Expert debunks peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state
The Convention, signed by 17 signatories in the Americas, set out four key criteria for statehood. The UK was not a signatory.
Richard McNeil-Willson, who lectures in the Islamic and Middle Eastern studies department at Edinburgh University, said that the interpretation was 'not only ludicrous' by a 'cynical' interpretation of the treaty.
READ MORE: Ipso defends chair for publicly opposing recognition of Palestine
And, Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said it was 'deplorable' that peers were trying to use legal technicalities while a genocide is underway.
The criteria under the Montevideo Convention sets out that a state must have a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and capacity to enter into relations with other states.
But, McNeil-Willson explained there are several issues with that argument, adding that it was a 'spoiler attempt' to stop Palestinians from having 'basic rights'.
'It's very bizarre that this has been focused on by the 43 peers and signatories who essentially put forward these arguments that Palestine doesn't meet any of the four criteria," he said.
'You can look at this from a technical point of view, the letter of the law, and you can say, well clearly Palestine has a permanent population.
'It also has borders, and it has borders that are internationally recognised, and they are recognised under the International Court of Justice.'
(Image: Supplied) McNeil-Willson noted the claims that this applies as there isn't a functioning government in Palestine, there have been no elections for decades, and Hamas is a terrorist organisation, falls short.
'The [Montevideo Convention] doesn't care what kind of government is in place, if it's a democratic organisation, they wouldn't care if it's non-democratic authoritarian – that doesn't stop it from being recognised as a state,' he added.
'Equally, the idea that it's a terrorist organisation – if you look at contemporary international relations, the recognition of the Taliban as a government in Afghanistan, despite it being previously seen by the US and lots of Europe as a terrorist organisation.
'Then there's the HTS [Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham] in Syria which is now being recognised as the legitimate government of Syria, that doesn't change Syria's righteousness as a state. None of these ideas make any sense.'
McNeil-Willson added that under the interpretation put forward by the peers in the letter, the 147 states that have already recognised Palestine, including Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, who also signed the Montevideo Convention, are already in violation of international law.
READ MORE: 'Keir' name goes extinct after Starmer comes to power
'The arguments they're putting forward – that the population isn't permanent, the borders aren't recognised – are a direct result of Israel's genocide, of its bombing and its invasion,' he added.
'It's not only ludicrous, it's a very cynical view of the conflict that in no way takes Israel's role into account.'
He added: 'To Israel, the existence of Palestine is a threat. To Palestinians, it's simply a way of proclaiming basic human rights that should be granted to them.'
Scottish Greens co-leader Harvie said that recognition of Palestine as a state is 'long overdue'.
'It must be just the first step of many toward achieving peace, security and justice for the Palestinian people,' he added.
'To seek legal technicalities to block progress is deplorable. We should completely reject the idea that Palestine should be denied statehood because of factors which are entirely the result of Israel's occupation and illegal settlements over many years.
'The current genocide must end, the occupation must end, and the international community must finally take action against the state of Israel for its dehumanisation of Palestinians and hold war criminals accountable.'
We previously told how Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK Government would follow France's lead and officially recognise Palestinian statehood in September if Israel and Hamas do not agree to a ceasefire.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines closer to Russia in power-play with Putin
Donald Trump has threatened higher tariffs and has vowed to use American nuclear submarines in order to protect itself following statements made by Dmitry Medvedev Donald Trump has ordered nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia in response to threats made by the country's former president. In a post shared to his Truth Social, Mr Trump called out ex-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev following statements that he made. The US President said in response he would move nuclear submarines "appropriate regions" closer to Russia. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Mr Trump said. It comes after Donald Trump recently reignited his feud with Sadiq Khan in front of Keir Starmer, with a savage jibe at the London "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Mr Trump and Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, traded taunts in recent days after the Republican said on Tuesday that Russia had 10 days from today" to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil, with higher tariffs. Medvedev accused Mr Trump of engaging in a "game of ultimatums" and said Russia still possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities after the Republican told the former president to "watch his words." The battle of words emerged after Mr Trump reportedly undid months of denying or limiting aid to Ukraine as he aimed to broker a peace between Kyiv and Moscow. Mr Trump agreed to send more lethal aid to Ukraine, sparking fury in Moscow where Putin and his allies had relished the US President's previous unwillingness to support Kyiv as much as his predecessor Joe Biden. Medvedev meanwhile has emerged as one of the Kremlin's most outspoken anti-Western hawks since Russia sent tens of thousands of its troops into Ukraine. Kremlin critics slammed him as an irresponsible loose cannon, though some Western diplomats have said his statements underscore the thinking in the Kremlin. Experts have warned Russia is pursuing its ambition to rebuild its influence and recreate a relevance not seen since its Soviet and imperial eras. Multiple foreign policy analysts have raised the alarm that Putin could pursue a war with NATO by targeting the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The countries were once member states of both the Russian Empire and, following brief inter-war periods of independence, the Soviet Union.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Consent for gigantic wind farm is an ironic act of ecocide
The irony is that Holyrood is contemplating the introduction of an ecocide bill – at the very time the [[Scottish Government]] is complicit in ecocide committed by renewable energy companies on an ever-expanding scale. We note 'SSE Renewables will have to provide a plan to counter any impact the wind farm may have on seabirds', but this is thin gruel, especially as SSE is quoted as admitting in its own environmental impact assessment that more than 31,000 bird collisions are estimated during its lifespan. READ MORE: Scottish crew 'excluded from Spider Man 4 filming' What will its proposed 'mitigation' provide? It is to be hoped it will be something better than the farcically inappropriate plans that Equinor has put in place to construct an inappropriately sited nesting habitat for Arctic Terns hundreds of miles from its proposed massive wind farm extension off the coast of Norfolk. Whatever it is, it is difficult to see how it can provide more than a small sticking plaster for an act of ecocide. The Scottish Government may well have shot itself in the foot here. People who would not normally object to a wind farm are sickened by this decision. The sleeping giant of Joe Public has awakened. Aileen Jackson Scotland Against Spin, Uplawmoor THE story about House of Lords peers warning UK recognition of Palestine may 'breach international law' (Jul 31) is revealing, not just for what it says about Westminster, but for what it exposes about Scotland's position. The peers cite the Montevideo Convention, claiming Palestine doesn't qualify as a state because it lacks a defined territory, unified government and full diplomatic capacity. This argument is flawed because the UK never signed the convention — it's a regional treaty drafted in 1933 by US states, not global law – and even if you accept it as a standard, it backfires spectacularly when applied to Scotland. Let's test the same criteria: Permanent population? Scotland has that; Defined territory? Clearly; Functioning government? We've had one for over 20 years, with its own legal system, civil service, and tax powers. Capacity for foreign relations? Scotland already hosts consulates and conducts international outreach, and could expand that overnight. By any serious standard, Scotland meets the Montevideo criteria more fully than [[Palestine]], Kosovo at the time of recognition, or even Israel in 1948. So why are we still being told we must wait for a Section 30 order from [[Westminster]] to hold an independence referendum — and why are the SNP still building their entire strategy around asking for one? John Swinney says a vote for the [[SNP]] in 2026 will be a vote for independence. But what comes after that? Nothing. Because the leadership still refuses to act without permission. The Supreme Court didn't say independence is illegal – it said [[Holyrood]] doesn't have the power under UK law to legislate for a referendum. That's a political dead end, not a legal one. Recognition doesn't begin with external approval, it begins with internal control. That's how Estonia, Ireland, Kosovo, and countless others did it. They asserted the fact of statehood, governed as such, and forced recognition by acting like a state. That's how international law actually works. The real reason Scotland isn't independent isn't legal, it's psychological. Our leaders won't cross the line. They keep asking Westminster to validate our democracy instead of enforcing it. They quote laws they never intend to test. And they call that strategy. So yes, the peers' letter is cynical and legally thin. But it also hands us a mirror. Because if the UK can consider recognising Palestine under the Montevideo Convention, then the only thing stopping Scotland is the lack of a leadership willing to act on what we already are. James Murphy Bute THE claims by a group of peers in the House of Lords that UK recognition of Palestine could 'breach international law' warrant scrutiny. These assertions are based on a rigid interpretation of the Montevideo Convention and a selective reading of legal principles and risk politicising law rather than defending it. A clear-eyed examination reveals that such recognition remains well within the bounds of international legality and reflects long-standing norms of state practice. The UK is not a signatory to the Montevideo Convention of 1933 and state recognition in international law has always been as much a political act as a legal one. Numerous recognitions have occurred over the years, including Kosovo and South Sudan, despite contested claims to defined territory or unified governance. Recognition of states remains a sovereign prerogative. As confirmed by the International Court of Justice in its 2010 advisory opinion on Kosovo, international law does not prohibit declarations of independence or third-party recognition, even in complex or disputed circumstances. Recognition by the UK would not constitute a breach of international law but rather an exercise of lawful foreign policy discretion. (Image: Jonathan Brady) More than 135 UN member states have recognised Palestine and in 2012 the UN General Assembly granted Palestine non-member observer state status. These actions underscore the fact that recognition of Palestinian statehood is neither novel nor legally exceptional. If such recognition were truly contrary to international law, it would have triggered challenges in international courts – none have materialised. It is time to move beyond legal obfuscation and act in pursuit of a just and lasting peace. Peter Macari Aberdeen
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Ghislaine Maxwell disappears from prison after push for Presidential pardon
The convicted teen sex trafficker, known as Jeffrey Epstein's 'Madam' has reportedly vanished from the US Bureau of Prisons custody register and has been transferred to cushier federal prison in Texas. Ghislaine Maxwell has disappeared from prison has she ramps up her efforts to secure a pardon from Donald Trump. The convicted teen sex trafficker, known as Jeffrey Epstein's 'Madam' has reportedly vanished from the US Bureau of Prisons custody register and has been transferred to cushier federal prison in Texas. Maxwell, who groomed girls for her paedophile ex-boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein, has been serving a 20-year sentence at the time low-security Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, Florida, The Mirror Reports. However, as of today, her official prison status is listed as"Not in BOP custody" - despite no public announcement of her release or scheduled transfer. Maxwell, though, has been moved to the cushy Federal Prison Camp Bryan, a minimum-security facility in southeast Texas known for less restrictive conditions. The prison is home to Elizabeth Holmes, the American biotechnology entrepreneur and convicted fraudster and Jennifer Shah an American television personality and former cast member of The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City. The transfer comes just days after Maxwell had met privately with officials from the Department of Justice, including Trump's Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, as part of a high-stakes negotiation for leniency in exchange for information. Maxwell is said to be offering her cooperation on the wider Epstein investigation, and her legal team has openly floated the prospect of a full pardon or a commuted sentence from Trump, who is currently battling mounting pressure over the release of files tied to Epstein's sprawling trafficking network. Her lawyer, David Oscar Markus, confirmed that the 63-year-old is prepared to 'testify openly and honestly ' before Congress but only if she is granted immunity. 'If her conditions are not met, she will invoke her Fifth Amendment right and decline to testify,' Markus said in a statement. The House Oversight Committee, which has already subpoenaed Maxwell and has set a deposition date of 11 August, has rejected her immunity plea. Her expected testimony could mark the first time she speaks publicly under oath since her 2022 conviction for luring underage girls into Epstein's orbit. The timing of her transfer, disappearance from the federal prison system's public records, and sudden re-emergence in Washington's political crosshairs has raised eyebrows among critics, who fear a backroom deal may be underway. Maxwell's legal manoeuvring also comes as Trump was directly asked this week about the possibility of granting her a pardon. 'Well, I'm allowed to give her a pardon,' he replied. 'But nobody's approached me with it.' Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. Maxwell's meetings with the Department of Justice are believed to be part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration to quell outrage over its handling of the Epstein case. Despite repeated promises from Trump and his allies, including a campaign vow to 'release all the Epstein files', key documents remain sealed, including any list of alleged co-conspirators or clients. The secrecy has infuriated survivors, lawmakers, and even members of Trump's own party, with renewed calls in recent weeks for full transparency and the unsealing of over 100,000 pages of federal investigative material. Maxwell's sudden re-emergence as a central player in the scandal threatens to deepen the crisis, as victims' advocates argue that any leniency would be a grave injustice. 'She is a convicted predator,' one Epstein victim told the Mirror. "To even entertain a pardon is to spit in the face of every survivor who came forward.' Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 for trafficking minors for Epstein between 1994 and 2004. Prosecutors described her as 'an integral part of the abuse,' helping to recruit, groom, and exploit underage girls on behalf of Epstein and his wealthy associates. Epstein died in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial - a death officially ruled a suicide but still mired in controversy.
