
Germany eyes strongest EU army by 2031
US President Donald Trump can feel vindicated:
Germany
's new foreign minister,
Johann Wadephul
, said this week that the government had accepted the president's demand to invest 5% of GDP in defense. Speaking at a meeting of
Nato
foreign ministers in Antalya, Turkey, on Thursday, Wadephul also said Germany would support Nato's proposal to provide 3.5% for classic military purposes and an additional 1.5% for defense-related infrastructure.
It will likely only become clear how much all the members of the security alliance plan to invest at a Nato summit scheduled for the end of June in The Hague, Netherlands.
Wadephul's comments came a day after German Chancellor
Friedrich Merz
announced that he wanted to transform the Bundeswehr into the "strongest conventional army in Europe."
Germany plans historic security shift
If Germany goes ahead and increases its defense expenditure to 5% of GDP, it will be making a historic turnaround in security policy. Since the end of the Cold War, it has primarily relied on international cooperation, diplomacy, and a culture of strategic military restraint. But former Chancellor
Olaf Scholz
's Zeitenwende speech on February 27, 2022, three days after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, marked a turning point.
Subsequently, the German government set up a special fund of €100 billion (about $112 billion) for the Bundeswehr. In 2024, regular defense spending amounted to around €90 billion, around 2.1% of GDP. An increase to 5% will require a future defense budget of over €160 billion per year. This will have enormous implications that have not yet been fully calculated, and for which the funds have yet to be raised.
The Bundeswehr currently consists of around 182,000 soldiers on active duty.
The defence ministry plans to raise those numbers to at least 203,000 by 2031, with some experts even speaking of 240,000 soldiers. Ongoing modernization efforts will affect all branches of the armed forces: the aim is to replace outdated tanks, aircraft, and ships, to develop digitalization, and expand command and control capabilities.
The key industrial players in Germany are Rheinmetall, Airbus Defence and Space, and the Diehl Group, which are becoming increasingly geared toward exports alongside foreign partners.
France only EU state with a nuclear deterrent
France, which is the only nuclear power in the EU, has pursued a strategy of global presence and military autonomy. Around 203,000 soldiers serve in the French army. The gendarmerie and other paramilitary units boast 175,000 members, and there are also at least 26,000 reservists.
Thanks to its Charles de Gaulle nuclear-powered aircraft carrier and strategic submarines, the French navy also plays an important role in France's nuclear deterrence strategy.
French Rafale fighter aircraft, some of which are nuclear-capable, are intended to secure air superiority.
Since President Emmanuel Macron came to power in 2017, the French defense budget has increased significantly. In a dramatic televised speech at the beginning of March, Macron spoke of the "Russian threat" affecting all countries in Europe and said France should nearly double its defense spending.
France's military budget used to be comparable to Germany's, but it has helped to build a more powerful army, not least because the state, which has a stake in the arms industry, has always promoted it strategically.
Poland acts as bulwark on Nato's eastern flank
For years, Poland has invested heavily in the military with the goal of developing the strongest land forces in Europe. In 2024, it allocated 4.12% of its GDP to its defense budget. The largest state on Nato's eastern flank specifically wants to deter Russia.
The Polish Land Forces and Territorial Defence Army currently comprise about 150,000 soldiers. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk recently said the government is working on plans for the country to expand the ranks to 500,000 troops, including reservists.
At the same time, the army and air force are to be supplied with more modern equipment, including more than 600 battle tanks, which have been ordered from South Korea and the US among others, as well as HIMARS rocket artillery systems, drones and F-35 fighter jets.
The Polish navy, however, is considered to be rather weak.
UK focuses on high tech
The UK is also planning to increase its defence spending to just under 2.4% of GDP. The focus will be on high tech: drones, artificial intelligence and laser systems.
The Royal Navy, which has two aircraft carriers in service, and the Royal Air Force are already considered to be very modern. The government has planned to purchase dozens more F-35 fighter jets from the US.
With around 140,000 active soldiers, the British Army is comparatively small. No significant increases in personnel are currently planned, in contrast to many EU countries.
Last year, British Prime Minister
Keir Starmer
emphasized the UK's loyalty to Nato and said the country would play a "full role" in the alliance.
The UK's military equipment, particularly the nuclear weapons stored on submarines, is more dependent on US technology than that of many EU countries.
Italy has powerful air force, but army in need of reform
A
ccording to Nato, Italy allocated 1.49% to its defense budget in 2024, which means it is still well below the 2% target. Nonetheless, the country is one of Europe's heavyweights, with 165,000 soldiers on active duty, two aircraft carriers and a powerful air force.
However, Italy's land forces are considered to be outdated and in need of reform. But this is set to change, with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni saying she wants her country to have the strongest armored force in Europe. Italy has ordered more 1,000 combat and multi-purpose tanks from the German company Rheinmetall.
In strategic terms, Italy is largely focused on the Mediterranean region and securing global trade routes.
Global firepower ranking unlikely to change
Despite these multibillion euro rearmament programs in Europe, little is likely to change in the global ranking of military strength, at least in the medium term.
According to the 2025 Global Firepower review, the United States clearly leads and is followed by Russia, China, India, and South Korea. The UK follows in sixth place, while France is ninth. Germany is currently 11th.
For its annual review, the Global Firepower platform evaluates over 60 individual factors, from numbers of tanks and naval capacities to manpower, in order to compare the military strength of nations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
European powers tell U.N. they are ready to reimpose Iran sanctions
Britain, France and Germany have told the United Nations they are ready to reimpose UN-mandated sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme if no diplomatic solution is found by the end of August, according to a joint letter released Wednesday. The letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the UN Security Council says the three European powers are "committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon". "Iran must not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons under any circumstances," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on X, posting a copy of the letter. "If Iran continues to violate its international obligations, France and its German and British partners will reimpose the global embargoes on arms, nuclear equipment and banking restrictions that were lifted 10 years ago at the end of August," Mr. Barrot added. In the letter, the Foreign Ministers from the so-called E3 group threaten to use a "snapback mechanism" that was part of a 2015 international deal with Iran that eased UN Security Council sanctions. Under the deal, which terminates in October, any party to the accord can restore the sanctions. All three have stepped up warnings to Iran about its suspension of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. That came after Israel launched a 12-day war with Iran in June, partly seeking to destroy its nuclear capability. The United States staged its own bombing raid during the war. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," said the foreign ministers of France, Britain and of Germany. All three countries were signatories to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with the United States, China and Russia that offered the carrot and stick deal for Iran to slow its enrichment of uranium needed for a nuclear weapon. U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the accord in 2018 during his first term and ordered new sanctions. The European countries said they would stick to the accord. But their letter sets out engagements that the ministers say Iran has breached, including building up a uranium stock to more than 40 times the permitted level under the 2015 deal. "The E3 remain fully committed to a diplomatic resolution to the crisis caused by Iran's nuclear programme and will continue to engage with a view to reaching a negotiated solution. "We are equally ready, and have unambiguous legal grounds, to notify the significant non-performance of JCPOA commitments by Iran ... thereby triggering the snapback mechanism, should no satisfactory solution be reached by the end of August 2025," the ministers wrote in the letter. End of cooperation The United States had already started contacts with Iran, which denies seeking a weapon, over its nuclear activities. But these were halted by the Israeli strikes in June on Iran's nuclear facilities. Even before the strikes, the international powers had raised concerns about the lack of access given to IAEA inspectors. Iran halted all cooperation with the IAEA after the strikes, but it announced that the agency's deputy chief was expected in Teheran for talks on a new cooperation deal. Last month Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi sent a letter to the UN saying that the European countries did not have the legal right to restore sanctions. The European Ministers called this allegation "unfounded". They insisted that as JCPOA signatories, they would be "clearly and unambiguously legally justified in using relevant provisions" of UN resolutions "to trigger UN snapback to reinstate UNSC resolutions against Iran which would prohibit enrichment and re-impose UN sanctions."
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Trump's tariffs on India are a colossal mistake
As a long-term Donald Trump supporter, it pains me to see the mistakes he is making regarding his treatment of India. Slapping India with 50 per cent tariffs is total madness! Starting August 7, a 25 per cent levy, then another 25 per cent penalty for buying Russian oil—framed as 'secondary tariffs' to squeeze Moscow over Ukraine. But this isn't smart. It's a blunder that alienates a powerhouse ally, hurts America's wallet, and weakens its global clout. In short, it is a colossal mistake, and I fail to understand why he is being so hostile. India, the world's fastest-growing major economy, deserves respect—not bully tactics. Here's why Trump is wrong! STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Strategically, this is a foolish decision. India is America's indispensable shield against China's aggression in the Indo-Pacific. The Quad—US, India, Japan, Australia—hinges on this bond to keep sea lanes free and Beijing in check. Trump risks shattering it. Wiser heads have called it an 'enormous mistake,' warning it will push New Delhi toward Moscow and Beijing after decades of US courtship. Prime Minister Narendra Modi? He's unbowed! He's prioritising India's energy security for 1.4 billion people and refusing to halt Russian imports that stabilise global prices. Back in 2022, America encouraged India to buy Russian crude oil to cool markets post-invasion. Now? Flip-flop betrayal! This idiocy accelerates India's BRICS pivot, ditching dollar dominance and eroding US leverage. India, with its booming tech hubs and military might, won't kneel. Trump's short-sightedness empowers adversaries, turning a vital partner into a reluctant rival. Economically, it is a disaster! China guzzles more Russian oil than anyone—yet no tariffs there? Trump spares Beijing while hammering India, exposing his selective rage. America itself trades $3.5 billion with Russia yearly, despite sanctions. India's 36 per cent reliance on Russian crude? Pure necessity—cheap fuel for growth, averting global spikes above $80/barrel that would slam U.S. consumers too. These tariffs crush India's exports: textiles, gems, autos—sectors employing millions. US supply chains? Disrupted! India powers America's pharma and IT—think life-saving drugs and software. Exports could plummet 40-50 per cent, shaving India's GDP by 0.3 per cent—but the ripple effects hit US jobs in linked industries. Trump killed a potential deal, branding India a 'bad partner'. Yet India's offers—cutting tariffs on US goods, boosting defence buys—were rebuffed. India is not exploiting anyone. It's fuelling about 7 per cent growth, lifting millions from poverty, creating markets for US firms like Apple and Ford. Diplomatically? Trump is isolating America, not Russia. The EU still imports 19 per cent of its LNG from Moscow. Turkey? Same deal. But India, a strategic gem, gets slammed. New Delhi rightly responds by saying: 'Unfair, unjustified!' and vows to safeguard its interests after US hypocrisy on Venezuela sanctions that burned India before. Trump's threats of broader 'secondary sanctions' also ring hollow. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What is impressive is India's diplomatic response—no knee-jerk retaliation, but a focus on talks. Trump is prioritising short-term Russia pressure over long-game alliances. But India won't flinch—the economy is resilient, stocks are steady despite threats. Alienating India empowers China. To whose advantage is this? Trump's error here will cost jobs, security, and influence. India will continue to rise regardless—vibrant, innovative, visionary. I hope Trump listens to better voices and changes his antagonistic approach. Making America Great means working with India to make it great too! Trump must now reverse course and work with PM Modi, as this is in the best interests of the world. David Vance is a political commentator and author. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
What happened during Trump's call with Zelenskyy and European leaders?
Donald Trump held a call with European leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, French President Emmanuel Macron, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, on Thursday. This comes a day ahead of the US president's meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin. Here's what we know so far Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are set to meet in Alaska on Friday (August 15) – the first meeting between the leaders of Russia and the United States in years. Ahead of his summit with Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump has had a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders. Trump and Putin are set to meet in Alaska on Friday (August 15) – the first meeting between the leaders of Russia and the United States in years. Putin previously met Joe Biden in 2022. The call comes in the backdrop of the White House reportedly pushing a ceasefire plan that involved Ukraine giving up the Donbas in exchange for a ceasefire. Zelenskyy has dismissed such a plan outright and European leaders have said that no talks about territory exchanging hands can occur without the involvement of Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what happened during the call? What do we know? Let's take a closer look European leaders push Trump to clarify position The European leaders during the call pushed Trump to clarify his position with Russia. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said European nations doing everything possible to help set the agenda for the summit in Alaska. Merz said Ukraine needed to be involved in peace talks and getting the ceasefire was a first step. He said the Europe and the US world have to exert even more pressure on Putin if there is no ceasefire agreement. French President Emmanuel Macron said 'any talks of territorial exchange must only be discussed with Ukraine'. Trump has previously said that the Russia and Ukraine could arrive at a piece deal via a land swap. Russia currently controls about 20 per cent of Ukrainian territory. 'The American will is to obtain a ceasefire,' Macron said. 'The exchange with President Trump allowed him to declare his intentions for the meeting on the 15 August and allowed us to very clearly explain our expectations.' Macron said that it is a 'good thing' that Washington and Moscow are talking but added that Europe needs to be heard on issues that impact the entire continent. French President Emmanuel Macron has said that the allies are united. AP 'We have reiterated until there is a durable peace, we must maintain support for Ukraine,' Macron said 'And by we, I mean Europeans and Americans.' Macron said the leaders on the call are united and that the US president hopes to achieve a ceasefire. Macron says leaders were 'very clear' that any decisions on territory can only be negotiated with Zelenskyy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on the call said 'international borders must not be changed by force and Ukraine must have robust and credible security guarantees to defend its territorial integrity as part of any deal'. A spokesperson for Starmer after the call described his support for Ukraine as 'unwavering'. 'All leaders agreed this week marks an important moment for the future of Ukraine". The spokesperson said the European leaders on the call thanked Trump for his 'efforts in bringing Putin to the table in pursuit of a ceasefire to end to the ongoing bloodshed' Europe and the US will continue to work for a 'just and lasting peace in Ukraine,' the statement added. 'Putin is bluffing' Zelenskyy, speaking to the media in the aftermath of the call, claimed the Russian president was bluffing. 'Putin is bluffing, he's trying to trying to push all over the front line", Zelenskyy said. He added that Russia is feigning that it can take over Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Zelenskyy said he told Trump and European leaders that the Russian strongman doesn't 'want peace'. He added that they completely understood his position. Zelenskyy said 'there should be a ceasefire first, then security guarantees – real security guarantees'. Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskyy said he told Donald Trump and European leaders that the Vladimir Putin doesn't 'want peace' He added that Russia should be further sanctioned if it refuses to accept a ceasefire. 'Trump supported us today', the Ukrainian president said. He added that Ukraine is 'very grateful to Germany" for its support. Zelenskyy also individually thanked his allies including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Nato's Mark Rutte, Italian President Giorgia Meloni, and French President Emmanuel Macron. Zelenskyy said leaders all over the world were united for the goal of peace in Ukraine. He said European allies spoke with 'one voice towards one mission'. He reiterated that there can be no peace deal without Kyiv. 'Everything about Ukraine has to be discussed with Ukraine - we have to be part of the conversation'. Zelenskyy said Trump would reach out to him after the Putin meeting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agenciess