logo
Donald Trump suggests reporter is "evil" for asking about preparations ahead of deadly floods in Texas

Donald Trump suggests reporter is "evil" for asking about preparations ahead of deadly floods in Texas

SBS Australia12 hours ago
Listen to Australian and world news, and follow trending topics with SBS News Podcasts . As he surveyed the damage from the deadly Fourth of July weekend floods in Texas that have killed at least 120 people, U-S President Donald Trump appeared temporarily lost for words. "We just were making a little tour of the area. It's hard to believe the devastation. Trees that are 100 years old just ripped out of the ground. I've never seen anything like it." But Mr Trump soon recovered his composure. He has previously been fond of decrying officials in Democrat-run states hit by past natural disasters and tragedy. During his visit to the Texas flood plain in America's most populous Republican state, the president struck a far more sombre and sympathetic tone - highlighting the heartbreak of what happened while effusively praising elected officials and first responders alike. "I think everyone did an incredible job under the circumstances. This was, I guess Kristi (Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem) said, a one in 500, one in 1,000 years. And I just have admiration for the job that everybody did. There's just admiration." Within that sympathetic stance, there has been little room for dissent. When a reporter asked him about whether the warning alert system for the devastating floods worked as well as it could have, Mr Trump lashed out. "Only a bad person would ask a question like that. I don't know who you are, but only a very evil person would ask you a question that." Texas Republican Representative Chip Roy was on the tour with the president and backed his criticism of the reporter. "The governor said it best when he said that pointing fingers is for losers. This state is about looking forward and we'll figure out how to make our systems the best they can be. But importantly, when you see 26 feet of water rising a foot per minute, don't go around pointing fingers." That's something some locals - like nurse Aliz Treibs - agrees with. "I know that everybody is trying to find fault and blame right now and try to make it about politics. But I just feel like this really has been just a horrible, horrible act of nature and nobody could have controlled this either way." But others, like the pastor at Christ is King church - Michael Bell - says there ARE people who should be held responsible for what happened, even if it's unclear who they might be. "I know there was something similar to this in 1987 that took some lives - not as extreme as this. But I know after that there were some discussions of some grander scale plans that could have been implemented to avoid catastrophe as regards to human life, you know? So, there will be some accountability that has to happen. Some changes need to be made for sure." Concerns about the official preparation for and response to the disaster have started at the top. Since the flood, the president has been conspicuously silent on his past, repeated promises to do away with the national disaster agency FEMA as part of his plan to dramatically shrink the size of government. Some have asked if those federal government cuts could have weakened the flood preparations or response. Dr Rick Spinrad - the former administrator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which oversees the National Weather Service - has told CNN that it's impossible to say right now. "A lot of the weather forecast offices now are not operating at full complement of staff, which means that you're really putting an extra burden on these folks. I don't know how much that was a factor in what happened in Texas." But it's at the state and local level where most of the questions are being asked. Camp Mystic's disaster plan was approved by Texas officials just two days before the floods swept away an estimated 27 campers and staff members. The Department of State Health Services released records earlier this week showing the camp complied with a host of state regulations around procedures to be implemented in the case of a disaster. It remains unclear what was in the plan and whether or not it was carried out. The actions of the police have also been in the spotlight, Community Services Officer, Jonathan Lamb at the Kerrville Police Department saying he would characterise it as heroic. "One of our patrol sergeants lives out there in Hunt (Texas). And he got up and got ready to go to work. And he realized, when he hit the intersection of FM 1340 and Highway 39, that he was trapped on an island that was Hunt, Texas. And he saw people, dozens of people, trapped on roofs. He saw people trapped in swift moving water. He gave them encouragement over his public address system in his vehicle. He told them to be strong, that he would get to him as quickly as he could, and to hang on, and he knew he needed help. He went to another detective, Kerrville Police Department detective who lives out there and he woke him up and he said, it's bad, I need you to get your gear on and come find me. And then he went back out. And for 13 hours, those two officers, along with some Hunt volunteer fire department firefighters and an emergency room doctor, provided care to that Hunt community." Meanwhile, the American ABC News network has reported that a firefighter in Ingram, upstream of Kerrville, had asked the Kerr County Sheriff's Office at 4:22am on the 4th of July to alert residents of nearby Hunt of the coming flood. The network said its affiliate KSAT obtained audio of the call, which suggested the first alert did not reach Kerr County's CodeRed system for a full 90 minutes, with some warning messages not arriving until after 10am, when hundreds of people had already been swept away by raging waters. Kerr County ultimately experienced the biggest loss of life in the region. Governor Gregg Abbott has scheduled a special session of the Texas Legislature, beginning July 21, which will discuss improving warning systems for weather events. Kerr County Sheriff Larry Leitha says local officials will have their own review - once they've completed the task of recovering those who perished in the floodwaters and cleaning up the area.
"As with other significant events that our emergency services encounter, this incident will be reviewed. You have my word... You know, we don't have - we're not running. We're not gonna hide from anything. That's gonna be checked into at a later time."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza truce talks falter, 17 die in latest aid shooting
Gaza truce talks falter, 17 die in latest aid shooting

The Advertiser

timean hour ago

  • The Advertiser

Gaza truce talks falter, 17 die in latest aid shooting

Progress is stalling at talks aimed at securing a ceasefire in Gaza, with the sides divided over the extent of Israeli forces' withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources familiar with the negotiations in Doha said. The indirect talks over a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire continued throughout Saturday, an Israeli official told Reuters, seven days since talks began. US President Donald Trump has said he hoped for a breakthrough soon based on a new US-backed ceasefire proposal. In Gaza, medics said 17 people trying to get food aid were killed on Saturday when Israeli troops opened fire, the latest mass shooting around a US-backed aid distribution system that the UN says has resulted in 800 people killed in six weeks. Witnesses who spoke to Reuters described people being shot in the head and torso. Reuters saw several bodies of victims wrapped in white shrouds as family members wept at Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots, but that its review of the incident had found no evidence of anyone hurt by its soldiers' fire. Delegations from Israel and Hamas have been in Qatar pushing for an agreement which envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals and discussions on ending the war. The Israeli official blamed the impasse on Hamas, which he said "remains stubborn, sticking to positions that do not allow the mediators to advance an agreement". Hamas has previously blamed Israeli demands for blocking a deal. A Palestinian source said that Hamas had rejected withdrawal maps which Israel had proposed that would leave around 40 per cent of Gaza under Israeli control, including all of the southern area of Rafah and further territories in northern and eastern Gaza. Two Israeli sources said Hamas wanted Israel to retreat to lines it held in a previous ceasefire before it renewed its offensive in March. The Palestinian source said aid issues and guarantees on an end to the war were also presenting a challenge. The crisis could be resolved with more US intervention, the source said. Hamas has long demanded an agreement to end the war before it would free remaining hostages; Israel has insisted it would end the fighting only when all hostages are released and Hamas is dismantled as a fighting force and administration in Gaza. Saturday's reported mass shooting near an aid distribution point in Rafah was the latest in a series of such incidents that the United Nations rights office said on Friday had seen at least 798 people killed trying to get food in six weeks. "The shooting was targeted. It was not random. Some people were shot in the head, some in the torso, one guy next to me was shot directly in the heart," eyewitness Mahmoud Makram told Reuters. "There is no mercy there, no mercy. People go because they are hungry but they die and come back in body bags." After partially lifting a total blockade of all goods into Gaza in late May, Israel launched a new aid distribution system, relying on a group backed by the United States to distribute food under the protection of Israeli troops. The United Nations has rejected the system as inherently dangerous and a violation of humanitarian neutrality principles. Israel says it is necessary to keep militants from diverting aid. The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive. Israel's campaign against Hamas has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, displaced almost the entire population of more than two million people, sparked a humanitarian crisis and left much of the territory in ruins. Thousands of Israelis rallied in central Tel Aviv on Saturday demanding a deal that would release all remaining hostages being held by Hamas. Protester Boaz Levi told Reuters here was there to pressure the government, "to get to a hostage deal as soon as possible because our friends, brothers, are in Gaza and it's about the time to end this war. That is why we are here." Progress is stalling at talks aimed at securing a ceasefire in Gaza, with the sides divided over the extent of Israeli forces' withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources familiar with the negotiations in Doha said. The indirect talks over a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire continued throughout Saturday, an Israeli official told Reuters, seven days since talks began. US President Donald Trump has said he hoped for a breakthrough soon based on a new US-backed ceasefire proposal. In Gaza, medics said 17 people trying to get food aid were killed on Saturday when Israeli troops opened fire, the latest mass shooting around a US-backed aid distribution system that the UN says has resulted in 800 people killed in six weeks. Witnesses who spoke to Reuters described people being shot in the head and torso. Reuters saw several bodies of victims wrapped in white shrouds as family members wept at Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots, but that its review of the incident had found no evidence of anyone hurt by its soldiers' fire. Delegations from Israel and Hamas have been in Qatar pushing for an agreement which envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals and discussions on ending the war. The Israeli official blamed the impasse on Hamas, which he said "remains stubborn, sticking to positions that do not allow the mediators to advance an agreement". Hamas has previously blamed Israeli demands for blocking a deal. A Palestinian source said that Hamas had rejected withdrawal maps which Israel had proposed that would leave around 40 per cent of Gaza under Israeli control, including all of the southern area of Rafah and further territories in northern and eastern Gaza. Two Israeli sources said Hamas wanted Israel to retreat to lines it held in a previous ceasefire before it renewed its offensive in March. The Palestinian source said aid issues and guarantees on an end to the war were also presenting a challenge. The crisis could be resolved with more US intervention, the source said. Hamas has long demanded an agreement to end the war before it would free remaining hostages; Israel has insisted it would end the fighting only when all hostages are released and Hamas is dismantled as a fighting force and administration in Gaza. Saturday's reported mass shooting near an aid distribution point in Rafah was the latest in a series of such incidents that the United Nations rights office said on Friday had seen at least 798 people killed trying to get food in six weeks. "The shooting was targeted. It was not random. Some people were shot in the head, some in the torso, one guy next to me was shot directly in the heart," eyewitness Mahmoud Makram told Reuters. "There is no mercy there, no mercy. People go because they are hungry but they die and come back in body bags." After partially lifting a total blockade of all goods into Gaza in late May, Israel launched a new aid distribution system, relying on a group backed by the United States to distribute food under the protection of Israeli troops. The United Nations has rejected the system as inherently dangerous and a violation of humanitarian neutrality principles. Israel says it is necessary to keep militants from diverting aid. The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive. Israel's campaign against Hamas has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, displaced almost the entire population of more than two million people, sparked a humanitarian crisis and left much of the territory in ruins. Thousands of Israelis rallied in central Tel Aviv on Saturday demanding a deal that would release all remaining hostages being held by Hamas. Protester Boaz Levi told Reuters here was there to pressure the government, "to get to a hostage deal as soon as possible because our friends, brothers, are in Gaza and it's about the time to end this war. That is why we are here." Progress is stalling at talks aimed at securing a ceasefire in Gaza, with the sides divided over the extent of Israeli forces' withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources familiar with the negotiations in Doha said. The indirect talks over a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire continued throughout Saturday, an Israeli official told Reuters, seven days since talks began. US President Donald Trump has said he hoped for a breakthrough soon based on a new US-backed ceasefire proposal. In Gaza, medics said 17 people trying to get food aid were killed on Saturday when Israeli troops opened fire, the latest mass shooting around a US-backed aid distribution system that the UN says has resulted in 800 people killed in six weeks. Witnesses who spoke to Reuters described people being shot in the head and torso. Reuters saw several bodies of victims wrapped in white shrouds as family members wept at Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots, but that its review of the incident had found no evidence of anyone hurt by its soldiers' fire. Delegations from Israel and Hamas have been in Qatar pushing for an agreement which envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals and discussions on ending the war. The Israeli official blamed the impasse on Hamas, which he said "remains stubborn, sticking to positions that do not allow the mediators to advance an agreement". Hamas has previously blamed Israeli demands for blocking a deal. A Palestinian source said that Hamas had rejected withdrawal maps which Israel had proposed that would leave around 40 per cent of Gaza under Israeli control, including all of the southern area of Rafah and further territories in northern and eastern Gaza. Two Israeli sources said Hamas wanted Israel to retreat to lines it held in a previous ceasefire before it renewed its offensive in March. The Palestinian source said aid issues and guarantees on an end to the war were also presenting a challenge. The crisis could be resolved with more US intervention, the source said. Hamas has long demanded an agreement to end the war before it would free remaining hostages; Israel has insisted it would end the fighting only when all hostages are released and Hamas is dismantled as a fighting force and administration in Gaza. Saturday's reported mass shooting near an aid distribution point in Rafah was the latest in a series of such incidents that the United Nations rights office said on Friday had seen at least 798 people killed trying to get food in six weeks. "The shooting was targeted. It was not random. Some people were shot in the head, some in the torso, one guy next to me was shot directly in the heart," eyewitness Mahmoud Makram told Reuters. "There is no mercy there, no mercy. People go because they are hungry but they die and come back in body bags." After partially lifting a total blockade of all goods into Gaza in late May, Israel launched a new aid distribution system, relying on a group backed by the United States to distribute food under the protection of Israeli troops. The United Nations has rejected the system as inherently dangerous and a violation of humanitarian neutrality principles. Israel says it is necessary to keep militants from diverting aid. The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive. Israel's campaign against Hamas has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, displaced almost the entire population of more than two million people, sparked a humanitarian crisis and left much of the territory in ruins. Thousands of Israelis rallied in central Tel Aviv on Saturday demanding a deal that would release all remaining hostages being held by Hamas. Protester Boaz Levi told Reuters here was there to pressure the government, "to get to a hostage deal as soon as possible because our friends, brothers, are in Gaza and it's about the time to end this war. That is why we are here." Progress is stalling at talks aimed at securing a ceasefire in Gaza, with the sides divided over the extent of Israeli forces' withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources familiar with the negotiations in Doha said. The indirect talks over a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire continued throughout Saturday, an Israeli official told Reuters, seven days since talks began. US President Donald Trump has said he hoped for a breakthrough soon based on a new US-backed ceasefire proposal. In Gaza, medics said 17 people trying to get food aid were killed on Saturday when Israeli troops opened fire, the latest mass shooting around a US-backed aid distribution system that the UN says has resulted in 800 people killed in six weeks. Witnesses who spoke to Reuters described people being shot in the head and torso. Reuters saw several bodies of victims wrapped in white shrouds as family members wept at Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots, but that its review of the incident had found no evidence of anyone hurt by its soldiers' fire. Delegations from Israel and Hamas have been in Qatar pushing for an agreement which envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals and discussions on ending the war. The Israeli official blamed the impasse on Hamas, which he said "remains stubborn, sticking to positions that do not allow the mediators to advance an agreement". Hamas has previously blamed Israeli demands for blocking a deal. A Palestinian source said that Hamas had rejected withdrawal maps which Israel had proposed that would leave around 40 per cent of Gaza under Israeli control, including all of the southern area of Rafah and further territories in northern and eastern Gaza. Two Israeli sources said Hamas wanted Israel to retreat to lines it held in a previous ceasefire before it renewed its offensive in March. The Palestinian source said aid issues and guarantees on an end to the war were also presenting a challenge. The crisis could be resolved with more US intervention, the source said. Hamas has long demanded an agreement to end the war before it would free remaining hostages; Israel has insisted it would end the fighting only when all hostages are released and Hamas is dismantled as a fighting force and administration in Gaza. Saturday's reported mass shooting near an aid distribution point in Rafah was the latest in a series of such incidents that the United Nations rights office said on Friday had seen at least 798 people killed trying to get food in six weeks. "The shooting was targeted. It was not random. Some people were shot in the head, some in the torso, one guy next to me was shot directly in the heart," eyewitness Mahmoud Makram told Reuters. "There is no mercy there, no mercy. People go because they are hungry but they die and come back in body bags." After partially lifting a total blockade of all goods into Gaza in late May, Israel launched a new aid distribution system, relying on a group backed by the United States to distribute food under the protection of Israeli troops. The United Nations has rejected the system as inherently dangerous and a violation of humanitarian neutrality principles. Israel says it is necessary to keep militants from diverting aid. The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive. Israel's campaign against Hamas has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, displaced almost the entire population of more than two million people, sparked a humanitarian crisis and left much of the territory in ruins. Thousands of Israelis rallied in central Tel Aviv on Saturday demanding a deal that would release all remaining hostages being held by Hamas. Protester Boaz Levi told Reuters here was there to pressure the government, "to get to a hostage deal as soon as possible because our friends, brothers, are in Gaza and it's about the time to end this war. That is why we are here."

Gaza truce talks falter, 17 die in latest aid shooting
Gaza truce talks falter, 17 die in latest aid shooting

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Gaza truce talks falter, 17 die in latest aid shooting

Progress is stalling at talks aimed at securing a ceasefire in Gaza, with the sides divided over the extent of Israeli forces' withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources familiar with the negotiations in Doha said. The indirect talks over a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire continued throughout Saturday, an Israeli official told Reuters, seven days since talks began. US President Donald Trump has said he hoped for a breakthrough soon based on a new US-backed ceasefire proposal. In Gaza, medics said 17 people trying to get food aid were killed on Saturday when Israeli troops opened fire, the latest mass shooting around a US-backed aid distribution system that the UN says has resulted in 800 people killed in six weeks. Witnesses who spoke to Reuters described people being shot in the head and torso. Reuters saw several bodies of victims wrapped in white shrouds as family members wept at Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said its troops had fired warning shots, but that its review of the incident had found no evidence of anyone hurt by its soldiers' fire. Delegations from Israel and Hamas have been in Qatar pushing for an agreement which envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals and discussions on ending the war. The Israeli official blamed the impasse on Hamas, which he said "remains stubborn, sticking to positions that do not allow the mediators to advance an agreement". Hamas has previously blamed Israeli demands for blocking a deal. A Palestinian source said that Hamas had rejected withdrawal maps which Israel had proposed that would leave around 40 per cent of Gaza under Israeli control, including all of the southern area of Rafah and further territories in northern and eastern Gaza. Two Israeli sources said Hamas wanted Israel to retreat to lines it held in a previous ceasefire before it renewed its offensive in March. The Palestinian source said aid issues and guarantees on an end to the war were also presenting a challenge. The crisis could be resolved with more US intervention, the source said. Hamas has long demanded an agreement to end the war before it would free remaining hostages; Israel has insisted it would end the fighting only when all hostages are released and Hamas is dismantled as a fighting force and administration in Gaza. Saturday's reported mass shooting near an aid distribution point in Rafah was the latest in a series of such incidents that the United Nations rights office said on Friday had seen at least 798 people killed trying to get food in six weeks. "The shooting was targeted. It was not random. Some people were shot in the head, some in the torso, one guy next to me was shot directly in the heart," eyewitness Mahmoud Makram told Reuters. "There is no mercy there, no mercy. People go because they are hungry but they die and come back in body bags." After partially lifting a total blockade of all goods into Gaza in late May, Israel launched a new aid distribution system, relying on a group backed by the United States to distribute food under the protection of Israeli troops. The United Nations has rejected the system as inherently dangerous and a violation of humanitarian neutrality principles. Israel says it is necessary to keep militants from diverting aid. The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive. Israel's campaign against Hamas has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, displaced almost the entire population of more than two million people, sparked a humanitarian crisis and left much of the territory in ruins. Thousands of Israelis rallied in central Tel Aviv on Saturday demanding a deal that would release all remaining hostages being held by Hamas. Protester Boaz Levi told Reuters here was there to pressure the government, "to get to a hostage deal as soon as possible because our friends, brothers, are in Gaza and it's about the time to end this war. That is why we are here."

Australia's climate left won't be able to stand new Trump appointee Steven E. Koonin who dares to question the science around global warming
Australia's climate left won't be able to stand new Trump appointee Steven E. Koonin who dares to question the science around global warming

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Australia's climate left won't be able to stand new Trump appointee Steven E. Koonin who dares to question the science around global warming

The climate science establishment is fond of lecturing us about the dangers of rising temperatures. With the return of Donald Trump as US President, however, it is rising scrutiny, not the rising heat, that has them most alarmed. In May, President Trump signed an executive order titled " Restoring Gold Standard Science ," requiring federally funded agencies to ensure their work is accountable, reproducible, and subject to open debate. It was unremarkable in tone, bordering on mundane. Yet the reaction was swift and bitter. The clause insisting that scientists consider dissenting views and protect employees from retaliation for expressing them cuts across the grain. If applied to almost any other field of government-funded research, it would have passed unnoticed. But in the domain of climate science, where agreeing with the so-called consensus is a condition of entry, it was received as heresy. The New York Times, which has followed these developments with increasing concern, reported this week that the Department of Energy had hired three scientists 'well-known for their rejection of the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change'. The three were named as physicist Steven E. Koonin, atmospheric scientist John Christy, and meteorologist Roy Spencer. Mr Koonin, in particular, has been a persistent irritant to the climate establishment, not least because of his credentials. He served as Under Secretary for Science in the first Obama administration, was chief scientist at BP, and before that, provost at Caltech. In 1985, he co-authored one of the first textbooks on computational physics, making him unusually well qualified to assess the limitations of climate models. His 2021 book, 'Unsettled', drew sharp criticism for stating what many others in the field privately acknowledge: that climate modelling remains too immature to offer confident forecasts. 'We don't understand features of the climate to anywhere near the level of specificity required,' he wrote. Greater processing power, he argued, had only increased the range of uncertainty. Mr Koonin's challenge to the mainstream began in 2014 when he convened a workshop of leading climate scientists and physicists to stress-test the prevailing assumptions. He came away unsettled. The distinction between human influences and natural variation was far from clear. Models often contradicted one another. The technical sections of IPCC reports were routinely oversimplified or misrepresented in press releases and summaries. 'In short,' he wrote, 'the science is insufficient to make useful projections about how the climate will change over the coming decades, much less what effect our actions will have upon it.' Mr Koonin's claims are plainly stated and extensively sourced. What is striking is not the volume of rebuttal but the absence of any serious attempt to refute them. He has been the target of denunciation, not debate. That in itself tells us something. Exposing the flaws in an argument is the surest way to demonstrate the strength of one's own. Yet the defenders of consensus seem oddly reluctant to try. Instead, they have surrounded themselves with a rhetorical fortress in which disagreement is cast as denial, and scepticism is treated as a threat. Criticism of Mr Koonin has been particularly fierce in Australia. Ian Lowe, emeritus professor at Griffith University, accused him of 'feeding climate denial in Australia'. Mr Lowe singled out News Corp (the owner of Sky News Australia) for giving him a platform, along with Fox News in the US. The logic is circular: those who challenge the consensus are said to mislead the public because the consensus is what the public must believe. An invitation to Mr Koonin to speak at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in 2021 prompted one climate scientist to resign in protest, accusing the lab of undermining science by entertaining views that would confuse the public. The complaint was not about errors in Mr Koonin's work, but the fact of its being heard at all. All this might be less troubling if climate policy were a purely academic concern. But the policies it justifies are costly, coercive, and far-reaching. Hence White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers' statement to the Washington Post last week: 'Future generations should not be expected to forfeit the American Dream to foot the bill of ambiguous climate threats.' The Trump administration's main strategy has been to cut off the stream of funding. The US National Climate Assessment, the flagship government report on global warming, has been quietly shelved. Hundreds of contributors found themselves without contracts, status or support. The Daily Wire reports that the US Global Change Research Program, which oversees the assessment, had a budget of US$4.95 billion in 2025, yet listed just two full-time employees. NASA's climate research has also been trimmed. Michael Mann described the cuts as humiliating. 'It debilitates our standing in the world community,' he said. Zach Labe, formerly of NOAA, put it more bluntly: 'Every day is a train wreck for climate science.' Trump is unlikely to be able to shut down the global warming project entirely. Corporate, philanthropic, academic, and state government funding will ensure that the global warming industrial complex survives. However, by engaging directly with the claims of climate science - rather than fighting a proxy war over energy policy - his administration has changed the terms of the debate. That shift is being felt in Australia too. Scott Morrison's embrace of the 2050 net-zero target brought a welcome cooling in the climate rhetoric. The nuclear debate is important. Yet the risk remains that it distracts from the underlying question: is climate change so dangerous that it warrants radical, expensive, and disruptive intervention? Trump's progress should give Australia's political leaders the courage to stop tiptoeing around the question. Before we discuss the mechanics of decarbonisation, we need an open debate about its justification. Must we not weigh the risks of climate change, such as they are, against the risks to national and economic security posed by over-reaction? Shouldn't we expect the same transparency, contestability, and rigour in climate science that we demand in other areas of public policy? The Trump administration, with the help of Mr Koonin, is determined to decriminalise dissent so that the evidence can be judged on its merits. Its executive order doesn't forbid climate action; it insists that action be justified. If the science is truly settled, it should be able to withstand challenge. That it recoils from scrutiny tells us almost everything we need to know. Nick Cater is a senior fellow at Menzies Research Centre and a regular contributor to Sky News Australia

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store