logo
More Americans exposed to false claims about measles and its vaccine, KFF poll shows

More Americans exposed to false claims about measles and its vaccine, KFF poll shows

TimesLIVE23-04-2025

Most adults and parents in the US have read or heard false claims about measles and the vaccine to prevent the illness, leaving many unsure of what to believe, a poll by the nonprofit organisation KFF showed on Wednesday.
The health policy nonprofit polled Americans on whether they had been exposed to three circulating false or misleading statements about measles.
Experts have said the fight against rising measles cases is being hampered by a lack of forceful advocacy for vaccination by government health officials and by statements about unproven treatments that confuse parents.
A third of the 1,380 US adults and parents polled by KFF have been exposed to the claim that receiving the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is more dangerous than becoming infected with the diseases, marking an increase of about 15 percentage points since a poll conducted in March 2024.
This came after a March 11 interview on Fox News in which US secretary of health and human services Robert F Kennedy Jnr amplified a false narrative about MMR vaccine risks by claiming without evidence that the vaccine results in 'deaths every year' and causes 'all the illnesses' associated with disease.
Since taking the top job, Kennedy, who has a long history of advocating against vaccines, has backed the use of shots as the best way to prevent measles.
However, he has also made misleading claims about nutrition and treatments, including vitamin A, which can help some children with malnutrition, but in high doses can cause liver damage.
Vaccine experts and physicians said there are no effective drugs for measles, only treatments to manage its symptoms, and they asserted the vaccine is the only way to prevent infection. The measles vaccine is 93% effective after one dose and 97% effective after two.
About six in 10 adults and 61% of parents surveyed said they have read or heard the MMR vaccine causes autism, a claim debunked by many studies.
Roughly a fifth of adults and parents have also heard the false claim that vitamin A prevents measles.
The poll's results come during one of the biggest measles outbreaks in the US in the past decade, fuelled by declining vaccination rates in parts of Texas and other areas in the country.
Less than 5% of adults surveyed think the three claims are 'definitely true', while fewer than half said they are 'definitely false', the poll showed.
However, at least half the respondents expressed some uncertainty about whether to believe each claim, describing them as 'probably true' or 'probably false'.
Most adults, and 78% of patients, said they are very or somewhat confident the vaccines are safe.
The survey was conducted online and by telephone among 1,380 adults from April 8 to 15.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Piers Morgan and Bill Clinton clash over Biden's health
Piers Morgan and Bill Clinton clash over Biden's health

The South African

time10 hours ago

  • The South African

Piers Morgan and Bill Clinton clash over Biden's health

Piers Morgan, the outspoken British broadcaster, set social media alight with a scorching attack on former US president Bill Clinton. The reason? Clinton's unwavering support for Joe Biden's health and fitness for office. Morgan, never shy of a headline, called Clinton 'delusional' and even questioned the former president's own cognitive state. 'This is either staggering delusion, wilful blindness, or President Clinton himself is now suffering from serious cognitive decline,' Morgan thundered on X. The drama kicked off after Clinton appeared on CBS Sunday Morning to promote his new memoir, The First Gentleman , according to Express. During the interview, Clinton dismissed claims that Biden was in decline while in the White House. When pressed about allegations from the explosive book Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again , Clinton stood firm. 'No. I thought he was a good president. The only concern I thought he had to deal with was, could anybody do that job until they were 86?' Clinton said. He added, 'I had never seen him and walked away thinking he can't do this anymore. He was always on top of his brief'. But Piers Morgan wasn't buying it. He shared a Fox News article and unleashed his trademark fury. The internet, as expected, erupted. Some supported Morgan's blunt honesty. Others accused him of stirring the pot for clicks. Clinton, for his part, brushed off the controversy. He insisted he'd never witnessed any signs of cognitive decline in Biden. 'I didn't know anything about any of this. And I haven't read the book. I saw President Biden not very long ago, and I thought he was in good shape,' Clinton said. He even questioned the motives behind the book's release, suggesting it was 'a way to blame him for the fact that [Donald] Trump was reelected'. As the Democratic Party faces scrutiny for allegedly hiding Biden's condition, the world watches. Clinton's defence may have backfired, fuelling more questions than answers. Morgan's words echo across continents: 'Is it delusion, or just politics as usual?' One thing's certain. In the world of power and politics, the battle for truth is never dull. As Morgan said, 'The public deserves honesty, not fairy tales.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Two seismic shifts in American health policy point have RFK's fingerprints all over them
Two seismic shifts in American health policy point have RFK's fingerprints all over them

IOL News

time5 days ago

  • IOL News

Two seismic shifts in American health policy point have RFK's fingerprints all over them

This week, two pivotal events highlight the evolving landscape of American health policy, revealing RFK Jr.'s significant influence on the direction of health care in the US, writes Armstrong Williams. Image: IOL To understand where our nation's health policy stands currently and where it is headed, two things occurred this week that enlighten our thinking. The first is Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s recent speech before the World Health Organization (WHO) General Assembly outlining in stark detail the specific reasons why the United States has left that organisation. On many levels, the global body has lost credibility – revealing its corrupt ties to the Chinese Communist Party and reckless manipulation from the strong arm of pharmaceutical companies. Kennedy was right to charge that the political interests of the WHO have become more important than the health security of nations around the globe. Let's go deeper on the overwhelming influence of the Chinese government regarding the WHO. The global pandemic was a prime opportunity for the WHO to step forward and assert unbiased, science-based leadership. Yet instead the group bent its knee to the CCP, hiding critical information and peddling false assumptions pushed by China. Is that in the WHO charter – to put its thumb on the scale of geopolitical squabbles? They're a health organisation, for Pete's sake! There's no room in health care delivery and research for politics. Yet gender ideology and other forms of political pseudoscience have permeated the thinking of organisations such as the WHO. And to what benefit? What public good? The president made the right call pulling its funding, and Kennedy gave a timely speech calling out what has been so wrong with that organisation for too many years. The second shift in where US policy with respect to health care is headed can best be captured in Kennedy's first 100 days at the helm of HHS. While it is very 'vogue' to look at a leader's first 100 days at the helm of whatever job they are doing, in Washington this often leads to much ado about nothing. The reality is, it's very difficult to set out in 100 days to make any lasting change. I think many politicos realise that. But I have to say, Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s first 100 days as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) has ushered in a period of ambitious reform to reshape America's approach to health and wellness. He stands in stark contrast to his predecessor. But that's not saying much. No, RFK, Jr. has set out on a path that focuses on Americans' true health, driving at the root causes of many diseases and what has ailed Americans. That should be commendable. With a mission to 'Make America Healthy Again,' Secretary Kennedy has prioritised chronic disease prevention, food safety, and a more efficient HHS. At the heart of Kennedy's mission is a renewed focus on the root causes of chronic disease. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ One of his top priorities so far has been to investigate the rise of autism and its potential environmental contributors, including air and water pollution, food additives, and mould. While experts remain skeptical of a direct link, Kennedy has long insisted that autism is a 'preventable disease,' and has committed HHS resources to uncovering environmental factors, promising preliminary findings by September. At the same time, Kennedy has publicly endorsed the MMR vaccine, calling it 'the most effective way to prevent the spread of measles', a notable shift from his earlier views and a move that aligns with mainstream medicine - a clear signal he's willing to evolve when the facts warrant it. In the area of food safety, Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary have committed to eliminating eight petroleum-based artificial food dyes from foods and medications by the end of 2026, aiming to reduce chronic disease and improve children's health. His administration has also proposed banning ultra-processed foods in schools and other institutions, reflecting his belief that food policy is central to tackling chronic disease. That may sound radical to some, but it's a simple truth: if we don't fix what's on our plates, we'll never fix what's ailing our nation. When it comes to specific health industries, let's quickly examine the Secretary's interest in the medtech sector. At a time when AI is enhancing prevention, early detection and treatment, Kennedy's emphasis on the role of innovation in health care is spot on. Further, the rise of digital health tech – including consumer wearables from rings that track your vitals to continuous glucose monitors – should play an increasingly important role if Kennedy is to accomplish his goals in improving individual health outcomes. Internally, HHS underwent significant reorganisation. Kennedy consolidated 28 sub agencies into 15 and announced plans to reduce the workforce by 20,000, aiming to save taxpayers $1.8 billion annually. While Kennedy's first 100 days have sparked both optimism and controversy, he has undeniably set a new tone at HHS, one that is focused on prevention, innovation, and a willingness to challenge the status quo. And that's exactly what America needs. * Armstrong Williams ( @arightside) is a political analyst, syndicated columnist and owner of the broadcasting company, Howard Stirk Holdings. He is also part owner of The Baltimore Sun. ** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL.

'Make America Healthy Again' report cites nonexistent studies: authors
'Make America Healthy Again' report cites nonexistent studies: authors

eNCA

time5 days ago

  • eNCA

'Make America Healthy Again' report cites nonexistent studies: authors

WASHINGTON - At least four of the studies cited in a flagship White House report on children's health do not exist, authors listed in the document told AFP Thursday, casting doubt on the paper outlining Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s agenda. The highly anticipated "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) report was released May 22 by the presidential commission tasked with assessing drivers of childhood chronic disease. But it includes broken citation links and credits authors with papers they say they did not write. The errors were first reported on Thursday by NOTUS, a US digital news website affiliated with the nonprofit Allbritton Journalism Institute. Noah Kreski, a Columbia University researcher listed as an author of a paper on adolescent anxiety and depression during the Covid-19 pandemic, told AFP the citation is "not one of our studies" and "doesn't appear to be a study that exists at all." The citation includes a link that purports to send users to an article in the peer-reviewed medical journal JAMA, but which is broken. Jim Michalski of JAMA Network Media Relations said it "was not published in JAMA Pediatrics or in any JAMA Network journal." AFP also spoke with Harold Farber, pediatrics professor at Baylor College of Medicine, who said the paper attributed to him "does not exist", nor had he ever collaborated with the co-authors credited in the MAHA report. Similarly, Brian McNeill, spokesperson for Virginia Commonwealth University, confirmed that Professor Robert Findling did not author a paper that the report says he wrote about advertising of psychotropic medications for youth. A fourth paper on ADHD medication, was also not published in the journal Pediatrics in 2008, as claimed in the MAHA report. "I can confirm that we didn't find that title in a site search," said Alex Hulvalchick, media relations specialist for the journal's publisher, the American Academy of Pediatrics. The Department of Health and Human Services declined to comment, referring questions on the apparent errors to the White House. Kennedy was approved as health secretary earlier this year despite widespread alarm from the medical community over his history of promoting vaccine misinformation and denying scientific facts. Since taking office, he has ordered the National Institutes of Health to probe the causes of autism -- a condition he has long falsely tied to the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. The report's chronic disease references appear to nod to that same disproven theory, discredited by numerous studies since the idea first aired in a late 1990s paper based on falsified data. It also rails against the "over-medicalization" of children, citing surging prescriptions of psychiatric drugs and antibiotics, and blaming "corporate capture" for skewing scientific research.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store