
Mother of machete attack victim says ‘streets are bleeding' after killers jailed
Two youths, aged 16, pleaded guilty to Kelyan's murder and having a knife.
In a televised sentencing on Friday, Judge Mark Lucraft KC detained them for life and set minimum terms of 15 years and 10 months.
Judge Lucraft said Kenyan's death was a 'senseless loss' of yet another young life to the 'horrors of knife crime'.
One of the youths in the dock of the Old Bailey smiled as he was sent down.
Bus CCTV image of two youths who cannot be named for legal reasons, who pleaded guilty to the murder of 14-year-old Kelyan Bokassa (Metropolitan Police/PA)
Outside court, Kelyan's mother Marie Bokassa issued a call for action to end the bloodshed.
In a statement read on her behalf, she said: 'To the Government and authorities. How many mothers like me, will it take? How many children must we bury before you act with urgency?
'Where are you? Where were you? I had no support from you when my son was alive and no support now that he is dead. A letter of condolence doesn't mean anything to us.
'Our streets are bleeding. Our cemeteries are full. Our prisons are overflowing. Pain and loss is becoming normalised.
'Our streets are no longer safe for our children. Public transport is no longer safe. Schools are no longer safe. You have lost control of London.'
Marie Bokassa, centre, listens as Detective Chief Inspector Sarah Lee, from Scotland Yard, who led investigation into the death of her son Kelyan, speaks outside the Old Bailey (Rosie Shead/PA)
She added: 'To the young people who carry knives, I beg you to stop before you raise up blades. Think of your own mother. Think of the mothers who will cry every night, like I do, will scream into her pillow, who will walk past her child's empty room and collapse with grief.
'Don't let a moment of anger steal your future. Don't let the streets raise you in a way your mother never would. There is no power in death, there is only loss.'
Earlier, prosecutor Deanna Heer KC said Kelyan had boarded the 472 bus just after 2pm to attend an appointment at the Youth Justice Centre in Woolwich.
CCTV showed Kelyan on the back seat of the top deck, with a knife in the waistband of his trousers.
Ms Heer said the teenager looked around and out of the windows before taking his seat 'giving every impression that he was concerned for his safety'.
The defendants, who cannot be named, boarded the bus 20 minutes later each armed with identical machetes hidden in their clothes.
The pair walked towards Kelyan 'with purpose' and withdrew their blades before immediately stabbing him without uttering a word to their victim.
Ms Heer said: 'Since Kelyan Bokassa was seated on the back seat, he was cornered, unable to escape as the defendants repeatedly thrust their knives towards him, smiling as they did so.'
The attack lasted around 14 seconds, with the youths thrusting the machetes towards Kelyan 27 times.
Ms Heer went on: 'Kelyan Bokassa had no time to reach for his own knife, which remained in his trousers, and instead tried in vain to protect himself with his school bag.
'There were several other passengers on the top deck who fled in panic when they realised what was happening. They describe hearing intense screaming from the back of the bus and the victim shouting, 'Help. Help. I've been stabbed'.
'They describe both defendants making quick, forceful movements towards Kelyan Bokassa as he tried to defend himself.'
The bus driver activated his emergency alarm just before 2.27pm and the defendants fled when the vehicle stopped at Woolwich Ferry.
Kelyan stumbled down the aisle to the stairs, where another passenger went to help him.
The boy was heard to say: 'Take me to my mum's. I want my mum,' before his legs buckled, bleeding heavily from a wound to the leg.
Members of the public flagged down a passing police car and officers found Kelyan had collapsed and his body was limp.
Despite attempts to save him, Kelyan died at the scene at 3.23pm.
One of the machetes was thrown into the River Thames, but was later recovered by police.
The defendants were quickly identified from CCTV on the bus and arrested.
In a victim impact statement read in court, Ms Bokassa said: 'At least my son is at peace, and those two kids are going to have a really tough time.
'I ask myself what has happened to those two boys that has resulted in that terrible act of violence, and I cannot imagine how can they be so angry.
'What they did was horrific and I do not know what has led them to do this, and maybe I will never.'
The court heard both defendants have previous convictions for carrying blades in public.
Floral tributes are left next to a bus stop on Woolwich Church Road in Woolwich, south London (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
Samantha Yelland, senior crown prosecutor for CPS London North, said: 'This was a savage and sustained attack on a 14-year-old boy which was carried out in broad daylight on a busy bus.
'We worked closely with police and were thankfully helped by clear CCTV evidence which both placed the defendants on the bus and showed one of them discarding the machete. They had little choice but to plead guilty.'
Detective Chief Inspector Sarah Lee, from Scotland Yard, said it had been a 'deeply troubling' case.
She said: 'The harsh reality in London is that violence disproportionately affects young black men and boys.
'The fact we're seeing so many teenagers like Kelyan die should be at the forefront of the minds of every politician, every policy maker and everyone who wants better for children growing up in London.
'Without this collective effort, we won't be able to tackle knife crime in its entirety.
'And while I am pleased that Keylan's mother, Marie, has been spared the emotional turmoil of a trial, I know that she still desperately seeks to understand why three young lives could be considered so disposable.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Family of Chiswick man killed in his home seek answers
The family of a pensioner who died after he was attacked in his west London home last year have appealed to the public for help as they seek answers about what Murray, 75, was "brutally" killed in his home in Carlton Road, Chiswick on 12 October 2024, the Metropolitan Police said. Crimestoppers is offering a £20,000 reward for information that leads to the arrest and conviction of those Ch Insp Brian Howie, who is leading the Met's investigation, said: "We need the public's help to get John, his family and friends the justice they deserve." In a statement, Mr Murray's family said they were "still struggling to understand why someone would harm a defenceless 75-year-old man in his own home".They added: "We cannot move on with our lives until we have some answers. To anyone with information, please come forward and help the police get justice for our family." 'Key to justice' Alexa Loukas, from Crimestoppers, said Mr Murray "was a much-loved family man and a popular neighbour and friend" which made the killing "even harder to comprehend".She added: "We know that someone out there has information that could help bring those responsible to justice. "That's why Crimestoppers is offering a reward of up to £20,000 for information we receive anonymously that leads to the arrest and conviction of those involved."John's family deserve answers. If you know something - no matter how small - please do the right thing. Your information could be the key to justice."Det Ch Insp Howie added: "Did you see or hear anything unusual around Carlton Road, such as any signs of a struggle or an argument? "If you knew John, did you notice a change in him in the weeks leading up to his death?" Police had previously said Mr Murray had moved to Chiswick after retiring and was a well-liked neighbour who always offered to help others in the was often seen riding his motorbike in the communal gardens which is where neighbours last saw him on the day he with any information, is asked to contact the are also asking people in the surrounding area to look at any CCTV, dashcam or doorbell footage from that time in case they contain any clues.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
'Facial recognition tech mistook me for wanted man'
A man who is bringing a High Court challenge against the Metropolitan Police after live facial recognition technology wrongly identified him as a suspect has described it as "stop and search on steroids".Shaun Thompson, 39, was stopped by police in February last year outside London Bridge Tube station. Privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch said the judicial review, due to be heard in January, was the first legal case of its kind against the "intrusive technology". The Met, which announced last week that it would double its live facial recognition technology (LFR) deployments, said it was removing hundreds of dangerous offenders and remained confident its use is lawful. LFR maps a person's unique facial features, and matches them against faces on month, the Met said it had made more than 1,000 arrests since January 2024 using the technology, including alleged paedophiles, rapists and violent robbers, of which 773 had led to a charge or a said since January 2025, there had been 457 arrests and seven false alerts. But Mr Thompson said his experience of being stopped had been "intimidating" and "aggressive"."Every time I come past London Bridge, I think about that moment. Every single time." He described how he had been returning home from a shift in Croydon, south London, with the community group Street Fathers, which aims to protect young people from knife he passed a white van, he said police approached him and told him he was a wanted man."When I asked what I was wanted for, they said, 'that's what we're here to find out'."He said officers asked him for his fingerprints, but he refused, and he was let go only after about 30 minutes, after showing them a photo of his passport. Mr Thompson says he is bringing the legal challenge because he is worried about the impact LFR could have on others, particularly if young people are misidentified."I want structural change. This is not the way forward. This is like living in Minority Report," he said, referring to the science fiction film where technology is used to predict crimes before they're committed."This is not the life I know. It's stop and search on steroids."I can only imagine the kind of damage it could do to other people if it's making mistakes with me, someone who's doing work with the community." 'Intrusive' or 'making London safer'? Big Brother Watch, whose director Silkie Carlo is bringing the legal challenge alongside Mr Thompson, said it was the first time that a misidentification case had come before the High Court. "It's a really intrusive new power, absent of any democratic scrutiny," said Madeleine Stone, senior advocacy officer. "There are no specific laws on the use of facial recognition, they're really writing their own rules on how they use it."Shaun's legal challenge is such an important opportunity for the government and the police to take stock of how this technology is spreading across London in a really unaccountable fashion." A Met Police spokesperson said that the force was unable to provide a full comment on Mr Thompson's case due to ongoing proceedings, but that it was confident its use of LFR was lawful."We continue to engage with our communities to build understanding about how this technology works, providing reassurances that there are rigorous checks and balances in place to protect people's rights and privacy." In July, the Home Office said it would be setting out its plans for the future use of LFR in the coming months, including a legal framework and safeguards. The Met is planning to double its use of LFR to up to 10 times a week across five days, up from the current four times a week across two days. Making the announcement last week, Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley told me the technology was "making London safer"."There are a lot of wanted offenders out there. This helps us round them up."He pointed to a case where a registered sex offender, who'd been banned from being alone with young children, was picked up on LFR cameras in Denmark Hill, south-east London, in January with a six-year-old girl."I think most people would expect two things. Is it accurate? Is it fair? We've worked really hard on this." The Met has said it works within existing human rights and data protection laws and its approach has been tested by the National Physical Laboratory, to check there is no gender or racial bias. "If you're not wanted, that image is deleted straight away," the commissioner told me. "The council CCTV you walk past, or shop CCTV, they keep your face for 28 days. We keep your face for less than a second. Unless you're wanted, in which case, we arrest you." The Met has also announced plans to use LFR on the approach to and from this year's Notting Hill Carnival over the August Bank Holiday, although not within the boundaries of the event. It says the move will protect Carnival against a "tiny minority of individuals intent on causing serious harm to others" and the watchlist will include wanted suspects, as well as missing people "who may be at risk of criminal or sexual exploitation".From September, a pilot scheme is due to be trialled in Croydon, south London, where fixed cameras will be mounted on street furniture, instead of being used by a team in a mobile force says the cameras will only be switched on when officers are using LFR in the area. 'An algorithm and a camera' "The Met Police has ramped up LFR in an extraordinary fashion over the last couple of years, in a way that raises questions around racial discrimination and the communities they're targeting", said Madeline force has said its use of the technology is data led and based on crime hotspots, and that it comes alongside boosting neighbourhood policing in those areas. However, it says it having to make savings due to "real term funding cuts" and expecting to lose around 1,700 officers, PCSOs and staff by the end of the year. "They're replacing a police officer, who might know their community, with an algorithm and a camera," said Ms Stone. Mr Thompson told me he was concerned about the deployment of LFR in communities where there were already low levels of trust in policing and contrasted this approach with the work being done by Street Fathers."We speak to the kids, we make time for the children, we put ourselves in hotspots." He said parents regularly called the group asking them to remove weapons they had discovered in their children's bedrooms. "We are doing a role where the community trusts us, and not the police. We don't need machines for that. It's about human contact."


South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Fact check: Claims around Britannia hotel in Canary Wharf
These claims differ from what the police have said about the events. The police say that people filmed leaving the hotel on mopeds were hotel staff, while the escort was provided to a delivery driver who was delivering to the hotel. Police also said that the ban on protest applies only to a specific group of people and if others want to protest at the hotel lawfully they are allowed. Protests took place outside the Britannia hotel on Sunday amid reports that asylum seekers are set to be housed at the site. Delivery drivers The video of the delivery driver being escorted by police matches images on Google Street View from the site, another video of the event has been shared on social media and the police commented on the video – all of which confirm that the event was indeed filmed at the location in Canary Wharf. The police statement said that the driver was not a resident at the hotel and that there's no evidence they were an illegal worker. 'This person was delivering to the hotel, they were not being accommodated there. There is no evidence to suggest they were working illegally,' the Met Police said. 'They were were surrounded and intimidated by those gathered outside and officers intervened to make sure they got away safely.' A screenshot from another video which showed two people on mopeds trying to leave the hotel matches Street View images from the scene. In response to that the police said: 'The two people leaving were members of staff working at the hotel who were, as with the incident this afternoon, subjected to unacceptable harassment by those waiting outside.' Protesters Videos were circulated online showing police ordering people to leave the area. However, in a statement the Metropolitan Police said that this was for a group which remained 'who were harassing occupants of the hotel and staff'. 'Their actions went well beyond protest to harassment and we used powers under the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 to order that specific group to leave and not return for 28 days. 'If a different group wishes to protest in the vicinity of the hotel they are not banned from doing so, providing they do so lawfully.' Post on X (archived post and video) Post on YouTube (archived post and video from separate source) Post on X (archived) First Street View image (archived) Video on Threads (archived) First police post (archived) Post of screenshot from video (archived) Second Street View image (archived) Second police post (archived) Post of video of police asking people to leave (archived post and video) Third police post (archived)