Financial watchdog revokes Banxso's licence
The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) has revoked the financial services provider licence of Banxso, marking an escalation in its regulatory action after receiving consumer complaints about the business.
However Banxso, which offers investments to the public via online trading platforms, said in a statement that it intends to mount a legal challenge to the financial watchdog's decision.
The final withdrawal, following a provisional suspension on 15 October 2024, was confirmed after the FSCA reviewed preliminary investigation findings and Banxso's submissions, the financial watchdog said on Friday.
'The FSCA is of the view that
'The investigation findings included that Banxso, inter alia, misappropriated client funds, provided false and/or misleading information to clients and to the FSCA, and did not act in the best interests of clients.'
The matter relates to a deepfake controversy which erupted last year with allegations that Banxso profited from deceptive ads featuring public figures like Elon Musk, Johann Rupert and
The company disputed the FSCA's decision, saying it would be exercising its full right of recourse under the Financial Sector Regulation Act, including applying for reconsideration before the Financial Services Tribunal.
'The company is also undertaking a comprehensive legal review of the procedural and factual aspects underpinning the FSCA's decision. We are disappointed by the FSCA's decision, which in our view does not reflect the substantial engagements with and representations to the FSCA, together with the material improvements made to our systems and compliance frameworks,' it said.
Banxso said it remained 'committed to the highest standards of client care and regulatory integrity and will engage the available legal avenues to fully ventilate and defend its position'.
The company said it would rely on its legal team, including senior counsel and regulatory experts, to challenge the FSCA's decision through the appropriate statutory channels.
'The company's legal response will be rooted in both procedural fairness and the factual merits of its case. The company remains fully committed to transparency and stakeholder engagement as the matter progresses,' Banxso said, adding that it was 'particularly mindful' of the economic and operational consequences of the decision.
'These include potential impacts on its 186 employees, downstream service providers and thousands of clients. It is Banxso's sincere belief that a full, fair and independent review of the relevant facts will ultimately support the company's position,' Banxso said.
The FSCA said it had also provisionally withdrawn the licence of AfriMarkets Capital.
'The FSCA has taken this step because it is concerned that there may be a risk of harm to clients and/or the general public if AfriMarkets continues its operations as a financial services provider. The provisional withdrawal is based on preliminary investigation findings regarding the activities of AfriMarkets and its possible association with
'The FSCA is amongst others also concerned about the apparent aggressive and pressurised sales techniques used by AfriMarkets agents when selling financial products to clients, promises of unrealistic returns, the failure to conduct the required risk and needs analyses prior to placing clients in specific financial products, and material losses suffered by clients.'
The consequence of the provisional withdrawal is that AfriMarkets is unable to conduct any further financial services business or receive any additional funds from its clients, the watchdog said.
'The FSCA emphasises that this is a provisional withdrawal of AfriMarkets' license based on provisional investigation findings. Once the investigation is finalised, the FSCA will consider the investigation and any submissions by AfriMarkets. In the interim, AfriMarkets has been provided with an opportunity to provide reasons why the provisional withdrawal should be lifted or not made final.'
The FSCA said AfriMarkets and Banxso are 'linked through common directorships and key persons and conducted their financial services business in a very similar manner'.
However, AfriMarkets, reacting to the provisional withdrawal of its licence, distanced itself from Banxso.
AfriMarkets said its banking partners had notified it that some of its accounts had been temporarily restricted 'pursuant to what is presently believed to be a directive issued under section 34 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 38 of 2001'.
'We are advised that such restrictions are only valid for a period of 10 days, pending further developments. Despite this, no formal notice has been received, articulating the basis of this intervention,' it said.
It had also been informed that its licence had been provisionally withdrawn by the FSCA, pending the finalisation of its investigation.
'Notwithstanding, however, to date, no formal, nor final findings have been made against AfriMarkets, and we are actively engaging with the relevant regulators in relation to their respective investigative processes. AfriMarkets has not been provided with any indication that these events are interlinked,' the company said.
'Whilst we are still in the process of seeking clarity on these invasive measures, we are engaging senior legal counsel to consider all available remedies, in order to protect the interests of our clients and stakeholders.'
It had 'consistently sought to uphold its regulatory obligations and remains committed to cooperating with the authorities, in the spirit of transparency and good faith'.
'We are also aware of commentary in the public domain suggesting a potential association between AfriMarkets and Banxso. For the avoidance of doubt, whilst there may be certain overlapping stakeholders, AfriMarkets and Banxso are, and have always been, distinct legal and operational entities. There are no shared platforms, client accounts or regulatory operations between the two.'
Banxso chief executive Manuel de Andrade has previously told the
Mail & Guardian
that 'Banxso has no connection or involvement in any deepfake ads that may exist on the internet'. The company maintained it monitored its marketing and adhered to regulations, framing itself as a target of unauthorised third-party actions.
The provisional withdrawal of AfriMarkets' licence initially barred both entities from conducting financial services or accepting new funds.
'The consequence of the provisional withdrawal is that AfriMarkets is unable to conduct any further financial services business or receive any additional funds from its clients,' the FSCA said, adding that it would update the public in due course on any further decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
11 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Murder as a message: When assassins set the local government agenda
Killing fields: More people in local government are murdered in KwaZulu-Natal than anywhere else in the country. Photo: Paul Botes Let's not tiptoe around it — local government in South Africa has become a killing field. In the past five years alone, 37 municipal officials and 59 councillors have been murdered across the country, according to official data compiled by These statistics are not merely numbers; they represent a deeply disturbing signal of the erosion of democratic governance and public accountability at the very foundation of our state. The recent assassinations of municipal officials in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal — two of the most affected provinces — underscore the climate of fear that is spreading through local government. In Gauteng, 11 officials were murdered in the 2019-to-2024 period. In KwaZulu-Natal, the number climbs to 17. These figures do not include attempted assassinations, threats, or acts of intimidation, which are becoming chillingly routine. Such violence is not random. It is systemic and often politically motivated — used to silence whistleblowers, intimidate reformers and secure control over lucrative tenders and municipal budgets. South Africa's municipalities have become sites of both political patronage and contestation, where violence is increasingly a tool of influence. Local government is meant to be the sphere closest to the people, but in many places, it is also the most dysfunctional. The In recent cases, murdered officials have often been linked to procurement investigations, disciplinary processes and efforts to clamp down on corruption. In 2022, the killing of a municipal finance officer in Tshwane was reportedly tied to revelations about misallocated Covid-19 relief funds. Earlier, a whistleblower in Harry Gwala district municipality was gunned down after raising concerns about irregular housing tenders. Yet, even as these patterns emerge, arrests remain rare and convictions even more so. This impunity reinforces a dangerous message — violence pays in South African politics. To understand this crisis, one must examine not only who is being targeted, but also who is being protected. While councillors and municipal staff are frequently exposed and unprotected, high-ranking party operatives often benefit from enhanced state security. The lack of parity in protection reinforces existing hierarchies and undermines the professionalisation of local administration. A 2024 report by the The violence is enabled by a toxic culture of political patronage, in which local government jobs are awarded based on party loyalty rather than merit. According to These systems create a fragile loyalty network, where internal dissent is not only punished with demotion or expulsion, but increasingly with death. This pattern is especially visible in factional party structures, where internal competition can turn deadly. The failure of party-political mechanisms to manage these internal contests is pushing the contestation into the public arena — with tragic consequences. Every murdered official leaves behind a community further alienated from public service. In KwaZulu-Natal's Umzimkhulu municipality, the 2017 assassination of Sindi Dlathu, a courageous audit committee chairperson, remains unresolved. Her death left a void in financial oversight, with reports indicating a rise in irregular expenditure in the next two financial years. Local civil society groups, such as Despite the gravity of these attacks, South Africa lacks a coherent, nationwide local government protection framework. The Compare this to Colombia and Mexico — two countries with equally alarming patterns of local political violence. Both have specialised protection programmes for at-risk public officials, coordinated by national bodies that integrate intelligence, police protection and community liaison strategies. South Africa must develop a similarly targeted response, not only to protect lives, but to safeguard democratic institutions at the community level. What's perhaps most concerning is how normalised these killings have become in our public discourse. News headlines read more like gangland reports than governance alerts. Public outrage is often fleeting. The victims are frequently forgotten, their deaths buried beneath bureaucratic inertia or party spin. South Africa cannot afford to continue down this path. Protecting local government officials from violence is not only a matter of personal security, but one of national stability. A democracy where fear silences dissent is not a democracy at all. Municipal officials are the frontline workers of governance. Their murder is a message — and one we can no longer ignore. Dr Lesedi Senamele Matlala is a governance researcher and lecturer at the School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, University of Johannesburg. He writes on public policy, evaluation and digital governance in Africa.
The Herald
13 hours ago
- The Herald
'He still has not come here': Mpofu says Ramaphosa still owes Marikana families an apology
Workers and Socialist Party (WASP) and Socialist Youth Movement (SYM) are demanding justice for the Marikana massacre victims and want the alleged killers prosecuted, including President Cyril Ramaphosa and police commanders. Saturday marked the 13th anniversary of the massacre when 34 mineworkers were killed by police during a strike at Lonmin Mine in Marikana in North West. Mineworkers had downed tools and participated in unprotected wage strikes. A total of 44 people lost their lives during the strike. Police allegedly shot 34 on August 16 2012. WASP and SYM believe the massacre was not a police operation that went wrong, claiming it was a deliberate act of violence to protect the profits of Lonmin (now Sibanye-Stillwater) and the capitalist mining industry. 'In its execution, it was premeditated. The ANC government, under Jacob Zuma, deployed police to crush worker resistance, proving once and for all that the ANC is no longer a movement for liberation but a bloody instrument of mining monopoly capital,' said WASP national executive committee member Mametlwe Sebei. Sebie said WASP and SYM were demanding the nationalisation of the mines under workers' control and a living wage for all workers — a R15,000 minimum wage now and a universal basic income grant of R1,500. He said Cosatu should break away from the ANC, as should all trade unions aligned with other capitalist parties, to unite into a united working class front, and a mass workers' party to fight for socialism. 'Even today, no-one has been held accountable. Cyril Ramaphosa, then a Lonmin director who called for 'concomitant action' against the strikers, is now president — showing the ANC's true allegiance. The Farlam commission was a whitewash and the police and politicians who ordered the killings remain free,' Seabi said.
The Herald
13 hours ago
- The Herald
Former North West traffic cop who killed girlfriend rearrested for retrial
William Mosiane, the North West traffic officer previously sentenced to life imprisonment for killing his girlfriend, Dimpho Motlodi, has been rearrested ahead of a retrial. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson Sivenathi Gunya confirmed that Mosiane was taken into custody on Saturday and is expected to appear in court on Monday on murder charges. Last week, TimesLIVE's sister publication, Sowetan reported that Motlodi's family was shocked to encounter Mosiane, whom they believed was serving a life sentence in a correctional facility. In March 2021, Mosiane shot Motlodi five times in front of their then nine-year-old son. After the attack, he allegedly took their son and left Motlodi at the scene before surrendering to the police. Mosiane was later released on bail. During the November 2023 trial, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. However, Mosiane successfully appealed against the conviction, arguing that the magistrate, Paul Moeng, erred by failing to ensure the presence of assessors during the trial. SowetanLIVE
