
Australian police offer $500,000 reward in bid to find murdered British backpacker Peter Falconio's remains
Northern Territory police are offering a $500,000 reward for information on the location of the remains of British backpacker Peter Falconio, whose murder in the Australian outback more than 20 years ago captured worldwide attention.
In July 2001, Falconio, then 28, was travelling Australia with his girlfriend, Joanne Lees, on a remote stretch of highway about 300km north of Alice Springs in the NT when he was pulled over by Bradley John Murdoch, who said their van might have an engine problem.
Falconio went behind the car with Murdoch to investigate, and Lees heard a gunshot, before Murdoch cable-tied her and covered her head.
Lees manage to escape and hide in bushland for five hours while pursued by Murdoch and his dog before flagging down a truck driver, while Falconio died from a gunshot wound to the head.
Murdoch was convicted of murder and attempted kidnapping in 2005 and sentenced to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 28 years, but had never revealed the location of Falconio's body.
The case partially inspired the hit Australian film Wolf Creek.
While the trial was underway, an injunction on the release of Wolf Creek was placed by the Northern Territory court, in the belief it could influence the outcome of proceedings.
The film, which centred around the kidnapping of three young backpackers in their 20s on a return from a hike in Wolf Creek National Park in the Western Australian outback, said in the tagline it was 'based on true events', including Ivan Milat's hitchhiker murders from the early 1990s and the abduction and murder of Falconio.
NT acting commander Mark Grieve told reporters on Wednesday the murder had 'captured the heart of the country' when it occurred and 'never gone away'.
'We've never gone away as far as investigating it,' he said. 'And it's just something that's captured worldwide attention.'
He said despite 'continued efforts' by police to pursue any viable information or leads, Falconio's body had never been located, leading to a renewed reward approaching the 24th anniversary of his death.
'The NT police still hold out hope that someone may be able to provide some vital information to assist in this search,' he said. 'We think there's still people out there that may hold some information.'
Grieve said police had interviewed Murdoch in recent weeks and made 'numerous approaches' over the years to no avail. Police had also been in regular contact with Falconio's family, including in the past 24 hours.
'He's [Murdoch's] not being too forthcoming in regards to engaging with police, but we will continue doing what we have to,' he said.
'There may be someone out there that he's confided in, whether or not that's family or friends, we just don't know.
'Like any ongoing police investigation, you want to solve it, you want to try and at least bring some slither of resolution to Peter's family by bringing home his remains.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The mushroom murder trial: Bizarre case of a woman accused of killing her ex-husband's relatives with beef wellington
A jury is now deliberating whether a woman in Australia is guilty of murdering three people and attempting to kill another by serving them a lunch laced with poisonous mushrooms. Erin Patterson, 50, gave her estranged husband's parents and his aunt and uncle beef wellington at her home in July 2023. The next day all four guests were hospitalised with symptoms of death cap mushroom poisoning, and later three of them died. Patterson was arrested and charged with murder and attempted murder over the deaths, and is standing trial in a case that has gripped Australia and drawn international attention. Here's what you need to know about the trial. Who is Erin Patterson, and what is she accused of? Patterson is a mother-of-two from the Victorian town of Leongatha, east of Melbourne. She has been charged with murdering Don Patterson, Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, and charged with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson. The defendant had also been charged with three counts of attempted murder relating to her husband Simon Patterson, but those charges were dropped on Tuesday, before the trial opened. In Australia, murder carries a maximum penalty of life in prison, while attempted murder has a maximum 25-year sentence. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all the charges. What happened at the lunch? On July 29, 2023, Patterson hosted her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail, as well as Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson and Heather's husband, church pastor Ian Wilkinson. She had invited them all for lunch at her home two weeks prior. Patterson had also invited her husband, Simon, but he declined. The pair had been separated since 2015. She served her guests beef wellington, which is a beef fillet wrapped in a mushroom paste and covered with pastry, with a side of mashed potato and green beans. The day after the lunch, all four guests fell ill and went to hospital complaining of nausea and diarrhoea. Within days, Don, Gail and Heather had died, while Ian Wilkinson survived after receiving an organ transplant. What is the prosecution case? Prosecutor Nanette Rogers opened her case at the beginning of May in Victoria's Supreme Court, and the jury heard from witnesses including Patterson's estranged husband Simon, the lone survivor Ian Wilkinson, as well as medical experts and Patterson herself. The court heard that on the way to hospital, Heather told Simon she had been puzzled by Patterson eating from a plate that looked different to those she had given her guests. "I noticed that Erin put her food on a different plate to us. Her plate had colours on it. I wondered why that was. I've puzzled about it since lunch," she said, according to the prosecution. Simon told his aunt that Patterson might have run out of plates. The prosecutor said Patterson had not eaten poisonous mushrooms, and had also not fed her children, then aged nine and 14, any leftovers from the lunch. The prosecutor said she did not need to provide a motive for the killing, and the jury could make its finding without one. "You might be wondering now why would the accused do this? What is the motive? You might still be wondering this at the end of this trial," Rogers said. "You do not have to be satisfied what the motive was or even that there was a motive." What did Patterson say in her own defence? In her testimony, Patterson admitted to foraging for mushrooms and using them in her meals. She acknowledged lying after the fatal lunch but denied knowingly serving toxic mushrooms. She described her attempts at dehydrating mushrooms as an 'experiment'. In the final moments of her cross-examination, the chief prosecutor put three key accusations to Patterson: that she deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms, knowingly included them in the beef wellington and intended to kill her guests. To all three, Patterson responded: 'Disagree.' Prosecutors alleged that she had fabricated her foraging history, calling her a 'self-confessed liar' who had no supporting evidence such as books or messages about foraging, but her lawyers maintained that she was simply a mushroom enthusiast and 'a person of good character'. Patterson's defence team has argued the poisoning was a 'terrible mistake', with her barrister Colin Mandy SC telling the jury that while the guests had been poisoned by mushrooms, it had been accidental. "The defence case is what happened was a tragedy. A terrible accident," Mandy said. Her defence conceded Patterson had lied to police when she told them she had not foraged for wild mushrooms. "She did forage for mushrooms. Just so that we make that clear, she denies that she ever deliberately sought out death cap mushrooms," Mandy said. What has the judge said? Supreme Court justice Christopher Beale, who has presided over the trial in the regional Victorian town of Morwell, instructed the jurors to discount lies Patteson admitted to telling, including about her own health. 'The issue is not whether she is in some sense responsible for the tragic consequences of the lunch, but whether the prosecution has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that she is criminally responsible,' he told the jury. 'Similarly, the fact that, on her own admission, Erin Patterson told lies and disposed of evidence must not cause you to be prejudiced against her,' he added. 'This is a court of law, not a court of morals.' The jurors have been sent out to deliberate until they can reach a unanimous verdict.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Fraud victims among top crypto ATM users, Australian regulator says
June 25 (Reuters) - Australia's financial crimes monitoring agency said on Wednesday that it has identified 90 scam victims, money mules and suspected offenders as the top crypto ATM users in the country, amid efforts to address crimes enabled by digital currency. A nationwide operation led by the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) examined the most prolific crypto ATM users in each state, and based on the transaction values, identified cases likely linked to scams or fraud. "We suspected that a large volume of crypto ATM transactions were probably illicit, but disturbingly, our law enforcement partners found that almost all of the transactions we referred involved victims rather than criminals," AUSTRAC CEO Brendan Thomas said. In one instance, AUSTRAC identified a woman in her 70s who had deposited more than A$430,000 into crypto ATMs after falling victim to romance and investment scams. Earlier this month, AUSTRAC had placed conditions and limits on crypto ATM providers after flagging compliance concerns, with the number of active machines exceeding 1,800. Lately, the Australian corporate regulator has been cracking down on cryptocurrency exchanges as well, with Binance and Blockchain Global coming under scrutiny.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Major update after two teenagers were stabbed in front of terrified shoppers at a busy Westfield
A 18-year-old man has been arrested after two teenagers suffered stab wounds in a brawl at a busy Sydney Westfield. Emergency services were called to the Mount Druitt shopping centre about 5.15pm on Tuesday with reports of an assault. Shoppers told police a group of young men, believed to be known to each other, had begun brawling outside the centre. NSW Police confirmed two people were stabbed with a knife. NSW Ambulance paramedics and doctors from CareFlight treated one man, aged in his 20s, for several stab wounds to his upper body. He was taken to hospital in a critical condition. A second man, believed to be aged in his late teens, was treated for a slash wound on his hand and face. He was transported to hospital in a stable condition. Police have opened an investigation into the fight which ended in the stabbing of two young men One 20-year-old man was treated for minor injuries at the scene and did not need further care. 'Officers attached to Mount Druitt Police Area Command established a crime scene and have commenced an investigation in relation to the incident,' a NSW Police spokeswoman told Daily Mail Australia. Witnesses reported seeing one man stabbing another in the chest before a third attempted to intervene, earning himself a stab to his hand. Prior to the stabbing, locals said a larger group of teens had been fighting. 'We (saw) it, two teens were getting chased and bashed by a group of guys with weapons, they had balaclavas on,' one wrote on a online community group. Others added the group had been chasing the boy 'with a chair'. They said the knife-wielding then attacker appeared and stabbed at one of the teens before running into a nearby Kmart store.