logo
Amid USAID chaos, some humanitarian aid groups still aren't getting paid for lifesaving programs

Amid USAID chaos, some humanitarian aid groups still aren't getting paid for lifesaving programs

Yahoo02-04-2025

Edesia, a Rhode Island-based company that makes 'Plumpy'Nut' — packets of specially fortified and highly caloric peanut butter paste that saves the lives of severely malnourished babies and children — recently laid off 10% of its staff and even briefly paused production altogether for more than two weeks. Its CEO says they are having serious cash flow problems.
In Georgia, MANA Nutrition — a plant that produces similar 'Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food,' or RUTF, packets of peanut butter — is leaning heavily on a line of credit from Bank of America to stay afloat for the time being, according to the company's founder.
Neither company has gotten paid by the US Agency for International Development in months — not since the last quarter of 2024.
'We are irreparably breaking a good system for no particular reason,' said Mark Moore, MANA's CEO and co-founder. 'And the impact on children — it's not at all dramatic to say that it's going to cost, at the very least, tens of thousands of lives.'
Edesia and MANA are among the scores of organizations grappling with canceled USAID contracts and little to no payment from the agency.
Both Edesia and MANA had their USAID contracts canceled before they were reinstated; for MANA, the cancellation was rescinded after Elon Musk personally weighed in. USAID, spurred by a court ruling, has begun issuing payments to other organizations — but those payments have been sporadic and minimal.
A federal judge has ordered USAID to pay out contracts and grants for all foreign assistance work done by mid-February. However, processing those payments has been slow going, and as of a March 27 court filing, more than 6,000 payments still needed to be processed.
The payment issues are among the many consequences of the Trump administration's efforts to abruptly shut down USAID and dramatically restructure foreign aid. The combination of the US government's sweeping freeze on foreign aid in late January, mass reductions in USAID staff, and thousands of contract terminations had already caused a significant impact — even for aid groups that are still supposed to be receiving money. Some of those same groups are owed money for work done before the freeze. The administration's move to shutter the agency by July is expected to further exacerbate the consequences.
The respective CEOs of Edesia and MANA Nutrition, Navyn Salem and Moore, told CNN in recent days that they can only guess when they might next get paid by USAID for the hundreds of thousands of boxes of lifesaving peanut butter paste they have already produced for the government agency. Their contacts at USAID — who, according to Salem and Moore, were initially fired or put on leave before eventually being brought back to work — can no longer provide them with any clear answers.
Other humanitarian organizations have similarly struggled to get answers as USAID has been gutted and their usual points of contacts are cut off from the internal systems. They fear this will only get worse as the vast majority of USAID personnel are expected to lose their jobs as the Trump administration moves to abolish the agency and fold it under the State Department. Fewer than 900 USAID direct-hire employees remained on the job as of March 21, according to another notice from the agency to Congress.
USAID said in a letter sent to Congress last week that it issued more than $250 million in payments between March 10 and March 21. However, sources who spoke to CNN said payments to aid groups have trickled in — if they have arrived at all. Several humanitarian officials told CNN they are still owed money for work they had completed.
One humanitarian official said their organization has received 'so little it's basically nothing.'
'They need to start issuing significant payments for existing lifesaving programs or organizations won't be able to continue,' they told CNN.
An association that represents humanitarian aid contractors has heard from the more than 70 groups they represent that they are getting paid in 'dribs and drabs,' a source familiar said.
Another humanitarian official said if they don't get paid, even for grants that have not been terminated, their organization cannot continue their programs.
'We might have to shut them down proactively simply because we cannot pay salaries or rent,' they told CNN.
Because of slow payment or funding cuts, many humanitarian organizations have had to furlough or lay off staff. Nearly 19,000 American jobs have been lost and more than 166,000 global jobs have been lost, according to USAID Stop Work.
A State Department spokesperson confirmed to CNN that 'between March 10 and March 21, 2025, USAID disbursed a total of over $257 million,' which 'equates to approximately $25 million per business day.'
'This work continues, as does streamlining the previously problematic and fragmented payment structure,' the spokesperson said.
Even if payments are made, it is not enough to fully stem the impact of USAID's dismantlement.
'Some of the damage is irreparable,' the first humanitarian official said. 'There are so many layers of impact. We can rehire, but trust with communities and some governments is broken.'
'No one will think of the US as a sure thing anymore,' they told CNN.
With the suspension of assistance and stop-work orders put in place in late January, efforts to combat infectious diseases like tuberculosis and to treat people, including children, with HIV/AIDS have been stymied. Local employees who worked with nonprofit organizations abroad may now be at risk in countries where affiliation with the US makes them a target.
Moore, the MANA CEO, said his organization is making contingency plans for USAID potentially never returning to the equation, including by reaching out directly to nongovernmental organizations that could partner in distributing his company's packets of peanut butter.
'We're scrounging hard to drum up partners who could go around the USAID system,' he said. 'It's a stopgap idea, but planning long term will be hard.'
CNN's Tierney Sneed contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Now that Musk has turned his chainsaw on Trump, what happens to all the government data he accessed?
Now that Musk has turned his chainsaw on Trump, what happens to all the government data he accessed?

San Francisco Chronicle​

time26 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Now that Musk has turned his chainsaw on Trump, what happens to all the government data he accessed?

For anyone who's seen the quintessential slasher classic 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre,' the destructive power of a man wielding a chainsaw is the indisputable stuff of nightmares. But the same could easily be said about this year's remake featuring Elon Musk, where the dancing chainsaw slasher reenacted, for Conservative Political Action Conference theatergoers, a scene eerily reminiscent of the original. I'm thinking, specifically, of that unforgettable final scene, where Leatherface fades to black swinging his gas-powered murder weapon wildly through the air as he helplessly watches his last potential victim make her last-minute daring escape, dangling from the back of a stranger's pickup truck. Social Security? Gutted. Veterans programs? Gutted. Alzheimer's, cancer and climate research? Gutted. School lunches, Head Start, the entire Department of Education? All gutted. Air safety, food safety, consumer protections? Gutted. Gutted. Gutted. Museums, libraries, hospitals, childcare? You get the drift. And what about all those thousands of federal workers whose jobs were cut? It'll take us years to recover from these self-inflicted wounds. Not to mention the generational damage wrought to our standing in the global community by what is possibly Musk's proudest personal achievement: the decimation of America's foreign assistance programs feeding starving children, combating human trafficking, fighting malaria and reducing the transmission of HIV. All summarized, of course, by the heartless tweet: 'We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper.' While the long-term consequences of these actions may be difficult to gauge, conservative estimates are measured in the tens of thousands. But now, apparently, our modern-day Leatherface has turned his power tool on the guy who gave him the chainsaw in the first place. Even implying that his former boss was involved in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking conspiracy, and has since conspired to bury the evidence that would expose Trump's connections to Epstein's decades-long criminal activities — sort of hard to put that toothpaste back into the tube, wouldn't you say? At first glance, this appears to have all the makings of an Ultimate Fighting Championship bout, fought in the middle of a monster truck rally. This calls to mind the 1990s Claymation TV show 'Celebrity Deathmatch,' where preposterously paired big-name personalities (Hillary vs. Monica? Prince Charles vs. Prince?) fought to the death. Promises to be one hell of a show! What America may be in danger of losing sight of in the ensuing spectacle is the real threat to our national security posed by the world's richest man, who, until quite recently, enjoyed unfettered access to everything the government knows about you. Never before has the data your federal government collects about every American been consolidated into a single database. It has always, religiously, been 'siloed' into disconnected data systems — some at the Treasury Department, some at the Education Department, some at the Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among other agencies — but always carefully stored and guarded by the separate entities collecting the data. The New York Times, for example, recently published a comprehensive story detailing 314 specific personal details your government potentially knows about you. I suggest giving that a read. A week ago, this casual observer would have assumed these two men, Trump and Musk, were acting with a single motive. Assembling the master data that could make possible Trump's ambitions for sweeping dictatorial powers, and for Musk's ambitions. The sheer volume of data, of course, far outstrips anything that social media titans like Mark Zuckerberg or Musk could legally monetize. And, in any event, certainly not the quid pro quo one might expect for a $288 million campaign contribution. Musk seemed, instead, to be carving himself a unique role in a near-future authoritarian oligarchy, as the undisputed Richelieu to Trump's Louis XIII. But, alas, that was not to be. What is to be, is the shocking revelation that a man who just days ago was given the ceremonial key to the White House — and in the weeks prior, the key to just about every federal government data base — has now cut all ties, and who we know talks regularly with Vladimir Putin, with whom he enjoys a reportedly friendly relationship, is now a free agent. Did Musk take the data with him? To me, the answer seems obvious. The way his pot-smoking 'college dropouts' sauntered into agency after rarified government agency, enjoying open access to virtually anything they wanted — and then they were called out by a whistleblower for uploading huge troves of data to an unsecured server. Within minutes, after Russian hackers had apparently been tipped off, they tried to download it using the correct passwords. We are told that in the end, the Russians were unable to access the data. Whether or not that denial is accurate and truthful, however, again, what should be obvious is that Musk's team successfully spirited your personal information from secure government databases to god knows where. That is the reality to which we wake today, and now every day. Let's hope that after those two Claymation figures have beaten the clay out of each other, someone comes up with a plan to clean up the mess they made. Before it's too late. Brett Wagner, now retired, served as professor of national security decision making for the U.S. Naval War College and adjunct fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Two aerospace stocks are deeply overbought and could be due for a pullback
Two aerospace stocks are deeply overbought and could be due for a pullback

CNBC

time33 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Two aerospace stocks are deeply overbought and could be due for a pullback

GE Aerospace and Howmet Aerospace are vulnerable to pullbacks after entering deep overbought territory this week. Each stock climbed more than 3% this week, outperforming the S & P 500 's 1.5% gain in the same period. The stocks have come so far so fast that now GE Aerospace and Howmet have the two highest 14-day relative strength index, or RSI, readings in the S & P 500. CNBC Pro used its stock screener tool available for subscribers to find the most oversold stocks as measured by the 14-day RSI. Stocks that have a 14-day RSI above 70 are viewed as overbought, leaving them susceptible to a decline, while those a 14-day RSI below 30 are often thought of as oversold, suggesting they may see a bounce. GE Aerospace has now risen for nine straight weeks, while Howmet has advanced for seven. GE Aerospace is ahead more than 53% year to date, while Howmet is up more than 60%. While the typical analyst polled by LSEG has buy ratings on both companies, the consensus 12-month price target foresees more than 5% downside for each stock over the next year following these big runs. Here's the full list of S & P 500 stocks with the highest 14-day RSIs, along with what Wall Street thinks of them, according to LSEG data as of Friday morning: At the other extreme, Brown-Forman is the most oversold name in the S & P 500 with a 14-day RSI below 22. Shares of the Jack Daniel's whiskey distiller tumbled nearly 16% this week. Much of the decline came after Brown-Forman posted revenue and net income for its fiscal fourth quarter that missed analysts' consensus forecasts, according to consensus LSEG numbers. The Louisville-based company said it was operating in an "exceptionally challenging macroeconomic environment." The stocks has slumped 37% in the past six months and is on pace to record its fifth consecutive down year. Although Wall Street analysts rate Brown-Forman no more than a collective "hold," the consensus 12-month price target as compiled by LSEG suggests shares may rally 35%. Brown-Forman also has a dividend yield of 3.32%. Here are the other stocks with 14-day RSIs below 30, along with what Wall Street sees for them:

State Thruway Authority OKs added funds for firm handling Seneca Nation lawsuit
State Thruway Authority OKs added funds for firm handling Seneca Nation lawsuit

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State Thruway Authority OKs added funds for firm handling Seneca Nation lawsuit

ALBANY — New York State Thruway Authority officials have agreed to increase by $1 million the payment cap on a contract with the Buffalo-based law firm that is representing the public agency in an ongoing legal dispute with the Seneca Nation of Indians. During a meeting on Tuesday, members of the authority's board of directors unanimously authorized an amendment to an existing contract with Nixon Peabody that will raise the maximum amount payable to the law firm to $1.8 million. The authority's original 2022 agreement capped the amount to be paid to Nixon Peabody at $800,000. The resolution supporting the move notes that Nixon Peabody has provided 'substantial services' pertaining to ongoing litigation involving the Seneca Nation. Seneca leaders filed a lawsuit in 2018 claiming that the state agency failed to obtain the necessary federal approvals for an easement that has allowed the thruway to run through the tribe's Cattaraugus territory for decades. The Nation's lawsuit seeks to compel the state authority to obtain a new easement or compensate the Nation for tolls collected from motorists using the authority on reservation land. It also seeks to end toll collection along the roughly 3-mile section of the thruway, which is about 30 miles south of Buffalo. In 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second District allowed the lawsuit to continue after it rejected an attempt by the state to have it dismissed. The decision upheld a 2020 U.S. District Court ruling. The resolution supporting the pay increase for Nixon Peabody notes that the law firm has provided 'substantial services' pertaining to the litigation over the easement while also serving as bond counsel for authority debt transactions that are reimbursable by the state. The resolution describes the Seneca litigation as 'complex' while indicating that there is also a 'continued need for support' with the authority's state debt transactions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store