Greek police arrest Moldovan tycoon Plahotniuc on Interpol notice
Vladimir Plahotniuc, considered one of Moldova's richest men and a former lawmaker, was arrested at the Athens airport on an Interpol notice on Monday evening. He has been accused in connection with a $1 billion fraud against Moldovan banks in 2014-2015, a case known locally as the "theft of the century". He has denied wrongdoing.
Police also arrested former Moldovan lawmaker Constantin Tutu, 38, who is wanted by Russia for allegedly trafficking drugs internationally, police officials said. Both suspects had an Interpol red notice issued against them.
Moldova's General Inspectorate of Police confirmed that Plahotniuc, who was the leader of the Democratic party from 2016-2019, and Tutu had been arrested. Plahotniuc, 59, is suspected to have fled Moldova in 2019.
Following a tip-off, Greek police launched an investigation which found that Plahotniuc was living with his partner in a luxurious villa in the southern suburbs of Athens. Tutu also lived in the same residence, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the confidentiality of the probe.
In 2023, the European Union imposed sanctions on seven people from Moldova, including Plahotniuc, for actions that it said destabilised and undermined the territorial integrity of Moldova and neighbouring Ukraine.
Since 2023, Plahotniuc has lived in 22 countries, changing residence regularly to avoid detection, the Greek police officials said.
The two men, carrying only backpacks, were arrested at the Athens airport after boarding a flight to Dubai. They will appear before a prosecutor on Wednesday to respond to charges.
Moldova is expected to request his extradition, the country's General Prosecutor's office said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
Trump's tariff shock to India: What Modi government could have done differently
After sealing a deal with the European Union and Japan, agreeing to a 15 per cent tariff in the case of these developed industrial economies, and even as he strings China along, United States President Donald Trump has shocked India, a low-middle-income developing economy, imposing 25 per cent tariff. Till recently, the official Indian briefing to the media was that discussions were still on and India may get a couple of weeks' reprieve in August to strike a deal. Hours after the Lok Sabha saw Prime Minister Narendra Modi unwilling to give any credit to President Trump for the pause in Operation Sindoor, the latter hit hard. Even after the PM's and foreign minister's statements in Parliament, President Trump tweeted for the nth time his claim that he had stopped the war. He had always linked that to trade. There's more to the Trump action than just trade and tariffs. Never since 1971 has India found both the United States and China on the same side on a matter concerning Pakistan, while at the same time having to defend her relationship with Russia. This is perhaps the lowest point for Indian foreign policy that has consistently endeavoured for three decades to keep the US on the Indian side while having to deal with the China-Pakistan alliance. The Parliament must undertake a comprehensive review of Indian foreign policy. India is now stuck in a Catch-22. Damned if he will, damned if he won't, Prime Minister Modi will not admit that US intervention played a role. If the issue was only about how the war ended, the matter would have rested there. After all, even in the past, the US did play a role in sorting out issues between India and Pakistan, even with India consistently maintaining that all disputes between neighbours can only be settled bilaterally. No US President has made a big deal of it in the past. This time it's different. Not only has President Trump made a big deal of his intervention, explicitly seeking credit for it, but he has gone a step further and linked this to the outcome of the trade and tariffs negotiations. While the EU and Japan are relatively happy with the outcome of tariff negotiations, making promises on investment, and China is working its way through Washington DC's corridors of power, India has been hit. Worse, as one longstanding watcher of US-India relations said on a social media post, Trump has rubbed salt into Indian wounds by striking a deal with Pakistan, 'whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive oil reserves.' Could Prime Minister Modi have handled President Trump differently? The problem goes all the way back to Indian expectations about a second Trump presidency. Even as Prime Minister Modi tried to remain neutral between Trump and Kamala Harris in the run-up to the presidential elections, many in India and many Indians in the US continued to assume that Trump would be better for US-India relations. When Trump chose to invite President Xi Jinping of China to his inauguration in January without extending such an invitation to Modi, alarm bells would have sounded in New Delhi's South Block. Both the PM and External Affairs Minister worked over time to reach out to President Trump and retrieve ground. It is possible that after this initial shock, the Prime Minister and his diplomatic team may have re-assessed the status of US-India relations. The earlier assumption that President Biden was unfriendly towards India, and in fact friendly towards Pakistan, while President Trump would rebalance the equation ought to have been dismissed and a new assessment made about what lies ahead. It appears Pakistan made such a re-assessment and quickly invested in the Trump entourage, buying up support. When President Trump unveiled his trade and tariff policy, he repeatedly named India a 'tariff king' and as a target for action. Perhaps the Modi government had hoped that by buying more defence equipment from the US, showing how it is contributing to the US economy, Trump could be appeased. The government even proposed a bilateral free trade agreement and hoped the negotiating process would get India off the hook. There was considerable optimism within the Union commerce ministry on this count even as late as April this year. Matters, however, had not been sorted out. Caught in this trade trap, the Modi government had a fantastic opportunity to feed President Trump's ego and vanity by thanking him for his role in the declaration of the ceasefire. Of course, it would be argued that Prime Minister Modi would not have wanted to depart from India's longstanding diplomatic posture of denying any role to the US or any other country in settling a bilateral dispute with Pakistan. But there was a way out. After ceasefire was declared, Prime Minister Modi could have called President Trump, referred to the conversations he had with Vice-President J D Vance, and the foreign minister had with his counterpart, and thanked Trump for his interest in ending wars and maintaining peace around the world and then added a line about how India-Pakistan issues can only be settled bilaterally. By linking his role in terminating Operation Sindoor to a trade deal, Trump appeared to be seeking a quid pro quo – credit for his role in exchange for concessions on trade. The official Indian position could have been, 'Yes, President Trump was concerned about the situation getting out of hand. He reached out to both sides. We thanked him for his concern. But, we declared ceasefire only after our objectives were met.' End of story. Modi would have acknowledged Trump's role without giving him credit for the final decision and sticking to the standard Indian position that India-Pakistan disputes will only be settled bilaterally. Whatever happened on those four fateful days in May this year, the government was clearly not prepared to deal with the larger challenge of the Trump presidency – that of pandering to and appeasing Trump's ego. The present Indian leadership does not have the toolkit to deal with egos as big as their own. This is all the more surprising given that few heads of government around the world had established a better equation with President Trump than Prime Minister Modi. The government and foreign affairs scholars owe an explanation to the lay public as to why US-India relations have deteriorated to the point we find ourselves in today. The writer was member, National Security Advisory Board of India, 1999-2001 and media advisor to the Prime Minister of India, 2004-08
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cincinnati horror: Councilwoman Victoria Parks under fire for remark on downtown assault; users demand resignation
City Councilwoman Victoria Parks is facing mounting criticism after a comment from her Facebook account appeared to defend a violent attack in downtown Cincinnati last weekend. The backlash erupted after a Facebook user, Leohna Alia La JCannon, posted a video showing a brutal assault on two individuals near the corner of Fourth and Elm Street in the early hours of Saturday morning. In response to the video, a comment linked to Parks' Facebook account read, 'They begged for that beat down!' The comment continued, 'I am grateful for the whole story.' The account in question appears to belong to Parks and lists her job title as 'City Council Member at City of Cincinnati Government.' It also mentions her past roles as Commissioner at Hamilton County, Ohio Government, and as Chief of Staff to Hamilton County Commissioner Todd Portune, details that match her official biography on the City of Cincinnati website, the New York Post reported. Cincinnati's city council operates as a nonpartisan body, but all nine members, including Parks, have been endorsed by the local Democratic party. Parks appears to have at least two other Facebook accounts, one last active in May and another that has not been updated since 2022. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo The page linked to the controversial comment includes several years of posts, mostly about her professional background. The comment sparked widespread outrage online, with screenshots being circulated rapidly across social media platforms. 'Cincinnati Councilwoman Victoria Parks must resign immediately! Defending violent criminals who viciously beat innocent people is disgusting,' Ohio's 39th District State Representative Phil Plummer posted on X. 'Her words 'They begged for that beat down!' are outrageous. Prosecutors must charge the attackers with a hate crime. We must protect our streets!' Other posts included strongly worded messages like, 'You're a racist pig, Victoria Parks,' and 'THIS IS INSANE!' with several users demanding her resignation. The attack captured in the video shows a group savagely beating two people, including a woman who was knocked unconscious and left lying in the street. The incident took place in Cincinnati's central business district and has been widely condemned by city residents and officials alike. In her official biography, Parks highlighted her role in 'passing Racism as a Public Health Crisis' during her time working with the Hamilton County government. She also claims credit for introducing and passing Juneteenth as a paid holiday for county employees. Parks announced in January that she would not seek reelection and plans to retire at the end of her current term. Cincinnati Fraternal Order of Police President Ken Kober criticised the comment, telling Fox News Digital, 'It's unconscionable that an elected official would be celebrating violence in the very city she was voted to serve." "This highlights the poor political environment that police officers, residents and visitors are currently enduring. Thankfully, there's an election in November. I urge voters to vote for change!' the officer further added. Parks has not responded to multiple requests for comment. Mollie Lair, Communications Director for the Cincinnati City Manager's Office, confirmed she viewed the Facebook post in person at City Hall but declined to comment.
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump slams ‘dead economies' India, Russia, hits out at Medvedev on ‘war' with US threat
Day after imposing 25% tarrif on Indian exports to the US, President Donald Trump refered to India and Russia as 'dead economies' and said on Thursday, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care." Trump's latest remarks came after he announced that the US would impose 25% tarrif on Indian exports, plus a penalty, starting August 1. On July 30, he had criticised India's relationship with Russia, saying India has always bought a vast majority of their military equipment and energy from Russia, which was 'not good.' In response to this, the Indian government said it was studying the implications of Trump's announcements and remained dedicated to securing a fair trade deal. On July 31, Trump said in a new post on TRUTH social, 'We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World,' 'Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way, and tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!,' Trump warned. Earlier on Monday, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said that Trump was playing "the ultimatum game" with Russia, and that such an approach could lead to a war involving the United States. Medvedev wrote on X, 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with (Trump's) own country.' Medvedev had called a framework trade agreement struck between the European Union and the United States "anti-Russian" – likening it to a de facto ban on buying Russian oil and gas.
