logo
TikTok Shop Cutting More Indonesia Jobs After Taking Over Rival

TikTok Shop Cutting More Indonesia Jobs After Taking Over Rival

Bloomberg2 days ago

ByteDance Ltd. 's e-commerce arm TikTok Shop is eliminating several hundred jobs in Indonesia in its latest round of cuts, slashing costs after taking over the operations of local rival Tokopedia last year.
The Chinese social media giant is reducing staff across e-commerce teams including logistics, operations, marketing and warehousing, according to people familiar with the matter. More cuts are set to happen as soon as July, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions haven't been made public. The reduction leaves Tokopedia and TikTok Shop with about 2,500 employees in total in Indonesia.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Knusford Berhad Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS: RM0.11 (vs RM0.092 in FY 2024)
Knusford Berhad Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS: RM0.11 (vs RM0.092 in FY 2024)

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Knusford Berhad Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS: RM0.11 (vs RM0.092 in FY 2024)

Revenue: RM80.5m (down 46% from FY 2024). Net income: RM10.5m (up 15% from FY 2024). Profit margin: 13% (up from 6.2% in FY 2024). The increase in margin was driven by lower expenses. EPS: RM0.11 (up from RM0.092 in FY 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Knusford Berhad shares are down 3.0% from a week ago. You still need to take note of risks, for example - Knusford Berhad has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Cape EMS Berhad First Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: RM0.004 (vs RM0.014 in 1Q 2024)
Cape EMS Berhad First Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: RM0.004 (vs RM0.014 in 1Q 2024)

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cape EMS Berhad First Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: RM0.004 (vs RM0.014 in 1Q 2024)

Revenue: RM72.4m (down 53% from 1Q 2024). Net income: RM3.43m (down 74% from 1Q 2024). Profit margin: 4.7% (down from 8.7% in 1Q 2024). The decrease in margin was driven by lower revenue. EPS: RM0.004 (down from RM0.014 in 1Q 2024). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Cape EMS Berhad shares are down 6.4% from a week ago. We don't want to rain on the parade too much, but we did also find 3 warning signs for Cape EMS Berhad (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you need to be mindful of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Why AI Search Advertising Could Reach $25 Billion By 2029
Why AI Search Advertising Could Reach $25 Billion By 2029

Forbes

time41 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why AI Search Advertising Could Reach $25 Billion By 2029

CHINA - 2025/02/28: In this photo illustration, A woman browses Shopify on her smartphone for online ... More shopping. (Photo Illustration by Serene Lee/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) EMARKETER now projects U.S. advertisers will pour over $25 billion—about 14% of all search budgets—into AI-powered search results by 2029. That leap from just $1.04 billion this year isn't wishful thinking: behind the scenes, platforms are wiring live, structured product feeds straight into large-language-model (LLM) interfaces. Shopify's new Catalog API, announced last week, now lets agents like Perplexity read titles, prices, and inventory for every Shopify SKU in real time, no scraping required. Meanwhile, early AI shopping experiences from ChatGPT to Amazon's "Buy for Me" show agents that can research, refine, and even check out in one conversational flow. Together, these infrastructure developments are transforming conversational answers into shoppable ad inventory—unlocking the explosive spend curve EMARKETER is forecasting. eMarketer now projects U.S. advertisers will pour nearly $25 billion—about 14% of all search ... More budgets—into AI-powered search results by 2029. Unlike traditional search ads that appear alongside blue links, AI search ads will be rendered inside conversational answers themselves. This represents what EMARKETER defines as "sponsored answers, brand mentions, and affiliate links embedded in AI-generated summaries or conversational responses"—a fundamental shift that means AI agents need enriched product titles, detailed attributes, and real-time inventory status to rank or surface "sponsored" suggestions effectively. The infrastructure for this shift is rapidly falling into place. Shopify's Catalog API, quietly launched during the company's Summer '25 Edition rollout on May 21st, provides "a single machine readable feed of every product published on Shopify," according to Gavin McKew, Director at Shero Commerce, who attended Shopify's developer conference. "Discovery apps like ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Copilot can pull titles, prices, stock levels, taxonomy, and enriched attributes in real time. No scraping, no daily lag." This creates an entirely new optimization challenge for brands. Success requires treating Shopify metafields, product descriptions, and structured data not as IT chores but as performance-media inputs. McKew's advice to merchants reflects this shift: "Treat every product field like ad copy. Fill standard metafields and tighten descriptions." 'A credible agentic-commerce flow must let customers see a product and buy it inside the chat,' says retail marketplaces expert Scot Wingo in an article mapping the AI agent ecosystem. This requires real-time product feeds as the foundation, plus either secure payment processing within the AI platform or seamless integration that redirects to retailer checkout—without accurate product data, neither path works. The trajectory EMARKETER projects—from $1 billion to $25 billion in five years—follows a familiar pattern in digital advertising evolution. Retail media took approximately five years to reach similar scale (from $1BN to $30BN in ad revenue), while search and social advertising each required longer timeframes. AI search advertising appears positioned to match retail media's rapid adoption curve. An Adobe survey of 5,000 U.S. consumers reveals that 39% have already used generative AI for online shopping, with 53% planning to do so this year. The shopping tasks consumers are using AI for include: Retail media exploded once merchants simply flipped on sponsored listings in their own walled gardens—immediate inventory, immediate return on ad spend. The sector started that sprint nine years ago and is already a $60-plus-billion line item today, whereas AI search is just entering year one. AI search needs more complex infrastructure before advertisers push big budgets. Clean, real-time product data feeds must connect with checkout capabilities—whether through direct payment processing or seamless retailer integration. The inflection point between 2027 and 2028, when EMARKETER projects spending to jump from $4.77 billion to $12.65 billion, likely coincides with platforms rolling out premium placement layers on top of their free catalog feeds. For brands and agencies buying media, this timeline suggests immediate experimentation with modest budgets, followed by more aggressive investment as the infrastructure matures. Brands that establish relationships with AI platforms and optimize their product data now will be positioned to scale when advertising inventory becomes widely available. The emergence of AI shopping agents is forcing retailers to make strategic choices about how they want to participate in conversational commerce. Two distinct approaches are emerging, with implications for brands planning their AI search advertising strategies. Retailers are already diverging on their approach. I recently wrote how Walmart is pursuing a dual path: building their own shopping agents while exploring technology that enables consumers to shop Walmart's assortment using their preferred personal shopping agents. This contrasts with Amazon's walled garden approach—developing proprietary AI tools including Rufus, Alexa+, and "Buy for Me" while blocking external agents from accessing its platform. Meanwhile, multi-merchant platforms like Shopify's partnership with Perplexity represent a third model: unified, cross-retailer shopping experiences. Users can discover products through AI search, compare options across multiple Shopify stores, and complete purchases using Shop Pay, all within a single conversational experience. For brands, these diverging retailer strategies create complex decisions about platform prioritization and budget allocation across different AI shopping environments. Monthly Active Users (MAUs) versus General Merchandise Volume (GMV) for the major AI LLMs AI-powered shopping experiences are creating new measurement challenges that will compound existing retail media attribution problems. When transactions begin in conversational interfaces and complete through various checkout systems, traditional budget categorization breaks down. If a shopper uses Perplexity to research "wireless headphones under $200," receives AI-powered recommendations, and then purchases through Perplexity using Shop Pay, does that sale belong to "search," "retail media," or "affiliate" budgets? Traditional attribution models weren't designed for transactions that begin in chat and complete in merchant wallets. This challenge extends beyond simple budget classification. Marketing teams will need new frameworks to track and optimize spending across conversational interfaces, especially as these platforms develop their own advertising inventory. The complexity increases when considering that a single AI agent might source product information from multiple retailers, compare prices across platforms, and complete transactions through entirely different systems. Even at its projected $25 billion scale by 2029, AI search advertising will remain smaller than retail media in absolute dollars. But the incremental advertising growth from 2027 onward will increasingly tilt toward AI-powered search as conversational interfaces become primary discovery channels. The convergence of product-data feeds and AI search advertising creates first-mover advantages for brands willing to treat these systems as integrated rather than separate challenges. Success requires alignment between traditionally siloed teams managing product information, media buying, and technology infrastructure. The technical infrastructure is rapidly maturing beyond Shopify's approach. Standards like Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) are creating what amounts to "USB-C for AI agents"—standardized connections that expose products, inventory, loyalty programs, and checkout capabilities to any compliant AI model. This gives retailers the opportunity to participate in multiple AI marketplaces without surrendering customer data or pricing control. Jason Goldberg, Chief Commerce Strategy Officer at Publicis Commerce, emphasizes the organizational challenge in a new white paper: "The companies that thrive in the new AI search landscape will not be the loudest—they'll be the most adaptable." His recent analysis of AI commerce disruption suggests brands should "optimize products and content for LLMs" while simultaneously piloting "AI commerce partnerships" with emerging platforms. The math behind EMARKETER $25 billion projection becomes clear when considering these infrastructure developments. Product feeds that once served only comparison shopping engines or retailer websites are now powering conversational AI that can research, recommend, and transact autonomously. Combined with growing consumer adoption, the foundation exists for the explosive growth EMARKETER forecasts. Brands that treat product data and media strategy as connected priorities will be better positioned as AI search advertising scales. Those who continue managing AI initiatives separately from their core commerce operations may find themselves at a disadvantage as conversational search becomes more prevalent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store