We are now counting the cost of Michael Gove's dreadful mistake
After a long and controversial career in politics, Michael Gove drew many admirers from the Conservative Party. But one of his biggest blunders is only now coming to light, and could well end up costing the Tories crucial votes next time Britain goes to the polls.
The Tories' 'Mr Fixit' served continuously in the Cabinet for 14 years under four prime ministers. Though (tellingly), he never held one of the Great Offices of State, he was unusually effective, particularly in reforming the education system and seeking to end the scandal of leasehold property 'ownership'.
Highly intelligent and full of can-do energy, he is the kind of politician who actually gets things done, rather than serving up endless platitudes like most MPs.
But his eagerness for change was also his weakness (see his disastrous public betrayal of Boris Johnson), and second home owners are now feeling the ill-effects.
I'm not convinced he fully understood the powers he handed to local councils as part of the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act. Perhaps I'm being too generous, but the powers go against everything the Conservatives should stand for.
Thousands of people across Britain have been shocked to receive demands for double council tax on second properties under powers granted by Mr Gove that took effect in April.
Back in 2023, the Government said one of the outcomes of the reforms would be to 'rebalance the housing and land markets'. It would do this by 'giving local councils the power to increase council tax on empty homes'.
That statement was misleading. The fine print of the Act makes it clear this is an increase on second homes, no matter how well used they are, not simply empty properties wealthy investors are hoarding with no intention of ever using.
Councils have already had the power to charge extra tax on empty homes since 2013. These were unfurnished properties that had been unoccupied for at least two years, and the premium was set at 50pc to encourage owners to rent them out or sell up. That seems fair enough.
The changes that Mr Gove brought in attack boltholes, often owned by families for generations. These are often in places where there is actually little demand for year-round housing.
Several writers at The Spectator, the august organ that Mr Gove now runs as editor, agree.
Matthew Lynn, also of this parish, notes that second homes account for just 3pc of our housing stock, compared to 10pc in France and 54pc in Sweden. He argues that, rather than penalising owners, we should be encouraging people to buy one.
In the same magazine, Ross Clark makes the obvious point that the real issue is we are not building enough of the kind of the houses in the places we actually want them. Branding second homers as evildoers who need to be bled dry, doesn't fix that one jot.
What does Mr Gove make of all this?
Does he regret giving councils free rein to extort property owners, some of who have invested in these homes in lieu of pensions and other savings to support themselves in old age, or painstakingly restored dilapidated homes no one else wanted?
We don't know what he thinks because he has been strangely quiet. To his credit, he is not stopping others from criticising his second homes raid, but we deserve to hear his side of the story.
Telegraph Money reader, Sue, is spot on when she says that the 'only people it seems to be popular with are the local councils, who can't believe their luck'.
She added: 'At a stroke, the Tories lost many of their hardcore voters (including me), some of them probably never to return (very probably me).'
He was a mercurial politician of rare skill but he has opened pandora's box. The least we deserve is an apology and his help in reversing a wrong-headed raid on aspiration.
The Telegraph is campaigning to abolish the second homes council tax raid. Mr Gove, if you are ready to join us, my email is below.
Email me at: sam.brodbeck@telegraph.co.uk.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scrap Chagos Islands deal and agree new one, UN panel urges UK
A UN panel has urged the UK to renegotiate a deal returning the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, saying it "fails to guarantee" the rights of the Chagossian people. The deal, signed last month, returned sovereignty of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius, but the UK retained the right to run a military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the Chagos Islands. By preventing the Chagossian people from returning to Diego Garcia, "the agreement appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return," the UN experts wrote. A Foreign Office spokesperson said the UK-Mauritius deal had been "welcomed by international organisations including the UN secretary general". The panel of four experts were appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, but are not UN staff and are independent from the UN. They said by the UK keeping the military base of Diego Garcia, the Chagossian people were hindered from being able to "exercise their cultural rights in accessing their ancestral lands from which they were expelled". The panel called for the current deal to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated. Under the agreement, the UK would pay an average of £101m a year for 99 years to continue operating the military base on Diego Garcia, in concert with the US. The Chagos Islands are located in the Indian Ocean about 5,799 miles (9,332km) south-east of the UK, and about 1,250 miles north-east of Mauritius. The UK purchased the islands for £3m in 1968, but Mauritius has argued it was illegally forced to give away the islands in order to gain independence from Britain. Diego Garcia was then cleared to make way for a military base, with large groups of Chagossians forcibly moved to Mauritius and the Seychelles, or taking up an invitation to settle in England, mainly in Crawley, West Sussex. Since then, Chagossians have not been allowed to return to Diego Garcia. Before the UK-Mauritius deal was signed last month, two Chagossian women living in the UK - who were born on Diego Garcia - launched a last-minute legal bid to stop it, saying the agreement did not guarantee the right of return to their island of birth. What is the Chagos Islands deal between UK and Mauritius? The deal includes a £40m trust fund to support Chagossians, a component that the UN panel also questioned would "comply with the right of the Chagossian people to effective remedy... and prompt reparation". "The agreement also lacks provisions to facilitate the Chagossian people's access to cultural sites on Diego Garcia and protect and conserve their unique cultural heritage," the panel added. The Foreign Office spokesperson said: "We recognise the importance of the islands to Chagossians and have worked to ensure the agreement reflects this." Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel said the Conservatives "have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people". "It is why I have introduced a bill in Parliament that would block the [agreement] and force the government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans," she said. Both the House of Commons and House of Lords have until 3 July to pass a resolution to oppose the deal being ratified. What I found on the secretive tropical island they don't want you to see
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rough sleeping to be decriminalised in England and Wales
Rough sleeping will be decriminalised next year under government plans to scrap a 200-year-old law. Ministers are planning to scrap the Vagrancy Act, which outlaws rough sleeping in England and Wales. The law was introduced in 1824 to deal with rising homelessness, but Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has called it "cruel and outdated". The government's plan includes new legislation which will target crimes such as organised begging by gangs and trespassing, a statement said. Rayner, who is also housing secretary, said Labour was "drawing a line under nearly two centuries of injustice towards some of the most vulnerable in society". "No one should ever be criminalised simply for sleeping rough and by scrapping this cruel and outdated law, we are making sure that can never happen again," she said. The number of prosecutions and convictions under the 1824 act has declined over the past decade. According to government statistics, there were a total of 79 prosecutions and 59 convictions for offences related to rough sleeping in 2023 - down from a peak of 1,050 and 810 respectively in 2011. Repealing the Vagrancy Act was first announced in 2022 by the previous Conservative government. It had wanted to pass alternative legislation first, but this did not happen before the general election was called last year. The party's Criminal Justice Bill would have allowed police to move on "nuisance" rough sleepers and fine them if they did not comply. The Labour government said it plans to replace the Vagrancy Act with "targeted measures" that will "ensure police have the powers they need to keep communities safe". These measures, which will be introduced through amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill, will include new offences of facilitating begging for gain and trespassing with the intention of committing a crime. Homeless charities have long called for the Vagrancy Act to be scrapped. Crisis chief executive Matt Downie said: "This is a landmark moment that will change lives and prevent thousands of people from being pushed into the shadows, away from safety." He praised the government for having "shown such principled leadership in scrapping this pernicious Act". He said: "We hope this signals a completely different approach to helping people forced onto the streets and clears the way for a positive agenda that is about supporting people who desperately want to move on in life and fulfil their potential." People living on London's streets rises by 26% Pressure grows over rough sleeping clampdown
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Welsh railways to get £445m investment in spending review
Welsh railways are set to receive a £445 million investment when the Chancellor announces her spending plans for the coming years on Wednesday. Rachel Reeves is expected to announce the additional funding as part of her spending review, aiming to address what the Treasury sees as years of underinvestment in Welsh infrastructure. Understood to be a combination of direct funding and additional money for the Welsh government, the investment is expected to be spent on projects such as fixing level crossings, building new stations and upgrading railway lines. A Treasury source said: 'With this Government, Wales will thrive, and the Chancellor has prioritised bringing forward a package that has the potential to be truly transformative.' On Tuesday, Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan told members of the Senedd that her government was 'expecting something positive from the spending review'. She said: 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice.' Baroness Morgan's comments came in response to criticism from Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth of a decision to classify the £6.6 billion Oxford-to-Cambridge line as an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth said Wales had been 'getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts'. The expected announcement of additional funding for Welsh railways is one of several transport-related investments set to be confirmed on Wednesday. Ms Reeves has already announced plans to spend a total of £15.6 billion on public transport projects in England's city regions, and is understood to be preparing to extend the £3 cap on bus fares in England until March 2027.
