Newsom, DHS Feud After 'Juveniles' Allegedly Found at Cannabis Facility During ICE Raids
Federal agents block people protesting an ICE immigration raid at a nearby licensed cannabis farm on ... More July 10 near Camarillo, California.ICE agents raided cannabis nurseries in Camarillo, California, and Carpinteria, California, on Thursday.
Both cannabis facilities are owned by Glass House Brands Inc., which bills itself as one of the largest cannabis flower brands in the world.
CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott said in posts on X Thursday and Friday that agents found 10 undocumented 'juveniles' as young as 14 years old, eight of which were allegedly unaccompanied, during the raids.
Scott said in an X post Thursday that the facility is now under investigation for 'child labor violations.'
It remains unclear if the juveniles found at the cannabis facility are employed by Glass House. The company denied hiring minors in a statement on X, stating that 'Glass House has never knowingly violated applicable hiring practices and does not and has never employed minors.'
During the raids, law enforcement used tear gas and crowd control munitions and were met with protests, The New York Times reported.
The LA Times reported that about 200 suspected undocumented immigrants were taken into custody as a result of the raids.
Newsom condemned the raids on X, posting a video of people who appear to be running from tear gas and writing, 'Trump calls me 'Newscum' — but he's the real scum.'
The Department of Homeland Security replied to Newsom's post on X Thursday with a post asking, 'Why are there children working at a marijuana facility, Gavin?'
In Scott's Friday post on X, he posted a photo of the undocumented juveniles and challenged Newsom, asking, 'California are you ready to partner with us to stop child exploitation?'
Newsom responded Friday with an X post, stating that California 'prosecute(s) criminals that break child labor laws.'
Trump campaigned on the promise of cracking down on illegal immigration and deporting undocumented criminals—a goal the administration has tried to achieve through raids and deportation. But ICE has increasingly arrested and detained immigrants with no criminal history since Trump took office. California has been in the national spotlight recently as the Trump administration carries out major anti-immigrant actions in the state, such as ICE raids in Los Angeles that prompted major protests in the city and a raid consisting of armed agents and troops on horseback, on foot and in humvees at MacArthur Park in LA this week. Why Are Newsom And Dhs Feuding On Social Media?
Newsom and DHS, as well as DHS agency CBP and CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott, have been in a heated social media exchange centered on the 10 'juveniles' found during the raids. Newsom has condemned ICE and Trump's actions against immigrants for months now, notably condemning Trump's decision to send the National Guard to LA during last month's anti-ICE protests. Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for Newsom, called the recent raids 'inhumane' in a statement to Forbes and said that rather than supporting businesses and workers that drive the economy, they 'evoke chaos, fear and terror.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
9 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
America Should Travel Fast
Regarding Allysia Finley's 'California's Bullet Train Is a Model of Progressive Governance' (Life Science, July 21): Every highway and airport in America is subsidized—by billions more than we've ever given to high-speed rail. The $6 billion private line in Florida isn't high-speed, which costs more. But the benefit of true high-speed rail is that more people ride it because it's more convenient than driving or flying. Dozens of other countries, even those with far fewer resources than America, such as Morocco, build it because it's a better return on investment. I conducted a financial analysis of the California high-speed rail with some Harvard Business School colleagues more than a decade ago, and we came to two conclusions: It will cost more than they say, and it will still cost less than expanding highways or airports. The rail project should be reformed, not tanked.
Wall Street Journal
9 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Readers Respond to Gavin Newsom on Energy
Regarding Gov. Gavin Newsom's 'Clean Energy Powers California's Economic Growth' (op-ed, July 24): Mr. Newsom brags of two-thirds of California energy being 'cheap, abundant, clean power.' Meanwhile, in the real world, a kilowatt hour of California electricity is among the highest in the country at around 32 cents—more than double the median state's 15 cents. This results in excess energy costs to consumers and businesses in California of billions of dollars a year. The extra dollar per gallon for gasoline adds insult to injury. If a President Newsom had his druthers, annual U.S. energy costs would be nearly $1 trillion higher if California policies were applied nationally.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California bill to turn lost Pacific Palisades homes into affordable housing paused after locals call it ‘a land grab'
When devastating wildfires swept through California earlier this year, many buildings were destroyed beyond repair. In fact, the Eaton and Palisades fires alone destroyed 40,000 acres of properties, and 6,800 buildings were damaged in the Palisades fire, affecting the Santa Monica Mountains. Now, the rebuilding process is leading to some conflict. Specifically, many residents of Pacific Palisades have recently expressed serious concerns about Senate Bill 549, which would create 'Resilient Rebuilding Authorities" funded by the government through property tax collection. These concerns were recently raised in a Fox 11 LA news report. These authorities would be given the power to purchase lots where homes had been destroyed by fire, and to build low-income housing on a significant percentage of those lots. However, residents of Pacific Palisades, where reports the median home listing price is $4.9 million, are not happy with what they see as a "land grab." Many have voiced opposition, and, in response, Senate Bill 549 has been put on hold until at least 2026. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to this $1B private real estate fund. In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how What would the California affordable housing bill do? Senate Bill 549 explains that existing law gives the government the authority to establish an "infrastructure financing district to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects of communitywide significance" and to "allocate tax revenues… to the district, including revenues derived from local sales and use taxes." Lawmakers now want to use this power to create Resilient Rebuilding Authorities, which would use some of the money to buy lots in Pacific Palisades and build homes for people with incomes between 60% and 30% of the median income, as well as homes that would be occupied by people with incomes below 30% of the area median and permanent supportive housing aimed at finding homes for the homeless. Governor Gavin Newsom also separately allocated $101 million in taxpayer money for the construction of more low-income housing to "accelerate the development of affordable multifamily rental housing so that those rebuilding their lives after this tragedy have access to a safe, affordable place to come home to." Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it Why is the California housing bill causing so much controversy? While lawmakers may want to build affordable housing in Pacific Palisades, residents are not so sure they want this to happen. Jessica Rogers, Pacific Palisades Residents' Association president, wrote a letter expressing her objections to lawmakers, which over 2,300 other local residents signed onto. "[Lawmakers are] asking for a land grab," Rogers said. "This is a rebuild, this is not a politicians get to decide a pet project on what they're going to decide in the Palisades. This is residents of this community get to decide what happens in our rebuild phase, period." Rogers also stated that while there was some affordable housing in the area in the past, residents don't want more of this housing built because they don't want things to change — they want their neighborhood back the way it was. "We had some low-income housing, and we had affordable housing," Rogers explained. "We want what we had on January 7 [the day of the Palisades Fire]. Nothing more, nothing less." Another resident was also upset about the idea of the government coming in and making sweeping changes without the consent of those who already lived there. "It does sound quite a bit like Big Brother deciding what's good for all of us," commented Aileen Haugh, another local resident. "It's irritating to think that other people [not local residents] are going to make decisions of what gets built and how it gets built." Misinformation may have also played a role in stoking opposition, as the LA Times reported that Spencer Pratt, a reality TV star, had shared information on social media about his opposition to the bill, who claimed that the government was focused on dense reconstruction and wouldn't be abiding by local zoning rules. The LA Times has also said that some of the other posts opposing the legislation were based on prejudiced views towards affordable housing and distrust of the government, as well as fears that the character of Pacific Palisades would change. Some even floated the conspiracy that the fires were set on purpose to replace the wealthy community with one where homes were more affordable. Regardless of whether the objections are based on conspiracy theories or fact, however, lawmakers have taken notice, and the controversial bill has now been put on pause. "I appreciate the input of the folks who have weighed in about the bill, and along with legislative colleagues have decided that it would be best for us to pause the bill until next year to give us more time to see if we can get it right," State Senator Ben Allen said in a recent statement. "For me to feel comfortable proceeding, the bill will have to be deeply grounded in community input, empowerment, and decision-making, including the support of the impacted councilmembers." What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Accredited investors can now buy into this $22 trillion asset class once reserved for elites – and become the landlord of Walmart, Whole Foods or Kroger without lifting a finger. Here's how Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Solve the daily Crossword
