Aurora Cannabis stock jumps over 50% after 'record-breaking' quarter
Aurora Cannabis (ACB.TO)(ACB) shares climbed over 50 per cent on Wednesday, after the Canadian pot producer booked a nearly 40 per cent annualized jump in net revenue in its third quarter.
Calgary-based Aurora reported financial results before Wednesday's opening bell. Shares climbed as much as 53 per cent, reaching their highest level since November.
"This quarter was record-breaking for Aurora, driven by all-time highs in global medical net revenue, net income, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), and free cash flow," CEO Miguel Martin stated in a news release.
Aurora says net revenue for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2024 topped $88.1 million, up 37 per cent year-over-year. The company reported an annualized adjusted EBITDA increase of 316 per cent.
In a note to clients, Canaccord Genuity analyst Matt Bottomley says the results were "well above consensus expectations (particularly on gross/operating margins), as the company continues to see accelerated growth within its European/Australian medical segments."
Aurora's Toronto-listed stock soared to dizzying highs at the dawn of Canada's legal recreational cannabis market in 2018. Canadian cannabis shares plunged shortly after legalization as the industry grappled with a litany of headwinds, from excess supply to challenges at retail.
Jeff Lagerquist is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance Canada. Follow him on Twitter @jefflagerquist.
Download the Yahoo Finance app, available for Apple and Android.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The $150 Million Bet That Could Rewrite Black Canada's Future
What if the solution to systemic racism isn't about waiting for a seat at the table—but building your own table and refusing to ask permission? That's exactly what 150 Black professionals decided in 2020 when they launched something unprecedented: a charity that doesn't just ask for change—it finances it. Trust us, you've never seen a Black charity like this before. Part investment engine, part resistance strategy, the Black Opportunity Fund (BOF) is a community-led Canadian charity with one mission: building sustainable wealth in Black communities. And here's where it gets interesting. At a time when Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs are being quietly shelved and anti-Black sentiment is growing louder, BOF is doing the opposite: it's doubling down. Their latest move? Launching BOF Capital—a first-of-its-kind investment arm designed to inject equity (the kind that buys homes and scales businesses) back into Black communities. The numbers are bold: a $100 million growth fund for Black entrepreneurs, and a $50 million housing fund to close the racial wealth gap through homeownership. I caught up with Craig Wellington, BOF's CEO, for an interview, and he's no stranger to challenging systems. At 19, fresh from Jamaica, he sued Ontario's largest shopping mall for racial harassment—and won, changing provincial law. That early victory taught him that sometimes, not knowing the odds is what makes you bold enough to win. Craig Wellington, CEO of Black Opportunity Fund BB: What drove you to move forward with this bold investment when others are retreating? This has always been part of BOF's plan—setting up an investment entity focused on creating wealth in Black communities. We're not looking for band-aid solutions. We need transformative approaches that address systemic issues, not just symptoms. During the pandemic, Black communities were hit harder than any other group. We started with emergency grants, then built a loan program for Black businesses declined by Canadian banks, then moved to capacity building. Now we're at equity investments—but we're also launching a $50 million housing fund. Black people in Canada have the lowest homeownership rate of any racial group. Without home equity, you can't invest in businesses, education, or health—or leave wealth to future generations. That's why the racial wealth gap keeps compounding. This is just the latest chapter in our whole-community approach to Black economic empowerment. BB: So, thestats are really stark; Black-led businesses received less than 1% of venture funding in Canada in 2023. Can you walk us through what this funding gap actually looks like on the ground for Black entrepreneurs trying to scale their businesses? Black entrepreneurs have always had to bootstrap because access to capital just isn't the same. We can't rely on the 'bank of mom and dad' or leverage home equity the way others can, so we start out undercapitalized. Even when there was a post-George Floyd spike in investment, it was short-lived. Funding for Black-led businesses dropped 73% the next year, then another 50% after that. Last year saw the lowest investment in Black-founded businesses in a decade. The reality is, outcomes for Black Canadians in business, health, and education are worse than before, because investments have only addressed symptoms—not the systemic barriers that keep us locked out. That's why we're focused on strategic, sustainable solutions that actually close the gap. BB: With anti-DEI and 'anti-woke' backlash rising in the U.S., do you see that sentiment threatening your work here in Canada? How is it impacting BOF's mission right now? Backlash always follows progress. Whenever there are real steps toward equity, you see pushback—like after the #MeToo movement, or now with DEI. People treat equity like it's a pie: if someone else gets more, they get less. But equity actually grows opportunity for everyone. What's happening in the U.S. isn't new—it's just louder now. It's easier to spot who's truly committed. Companies doubling down on equity are our real partners. Those pulling back were never mission-aligned; they were just checking boxes. At BOF Capital, we're not about box-ticking. We're offering market-rate investments that drive both returns and real social impact. For us, equity isn't a trend. It's a smart, sustainable business decision. BB: You've structured BOF capital with the two distinct funds, one being for business investment and the other for home ownership. Why was it crucial to address both entrepreneurship and housing wealth simultaneously in your strategy? If we're serious about real economic empowerment for Black communities, we can't just focus on entrepreneurship—we have to tackle the root causes of the capital gap, and that starts with homeownership. I mentioned earlier that Black Canadians have the lowest homeownership rate in the country. That's not by accident. Systemic barriers have kept us from building equity for generations—look at Africville, or the fact that the Black-white homeownership gap in the U.S. hasn't budged since 1968. Without home equity, Black entrepreneurs can't access the capital others use to start or grow businesses. That's why we're creating pathways to build wealth through business ownership and homeownership, attacking the problem from both sides. BB: The Ourboro Opportunity Fund focuses on a shared equity down-payment assistance model to increase Black homeownership. Can you explain how shared equity works and why this approach is powerful for closing the racial wealth gap? Shared equity is about breaking down the biggest barrier to homeownership: the down payment. Many Black Canadians can afford to carry a mortgage, because often their rent payments are just as high or higher than what a mortgage would be. The problem is, they can't get over that initial hurdle of the big down payment. Our program steps in to co-invest with them, helping cover the down payment so they can buy their first home. We share in the home's equity, and when the homeowner sells, refinances, or buys us out, our share goes back into the fund to help the next family. It's a cycle—building wealth for Black families now, and for generations to come. BB: With 145,000 Black-owned businesses across Canada, how will BOF Capital identify and prioritize which ventures to support? What criteria will determine which entrepreneurs receive backing from the Growth Fund? We're focused on growth-stage Black-led businesses—ventures that have proven themselves, have steady revenue, and need capital to scale. About 75% of our Growth Fund will go directly to these businesses. The remaining 25% will support earlier-stage companies through investments in Black-led venture capital funds. Our goal is impact: by prioritizing businesses ready to grow, we can help them reach the next level and create real economic change. At the same time, our partnerships with Black-led VCs and the support ecosystem from BOF charity means we're building a pipeline—helping entrepreneurs move from grants and capacity building to early-stage funding, and eventually to growth investment. BB: Beyond capital, you're also promising mentorship and market access. What does that comprehensive support system look like? And how does it differ from traditional venture funding approaches? For us, it's about true wraparound support. BOF Capital doesn't just invest money—we open doors. That means connecting entrepreneurs to valuable networks, offering business and strategy advice, and helping them access new markets and investors. Money alone isn't enough; real growth comes from mentorship, guidance, and market access. That's what sets us apart from traditional venture funding—we're partners in every sense, not just cheque writers. BB: BOF is described as an initiative by and for the Black diaspora. How important was it to ensure that BOF capital remained community-controlled, rather than seeking funding from traditional institutional investors who might have different priorities? From day one, BOF has insisted on Black leadership and excellence at every level—our board, our team, our investment committee. Too often, Black organizations are told to lower the bar. We're doing the opposite: setting new standards and proving what's possible when we lead ourselves. There's no precedent for a Black-led charity launching an investment vehicle like this in Canada—or even the U.S. or U.K. We're building this ship, sailing it, and steering it as a community. That's how we ensure real, sustainable change. BB: How will you measure whether this initiative has truly created the generational change or the sustainable change that you're aiming for in Black communities? Success for BOF Capital is about real, measurable impact. We'll track how many Black families achieve homeownership and build equity, and how many businesses scale and create jobs thanks to our investment. We'll measure returns that flow back into BOF the charity, fueling work in education, health, justice, and more. If we see families building generational wealth, businesses thriving, and a pipeline of new funds growing this movement, we'll know we're driving sustainable, long-term change. That's the legacy we're aiming for.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Enghouse Systems Ltd (EGHSF) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Economic Challenges ...
Revenue: $124.8 million for the quarter, a decline of 0.8% year over year; $248.8 million year-to-date, an increase of 1%. Recurring Revenue: $86.2 million, representing 69.1% of total revenue, up from 67.5% last year. Adjusted EBITDA: $28.6 million with a margin of 22.9%, compared to $35.7 million and a 28.4% margin in Q2 2024. Net Income: $13.5 million or $0.24 per diluted share, compared to $20 million or $0.36 per diluted share last year. Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: $25.5 million, excluding changes in working capital and income taxes paid. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $263.5 million, with no external debt. Dividends: $14.3 million returned to shareholders. Acquisitions: $26.8 million invested, including Margento and Trafi acquisitions. Quarterly Dividend: $0.30 per common share, payable on August 29, 2025. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with EGHSF. Release Date: June 06, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Enghouse Systems Ltd (EGHSF) reported a year-to-date revenue increase of 1% to $248.8 million, indicating growth despite a challenging economic environment. Recurring revenue, including SaaS and maintenance services, increased to $86.2 million, representing 69.1% of total revenue, up from 67.5% last year, highlighting a strategic focus on predictable long-term revenue streams. The company maintains a strong balance sheet with $263.5 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, and operates with no external debt, providing financial flexibility. Enghouse Systems Ltd (EGHSF) returned $14.3 million to shareholders through dividends and invested $26.8 million in acquisitions, demonstrating a commitment to shareholder value and growth. The acquisition and integration of Margento and Trafi enhance the company's transportation portfolio, aligning with its broader mobility strategy and supporting long-term growth. Revenue for the quarter declined by 0.8% year over year, reflecting challenges in the current economic climate. Adjusted EBITDA decreased to $28.6 million with a margin of 22.9%, down from $35.7 million and a 28.4% margin in Q2 2024, indicating pressure on profitability. Net income for the quarter fell to $13.5 million or $0.24 per diluted share, compared to $20 million or $0.36 per diluted share last year, due to increased operating costs and special charges. Foreign exchange volatility negatively impacted both revenue and expenses, contributing to financial uncertainty. The transition from 4G to 5G is progressing slower than expected, and AI monetization remains challenging, affecting growth in certain business segments. Q: Steve, can you discuss which parts of the business are most affected by the current demand environment? A: Stephen Sadler, CEO: The transition from 4G to 5G is slower than expected, impacting telecom companies. In the IMG Group, networks and contact centers are on hold, with AI discussions not yet monetizing. Transportation is improving, with major contracts nearing completion, which should enhance profitability. Q: Can you elaborate on the factors affecting profitability outside of the transportation division? A: Stephen Sadler, CEO: Revenue decline and restructuring in January affected profitability. We are addressing cost reductions, which should be resolved by next quarter. Q: Has the revenue from Lifesize stabilized, or is there still churn? A: Stephen Sadler, CEO: There is still some churn in Lifesize and video areas, but it is decreasing and looking better for the future. Q: How does the pipeline for SaaS look, and what are customer sentiments? A: Stephen Sadler, CEO: The environment is challenging for new wins, with AI integration being a key factor. Customers are cautious but hopeful for productivity improvements. We are preparing for future opportunities. Q: What are your thoughts on share buybacks versus M&A for capital allocation? A: Stephen Sadler, CEO: M&A expands the company, while buybacks are less risky if priced right. We will consider buybacks if they provide a good return, but M&A remains a priority. Q: How did foreign exchange (FX) impact revenue and EBITDA, and how did it compare to expectations? A: Stephen Sadler, CEO: FX had a complex impact, with a $4 million write-off on the balance sheet due to US dollar fluctuations. FX helped revenue but also increased costs, slightly affecting profitability and EBITDA percentage. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
China's grueling ‘996' work culture is being debated by European startups — 7 founders and VCs on why they are resisting
The European startup scene was recently shaken by a LinkedIn debate with some venture capitalists applying pressure on founders to embrace a culture of overwork to compete on a global stage. The "996" work culture reigns supreme in China and has been adopted by various tech giants including Jack Ma's Alibaba and Bytedance's TikTok, but the system has also been the subject of much protest in recent years. Tech workers in Europe told CNBC in 2021 that they're turning down job offers, rejecting interviews, or even quitting their roles, upon learning of TikTok's 996 work culture. Sebastian Becker, general partner at Switzerland-based VC company Redalpine added to the debate on LinkedIn by addressing the new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who has called for removal of the legal work limit of eight hours per day in Germany in a bid to increase efficiency, while keeping the 40-hour week. Becker said Merz' proposal doesn't go far enough, as "40 hours a week won't cut it." "In Silicon Valley, 60-70 hour weeks aren't the exception — they even have a term for it: 996 — 9am to 9pm, six days a week... we can have the same amount of smart, ambitious people, but if we're consistently being outworked, we won't win," Becker said. Index Ventures Partner Martin Mignot in London explained on LinkedIn that 996 originated in China and has "quietly become the norm" at startups internationally. Part of the reason behind this most recent push is that there's a persistent view that Europe's tech and startup scene is lagging behind the U.S. and China, both of which have produced tech giants and are known for intense work cultures. However, Suranga Chandratillake, general partner at Balderton Capital, told CNBC Make It that these views are outdated as Europe has produced deca-corns in recent years— companies worth more than $10 billion including Klarna, Revolut, Wise, and The continent has yet to produce a trillion-dollar tech firm like Nvidia. "The European tech market and ecosystem is keeping up today with the U.S. and Asia... back in the 1980s the European tech scene was behind the tech scene on the West Coast of the US, but that's not the case now," Chandratillake said in an interview. The calls for Europe to adopt the 996 work culture sparked a wave of backlash. CNBC spoke with seven European startup founders and VCs on why they disagree. The obsession with China's 996 or Silicon Valley's 24/7 work culture emerges from a glorification of hustle culture in the startup landscape, founders and VCs said. "It's about a fetishization of overwork rather than smart work…it's a myth," Chandratillake said. "California is very good at telling stories and there's a lot of mythmaking around the concept of what startups look like…. there is hard work involved but if you really spend time in that ecosystem, you will discover that lots of people work really hard, but there are also periods where they don't work." Nina Mohanty, a Silicon Valley native and founder of London-based Bloom Money, said there are actually "lasting effects and unintended consequences" to adopting an aggressive overwork culture, "You only have to think about Revolut and the culture that they have is probably the closest that we've seen in Europe to the 996 culture, and they struggled," Mohanty told CNBC. "Their churn rate was incredibly high within their team, and they even struggled to get their banking license, and their culture was actually cited as one of those reasons." For its part, Revolut told CNBC it operates in a "high-growth, high-performance environment." "In line with this, we've evolved how we support our people: through value-based behaviours, structured development, and a culture that's collaborative, challenging, and built for scale," a spokesperson from Revolut said. Noa Khamallah, general partner at Don't Quit Ventures, pointed out that there's "no need for 996" and that these values are often at odds with both the European mindset and regulation. "Europe's most successful companies — from Spotify to SAP to ASML — didn't achieve dominance through overwork but through sustainable innovation cultures," Khamallah said. He offered the examples of Silicon Valley's Uber and Meta, both companies that expanded into Europe and faced massive regulatory pushback. "These examples reveal how Silicon Valley's 'move fast and break things' ethos often breaks against European values around worker rights, privacy, and sustainable business practices," Khamallah said. An always-on culture decreases retention and creates a revolving door of talent, Sarah Wernér, co-founder of Husmus, told CNBC. "Overwork today is a productivity crisis tomorrow," Wernér said. "Personally, I hope my competitors are doing 996. It makes poaching great people a lot easier when they decide they've had enough." Dama Sathianathan, a senior partner at Bethnal Green Ventures said it's unhelpful to "prescribe" working hours, especially if it means putting workers' wellbeing at risk. "Optimizing labor doesn't always lead to better productivity, or help with differentiating from other companies long-term, if you've made work devoid of meaning," Sathianathan explained. Meanwhile, the youngest generation at work are less likely to put up with overworking and tend to prioritize work-life balance. Jas Schembri-Stothart, founder of Luna, a health and wellness app for teen girls, said 996 will drive young talent away from European startups. "People may tolerate overwork for a while, but eventually it leads to churn and even resentment, especially with Gen Z and younger millennials, there's much less tolerance for toxic hustle cultures," Schembri-Stothart said. Founders insist that instead of increasing working hours, startups need more funding and resources to position themselves as key players in the global startup scene. "What Europe really needs isn't more hustle-porn it's more aggressive funding," Wernér said. "With the right level of capital, our startups can hire enough talent to work intensely without breaking themselves. If a team of 10 is burning out to keep up with a 50-person U.S. VC or Chinese government-backed startup, the problem isn't their stamina, it's their cap table." In fact, since 2015 Europe's tech startups have missed out on nearly $375 billion in growth-stage funding, with founders losing out on a potential $300 billion in European investments, according to Atomico's State of European Tech report published in 2024. Additionally, one in two companies raising funding turn to the U.S. for capital rather than Europe. "What European startups really need is access to the right resources — funding, talent, and support — to grow, innovate quickly, and scale effectively," Schembri-Stothart said. "The venture landscape in the U.S. is a different ballgame altogether, and it's tough to compete with that without a stronger ecosystem here. Founders acknowledged that the startup life requires intense hustle and grind, but it's a more nuanced picture than just adopting 996. Timothy Armoo, co-founder and former CEO of Fanbytes, an influencer marketing firm that he sold for eight figures in 2022, told CNBC that he's a "huge supporter" of this new 996 push, but admitted that timing is key. "I think there are seasons but I also think that if you are a first-time founder or if your primary goal is basically wealth creation, I'll be very candid, if this is your season, and you're stepping back, then you're not serious about it," he said. Armoo said there are no excuses because AI allows entrepreneurs to be maximally efficient as it can reduce certain time-consuming manual tasks. Meanwhile, Bloom Money's Mohanty, said that when she's not sleeping, she's working. "I think early stage teams tend to almost unknowingly or without actually saying it, work the 996 life, because when you are early stage, you just have to hustle harder with less, and especially if you're the founder, you're always on and always working, and it can be very, very difficult to turn off." Schembri-Stothart draws the line at exploiting her team to produce more work. "It's my choice to work at the weekend, but I'd never expect that on my team, it's definitely not glorified to push your teams to breaking point. Silicon Valley tech exec Dion McKenzie warned that expectations of a 996 culture could make VC funding even more out of reach for early-stage startups. "My fear is that as these new norms and trends become the status quo and benchmarks for getting funded, it excludes so many brilliant founders that value their mental health and/or can't commit to a 996 due to caregiving responsibilities or being a parent," Mckenzie said.
