Facing EU deadline, Apple announces App Store changes
Brussels:
Apple
announced changes to its
App Store
payment rules in Europe as it hit a Thursday deadline to address accusations of breaking
EU digital competition rules
-- or face steep new daily fines.
The European Commission in April slapped Apple with a fine of 500 million euros ($586 million) after concluding it prevented developers from steering customers outside its App Store to access cheaper deals in violation of the bloc's rules.
The EU warned Apple it had 60 days -- until Thursday -- to make changes to comply with the rules or face additional "periodic penalty payments", which it believed could be more than 50 million euros daily.
Apple has changed the rules on the App Store effective Thursday, allowing developers to offer different payment options directly to consumers within their apps, arguing that the changes address the EU's concerns.
Apple has paid the 500-million-euro fine but still plans to appeal the penalty on July 7 -- and it hit out on Thursday at the extent of the changes sought by Brussels.
"The European Commission is requiring Apple to make a series of additional changes to the App Store. We disagree with this outcome and plan to appeal," Apple said.
EU spokesman Thomas Regnier said the commission took note of Apple's announcement "and will now assess these new business terms" to see if they are compliant with the bloc's
Digital Markets Act
(DMA).
"As part of this assessment the commission considers it particularly important to obtain the views of market operators and interested third parties before deciding on next steps," Regnier added.
Apple has frequently hit out at the DMA antitrust rules, complaining it has no choice but to make the changes under threat of large fines.
The EU reinforced its legal weaponry in recent years with major twin laws, the Digital Services Act and the DMA, which have provoked the ire of President Donald Trump.
The US leader has slammed the EU's digital laws and taxes as "non-tariff barriers" to trade and many tech CEOs have aligned with his administration.
The EU and the United States are currently locked in negotiations to avoid Trump's sweeping tariffs on European goods but Brussels has insisted that the digital rules are a red line for the 27-country bloc.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
NATO withdrawal bill: US to withdraw from NATO? Lawmaker introduces bill, labels it
Senator Mike Lee has introduced a bill to withdraw the U.S. from NATO, arguing it's outdated and Europe isn't paying its fair share. This move comes amid debates about European defense spending and America's role in global security. While Trump has previously questioned NATO, he recently expressed support, creating uncertainty about the bill's prospects. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What Congress has done before Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What Trump said What Senator Lee said FAQs Senator Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, has introduced a new bill to make the U.S. leave NATO. He named the bill " Not A Trusted Organization Act ", which makes fun of NATO's thinks NATO is no longer useful and says European countries aren't paying their fair share, making Americans pay more. The bill asks the President to officially tell NATO the U.S. is quitting, as allowed in Article 13 of the NATO treaty. It also wants to stop any U.S. money from going to NATO, according to the report by December 2023, Congress passed a bipartisan law saying the President cannot leave NATO alone — they need Senate approval or a full act of Congress. Back in 2019, the House also passed a rule stopping President Trump from quitting NATO on his own during his first Lee also introduced two more bills to check how much NATO countries are spending, one is the Allied Burden Sharing Report Act. The other is the NATO Burden Sharing Report Act. These were supported by Senators Rand Paul and Marsha Blackburn. Blackburn said these bills will show who is paying their fair share and who is not, as per the report by is happening while people are again debating Europe's defense spending and America's role in world security. If the U.S. leaves NATO, it would be a huge change in foreign policy and affect military partnerships and global to the report by Associated Press, President Donald Trump has often questioned NATO in the past, but at the summit in The Hague, he said he supports NATO's Article 5 — the rule that says if one NATO country is attacked, all defend it. Trump said: "If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here." He was happy that NATO members agreed to spend 5% on defense, as stated by the Newsweek Williams, a professor from Syracuse University, was at the summit and said tensions were high. He said NATO's Secretary General, Mark Rutte, tried hard to get all countries to agree to the 5% defense target and keep Trump happy. Williams also said it's not clear if Europe really trusts the U.S. to stay committed to said: 'America's withdrawal from NATO is long overdue.' He said NATO is based on old threats that no longer exist and that Europe should be paying more. He believes his bill will put America bill might not pass easily because many people in both parties still support staying in NATO. Trump also seems to be less against NATO now, which could mean less support for the bill from his side too, as reported by Mike Lee says NATO is no longer useful and that Europe is not paying its fair share. He believes the U.S. is spending too much and wants to stop funding A 2023 law says the President must get Senate approval or a full act of Congress to withdraw the U.S. from NATO.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
EU intel confirms CNN, NYT bombshell that Trump's obliteration of Iran's nuclear sites was fake
Iran uranium stockpile intact after U.S. strikes, say European officials — conflicting views deepen between Trump, CIA and Pentagon- Iran's uranium stockpile appears largely untouched following U.S. airstrikes on key nuclear sites, according to a European intelligence probe reported by the Financial Times . This finding could deepen tensions between U.S. President Donald Trump and his own intelligence agencies, which are divided over how effective the strikes really were. What did EU intelligence confirm about Trump's Iran strike? European officials have now backed the internal U.S. intelligence leak — originally reported by CNN and the NYT — stating that the 2025 U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear program only caused temporary setbacks, not the 'obliteration' President Trump announced. According to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment, the Iranian nuclear program was delayed by just a few months, not years. That report was leaked weeks ago, prompting a storm of controversy — now validated by EU sources. Was Iran's enriched uranium moved before the U.S. strikes? European officials, citing early intelligence, say Iran's 408 kilograms of uranium enriched near weapons-grade levels were not stored at the Fordow facility during the June 21 U.S. strikes. The uranium might have been moved beforehand, a move that could mean Iran's nuclear capability remains largely intact despite the heavy bombing campaign. However, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected this notion outright. 'We were watching closely and there was no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved,' she said on Thursday. Live Events How does Trump view the outcome of the Iran nuclear strikes? President Trump has repeatedly claimed the strikes were a 'spectacular military success.' At the NATO Summit in the Netherlands on June 25, he even compared the impact to the atomic bombings of World War II. 'It's destroyed,' Trump said about Iran's nuclear program. Yet, not all in Washington agree with his assessment. CIA Director John Ratcliffe stated that while the operation caused 'severe damage,' it may take years to rebuild some facilities. Still, he did not go as far as to fully back Trump's sweeping declaration. Why is Trump calling the reports fake? Trump and his senior advisers have slammed the DIA leak, branding it 'fake news' and accusing the intelligence community of undermining his national security legacy. Trump maintains that the strike completely wiped out Iran's nuclear capabilities, calling it the 'single most successful deterrent strike in modern history.' What does the Pentagon say about the nuclear facilities? A report by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), first cited by CNN , contradicted Trump's version. The assessment, based on 96 hours of intercepted communications and satellite imagery, found that key components of Iran's nuclear program, including centrifuges and uranium stockpiles, survived the attack. The DIA believes the U.S. operation set Iran's nuclear progress back by 6 to 12 months—not permanently. Some parts of the report are labeled "low confidence," prompting skepticism within the Trump administration. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, however, claimed, 'Our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' What did the strikes target and what's the damage? On June 21, the U.S. launched airstrikes on three major Iranian nuclear sites: Fordow: Located under a mountain near Qom, this site was hit with 14,000-kg bunker-busting bombs from stealth bombers. The entrance collapsed, and key infrastructure was damaged. But U.S. intelligence noted that the core facility was not entirely destroyed. Natanz: Another critical uranium enrichment site, reportedly struck hard, though full damage assessments are still pending. Isfahan: This location, which houses the main uranium conversion plant, was attacked by submarine-launched cruise missiles. Early reports suggest severe surface damage, but again, uncertainty remains over what lies beneath. Air Force General Dan Caine said assessments would take time, especially at deeply buried facilities like Fordow and Natanz. How did Iran and Israel respond to the U.S. strikes? Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed the U.S. strike as exaggerated. 'They could not achieve anything significant,' he said during a video address following a ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel that ended a 12-day conflict. Meanwhile, Israel backed Trump's narrative, with its Atomic Energy Commission stating the Fordow facility was made 'inoperable' by U.S. and Israeli strikes. The IAEC reported that the site's 'critical infrastructure' had been destroyed and claimed the attack was 'devastating.' Israel's military also said it bombed potential exit routes to prevent Iran from relocating any nuclear material before the strikes. Is Iran's nuclear threat truly delayed or just disrupted? Despite Trump's confidence, the disagreement among intelligence communities is stark. While European and Pentagon assessments stress that parts of Iran's nuclear capacity are still operational, Trump and Israeli officials argue otherwise. David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security called the DIA's report 'hard to believe,' suggesting both Fordow and Natanz were likely destroyed or knocked out of operation. The institute also stated that Isfahan's tunnel entrances had collapsed, blocking access. Could the U.S. strike Iran again? Despite the conflicting reports, U.S. military officials have made it clear: 'All options remain on the table.' If Iran restarts full-scale uranium enrichment or retaliates militarily, the Biden-Trump administration is prepared to strike again. Here's what's being discussed: Contingency plans are active , including cyberwarfare and targeted precision bombings. Vice President JD Vance warned that any Iranian retaliation would be met with 'overwhelming force.' Trump hasn't ruled out diplomacy either — hinting at potential 'renewed talks' if Iran backs down. Still, the central question remains: did the U.S. strikes truly dismantle Iran's path to a nuclear weapon, or merely delay it? Only time—and clearer intelligence—will tell. FAQs: Q1: Is Iran's uranium stockpile still intact after the U.S. attack? Yes, European officials say most of Iran's enriched uranium is still intact after the strikes. Q2: Did Trump exaggerate the success of the Iran nuclear strikes? Trump called it a total success, but U.S. intelligence reports suggest only partial damage was done.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Best phones under Rs 75,000 (June 2025): Apple iPhone 16, OnePlus 13 to Xiaomi 15
A budget of Rs 75,000 can easily fetch you some current and previous generation flagship phones. There are some great options out there and we have handpicked the best half a dozen for you to choose from. Ample processing power, great camera setups to excellent displays, they have it all. Here are the best phones under Rs 75,000 in India at the moment. Best phones to buy under Rs 75,000 in India Apple iPhone 15/ iPhone 16 We have two options from Apple, one for the early adopters and other for the pragmatic. You can either buy the 128 GB variant of the iPhone 16 or the 256 GB storage variant of the iPhone 15 under 75K. The iPhone 15 is powered by Apple's A16 Bionic chip, which is still sufficiently powerful for most tasks. The phone feels great in hand due to its compact size and lightweight, and it has IP68 rated ingress protection. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Apple iPhone 15 The iPhone 15 has a bright 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with a resolution of 2556 x 1179 pixels, 2000 nits peak brightness and HDR10 and Dolby Vision compliance. Photography department consists of a 48MP main camera with dual-pixel PDAF and optical image stabilisation (OIS). You also get a 12MP ultra-wide shooter and a 12MP selfie camera. The performance in photography and videography is excellent, as one expects from an iPhone. Apple iPhone 16 As for the Apple iPhone 16, the display specs are similar to the iPhone 15 but you get a more powerful A18 chip here. The camera department seems similar on paper with a 48MP + 12MP combination, but the 12MP ultra-wide camera has auto-focus and thus macro capabilities; a welcome addition. And of course, it has the new Action button. If you do not care for these minor changes, we suggest you give higher storage the preference and opt for the iPhone 15. Both phones run iOS 18 with more OS updates to follow over the years. Apple iPhone 15 price in India: Rs 70,900 for 256 GB storage Apple iPhone 16 price in India: Rs 69,999 for 128 GB storage Vivo X200 5G The Vivo X200 5G packs impressive features for photography enthusiasts as well as some serious processing muscle. This phone is powered by Mediatek's flagship Dimensity 9400 SoC, and you can choose between 12 GB or 16 GB RAM along with 256 GB or 512 GB UFS 4.0 storage. You get a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with 120 Hz refresh rate, HDR10+ compliance, 4500 nits peak brightness and a resolution of 2800 x 1260 pixels. Vivo X200 5G The cameras on this phone have been designed in collaboration with Zeiss. You get three 50MP units at the back, with the primary camera flaunting a Sony IMX921 sensor and OIS. Accompanying it is an ultra-wide shooter with 119-degrees FOV and auto-focus, along with a telephoto camera with Sony IMX882 sensor and OIS that facilitates 3X optical zoom. Collectively, they cover all the key bases including macro and portrait photography with excellent results. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 32MP front camera is bound to impress the selfie enthusiasts. The phone's large 5800 mAh battery comfortably lasts over a day and a half of moderate use, and the bundled 90W fast charger juices it up briskly. An IP69 rating protects it from dust and water ingression. The Vivo X200 5G runs the latest Android 15 with the company's Funtouch 15 UI. Vivo has promised four major Android updates for this device. Vivo X200 5G price in India: Rs 65,999 for 12 GB RAM/ 256 GB storage; Rs 71,999 for 16 GB RAM/ 512 GB storage OnePlus 13 The OnePlus flagship is another excellent option in this budget. While the OnePlus 13 continues with the OnePlus 11/12 design language with the circular camera island at the back, the company has made the phone slimmer and lighter and added IP68/IP69 ingress protection. You still get a large 6.82-inch QHD+ LTPO4 AMOLED display with a peak brightness of 4500 nits, 120 Hz variable refresh rate and compliance with Dolby Vision and HDR10+. It is protected by a layer of Ceramic Guard glass. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD OnePlus 13 The OnePlus 13 is powered by Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, and you can get its 12 GB RAM and 256 GB UFS 4.0 storage variant comfortably in this budget. A massive 6000 mAh battery keeps the phone running for close to two days of moderate use and supports 100W fast wired charging and 50W fast wireless charging. The phone runs the latest OxygenOS 15 based on Android 15 with four major Android updates to follow. The rear camera department is quite impressive and packs three 50MP cameras. The primary module is fitted with a Sony LYT-808 sensor with OIS. The support cast has a 50MP ultrawide camera with auto-focus that also doubles up as a macro camera and a 50MP periscope telephoto camera with OIS that provides 3X optical zoom. Hasselblad colour tuning and portrait tricks are also available. The 32MP front camera does a good job with selfies and video calls. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD OnePlus 13 price in India: Rs 69,998 for 12 GB RAM/ 256 GB storage Xiaomi 15 If you like compact flagship phones, Xiaomi 15 might just be the right fit for you. It packs true flagship-grade features in a compact body with an IP68 rated ingress protection. You get a 6.36-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a variable refresh rate up to 120 Hz and a resolution of 2670 x 1200 pixels. The Pro HDR display is HDR10+ and Dolby Vision compliant, with a peak brightness of 3200 nits and supports up to 68 billion colour shades. The Xiaomi 15 too is powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC and accompanied by 12 GB LPDDR5X RAM and 512 GB UFS 4.0 storage. Just like its predecessor, the cameras on this phone have been designed in collaboration with Leica. You get three 50MP units at the back, with the primary camera flaunting a Light Fusion 900 image sensor, Leica Summilux optics and OIS. Giving it company are an ultra-wide shooter with 115-degrees FOV and a 60 mm floating telephoto camera with OIS that provides up to 2.6X optical zoom. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The telephoto camera is competent at portrait photography as well. The 32MP front camera is quite good for selfies and video calls. The battery capacity sees a jump from 4610 mAh to 5240 mAh and lasts for a day and a half of moderate use, and the bundled 90W fast charger promises to juice it up fully in about 45 minutes. The phone also supports 50W fast wireless charging. The Xiaomi 15 runs the latest Android 15 with the company's new HyperOS 2.0 UI with the company promising four major OS updates going forward. Xiaomi 15 price in India: Rs 64,999 for 12 GB RAM/ 512 GB storage Google Pixel 8 Pro There's always a bit of indecision between the current generation Pixel phone and the last gen Pro model. But with the 256 GB variant of the Google Pixel 8 Pro selling for 10K less, the decision was pretty straightforward this time. The Pixel 8 Pro is powered by Google's previous flagship Tensor G3 processor and you get 12 GB RAM to go with it. It sports an excellent 6.7-inch LTPO OLED HDR10+ display with a resolution of 2992 x 1344 pixels, 120 Hz refresh rate and 2400 nits peak brightness. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The screen as well as its glass back are protected against scratches by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2. This phone sports an IP68 rating against dust and water ingression. As you expect from Pixel phones, you get the purest version of Android 15 with the Material You design language. Google has promised at least 6 more years of OS and security updates for this phone. Other than speedy OS updates, Pixel phones are known for their camera capabilities, and the Pixel 8 Pro is still among the very best camera phones out there. Google Pixel 8 Pro You get a 50MP primary camera with laser auto-focus and OIS and a 48MP ultra-wide camera with 126-degrees FOV and dual-pixel PDAF that lets you capture some excellent macro shots too in addition to its primary functionality. And not to forget the 48MP telephoto camera with dual-pixel PDAF and OIS that provides you with 5X optical zoom. The cameras do a fabulous job across different lightings and modes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Google Pixel 8 Pro price in India: Rs 64,999 for 12 GB RAM/ 256 GB storage Pro tip: If you prefer the faster Tensor G4 processor, more compact and refined design and modern AI features instead of a telephoto camera, and do not mind spending additional Rs 10,000 for that, you should opt for the Google Pixel 9 instead.
