOS told KXAN they are 'considering options for appeal.' KXAN has reached out to the city of Austin for its response to the ruling. We will update this article if a statement is received. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
You Are Completely Unprepared for What Tesla's Robotaxi Actually Looks Like
We've finally gotten a glimpse at one of Tesla's Robotaxis in action. But don't expect your socks to be blown off. As seen in a bystander's footage taken in Austin, Texas, that Elon Musk has proudly reshared, it's literally just a black Model Y with the word "Robotaxi" scrawled on the side in a painfully outdated graffiti font. The future is truly upon us. "Beautifully simple design," Musk tweeted, presumably through a pained grimace. To be clear, this isn't the Cybercab, Tesla's currently in-development car that's supposed to function exclusively as an autonomous taxi, with an extremely boneheaded design that features only two seats and no steering wheel. What we're seeing, instead, is a regular Tesla with a software update (and a mid-life crisis design flourish.) "These are unmodified Tesla cars coming straight from the factory," Musk explained in a followup tweet, "meaning that every Tesla coming out of our factories is capable of unsupervised self-driving!" The self-driving cabs are right around the corner. According to a Bloomberg report last month, Tesla plans to launch its Robotaxi service in Austin on June 12, with development reportedly ahead of schedule. Around the time of the reporting, Musk confirmed in a tweet that the automaker had completed its first test of operating a Robotaxi with no human behind the wheel on a public road. In the recent footage, there was no driver physically present, either. The cab service will start with about 10 vehicles operating in the city, according to Musk. At first, only Tesla employees will be allowed to ride in them. But Musk insisted that the service will quickly expand, if all goes to plan. In one of his trademark grand promises, the billionaire estimated that the city would be crawling with over 1,000 Tesla robotaxis "within a few months" of launching, and upped the ante further by adding that more than a million self-driving cars would be roaming American roads by the end of 2026. There are still huge question marks hovering over the entire thing. Tesla's current self-driving offerings, like its misleadingly named Full Self-Driving feature, are considered to have Level 2 autonomy. That means a human driver must be physically present and ready to take control at any moment. But Robotaxis will need to operate at Level 4 autonomy and higher, which entails they're capable of driving with no human present, though only in limited conditions. That's a concerning leap, as Tesla's safety record with its existing FSD is already questionable, and it's yet to demonstrate that it can even accomplish Level 3. The choice of location explains a lot. Texas virtually has no special regulations in place for autonomous vehicles. A prospective Robotaxi basically just has to follow the same safety requirements as any other car, along with having cameras and other data recording systems installed. And due to a 2017 Texas law, cities can't intervene by imposing their own regulations, leaving everything handled by the state. At this stage, it's also unclear how Tesla plans to teleoperate the vehicles, a term that describes the use of humans to remotely supervise or even completely control the Robotaxis as they prowl public roads — something that Tesla's competitors in the space also do, though they try to avoid talking about. Tesla has put up listings for developing a teleoperation system — but, perhaps tellingly, has avoided providing any further details. More on Tesla: Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped