logo
Misinformation casts shadow on US-China trade truce

Misinformation casts shadow on US-China trade truce

Qatar Tribune6 days ago

Agencies
From false claims of Americans panic-buying Chinese goods to bot-driven attacks on US brands, a tide of misinformation is casting a shadow over a temporary trade truce between Washington and Beijing.
The world's two biggest economies agreed earlier this month to pause reciprocal tariffs for 90 days, a surprise de-escalation in their bitter trade war following high-level talks in Geneva. But an alternate reality is unfolding across social media platforms, including China's Douyin and Weibo, where a surge of falsehoods is fueling anti-American sentiment that could undermine the fragile truce.
One online video, which garnered millions of views across those platforms and TikTok, claims to show panicked American shoppers snapping up Chinese-branded television sets in the aftermath of trade tensions.
But in reality, that was old footage from 2018 showing Black Friday shopping frenzy at a US supermarket. The falsehood was further amplified by Chinese state media outlets, including China Daily, which ran headlines such as: 'Americans are starting to stock up like crazy amid tariffs and snapping up Chinese-branded TVs.'
A news clip on its website - more recycled footage from 2018 - bears a 'file footage' watermark in the upper left corner, apparently to shield the outlet from legal liability.
Other unfounded claims emerged on Chinese platforms about Americans flying to China to shop for Chinese goods, and that US citizens - reeling from the economic fallout of the trade war - were queuing up to purchase supplies in bulk.
'These narratives are almost certainly curated by the state, which has become increasingly fluent in harnessing social media,' Andrew Mertha, director of the SAIS China Global Research Center at Johns Hopkins University, told AFP. '(They) help align Chinese public opinion with governmental strategy, in this case demonstrating - albeit inaccurately, certainly prematurely - that 'the US is already feeling the pain, so China must stay the course.''
US President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs have sent jitters through the world economy, unnerving investors and roiling financial markets. Under the May 12 truce, the United States agreed to temporarily reduce the tariff on Chinese imports to 30 percent from 145 percent, while China said it would lower its import duty on American goods to 10 percent from 125 percent. Some of the false narratives emerged before the agreement but have continued to spread online, fueling confusion and a broader wave of information chaos.
'A lot of friends in China asked me: Are there no eggs in the United States? Is it very unsafe? Are people rushing to buy things? Have you stockpiled anything?' Vivian Wei, a Chicago-based content creator, told AFP. 'Some people even (suggested) not to come to the United States for tourism or study.'
The rumors prompted Wei to tour several supermarkets across Chicago, only to find shelves stocked. While American shoppers seemed unfazed by the swirl of online misinformation, Wei observed that the 'Chinese were getting very excited.' Last month, disinformation security firm Cyabra uncovered an anti-US influence campaign on the Elon Musk-owned X involving thousands of fake or bot-operated accounts.
They targeted global brands such as Gucci, Chanel and Amazon, amplifying the unfounded narrative that they produced goods in China while branding them as 'Made in France' or 'Made in Italy.' The accounts blamed Trump's trade policies for enabling such deceptive marketing practices, while urging consumers to ditch those brands and purchase products directly from China. 'This was a digital blitz. A third of the accounts weren't real, but the backlash they triggered was,' Dan Brahmy, chief executive of Cyabra, told AFP. 'Fake profiles hijacked luxury brands, pushed anti-US narratives, and steered buyers away without raising suspicion.
That's what makes it effective.' Last month, AFP also uncovered viral TikTok videos by Chinese content creators promoting the spurious claim that international luxury brands were secretly manufacturing their products in China. The targeted brands did not respond to the claim, which appeared to be part of a sprawling campaign exploiting US-China trade tensions to market counterfeit luxury goods.
The false narratives are unlikely to fade as trade negotiations continue, experts say. 'I believe these narratives will continue and will evolve in parallel with strengthening the Chinese government's negotiating position,' said Mertha from Johns Hopkins University.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil market braces for glut amid weak demand and rising supply
Oil market braces for glut amid weak demand and rising supply

Qatar Tribune

time10 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Oil market braces for glut amid weak demand and rising supply

Agencies Worries over the health of the global economy amid escalating trade protectionism together with an accelerated unwind of OPEC+ output cuts pushed Brent crude to a four-year low of $60/bbl in early May – though prices have risen off their lows. Responding to the weaker economic outlook, the IEA downgraded its 2025 oil demand growth projections to a multi-year low of 740 kb/d, which, in the context of faster OPEC+ supply increases and rising non-OPEC flows, risks a supply glut over the medium term. This is the central downside risk to oil prices, signaled by weaker oil futures and a spate of downward price revisions by forecasting agencies. Providing some upside potential is the prospect of supply disruptions from more stringent US sanctions on Iran and Venezuela or a de-escalation in the global trade tariff conflict. Largely unchanged in Q1,benchmark oil prices have dropped precipitously so far in Q2, after President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff deluge on US trading partners and OPEC+'s decision to accelerate the pace of its supply cut unwinding schedule. Brent fell to four-year lows in April, shedding 15 percent by the close of the month, the steepest monthly decline since November 2021, and then dropped further to $60.2 earlier in May. The marker has since struggled to break out of the low-to-mid-60s range, though President Trump's decision to slash tariffs on Chinese goods for 90-days did lift prices marginally. Prices are now ranging around $64/bbl, caught between bearish sentiment linked to unexpected crude inventory builds in the US and a third consecutive month of schedule-busting OPEC+ supply hikes on the one hand, and falling US oil rig counts and pessimism surrounding the prospects for a new Iran nuclear deal that would satisfy both the US and Iran on the other. President Trump's 'maximum pressure' strategy vis-à-vis Iran and threat to impose even more stringent sanctions on the country's energy exports has been one of the few bullish impulses for oil prices and could puncture the negative sentiment that has befallen the oil market in 2025. The pessimism has also been evident in the formation of a curious anomaly in Brent's forward curve: while the front end of the curve has been 'backwardated'(near-term prices higher than prices in the future), later month prices have shifted into a contango structure that see prices rising over earlier months. This so-called 'smiley' structure is fairly unprecedented and appears to signal that markets believe summer oil demand will be healthy enough to keep prices firm in the short term but insufficient to prevent a surplus and stock builds later on. And this is due to the potent combination of trade-tariff linked macroeconomic weakness and accelerating OPEC+ supply especially. Meanwhile, the bullish speculator positions that had built up in Q1 quickly reversed in Q2 amid the spike in risk and uncertainty that followed April's tariff onslaught and OPEC+'s accelerated resupply timetable. 'Net length', the difference between the number of 'long' (betting on prices rising) and 'short' contracts (positions staked on prices falling) declined by 155,838 lots w/w in the week-ending 4 April, the sharpest drop in the available data. Net length has recovered slightly more recently as hedge funds view some upside risk in US-Iran nuclear talks failing to progress. Near-term oil demand growth was revised sharply lower following the escalation of the trade war between the US and China. The International Energy Agency (IEA), taking its cue from the earlier downgrade by the IMF to global GDP growth in 2025 (and beyond), has lowered its forecast for oil demand growth this year to 740 kb/d and 760 kb/d in 2026. This is the weakest rate of growth since pandemic-affected 2020. The IEA pegs total oil demand at 105 mb/d in 2025. OPEC lowered its demand growth forecast by a less severe 150 kb/d to 1.3 mb/d for both years. OPEC cites higher petrochemical production, solid road and air mobility as well as robust industrial activity in support of its more bullish oil demand growth projection compared to peers. This would also not be incongruous with its recent policy of fast-tracking the unwinding of members' voluntary supply cuts. Despite broad demand-side worries, OPEC+ surprised the markets by accelerating the pace of unwind of 2.2 mb/d in voluntary output cuts by the 'OPEC-8' (which includes Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, UAE, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria, and Oman) from 131 kb/d per month from April to 411kb/d in May and then again for both June and July. The move was ostensibly framed as a bid to 'punish' serial quota violators, such as Kazakhstan and Iraq, for failing to cut production in line with their quota obligations and compensatory cut promises. The Saudis hoped the fiscal discomfort of freefalling oil prices would bring about the discipline that has so far been absent among these overproducing members. Part of the deal was that overproducing members would in good faith compensate for their non-compliance by cutting production according to a mutually agreed timetable thereby offsetting some of the supply that was about to be released. According to OPEC secondary sources, the average aggregate volume of OPEC-8 compensatory cuts required as 'payback' for members' overproduction from January 2024 to March 2025 is 305 kb/d, which would have easily offset the 131 kb/d of monthly incremental production OPEC-8 had originally planned. This would have resulted in a de-facto output cut. That said, in April, the first month in the schedule that called for higher OPEC-8 supply, monthly supply gains from the group, at 23 kb/d, fell far short of the 131 kb/d that had been planned. Only four of the eight producers – Saudi, the UAE, Oman and Russia – increased production. Despite lowering output in April, Kazakhstan and Iraq were once again producing well above their respective quotas never mind honoring compensatory cut pledges. Declaration of Cooperation(DOC) production (excluding quota-exempt Iran, Libya, Venezuela and Mexico) fell slightly in April to 30.0 mb/d (-17 kb/d). In the US, crude production hovered near record levels of 13.4 mb/d by mid-May, as per Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. (Chart 6).Following the plunge in oil prices and the downturn in global macroeconomic prospects, the EIA lowered its forecast for US crude oil output growth this year by nearly half to 208kb/d, the slowest rate of expansion since 2021.

Visit Qatar concludes successful ITB China 2025 participation
Visit Qatar concludes successful ITB China 2025 participation

Qatar Tribune

time10 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Visit Qatar concludes successful ITB China 2025 participation

Tribune News Network Doha Visit Qatar concluded a successful participation in ITB China 2025, which was held from May 27 to 29 at the Shanghai World Expo Exhibition & Convention Centre. ITB China is one of the most significant B2B trade shows in the Chinese travel market and serves as a key platform to highlight Qatar's tourism offering, foster strategic partnerships, and attract investment. As part of its participation, Visit Qatar led a delegation of 16 hospitality and travel industry partners, including leading hotels and destination management companies. Participating partners included Discover Qatar, Qatar Airways, Banyan Tree Doha, Mondrian Doha, The Ritz-Carlton Doha, The Westin Doha Hotel & Spa, Steigenberger Hotel Doha, The Outpost Al Barari, The St. Regis Doha, and Marsa Malaz Kempinski, Noor Al Shams Tours, Peninsula Compass Tourism, Regency Holiday, Tawfeeq Holidays, Doha Bus and Ms SKY. As part of its commitment to digital innovation, Visit Qatar participated in the C-Talk session at ITB China, where Jassim Mahmoud, director of PR and Communications, spoke about the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) and extended reality (XR) in the future of tourism. He highlighted recent strategic partnerships with Microsoft and Huawei, which are supporting the sector's digital transformation. China remains a key priority market within Qatar's tourism strategy, and Visit Qatar continues to invest in targeted outreach Chinese market, Mandarin-language services, and curated offerings tailored to the preferences of Chinese travellers.

Chinese automakers get stern ‘price war' warning after discount spree
Chinese automakers get stern ‘price war' warning after discount spree

Qatar Tribune

timea day ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Chinese automakers get stern ‘price war' warning after discount spree

Agencies A top industry group had a stern rebuke Saturday for automakers fueling a 'price war', a week after Chinese EV giant BYD announced sweeping trade-in discounts, with multiple competitors following suit. 'Since May 23, a certain automaker has taken the lead in launching a substantial price drop campaign... triggering a new round of 'price war' panic,' the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) said in a statement posted to its WeChat account. The group warned that such 'disorderly' competition would 'exacerbate harmful rivalry' and hurt profit. The statement, dated May 30, did not single out any company by name, but on May 23, BYD announced it was offering big trade-in discounts on nearly two dozen makes, offering discounts of up to 34 percent. Its cheapest model, the smart-driving Seagull, now goes for a starting price of 55,800 yuan ($7,800), down from 69,800 yuan, with a trade-in. Days later, Stellantis-backed Chinese EV startup Leapmotor announced similar discounts on two 'entry-level' models through June 8. Geely Auto announced Friday limited-time trade-in subsidies for 10 models, with its X3 Pro going for the lowest starting price of 44,900 yuan. But there is growing domestic criticism against what the autos association called 'involution' -- a popular tag used to describe the race to outcompete that ends up nowhere. The CEO of China's Great Wall Motor, whose annual revenue was roughly a quarter of BYD's, compared it to the start of China's years-long housing slump triggered by the 2021 default of property giant Evergrande. 'Evergrande in the auto industry already exists,' Wei Jianjun said this month in an interview with Chinese outlet Sina Finance. 'I hope that... all these years of hard work will not go to waste.' Beijing has poured vast state funds into the electric vehicle sector, supporting the development and production of less polluting battery-powered vehicles. But China's automakers association on Saturday warned its goliaths to play fair. 'Leading companies must not monopolise the market,' the CAAM statement said. It added that 'with the exception of lawful discounting, companies must not sell products below cost nor engage in misleading advertising'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store