Special court grants bail to 2 men booked by CBI for defrauding NEET UG 2025 aspirants
The accused — Sandeep Jawahar Shah, a resident of Solapur, and Salim Khubbuddin Patel, a resident of Navi Mumbai — were arrested in Mumbai and Sangli earlier this month. As per the CBI, it discovered that the two were involved in duping NEET candidates and their parents by falsely claiming to have connections with officials of the National Testing Agency (NTA) that conducts the examination.
As per the CBI, Shah initially demanded Rs 90 lakh from each candidate and agreed to accept Rs 87.5 lakh per candidate. The central agency claimed that Shah and Patel would assure candidates that they would receive details of their purportedly increased marks six hours before the official declaration of results.
The accused sought to be released on bail on the grounds that probe was completed and their custodial interrogation was not required. The pleas claimed that there was no recovery at the instance of the applicants and they'll co-operate with the trial after being released on bail.
The CBI, however, opposed the pleas stating that the same be rejected as there other accused persons are yet to be arrested and therefore the custodial interrogation of present applicants would be required.
However, special judge VP Desai observed that till date (on June 21) 'the investigating officer has nothing concrete to show that till what period the other accused will be arrested'.
Merely because the other accused persons are yet to be arrested cannot be a ground for rejection of the bail, the judge added.
The court further noted that offence under section 7(A) of Prevention of the Corruption (PC) Act is not punishable in imprisonment of life or death AND punishment prescribed is not less than three years but will extend to seven years.
'Nothing is brought on record against the applicant that he will not be available for trial. Hence discretion in the nature of bail can be exercised in the favour of applicants,' the court held and granted bail to the two on furnishing personal bond of Rs 50,000 each along with other terms and conditions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mumbai man held with narcotics worth ₹2.87 crore at airport
Mumbai: The Air Intelligence Unit (AIU) of Indian Customs arrested a 24-year-old passenger, Hardik Pragjibhai Bhadani, at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, Mumbai, for allegedly smuggling narcotics. Bhadani, who arrived from Bangkok on August 19, was intercepted based on intelligence inputs. During baggage examination in the presence of panch witnesses, officers recovered a silver trolley bag containing six vacuum-sealed packets. The packets, wrapped in brown tape, were found to contain 2,873 grams of hydroponic weed (cannabis), valued at Rs 2.87 crore in the illicit market. The substance tested positive in a field drug test kit. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat govt terminates services of APP in POCSO case after victim says he asked her to testify in favour of accused
The Gujarat government has terminated the services of an additional public prosecutor in Navsari for allegedly trying to protect a man booked under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for the alleged rape of a minor. The State Home Department issued orders on August 14 terminating the services of Additional Public Prosecutor of Navsari Ajay Tailor with immediate effect, who was handling the POCSO case of 2024. The case has since been handed over to another APP of Navsari District Court, Bhavesh Gupta. The termination came after the victim wrote a letter to Minister of State for Home Harsh Sanghavi, the Navsari Superintendent of Police, and Additional District and Sessions Judge D K Dave on August 5 claiming that the APP had tutored her to testify in favour of the accused, who was charged of raping her some two years ago. The case is currently at the stage of recording testimonies of the complainant and witnesses in the Navsari court. The case goes back to May 22, 2023 when a teenage girl and resident of a town in Navsari district, left her house to attend her private classes and failed to return in the evening. Her parents searched for her but could not find her. They suspected the accused, an alleged bootlegger and lodged a missing complaint, naming him. The following day, the missing girl's father received a call from his daughter where she told him that she had 'married' a person (not the alleged bootlegger) That evening, the girl arrived at the local police station with her 'husband' and showed photos and their marriage affidavit to the officers. As per her wishes, the girl returned home with her parents. On June 24, 2023, the victim lodged a rape case and claimed threat to her life and named the accused (the alleged bootlegger) and six others including her 'husband' and an advocate. In her complaint, she said that her marriage was fake. Police booked the accused under IPC Sections 376 (2) (n)(rape committed repeatedly on the same woman), 323 (Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (Intentional insult to provoke breach of trust), 506(2) (Punishment for criminal intimidation). In the FIR, the girl had alleged that the accused, a notorious criminal, started sending proposals to her in 2019. She stated, 'After my rejection, he chased me at different locations. Fed up with such harassment, my father got my admissions in a Diploma course in dairy management at a private university in Vadodara in 2021. The accused turned up at the college in August 2021 and threatened me that he would kill me and also die by suicide'. The accused, who is already married, allegedly took her to his friend's flat in Vadodara where he allegedly raped her. The victim learnt that he was already married and broke up with him and told her parents the whole story. On her parents' instructions, the victim quit studies and returned to her home in 2022. According to police, the girl's parents fixed her marriage in February 2023. The accused learnt of it and sent videos of them to the mother of the boy and they decided against going ahead with the marriage plan. The accused then forced her to marry his friend, who, he said, would 'divorce' her to facilitate their marriage. Thus the victim married the friend and appeared before the Navsari police and on her wish she was handed over to her parents after which she filed a complaint against the accused, charging him of rape. In her letter to the MoS (Home) and other officials, as seen by The Indian Express, she has alleged that the APP, Ajay Tailor, spoke to her on a ' WhatsApp call from the accused's mobile phone and instructed me to respond with 'yes' and 'no' during my testimony before the court. 'He (Tailor) also said that all the necessary papers for getting the accused let off from the case are ready. As per his instruction, I testified in favour of the accused before the court (on July 25, 2025). The accused also had threatened me to act on the instructions of Tailor and threatened that if I failed to do so, he) would post viral videos of them on social media and also threatened to kill my parents,' the victim alleged in her letter. She further alleged that the accused had called her and pressured her to meet the APP in his official chambers, before her testimony on July 25, 2025. 'I testified as tutored by the APP before the court, and he also told me about the consequences if I failed to act as per his directions,' she says in the letter. On finding that she was declared 'hostile', the victim filed another application before the Navsari Court a few days ago to allow her to testify again, against the APP. The second application of the victim was heard on Monday in the Court of the Additional District and Session Judge D K Dave. The new APP, Gupta, moved an application in the court and asked for more time as he wanted some days to study the case and get all the case documents. The Judge, D K Dave, had fixed a hearing on September 18. Navsari Superintendent of Police Sushil Agrawal said, 'Based on the application, after primary inquiry, APP Ajay Tailor's services as APP was terminated. The case was in hearing stage and the rape victim testified before the court on July 25, 2025.' Meanwhile, speaking to The Indian Express, Tailor denied the allegations of tutoring the victim. 'I have been practising as APP with Navsari district court since 2020, and till date I have fought and got convictions in 29 criminal cases. My track record shows how honestly I worked, and now my services have been terminated,' Tailor claimed. He added that he would accept the order and will continue practising as a lawyer in the Navsari district court. 'The victim had testified before the court last month and she replied according to the questions posed to her. I have not tutored her, nor have I met the accused before the hearing,' Tailor claimed. In 2024, the accused was booked under GUJCTOC (Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime) Act. The Navsari district police also arrested and booked six of his family members including his father and brothers, in the GUJCTOC case for their alleged involvement in bootlegging and criminal activities. Presently, all the GUJCTOC accused are out on bail, and they are staying in the neighbouring Valsad district, acting on the conditions of the Gujarat High Court's bail order.
New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Govt to criminalise promotion of online money gaming
The government plans to criminalise the offering or promotion of online money gaming and make it an offence for banks, financial institutions or individuals to facilitate fund transfers related to such activities. A bill to regulate the online gaming industry by prohibiting online money gaming was approved by the Cabinet on Tuesday and is expected to be introduced in the Lok Sabha tomorrow. The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 seeks to regulate the sector by promoting e-sports and online social games while banning online money gaming. The Bill also prohibits advertisements for money gaming platforms and prescribes penalties and fines for violations, with stricter punishment for repeat offenders. It prohibits offering, aiding, abetting, inducing or otherwise in the offering of any online money gaming service and declares it as an offence. Authorities will also be empowered to block access to prohibited games and seize related property to ensure compliance. Government sources said online money gaming is increasingly being used as a channel for money laundering, fraudulent transactions and other illicit activities, including cybercrime and terror financing. Offshore platforms have also been able to evade Indian tax and legal obligations, further complicating the situation. The absence of a central regulator has left the industry without uniform standards for content, user safety or financial practices, leaving players vulnerable and the sector without a coherent growth path. According to the government, in the absence of a clear framework, both e-sports and online social games in India continue to operate in a regulatory grey zone, restricting the sector's growth while exposing users, particularly young audiences, to various risks. Officials noted that there is currently no central authority overseeing online money gaming, while judicial interpretations of the distinction between 'games of skill' and 'games of chance' have been inconsistent, resulting in legal uncertainty and weak enforcement. The Bill will accord formal recognition and governance of e-Sports, 'enabling India to tap into the global competitive gaming ecosystem, promote sportsmanship, and open new career opportunities for youth'. The government claims that establishing institutional mechanisms for both e-Sports and online social games will support innovation, attract responsible investment, and ensure alignment with international best practices. The bill envisages the establishment of a new regulatory authority with an initial capital outlay of ₹50 crore and an annual recurring expenditure of Rs 20 crore. Implementation measures are expected to be rolled out within six months of Cabinet approval.
