logo
New Pope Update: Favorite Emerges to Replace Francis as Conclave Starts

New Pope Update: Favorite Emerges to Replace Francis as Conclave Starts

Miami Herald07-05-2025

World New Pope Update: Favorite Emerges to Replace Francis as Conclave Starts
Pietro Parolin. The Vatican Secretary of State cardinal Pietro Parolin presides at Mass marking the 20th anniversary of the death of Pope St. John Paul II at St. Peter's Basilica on April 02, 2025 in Vatican City, Vatican.
Vatican Media via Vatican Pool/GETTY
As the conclave to elect the next pope begins, Pietro Parolin has emerged as the betting favorite to succeed Pope Francis, according to the latest market analysis by William Hill.
Parolin, who serves as the Vatican secretary of state, has seen his odds shorten to 12/5 (29.4 percent) from 5/2 (28.6 percent) on April 21, overtaking Filipino Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, whose odds have drifted to 3/1 (25 percent) from 2/1 (33.3 percent) over the same period.
Why It Matters
On April 21, Francis died at the age of 88, ending his 13-year papacy. On Wednesday, the search for his replacement begins, a decision set to chart the ideological course of the Roman Catholic Church-with some clergy members expressing concern that Francis' replacement will continue the Argentine's progressive changes.
What To Know
Parolin, an Italian cardinal, is now seen as a leading candidate. However, Tagle, a former archbishop of Manila, remains a close second in the betting odds.
Other prominent candidates include Matteo Zuppi, the archbishop of Bologna, whose odds have shortened to 4/1 (20 percent) from 5/1 (16.7 percent), positioning him as the third favorite.
Peter Turkson of Ghana, formerly the head of the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, follows at 5/1 (16.7 percent). Turkson's election would make him the first African pope since the fifth century, following Francis' history-making turn as the first Latin American to serve in the role.
Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, has also gained traction in the betting market, moving to 6/1 (14.3 percent) from 8/1 (11.1 percent).
Hungarian Peter Erdo, the current Archbishop of Esztergom-Budapest, also has odds of 8/1 (11.1 percent) while Guinean Catholic prelate Robert Sarah is on 14/1 (6.7 percent).
Parolin has been praised for his diplomatic work, including mediating between the United States and Cuba. Known for his closeness to Francis, the Irish News described him as a "pragmatist" who wants "progress while adhering to the tradition and heritage of the Catholic Church."
He described a 2015 Irish vote to legalize same-sex marriage as "a defeat for humanity."
The next pope is being selected during an ongoing papal conclave which began on Wednesday by members of the College of Cardinals. Up to four rounds of voting will take place each day until one candidate achieves two-thirds support.
What People Are Saying
Lee Phelps, a spokesperson for William Hill, told Newsweek: "The conclave has begun to elect the next pope, and it appears that Pietro Parolin, who was replaced as favorite by Luis Antonio Tagle last week, is back in front in the race to become the next pontiff. He has been backed into 12/5 from 5/2 while Tagle is now 11/4 from 2/1.
"Matteo Zuppi and Peter Turkson remain firmly in contention, at 4/1 and 5/1 respectively, while Pierbattista Pizzaballa is a mover in the market at 6/1 from 8/1, as we await white plumes of smoke from the Vatican's Sistine Chapel chimney."
What Happens Next
The College of Cardinals has gathered to begin the conclave process, which will continue behind closed doors in the Sistine Chapel until a new pope is selected.
Vatican watchers are set to keep a close eye on the smoke signals from the chapel, with white indicating whether a consensus has been reached among the 133 cardinals.
Related Articles
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
This story was originally published May 7, 2025 at 12:09 PM.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Escalating ICE raids pull California Democrats back into immigration fight
Escalating ICE raids pull California Democrats back into immigration fight

Politico

time37 minutes ago

  • Politico

Escalating ICE raids pull California Democrats back into immigration fight

SAN FRANCISCO — The Trump administration's increasingly aggressive moves on immigration are pulling Democrats back into a border security debate they had tried to ignore. For months, Democrats scarred by the politics of the issue sought to sidestep President Donald Trump's immigration wars — focusing instead on the economy, tariffs or, in the case of deportations, due process concerns. But in the span of a week, that calculation was jolted in California, after a series of high-profile raids and arrests, including of a labor union leader and dozens of other people in Los Angeles, and with President Donald Trump on Saturday announcing the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to the area. In this citadel of Democratic politics, party officials from the governor's mansion to city halls are suddenly tearing into Trump on immigration again, inflaming a debate that worked to Trump's benefit in 2024 — but where Democrats believe they now have a political opening. 'We were wrong on the border,' said Rep. Scott Peters, a Democrat from San Diego who chided Immigration and Customs Enforcement over a raid at a popular restaurant in the city. 'But it is not hard to explain to average Americans why what's happening here is unproductive. It's so un-American, and it's so cruel.' Peters and other San Diego leaders — including Democratic Reps. Juan Vargas, Sara Jacobs and Mike Levin — were quick to condemn the recent raid on an Italian restaurant in the trendy South Park neighborhood, where around 20 masked agents stormed the restaurant and handcuffed workers as a rattled crowd looked on. Four undocumented immigrants were arrested. The lawmakers called the agents' tactics 'needlessly reckless' and said the heavy-handed approach 'terrorized' residents, noting agents used flash-bang grenades to disperse those who gathered outside to protest. But if the enforcement action was aggressive, the response from Democrats represented an escalation in their engagement on immigration, too. San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria, a Democrat, had previously said little about Trump or his immigration policies in the early months of his second term — similar to other blue-city mayors in California who've sought to avoid drawing the president's ire. But in recent days, Gloria sharply criticized federal officials over the raids. And then came the immigration sweeps in Los Angeles, where union officials said the Service Employees International Union's state president, David Huerta, was injured and arrested. Rep. Derek Tran, a Democrat from Orange County, who last fall flipped a hotly contested GOP seat, said on X that he was 'appalled by this clear violation of first amendment rights,' while Rep. Jimmy Gomez called it part of a 'nationwide pattern of suppression.' Protests erupted in the city, and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass decried immigration enforcement tactics she said 'sow terror in our communities.' 'These are fear-driven, military-style operations that have no place in a democratic society,' said Mark Gonzalez, a Democratic state Assemblymember whose downtown LA district was the epicenter of Friday's raids. The next day, when Trump announced the Guard's deployment, Democrats rushed to take a stand in a fight shifting from deportations to the deployment of the Guard. Gov. Gavin Newsom blasted the measure as 'purposefully inflammatory.' And when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to deploy the U.S. military, too, Newsom posted on social media, 'This is deranged behavior.' In a note to his super PAC list, he said, 'These are not people who have some deep conviction about protecting law enforcement. This is a President who failed to call up the National Guard when it was actually needed — on January 6th — and then pardoned the participants as one of his first acts as president. They want a spectacle. They want the violence.' For the party at large, it's a notable swing from the immediate aftermath of Trump's victory in November, when many Democratic leaders in California and elsewhere sought to moderate on the issue — or at least strike a more muted tone than they did during Trump's first term. Polling suggests that voter frustration over Democrats' handling of border security and crime played a strong role in Trump's sweeping return to power, and many elected officials adjusted in response. Newsom was among them. He has avoided using the word 'sanctuary' to defend the state's immigration laws that limit police cooperation with ICE. He also vowed to veto a Democratic-led bill that would have applied such restrictions to state prisons and is now proposing steep cuts to a health care program for undocumented immigrants. Earlier this year, he suggested the legal fight over Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland resident mistakenly deported by the Trump administration and imprisoned in El Salvador — he is now back in U.S. custody and facing federal human trafficking charges — was a 'distraction' intended to take Democrats' focus away from other parts of Trump's agenda (Newsom's office later said his remarks were misconstrued). But in recent days, the governor has criticized federal deportation efforts, including reports that federal authorities threatened the family of a Bakersfield girl with a rare, life-threatening medical condition with deportation, despite the family earlier being granted humanitarian protection. 'The @GOP are sending a 4 year old off to her death without a care in the world. It's sick,' Newsom posted on X. The Trump administration has accused Democrats and the media of distorting the facts of the case, noting the girl wasn't actively being deported. Department of Homeland Security Officials said the family has since been approved to stay in the U.S. while she receives medical care. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in an email that the left's 'unhinged smears' of immigration-enforcement tactics have led to a surge of assaults on ICE agents. 'President Trump is keeping his promise to the American people to deport illegal aliens,' she said. 'It's disturbing that Democrats would side with illegal aliens over Americans and stoke hatred against American law enforcement.' In a social media post, Trump said, 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' ICE officials have also defended the agency's actions in the San Diego raids, saying agents wear masks due to escalating death threats and online harassment. The agency said it deployed flash-bang grenades when the crowd outside the restaurant 'became unruly' and posed a potential danger. Regarding the arrest of SEIU's leader, federal authorities said Huerta had blocked an ICE vehicle while agents were serving a warrant. Still, the headline-grabbing incidents and images of residents clashing with ICE agents have provided an opening for Democrats to put the Trump administration on the defensive — over raids, accounts of children being separated from their parents during ICE detentions and migrants being arrested in federal courthouses while attending legal proceedings. Recent polling suggests that after making gains with Latino voters in 2024, Trump's support among Latinos is falling off. 'It's one thing when you're talking about illegal aliens in the abstract,' said Mike Madrid, a veteran political consultant and anti-Trump Republican. 'It moved from the abstract to the real. It's cruelty for cruelty's sake, and that's where you're going to lose support.' Chris Newman, legal director with the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, said while Democrats were hurt in the 2024 election by the Biden administration's handling of immigration, the politics are shifting as Trump tries to carry out his promise of mass deportations. 'When you see these types of Gestapo-style tactics playing out in real life, the whole country is recoiling to that,' said Newman, who represents the family of Abrego Garcia. He has criticized Democrats, including Newsom, over their response to the Abrego Garcia case, which captured national headlines due to Trump's defiance of multiple federal court orders. In that case, Democrats focused their messaging not on the humanitarian toll of deportations, but due process and the rule of law. Newman said the latest raids show Democrats hesitant to attack Republicans over their immigration policies have misread the moment: 'The wrong lesson (from the 2024 election) is that immigration is inherently a losing issue for Democrats at the top level. The right lesson is that what … the American public wants is a clear, legible immigration policy.' Among the most outspoken California Democrats in recent days has been San Diego Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera, who was pilloried by conservative media outlets over his Instagram post that included a photo labeling ICE agents as 'terrorists' in the restaurant raid. The post drew national attention, with White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller accusing politicians on the left of 'openly encouraging violence against law enforcement to aid and abet the invasion of America.' Elo-Rivera, who's also a member of the progressive Working Families Party, said while the restaurant incident made headlines, it was indicative of more aggressive ICE actions that have rattled his district near the U.S.-Mexico border — tactics he argues are designed to stoke fear. He said while Democrats did a lot of 'hemming and hawing' post-election over the party's stance on immigration, they now have a chance to make a sharp contrast with the GOP by consistently advocating for the dignity and rights of migrants. 'Immigration is not a distraction for Democrats. We just need to have the conversation on our terms,' Elo-Rivera said. 'Unfortunately, there's folks that think they need to see a poll first before they take a position.'

Rwanda pulls out of Central African bloc over clash with Congo
Rwanda pulls out of Central African bloc over clash with Congo

Business Insider

time4 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Rwanda pulls out of Central African bloc over clash with Congo

Rwanda has announced its decision to withdraw from the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) following a diplomatic dispute over its alleged role in the conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Rwanda announced its withdrawal from the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) after a dispute over its alleged involvement in the DRC conflict. Rwanda's foreign ministry expressed condemnation regarding ECCAS's decision to retain Equatorial Guinea as its chair instead of Rwanda. Efforts involving international mediation are ongoing to resolve tensions and foster peace in the region. Rwanda has announced its decision to withdraw from the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) following a diplomatic dispute over its alleged role in the conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. ECCAS, the 11-member regional bloc founded in the 1980s, was created to promote cooperation on security and economic development across Central Africa. Rwanda was meant to take over as the new leader of the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), a position that moves from one country to another, according to Reuters. But at a meeting on Saturday in Equatorial Guinea, it was stopped from doing so. Instead, the bloc opted to retain Equatorial Guinea as chair, a move Rwanda's foreign ministry condemned as a breach of its rights. In a statement, Rwanda accused the Democratic Republic of Congo of 'instrumentalizing' ECCAS. It declared that it saw 'no justification for remaining in an organization whose current functioning runs counter to its founding principles.' The office of Congolese President Félix Tshisekedi said in a statement that ECCAS member states had "acknowledged the aggression against the Democratic Republic of Congo by Rwanda and ordered the aggressor country to withdraw its troops from Congolese soil." Accusations fly as Rwanda denies backing M23 rebels Rwanda has been accused of supporting the M23 rebel group in eastern DR Congo. Earlier this year, M23 fighters captured two of the region's biggest cities, in an offensive that killed thousands and raised fears of a wider regional war. The governments of DR Congo, the US, and France have all pointed to Rwanda as backing the rebel group. Rwanda has repeatedly denied the allegations, claiming its military presence near the border is purely defensive. Meanwhile, efforts to broker peace have been ongoing, with African leaders, the United States, and Qatar involved in mediation attempts.

Red Cross suspends aid work in Niger after military regime orders office closures
Red Cross suspends aid work in Niger after military regime orders office closures

Business Insider

time6 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Red Cross suspends aid work in Niger after military regime orders office closures

The decision to halt Red Cross operations in the military-led African nation came after Nigerien authorities accused the organization of engaging with armed groups in the country. Niger's junta leader, Abdourahamane Tchiani, stated during a May interview on state television that the ICRC had been expelled early this year. According to him, the decision followed claims that the organization had held meetings and collaborated with I slamist insurgent leaders. These accusations have not been substantiated publicly with evidence. In response, the ICRC has firmly denied any wrongdoing. In a statement issued on Thursday, the organization explained that as part of its neutral humanitarian mission, it communicates with all parties involved in conflicts whether in writing or through dialogue. However, it emphasized that this engagement 'never provides those parties with financial, logistical or other support. ' The ICRC, which has been present in Niger for 35 years, described the shutdown as regrettable. The organization disclosed that foreign personnel were withdrawn from the country earlier this year, in compliance with the government's initial order. It also stated that efforts to open dialogue with Niger authorities had not yielded results. ' Our priority in Niger has been to help the most vulnerable people affected by ongoing armed conflicts and to do so with transparency, independence, neutrality and impartiality, ' said Patrick Youssef, ICRC's Regional Director for Africa. Impact on humanitarian aid According to United Nations figures, around 4.5 million people, or 17% of Niger's population, needed humanitarian assistance in 2024. The country continues to face a severe crisis fueled by insecurity, disease outbreaks, and environmental disasters. The Red Cross's exit is likely to further strain humanitarian support in a country already battling multiple emergencies. Since the 2023 coup that ousted President Mohamed Bazoum, Niger's military government has taken a hard stance against Western organizations and allies. It has joined regional neighbors Mali and Burkina Faso in expelling French and Western forces while seeking closer security cooperation with Russia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store