Yellowstone's ‘1944' Spinoff: Latest updates on release date, cast and plot details
The Yellowstone saga keeps growing, and folks are buzzing about the new prequel, 1944 . This spinoff dives into the Dutton family's story during World War II, promising the same raw drama and historical flavor fans love from Taylor Sheridan's world. Here's the latest on when it might drop, who could star, and what the story holds—written to grab readers and keep search engines happy. When's Yellowstone: 1944 Hitting Screens?
No exact release date is out yet for 1944 , but signs point to a 2026 premiere, maybe stretching to 2027. Why the delay? The Yellowstone universe is juggling projects like 1923 Season 2, which wrapped on April 6, 2025, plus other spinoffs like The Madison and 6666 . Since 1944 follows 1923 , it's likely next up after those wrap. The 2023 writers' and actors' strikes slowed things down too, so 2026 feels like a safe bet, though some whispers hint at early 2025 if production speeds up. Fans should stay tuned for solid news. Who's Starring in 1944 ?
The cast list for 1944 is still hush-hush, but the timeline sparks some guesses. Set 21 years after 1923 , the show could bring back characters like Spencer Dutton (Brandon Sklenar), Alexandra (Julia Schlaepfer), Jack Dutton (Darren Mann), or Elizabeth (Michelle Randolph). Both Alexandra and Elizabeth were pregnant in 1923 , so their kids—maybe John Dutton II—could take center stage. Brandon Sklenar's dropped hints about wanting to play an older Spencer, which has fans hyped.
John Dutton II, father of Yellowstone 's John Dutton III (Kevin Costner), will likely be key. With Dabney Coleman, who played an older John II, gone since 2024, a new actor will step in for a younger version. Could Jacob (Harrison Ford) or Cara Dutton (Helen Mirren) show up? Maybe, but their age in 1944 might mean smaller roles. Talk of Matthew McConaughey joining the Yellowstone world swirls, but he's more likely tied to The Madison . No official casting news yet, so speculation's all we've got. What's the Plot of 1944 About?
No official plot details are out, but the title 1944 sets the stage: Montana during the tail end of World War II. The Dutton ranch will likely stay at the heart of things, with the war's impact—like the D-Day invasion or labor shortages—shaping the drama. Expect the next generation of Duttons, maybe John Dutton II or his parents (Spencer and Alexandra or Jack and Elizabeth), to drive the story, based on 1923 's baby reveals.
The wartime backdrop opens doors for big moments. With men possibly off fighting, women like Alexandra or Elizabeth could step up to run the ranch, echoing Cara's strength in 1923 . Fans are also hoping 1944 clears up mysteries, like who Chance and Ned Dutton are—names dropped in Yellowstone but not yet pinned down. Taylor Sheridan's gift for blending romance, betrayal, and rugged Western vibes with history means 1944 will pack a punch.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at BusinessUpturn.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oasis faces backlash in South Korea over controversial sunrise video
Oasis faced a backlash online this week after sharing a video featuring a rising sun, which fans in Asia said closely resembled a symbol of Japanese imperialism and World War II militarism. On 8 August, the band shared a video on their social media accounts for their song 'Morning Glory,' which contains a stylised sun motif with radiating rays recurring over various scenes, from graphic landscapes to urban backdrops. South Korean fans were quick to point out the resemblance to the Rising Sun Flag and were upset at the video's release just days ahead of South Korea's Liberation Day on 15 August, a commemoration of the country's independence from Japanese colonial rule. Oasis are scheduled to perform in South Korea and Japan later this year. They have a show set for 21 October at the Goyang Sports Complex in Gyeonggi province, followed by two shows on 25 and 26 October at the Tokyo Dome. The Rising Sun Flag, known as the 'Kyokujitsu-ki' in Japanese, features a red sun with 16 rays extending outward and was used by the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy from the late 19th century until Japan's defeat in 1945. Though still used today by Japan's Self-Defense Forces, the flag is widely regarded in countries such as South Korea, North Korea, and China as a symbol of militarism, colonial aggression and wartime atrocities committed during Japan's imperial expansion. Critics of its use argue that it evokes painful historical memories similar to the symbolism of the Nazi swastika in Europe. 'If you plan to keep disrespecting Korea and never set foot here again, then stick with this one. Otherwise, fire them and get someone else,' commented one person on X, formerly Twitter. 'Brilliant. Nothing says rock n roll like slapping a symbol of imperial violence into a video. It's 2025, lads—thought we'd left this colonial throwback in the history books, not on track visuals. You can't plead ignorance forever. At some point, it's not a mistake. It's a choice,' wrote another. 'Don't you want to sincerely apologize for the Rising Sun Flag and delete the video? Many Korean fans, including myself, are very disappointed,' another fan wrote on the group's Instagram. At the time of writing, the video was still up on the band's social media accounts. The Independent has reached out to representatives of Oasis for comment. This is not the first time Oasis has encountered controversy in the region. In July, frontman Liam Gallagher came under fire for posting a racially offensive term on social media, one widely recognised as derogatory toward East Asians. After public criticism, Gallagher eventually deleted the post and wrote: 'I'm sorry if I upset anyone. I love all people and do not discriminate. Peace and love.'
CBS News
9 hours ago
- CBS News
Decades ago, a WWII veteran signed a contract to conduct a band on his 100th birthday. Last month, he fulfilled it.
Wheaton, Illinois — It's been more than 80 years since retired U.S. Air Force Col. Arnald Gabriel of Arlington, Virginia, took an enlistment oath to defend his country during World War II, where he saw combat. The 100-year-old Gabriel, who also served in the U.S. Army, was once the conductor of the U.S. Air Force Band, and under his leadership, it became internationally renowned. In 1992, one of his biggest fans, Bruce Moss — conductor of the Wheaton Municipal Band in Wheaton, Illinois — invited Gabriel to be a guest conductor. "He did not know me," Moss told CBS News. "He did not know the band. But he fell in love with the band over time, and kept coming back." On a subsequent visit in 2000 or 2001, Moss said he told Gabriel, who was in his 70s at the time, "You look so good, I bet you'll still be conducting at 100." According to Moss, Gabriel replied, "I fully intend to." When Moss heard that, he recognized an opportunity too good to pass up. He wrote up a contract that stated Gabriel would commit to conducting the Wheaton Municipal Band on his 100th birthday. "So I went home, wrote a contract and mailed it to him," Moss said. "... He [Gabriel] said, 'Of course, if I don't make it to 100, this contract's null and void, but don't count on it.'" Gabriel's health is declining and he cannot travel anymore. But he was determined to honor his commitment. "Your word is your bond," Gabriel told CBS News. "If you sign a contract, you have to fulfill it — no question about it." And that's why, last month, remotely, he struck up the Wheaton Municipal Band one last time. Even at age 100, he kept perfect time. But more importantly, he had kept his word. "It felt like I was there on stage with them," Gabriel said. "That's the way it felt."
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Princess Anne Didn't Just Curtsy to Her Mother Queen Elizabeth, She "Took It Further," Per Royal Biographer
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. When it comes to royal etiquette, few traditions spark more stress than the idea of curtsying. For those meeting the Royal Family, knowing when—and to whom—to curtsy or bow to can feel like a social minefield. Even within the Royal Family, the rules of deference can weigh heavily, as author Craig Brown wrote in his biography Q: A Voyage Around The Queen. Noting that Queen Elizabeth "took the order of precedence very seriously," he shared the intricacies of curtsying—and how Princess Anne took royal etiquette even more serious than most. Brown wrote that Queen Elizabeth "expected everyone, including her sister, her mother and her children, to greet her with a bow or a curtsy"—even when "others in her circle" thought the practice was "roughly a couple of centuries out of date." Throughout her 70-year reign, members of the Royal Family dutifully bowed or curtsied to Queen Elizabeth—even when viewing her coffin—but Brown noted that one member of the family "took it further." According to the author, "A friend of Princess Anne noticed that she would automatically stand up when taking a telephone call from her mother." View Deal View Deal As the times (and marriages) changed, the author noted that "rules had to be rejigged" as to who curtsied to whom, calling it "a matter of some complexity." When Camilla Parker Bowles married Prince Charles in 2005, Queen Elizabeth tasked her private secretary with creating a document titled "Precedence of the Royal Family to be Observed at Court." This laid out who would curtsy to each other, and only Duchess Sophie, who was born to a middle-class family, was required to curtsy to Camilla at the time. When Kate Middleton married Prince William, the rules changed again, and when Meghan Markle started dating Prince Harry she was given a crash course in curtsying by none other than Sarah Ferguson. However, the tradition might not be long for this world. Earlier this year, etiquette expert William Hanson told Marie Claire that he "wouldn't be surprised" if bowing and curtsying goes away for all but the most formal of court occasions when Prince William takes the throne. Solve the daily Crossword
