
Former DEA officials raise concerns about Trump's pick to lead the agency
Years ago, the Drug Enforcement Agency was shaken by a pair of particularly deadly overseas incidents: a botched operation by a US-vetted Colombian police squad that left 10 local officers dead, and a cartel's brutal retaliation in a small Mexican town that killed dozens.
In both Colombia and Mexico, according to CNN interviews with more than a dozen former DEA officials, key figures in those cases worked with an agent named Terrance Cole – who now is President Donald Trump's nominee to run the agency.
The exact nature of Cole's role in those incidents has never been made public, in part because the DEA has declined to release two internal reports that former officials told CNN were produced in the wake of the bloodshed in Colombia and Mexico.
Now, former DEA officials have sent an unsigned letter to lawmakers asking them to publicly question Cole about his actions in those cases and more broadly raising concerns about his record at the agency. Roughly a dozen former DEA officers contributed, the lead author said, about half of whom spoke with CNN. Most of the critics who spoke with CNN spent decades in the DEA and reached executive-level positions; several worked directly with Cole, though none had firsthand knowledge of his actions in Colombia or Mexico.
Sen. Dick Durbin, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee that will hold Cole's confirmation hearing on Wednesday, has been speaking with some of those critics, his staff said.
'I can confirm that Sen. Durbin's staff has been in contact with multiple concerned parties about Terry Cole's nomination,' said a spokesman for Durbin, Josh Sorbe. 'As with all nominees, the Senator will continue to scrutinize Cole's record and looks forward to the opportunity to further examine his record at his hearing.'
Three former DEA agents who support Cole, however, told CNN that neither internal report found fault with Cole, and that he bore no blame for violent deaths in countries on the front lines of the drug wars. Those agents declined to share the internal reports with CNN to verify those findings. The Cole critics who spoke to CNN had not reviewed those reports.
Cole, 55, who left the agency in late 2019 for the private sector and now serves as Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin's secretary of Public Safety and Homeland Security, did not respond to requests for comment. A DEA spokesperson also declined to comment, referring queries to the White House. The DEA has previously defended its actions in the lead-up to the Mexican incident, blaming the violence solely on cartel leaders.
Trump has touted Cole's work in Virginia overseeing 11 state public safety agencies with more than 19,000 employees.
'Terry Cole is the perfect choice to deliver on President Trump's mandate to end drug distribution in the United States,' said Harrison Fields, a White House spokesman. 'His nomination of Terry Cole proves his unwavering commitment to making our country safe again and anybody who says otherwise isn't prioritizing the well-being of Americans.'
The letter to lawmakers about Cole – who spent 22 years with the DEA – is the latest challenge in a bumpy White House effort to fill a key job in its campaign to rein in Mexico's powerful drug cartels. Trump's first nominee to lead the DEA, Chad Chronister, a sheriff in Florida's Tampa Bay region, quickly withdrew from consideration.
The first of the deadly overseas incidents noted in the letter came in 2006 in Bogota, where Cole was stationed as a special agent, according to his online resume. An elite group of 10 anti-narcotic Colombian police officers, who were polygraphed by the DEA as part of its vetting process and worked directly with Cole, according to agents who served with him, were gunned down by a platoon of Colombian soldiers later convicted of working for drug traffickers.
Five years later, Cole was working in the DEA's field office in Dallas, supervising a probe into the leadership of the powerful Zetas drug cartel in Mexico, according to agents who worked with Cole at the time and press reports. In early 2011, the Zetas carried out a mass murder that was later the subject of a yearlong investigation published jointly by ProPublica and National Geographic. That report found that the border region violence was sparked when DEA officials shared intelligence produced by an agent Cole supervised with Mexican federal police, who then leaked it to the cartels.
Cole's defenders told CNN that he was not at fault in the Mexico or the Colombia case.
'He's worked in two of the toughest places in the world when it comes to drug-trafficking investigations – in Colombia and Mexico – where bad things happen every day,' said Matt Donahue, who worked as Cole's supervisor for several years in Colombia, but who'd taken another job in New York when the police officers were killed.
The detractors, though, say Congress has a responsibility to demand a more public accounting of his record.
'There's bad luck, but how many times do you have lightning strike twice?' a former DEA agent said.
Cole was in his early 30s when he came to work as a special agent in the Bogota office in 2002 after a nearly five-year stint in Oklahoma, according to his online resume.
Colombia was no Oklahoma. The country was steeped in drug-related violence as well as a long-running civil war. Its former president, Andrés Pastrana, sought US help in neutralizing its all-powerful cartels. As the US poured billions into Colombia's war, DEA agents vetted and trained Colombian police, who often did the dirty work of apprehending traffickers and seizing drugs.
Donahue, Cole's former boss in Colombia, said Cole was not directly in charge of the anti-narcotics unit that ended up in the middle of the deadly raid. Rather, he said, Cole worked alongside the squadron as a colleague with a handful of other agents. He frequently flew from Bogota to the unit's headquarters in Cali, where they listened to wiretaps and exchanged information. Cole and the other DEA agents also helped train the officers and coordinated classes on how to conduct investigations and handle informants, Donahue said.
On May 22, 2006, 10 members of that unit headed for a psychiatric facility in Jamundi after an informant told them a 220-pound stash of cocaine was nearby. Wearing green police vests and ballcaps, the officers arrived with the 37-year-old civilian informant – and were greeted with a hail of bullets, according to a detailed report published in Semana, a weekly magazine in Colombia.
Twenty minutes after the attack began, all 10 officers – plus the informant – were dead. Most were shot at close range; some were killed by grenades.
The attack was carried out by a platoon of military soldiers. Fourteen of them and a colonel were later convicted of aggravated homicide – prosecutors said they'd acted on orders from drug traffickers, according to media reports.
US coverage of the debacle was sparse and often didn't mention the role of the DEA. But a Semana story published days after the massacre said Cole was among the first officials to arrive at the crime scene that evening. DEA agents flew to Cali after the killings on a Colombian military flight with local officials, said a White House official speaking on the condition of anonymity.
'In an unusual event, this man wept in public,' the Semana article said. 'After a few minutes, he managed to say: 'This has to be explained. Nothing must be hidden from us or from Colombia.''
In the letter to US senators, the former DEA agents allege that Cole failed to properly oversee the unit before the killings and that he personally missed the deadly raid because he was 'distracted.'
Cole's defenders strongly reject this contention.
'It's easy to sit back and say that now 20 years later,' Donahue said. He added, 'I don't think (the letter) has any credibility because it's anonymous.'
The White House said Cole had no direct role in the failed operation.
'(The) DEA had nothing to do the operation that resulted in the massacre,' said the White House official, adding that the agency had 'no knowledge of the police operation. This was a Colombia national police operation.'
A Colombian military report on the massacre did not mention the DEA, the White House official said.
A former DEA agent who said he worked on and reviewed the agency's own internal report on the incident said it found no fault with Cole. That agent told CNN he no longer has access to the report. He added that because the police unit was embarking on a routine seizure operation, it wasn't unusual for Cole not to ride along.
'It wasn't a capture operation, which would be something like, yeah, you'd definitely cancel your vacation plans if you had good intel to go capture one of the top guys,' the former agent, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a confidential report, told CNN.
David Gaddis, the DEA's regional director in Colombia at the time, said Cole had no fault in the operation. The DEA only provided support to the vetted units, and it wasn't the DEA's decision to carry out an operation.
'The DEA only provides the intelligence, and it's up to the Colombians to decide when an operation is doable,' Gaddis said.
Another former official who worked in Colombia years after the 2006 attack also said it wasn't out of the ordinary for a Latin American police unit's DEA liaison to be absent on the day of such a raid. 'They're policemen – they have their own sovereignty, their own responsibilities, and they have their own chain of command for reporting,' that agent told CNN.
The deaths deeply impacted Cole, his colleagues said. Another former DEA official who worked with Cole in Texas said Cole kept a memorial of the slain unit in his Dallas office.
'That can't be something that he's responsible for,' the former official said. 'I'm friends to this day with people I worked with 35 years ago in these countries. … It would've hit him hard, just like it hit me hard when guys I worked with were killed.'
Cole left Colombia for a brief stint in Afghanistan before taking a job in 2007 in the Dallas office as a group supervisor who later oversaw a probe into Mexican drug cartels.
About four years later, the Dallas office received a promising lead out of Mexico with big implications, according to the ProPublica story. The broad details about the case described in the article were confirmed to CNN by Dan Salter, Cole's former supervisor from the Dallas office, and a former DEA official who said he reviewed an internal report on the case.
An agent named Richard Martinez, whom Salter confirmed was a direct report of Cole's, had gotten a breakthrough tip from a source about the violent Zetas cartel: trackable IDs for BlackBerry phones belonging to two alleged leaders of the cartel, Omar and Miguel Treviño. Martinez, who was named agent of the year in 2011, passed the cell phone IDs to his superiors in Dallas.
Salter said that in general, when Martinez had intelligence, Cole coordinated with him and other superior officers before anything was passed on to the DEA's Mexico City office and then to foreign counterparts. 'It wouldn't have gone without my concurrence,' Salter said.
Salter ultimately decided to share that information with the DEA's office in Mexico City, according to the White House official, who said he 'followed standard protocol.'
Both Donahue and the White House official said it was Mexico City's DEA unit – not Cole's in Dallas – that signed off on passing the tip to the Mexican federal police.
Soon after the tip was shared with the Mexican officials, all hell broke loose: The kingpins unleashed a torrent of violence on the town of Allende – possibly in a frenzied hunt for those helping the DEA. Operatives with the Zetas arrived in 50 trucks and, in a rampage that lasted weeks and spread to other towns, ProPublica reported, terrorized the region. When it was over, authorities estimated at least 28 people were presumed dead or missing. Some estimates put the toll as high as 300.
Ernest Gonzalez, the assistant US attorney who worked on the case, told ProPublica he was upset that DEA management decided to pass the numbers to Mexico. 'It was a great opportunity,' he told the publication. 'But it was squandered because it wasn't done correctly.'
Now a federal judge in Texas, Gonzalez did not return multiple emails and calls to his office from CNN. Martinez died in 2019.
Cole's critics say his precise role in handling Martinez's intelligence should be made public and question whether he should have fought to keep it from Mexican authorities.
But Salter told CNN that Cole did nothing wrong. 'Terry did not act unilaterally,' he said.
Salter added that the decision to forward the intel would have been routine and that the DEA had never had issues before sharing information with their Mexican colleagues.
'We did it almost every day,' Salter said. 'Never had we had an issue until this horrible event.'
Salter said that while he doesn't remember any objections from Martinez and Gonzalez to passing the intel in this specific case, there were times when opinions on such matters differed.
'What you typically have in an investigation is you have case agents and prosecutors sometimes that are – they like to hold information tight because they think of the worst possible thing,' he said.
But one former high-ranking DEA official who spoke to CNN said that in his view, it was far from routine to share such particularly sensitive intelligence with Mexican officials.
'Nobody ever wants to get other people killed,' said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he said he still works with the government and fears retribution from Cole. 'Now does it happen sometimes? Yeah, but if you're reckless about it, it'll happen more often.'
The DEA produced a 32-page internal report on the Allende killings – though not until after political pressure mounted following the ProPublica report, said a former DEA official who has a copy of the report. The official said the report concluded that while the leak occurred, it wasn't the reason for the mayhem. Rather, he said, the agency concluded the Zetas were incensed about recent drug and money seizures.
'They kept seeing all these seizures in the Dallas area, in Chicago – all this money but no one was going to jail,' said the official, who declined to provide the report to CNN and asked to remain anonymous due to the report's sensitivity. 'So, they started suspecting people.'
Donahue, meanwhile, said if he had been in Cole and Salter's position, he too would have passed the tip on to the DEA's Mexico City office, which he said is 'standard operating procedure.'
'You gotta weigh your risks and all that,' he said. 'But if you're going to go after people like (the Zetas leaders) … you gotta pass intelligence.'
In past interviews, DEA officials have stressed that, the Treviño brothers, the alleged Zetas cartel leaders behind the killings, were eventually apprehended. They were among 29 Mexican cartel operatives extradited to the United States in March.
Cole is not able to comment on the Allende incident because of the ongoing criminal case involving the Treviños, the White House officials said.
'The DEA's official position is: That's squarely on Omar and Miguel Treviño,' Russ Baer, a DEA spokesman, told ProPublica in 2017. 'They were killing people before that happened, and they killed people after the numbers were passed.'
With a day to go before Cole's confirmation hearing, it's unclear whether he will face resistance from the GOP-controlled Senate.
The critics who sent the unsigned letter to lawmakers say their concerns go beyond Cole's role in the two overseas cases. They note that in two decades at the DEA, he did not rise past the level of upper-middle management, although he now occupies a Cabinet position under Virginia Gov. Youngkin.
'And now we're skipping over all the way to letting him run the organization,' said a former high-ranking DEA official. 'He doesn't have the leadership abilities.'
But more broadly, those critics say lawmakers owe the public a chance to learn more about what Cole did before the Mexico and Colombia incidents.
'Cole has demonstrated, at a minimum, two clear operational failures (Colombia and Mexico) resulting in two of the most consequential failures of DEA and resulting in the murder of law enforcement partners and civilians,' the letter to lawmakers states. 'Cole has clearly shown an INABILITY to run complicated enforcement operations.'
The former high-ranking DEA official said he fears what Cole's confirmation to become the next administrator would mean for the agency.
'The administrator sometimes has to push back against the administration for what's good for the agency, and you are not going to see that,' he said. 'You're going to see a lot of people retire.'
Donahue and Salter strenuously disagree that he is unfit to lead the agency, which is headed on an interim basis by veteran DEA official Derek Maltz.
'(Cole) had some of the biggest seizures of all time in Colombia,' Donahue said, noting that Cole's busts also led to crucial extraditions of suspects to the United States. 'He was really engaged.'
CNN's Evan Perez contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After images of unrest comes the political spin, distorting the reality on the ground in L.A.
Driverless Waymo vehicles, coated with graffiti and engulfed in flames. Masked protesters, dancing and cavorting around burning American flags. Anonymous figures brazenly blocking streets and shutting down major freeways, raining bottles and rocks on the police, while their compatriots waved Mexican flags. The images flowing out of Los Angeles over nearly a week of protests against federal immigration raids have cast America's second most populous city as a terrifying hellscape, where lawbreakers rule the streets and regular citizens should fear to leave their homes. In the relentless fever loop of online and broadcast video, it does not matter that the vast majority of Los Angeles neighborhoods remain safe and secure. Digital images create their own reality and it's one that President Trump and his supporters have used to condemn L.A. as a place that is "out of control" and on the brink of total collapse. The images and their true meaning and context have become the subject of a furious debate in the media and among political partisans, centered on the true roots and victims of the protests, which erupted on Friday as the Trump administration moved aggressively to expand its arrests of undocumented immigrants. Read more: Newsom, in California address, says Trump purposely 'fanned the flames' of L.A. protests As the president and his supporters in conservative media tell it, he is the defender of law and order and American values. They cast their opponents as dangerous foreign-born criminals and their feckless enablers in the Democratic Party and mainstream media. The state's political leaders and journalists offer a compelling rebuttal: that Trump touched off several days of protest and disruption with raids that went far beyond targeting criminals, as he previously promised, then escalated the conflict by taking the highly unusual step of sending the National Guard and Marines to Southern California. Reaction to the raids by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and the subsequent turmoil will divide Americans on what have become partisan lines that have become so predictable they are "calcified," said Lynn Vavreck, a political science professor at UCLA. "The parties want to build very different worlds, voters know it, and they know which world they want to live in," said Vavreck, who has focused on the country's extreme political polarization. "And because the parties are so evenly divided, and this issue is so personal to so many, the stakes are very high for people." As a curfew was imposed Tuesday, the sharpest street confrontations appeared to be fading and a national poll suggested Americans have mixed feelings about the events that have dominated the news. The YouGov survey of 4,231 people found that 50% disapprove of the Trump administration's handling of deportations, compared with 39% who approve. Pluralities of those sampled also disagreed with Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to Southern California. But 45% of those surveyed by YouGov said they disapprove of the protests that began after recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions. Another 36% approved of the protests, with the rest unsure how they feel. Faced with a middling public response to the ICE raids and subsequent protests, Trump continued to use extreme language to exaggerate the magnitude of the public safety threat and to take credit for the reduction in hostilities as the week progressed. In a post on his TruthSocial site, he suggested that, without his military intervention, 'Los Angeles would be burning just like it was burning a number of months ago, with all the houses that were lost. Los Angeles right now would be on fire.' In reality, agitators set multiple spot fires in a few neighborhoods, including downtown Los Angeles and Paramount, but the blazes in recent days were tiny and quickly controlled, in contrast to the massive wildfires that devastated broad swaths of Southern California in January. Trump's hyperbole continued in a fundraising appeal to his supporters Tuesday. In it, he again praised his decision to deploy the National Guard (without the approval of California Gov. Gavin Newsom), concluding: 'If we had not done so, Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated.' The Republican had assistance in fueling the sense of unease. His colleagues in Congress introduced a resolution to formally condemn the riots. 'Congress steps in amid 'out-of-control' Los Angeles riots as Democrats resist federal help,' Fox News reported on the resolution, being led by Rep. Young Kim of Orange County. A journalist based in New Delhi pronounced, based on unspecified evidence, that Los Angeles 'is descending into a full-blown warzone.' Veterans Affairs Secretary Douglas Collins suggested that the harm from the protesters was spreading; announcing in a social media post that a care center for vets in downtown L.A. had been temporarily closed. "To the violent mobs in Los Angeles rioting in support of illegal immigrants and against the rule of law,' his post on X said, 'your actions are interfering with Veterans' health care." A chyron running with a Fox News commentary suggested "Democrats have lost their mind," as proved by their attempts to downplay the anti-ICE riots. Many Angelenos mocked the claims of a widespread public safety crisis. One person on X posted a picture of a dog out for a walk along a neatly kept sidewalk in a serene neighborhood, with the caption: 'Los Angeles just an absolute warzone, as you can see.' In stark contrast to the photos of Waymo vehicles burning and police cars being pelted with rocks, a video on social media showed a group of protestors line dancing. 'Oh my God! They must be stopped before their peaceful and joy filled dance party spreads to a city near you!' the caption read. 'Please send in the Marines before they start doing the Cha Cha and the Macarena!' And many people noted on social media that Sunday's Pride parade in Hollywood for the LGBTQ+ community went off without incident, as reinforced by multiple videos of dancers and marchers celebrating along a sun-splashed parade route. But other activists and Democrats signaled that they understand how Trump's position can be strengthened if it appears they are condoning the more extreme episodes that emerged along with the protests — police being pelted with bottles, businesses being looted and buildings being defaced with graffiti. On Tuesday, an X post by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass reiterated her earlier admonitions: "Let me be clear: ANYONE who vandalized Downtown or looted stores does not care about our immigrant communities,' the mayor wrote. "You will be held accountable." Read more: ICE expands immigration raids into California's agricultural heartland The activist group Occupy Democrats posted a message online urging protesters to show their disdain for the violence and property damage. 'The moment violence or property damage begins, EVERY OTHER PROTESTER must immediately sit on the floor or the ground in silence, with signs down,' the advisory suggested. 'The media needs to film this. This will reveal paid fake thugs posing as protesters becoming violent. ….The rest of us will demonstrate our non-violent innocence and retain our Constitutional right to peaceful protest.' Craig Silverman, a journalist and cofounder of Indicator, a site that investigates deception on digital platforms, said that reporting on the context and true scope of the protests would have a hard time competing with the visceral images broadcast into Americans' homes. 'It's inevitable that the most extreme and compelling imagery will win the battle for attention on social media and on TV,' Silverman said via email. 'It's particularly challenging to deliver context and facts when social platforms incentivize the most shocking videos and claims, federal and state authorities offer contradictory messages about what's happening.' Dan Schnur, who teaches political science at USC and UC Berkeley, agreed. 'The overwhelming majority of the protesters are peaceful,' Schnur said, 'but they don't do stories on all the planes that land safely at LAX, either.' Though it might be too early to assess the ultimate impact of the L.A. unrest, Schnur suggested that all of the most prominent politicians in the drama might have accomplished their messaging goals: Trump motivated his base and diverted attention from his nasty feud with his former top advisor, Elon Musk, and the lack of progress on peace talks with Russia and Ukraine. Newsom "effectively unified the state and elevated his national profile" by taking on Trump. And Bass, under tough scrutiny for her handling of the city's wildfire disaster, has also gotten a chance to use Trump as a foil. What was not disputed was that Trump's rapid deployment of the National Guard, without the approval of Newsom, had little precedent. And sending the Marines to L.A. was an even more extreme approach, with experts saying challenges to the deployment would test the limits of Trump's power. The federal Insurrection Act allows the deployment of the military for law enforcement purposes, but only under certain conditions, such as a national emergency. California leaders say Trump acted before a true emergency developed, thereby preempting standard protocols, including the institution of curfews and the mobilization of other local police departments in a true emergency. Even real estate developer Rick Caruso, Bass' opponent in the last election, suggested Trump acted too hastily. 'There is no emergency, widespread threat, or out of control violence in Los Angeles,' Caruso wrote on X Sunday. 'And absolutely no danger that justifies deployment of the National Guard, military, or other federal force to the streets of this or any other Southern California City.' 'We must call for calm in the streets,' Caruso added, 'and deployment of the National Guard may prompt just the opposite.' Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.


CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
Rand Paul attacks ‘immaturity' of White House after rescinded picnic invitation, says he's lost a ‘lot of respect' for Trump
GOP Sen. Rand Paul is accusing the White House of 'immaturity' and engaging in 'petty vindictiveness' after he and his family were disinvited from the annual White House picnic long held with members of both parties. Paul, a libertarian-minded deficit hawk who has been raising deep concerns over President Donald Trump's sweeping policy bill, said his family – including his nearly six-month-old grandson — had been planning on attending Thursday's bipartisan picnic on the White House lawn. But Paul said their invitation was abruptly rescinded with no real explanation, even as the move came after Trump and his aides have been bashing Paul over his position on the president's bill for days. 'The level of immaturity is beyond words,' Paul said of the White House, adding that he's lost 'a lot of respect' for Trump. 'It's just incredibly petty,' Paul told CNN outside the Capitol on Wednesday evening. 'I'm arguing from a true belief and worry that our country is mired in debt and getting worse. And they choose to react by uninviting my grandson to the picnic. I don't know. I just think it really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. The move could be a risk for Trump. To pass his agenda through the Senate, he can only afford to lose the support of three Republican senators. Paul has indicted he couldn't support the bill because it includes an increase of the national debt limit, but he's said he'd be open to considering it if GOP leaders removed that from the overall bill. The White House and top Republicans have rebuffed Paul's demand. 'It's just, I think, a really sad day that this is the level of warfare they've stooped to,' Paul said. 'But it's also not very effective. It probably has the opposite result.' Paul said it's unclear if the directive came directly from the president or 'petty staffers who have been running a sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter.' 'Who knows if it came from him,' Paul said of Trump. 'It could be from lower-level staff members, but these are people that shouldn't be working over there.' And then he took a shot at one of the most powerful aides in the White House, Stephen Miller. 'You have people that are basically going around casually talking about getting rid of habeas corpus,' Paul said. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So, I think what it tells it they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me.' When asked if he was speaking about Miller, Paul nodded. When asked by CNN if he believes Miller should still be working at the White House, Paul would only say: 'I'm just going to leave it at that.' 'I like Donald Trump, but when they want to act this way, it's where they begin to lose a lot of America who just wonders, 'Why does everything have to descend to this level?'' Paul added. Paul said that his wife, Kelley, along with his son, daughter-in-law and infant grandson were all planning on attending Thursday's event — with some planning to fly in Thursday morning. 'President Obama didn't disinvite us …. Biden didn't disinvite us, and we always did this,' Paul said, noting he's been to 10 White House picnics. 'It's the Americans' White House. We all pay for it.'


Hamilton Spectator
31 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
AP PHOTOS: Mexican flags at LA protests spark debate over symbolism
This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors. ——— Over the last week, a sea of green, white and red Mexican flags have become a fixture of the Los Angeles protests against immigration raids. The use of Mexican and other Latin American flags during the protests are a form of symbolism many conservatives are calling anti-American — while others argue they're an expression of pride in one's homeland that could not be more American. Whether it be U.S., Mexican or Palestinian flags, the banners reflect a nation of immigrants whose stories have become intertwined with the story of America, experts say. Kris Hernández, an associate professor of history at Connecticut College, said the flying of foreign flags in the U.S. has always brought awareness to the plight of marginalized groups. Their appearance in the latest protests might symbolize solidarity with their native land or social movements that support Americans of Mexican descent, she said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that those flying Mexican flags at immigration protests were left-wing radicals that attacked law enforcement agents 'removing violent, criminal illegal aliens from the city.' And even fierce Trump critic Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a Democrat, expressed his displeasure with the display of non-American flags at immigration protests that have spread to other states. 'Peaceful protests are fine. Violence is not and will only destroy your message,' Kinzinger wrote on X . 'American flags or nothing.' Amid the backlash, many Americans who support the right to protest are encouraging demonstrators to protest against immigration policies with the American flag instead of a foreign one, as way of reclaiming the U.S. flag for all who call the U.S. home. This underscores just how influential the American flag can be, Hernández said. 'What we are seeing ... is that people don't like to see some flags over others,' she said. Some Latino activists say the Mexican flag is being used by people who were in this land before it was part of the United States. California was part of Mexico until the 1800's. Many Mexican Americans are descendants of people who never crossed a border — instead the border crossed them. Still, their display of the Mexican flag at protests is being twisted into something it's not, said Juan Proaño, CEO of the League of United Latin American Citizens. Hector E. Sanchez, president and CEO of 'Mi Familia Vota,' a non-profit focused on mobilizing Latino voters, said Mexicans have been at the forefront of attacks when it comes to immigration — attacks heightened during both of Trump's campaigns. Sanchez said he wonders why it's not called anti-American when some Americans fly Confederate flags next to the U.S. flag. 'We see a lot of flags celebrating cultural history and heritage,' he said. 'Why is it that the Mexican community is constantly under attack?' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .