AOC breaks silence on yearbook photo that destroyed her tough girl from the Bronx image
On Tuesday, State Assemblyman Matt Slater jumped into the online clash between AOC and President Donald Trump, after the liberal progressive called for Trump's impeachment over his approval of airstrikes on Iran without congressional authorization.
After the discourse led users to show off her alleged old home in Yorktown Heights - supposedly now valued at over a half a million dollars - Ocasio-Cortez responded to allegations she grew up 'privileged.'
'I'm proud of how I grew up and talk about it all the time! My mom cleaned houses and I helped. We cleaned tutors' homes in exchange for SAT prep,' she wrote to social media.
'Growing up between the Bronx and Yorktown deeply shaped my views of inequality & it's a big reason I believe the things I do today!'
Slater told The New York Post the left-wing congresswoman was just continuing to double down on her inconsistent story.
'She's embarrassing herself for doing everything possible to avoid saying she grew up in the suburbs instead of the Bronx.'
'She has said she visited extended family, she has said she commuted,' Slater said. 'Now she's in between. It's clearly desperate attempts to protect the lie that she is from the Bronx.'
After the discourse led someone to show off her alleged old home in Yorktown Heights - supposedly now valued at over a half a million dollars - Ocasio-Cortez responded to allegations she grew up 'privileged'
Ocasio-Cortez was born in the Bronx, though she moved to Yorktown at the age of five, eventually graduating from Yorktown High School before attending Boston University.
The original clash earlier this week ignited a fiery exchange between AOC and Trump, during which the congresswoman appeared to invoke her Bronx roots as a source of her toughness.
'Also, I'm a Bronx girl. You should know that we can eat Queens boys for breakfast. Respectfully,' AOC wrote to X in regards to the president's Queens upbringing.
But Slater escalated the debate by unveiling a yearbook photo of her as a high school freshman in the affluent suburb of Yorktown, Westchester County - a 40-minute drive from the Bronx.
'If you're a BX girl then why are you in my Yorktown yearbook?' Slater wrote on X. 'Give it up already.'
Alongside his tweet, the Republican lawmaker posted two images: a black-and-white throwback of a young, smiling AOC, and the 2004 yearbook cover from Yorktown High School.
In a statement to The New York Post, he dismissed the 'AOC-Bronx mythology' as 'laughable,' adding that the claim is just as laughable to the 36,000 residents of the Westchester community.
'The truth is AOC is Sandy Cortez who went to Yorktown High School and lived at the corner of Friends Road and Longvue Street,' Slater told the outlet.
'She may think it makes her look tough or like some kind of champion for the radical left who voted for Zohran Mamdani, but she really needs to come clean and drop the act,' he added.
The takedown came shortly after AOC - who represents parts of both the Bronx and Queens - called for Trump's impeachment following his order to deploy a dozen 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs that reportedly 'obliterated' Iran's three largest nuclear facilities.
'The president's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers,' she said on Saturday.
'He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.'
Trump swiftly fired back, challenging her to 'go ahead and try impeaching me, again.'
'Stupid AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, one of the 'dumbest' people in Congress, is now calling for my Impeachment, despite the fact that the Crooked and Corrupt Democrats have already done that twice before,' he wrote in retaliation.
Trump then noted that the liberal firebrand 'can't stand the concept of our country being successful again,' because members of her party 'aren't used to winning.'
After that came the personal attacks on the congresswoman's intelligence, as Trump added 'when we examine her test scores, we will find out that she is not qualified for office.'
Less than an hour later, AOC replied to Trump's jab, writing: 'Mr. President, don't take your anger out on me - I'm just a silly girl.'
'Take it out on whoever convinced you to betray the American people and our Constitution by illegally bombing Iran and dragging us into war,' she added.
'It only took you five months to break almost every promise you made.'
But Slater - representing parts of both Putnam and Westchester counties - quickly jumped in, posting the two photos with the caption beneath one: 'Here's the Yorktown High School '04 yearbook pic. Friends Road looks nothing like the Bronx.'
The 35-year-old Democratic socialist congresswoman has faced scrutiny over her suburban upbringing since her unexpected triumph in 2018 catapulted her onto the national stage.
During her campaign, AOC highlighted her deep personal ties to the borough by sharing stories of her childhood and neighborhood life, aiming to authentically connect with Bronx voters and present herself as 'one of their own.'
Even during a segment with late-night host Stephen Colbert during Trump's first term, she reaffirmed her Bronx identity, telling him, 'I don't think he knows how to deal with a girl from the Bronx.'
However, at just five years old, AOC moved with her family to a modest two-bedroom house on a quiet street in Yorktown Heights - a suburban relocation driven by the search for better schools, according to a 2018 article by The New York Times.
In 2007, the congresswoman graduated from Yorktown High School before attending Boston University, where she studied economics and international relations—and briefly engaged with establishment politics - before returning to the Bronx.
Once back in the borough, she began advocating for improved childhood education and literacy - and even launched a children's book publishing company aimed at portraying the Bronx in a more positive light.
Despite criticism of her suburban roots, AOC has continued to lean into and defend her Bronx narrative, arguing that her time in Yorktown highlighted the stark disparities people face based on where they're born.
'It is nice. Growing up, it was a good town for working people,' she said in reference to Yorktown in a 2018 tweet.
'My mom scrubbed toilets so I could live here & I grew up seeing how the zip code one is born in determines much of their opportunity.'
AOC's biography notes that she was born in the Parkchester neighborhood of the Bronx before her family moved north to Yorktown.
'Alexandria's mother was born and raised in Puerto Rico and worked throughout her childhood as a domestic worker,' her biography reads. 'Alexandria's father was a second-generation Bronxite, who ran a small business in The Bronx.'
Throughout her childhood, Representative Ocasio-Cortez traveled regularly to The Bronx to spend time with her extended family,' it adds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump shifts ceasefire position ahead of Zelensky talks
Donald Trump has said he wants to bypass a ceasefire in Ukraine to move directly to a permanent peace agreement after his meeting with Russian President Vladimir a major shift of position, the US president said on Truth Social following Friday's summit that this would be "the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine", adding ceasefires often "do not hold up".Trump will welcome Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, to Washington on Monday and urged him to agree to a peace a phone call with Trump after the summit, Zelensky called for a real, lasting peace, while adding that "the fire must cease" and killings stop. Trump's comments indicate a dramatic shift in his position on how to end the war, having said only on Friday ahead of the summit that he wanted a ceasefire "rapidly".Ukraine's main demand has been a quick ceasefire before talks about a longer-term settlement, and Trump reportedly told European leaders beforehand that his goal for the summit was to obtain a ceasefire deal. Meanwhile, multiple news outlets reported on Saturday that Putin had presented an offer that involved Ukraine handing over complete control of its eastern Donetsk region, which is 70% occupied by Russia. In return, Russia would reportedly agree to front lines being frozen and other unspecified concessions were apparently US president, who has previously said any peace deal would involve "some swapping of territories", is said to have relayed the offer to Zelensky in a phone call following the summit. Just days ago, Ukraine's president ruled out ceding control of the Donbas, saying it could be used as a springboard for future Russian attacks. The BBC's US partner CBS has reported, citing diplomatic sources, that European diplomats were concerned Trump may try to pressure Zelensky on Monday into agreeing to deal terms he and Putin may have discussed at the summit. CBS quotes sources as saying that Trump told European leaders in a call after the summit that Putin would make "some concessions", but failed to specify what they were. In an interview with Fox News following Friday's summit, Trump was asked what advice he has for the Ukrainian leader, to which he responded by saying "make a deal"."Russia's a very big power and they're not," he had previously threatened "very severe consequences" if Putin did not agree to end the war, last month setting a deadline for Moscow to reach a ceasefire or face tough new sanctions, including secondary was announced by way of an agreement by either president following Friday's summit, but Trump insisted progress had been Saturday, Putin described the summit as "very useful" and said he had been able "set out our position" to Trump. "We had the opportunity, which we did, to talk about the genesis, about the causes of this crisis. It is the elimination of these root causes that should be the basis for settlement," the Russian president the "coalition of the willing" - a group of countries that have pledged to strengthen support for Ukraine that includes the UK, France, and Germany - will hold a call on Sunday afternoon before Zelensky's visit to the White House on Monday. A group of European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, said "the next step must now be further talks including President Zelensky".The leaders said they were "ready to work" towards a trilateral summit with European support."We stand ready to uphold the pressure on Russia," they said, adding: "It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force."UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised Trump's efforts to end the war, saying they had "brought us closer than ever before"."While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelenskyy. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without him," he in Kyiv, Ukrainians have described feeling "crushed" by the scenes from Alaska."I understand that for negotiations you shake hands, you can't just slap Putin in the face when he arrives. But this spectacle with the red carpet and the kneeling soldiers, it's terrible, it makes no sense," Serhii Orlyk, a 50-year-old veteran from the eastern Donetsk region said.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump ‘played into Putin's hands'
Donald Trump has 'played into Vladimir Putin 's hands' by dropping his demands for a Russian ceasefire, a senior Ukrainian politician has warned. By aligning himself with Putin's 'insincere' peace proposal, the US president risked repeating Neville Chamberlain's betrayal of Czechoslovakia at the Munich conference of 1938, Oleksandr Merezhko, the chairman of the Ukrainian parliament's foreign affairs committee, said. 'If Trump is serious about supporting Putin's peace treaty idea without calling for a ceasefire first, then it looks very much like a betrayal,' Mr Merezhko told The Telegraph. 'It looks like Munich 1938,' he added referring to the decision to carve out Czechoslovakia's Sudetenland and award it to Hitler in the vain hope of staving off war. Mr Trump's effusive welcome of Putin at their summit in Alaska coupled with subsequent revelations of the concessions the US president appears to have made have triggered widespread anguish in Ukraine. Mr Merezhko said he believed Mr Trump had allowed Putin to hoodwink him into believing he was offering something bigger than a ceasefire, while remaining intent on destroying Ukraine. After emerging from his talks with the Russian leader, the US president said he now agreed with Putin that the best way to end the war was 'to go directly for a peace agreement and not a mere ceasefire agreement'. Yet in accepting that framework – and splitting from Ukraine and his European allies in doing so – Mr Trump had allowed himself to be captured by a long-held Kremlin narrative. 'When Putin talks of a peace treaty and addressing the root causes of the conflict, what he really means is the surrender and capitulation of Ukraine,' Mr Merezhko said. 'Trump has played into the hands of Putin. In choosing to support this idea it is a clear sign that unfortunately he is on the road to aligning with Putin.' In Kyiv, residents shared their dismay over the welcome given to Putin by Mr Trump. Olena and Yuriy, a couple who lost their son in the war, said they watched the Alaska summit unfold on television and were sickened by images of the Russian leader responsible for the invasion being welcomed on a red carpet. They spoke to The Telegraph as they put up a photograph of their son on the memorial wall of fallen soldiers at Saint Michael Square. 'The soldiers of the United States of America were unrolling this red carpet before Putin,' Yuriy said. 'For what reason is a person given such respect, who actually invaded our country?' In a nearby café, the events in Alaska were the topic of the day. 'We are supposed to be allies,' said Yevgheny Sofychuk, 39, who was getting a coffee during his morning dog walk. 'They behaved in a way that suggests they [Russia] are better.' The barista interrupts, 'All I want to say is that Trump is a chicken.' No ceasefire deal was reached at Friday's summit in Alaska and one Ukrainian MP described the outcome as one of the 'worst' possible for Ukraine. 'Putin has won some time for him and his troops,' she said. 'President Trump, in his own words, got a very good meeting. Ukraine got nothing.' On Saturday, after a call between Mr Trump, Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders, the US president outlined a new proposal under which Ukraine would concede the entirety of the Donbas – Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts – in exchange for Article 5-style security guarantees, though these guarantees would not involve Nato membership. It has also been suggested that in other regions, such as Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the front line will be frozen, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to several media outlets. While the fate of the Donbas region is already part of public debate, some Ukrainians said they would rather continue fighting for the land, even at the risk of losing it, than concede it to Putin. 'Our boys have been fighting and dying and they will never give away those territories. They are not ready for this.' Katerina, 35, said. 'But on the other side, for us civilian citizens, we've been working hard. We've lost a lot of relatives, lost properties, lost emotional and nerve cells. We want it to be over.' While Ukraine's constitution forbids recognition of any territory ceded to Russia, Serhii, 44, argued for a national deliberation. 'I think we should conduct some kind of pan-Ukrainian referendum to decide. It's a tough choice and there are no good options,' he admitted. 'The people of Donbas should also be consulted. I know that many there don't care much who is in charge – Russians or Ukrainians. Some are fine with being under Russian rule – that's a fact.' He added that with so much mixed messaging, it is hard to know whether Ukraine still has any 'cards' to play. 'If it's really bad and we are not in a position to choose or decide, then why should they ask us anyway? But if we still have some cards, then why not bargain for a bit longer?' Standing beside Serhii was a friend, pale-faced and silent. He refused to give his name or comment, explaining only that he has just returned from Russian captivity and the subject was too sensitive. Back at the memorial wall of heroes, the photograph of Olena and Yuriy's son now fills a once-empty space. The wall runs the length of a city block, with large sections of blue plaster still bare — spaces that could yet be filled if Ukraine continues the fight. 'Even if Trump stops all this weapons support,' said his father, Yuriy, 'we Ukrainians, those who care about our future, will be standing up to the very end.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Putin has cemented Russia's status as a great power. Europe should be terrified
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin met as equals on American soil this week, not because Mr Trump is in thrall to Putin but because his advances into Ukraine have been unstoppable despite over three years of Western effort. Ukrainian forces have fought hard and with tremendous courage, skill and sacrifice. They prevented the intended Russian blitzkrieg at the beginning of the war and have pushed Russia back in places. They even conducted audacious assaults into Russian territory and inflicted unexpected damage on Moscow's forces including in the Black Sea and as far away as eastern Siberia. But Putin still believes he can absorb whatever blows Kyiv throws at him and win even more territory as his forces push hard and continue to make progress in the Donbas. This region, rich in mineral wealth, is Russia's main military focus. Pushing against well-prepared Ukrainian defences here has proven costly in men and munitions and has made slow progress. Putin would prefer not to continue fighting for it if he can get it by other means and he told Mr Trump at Anchorage that the war could end if Ukraine withdraws from the 30 per cent of Donetsk that his forces have not yet conquered. Volodymyr Zelensky will be reluctant to agree to that and has said that voluntarily ceding any Ukrainian territory would require constitutional change. He will have to balance that with his judgment on whether Ukrainian forces will be able to hold on to it if the war continues, and what the price of that might be. That assessment will have to include the extent to which the West, eyeing the potential for peace, will continue to enable his defensive efforts and how effective Ukraine can be on its own. On top of that, Mr Zelensky will be mindful that at this stage in this extremely costly war, polling suggests that the majority of the population want to see its end, with significant proportions reluctantly willing to give up land. What is Putin offering in return? Virtually nothing. Russia has taken small areas of territory in the north-east, around Kharkiv and Sumy, and has said he will be willing to withdraw from there in exchange for Donetsk. He has also agreed to freeze the front lines in the south, in the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, of which Russia currently holds around three quarters of the total. A ceasefire prior to Putin's 'deal' is of no interest to him and it seems any such thing, which had been a Western priority, was not seriously entertained in Anchorage. Despite serious military flaws that became only too evident since the start of the war, Russia has shown that its forces are no paper tiger. The much-vaunted Western hardware, technical sophistication and military doctrines are not enough to beat it. Indeed Russia has learnt the lessons of modern warfare, adapting its forces and strategies to deal with drones and other battlefield innovations in a way that the West has not. Russia is maintaining astonishing levels of arms production and has been supplementing its own output with supplies from Iran, North Korea and China. In this form of attritional warfare the West has been unable or unwilling to keep up. Putin has reoriented his economy away from Europe especially towards the Brics nations. Although Russian finances are in difficulties, the West has not yet been willing to administer the level of shock that might lead to anything approaching collapse. Instead, dependent on Russian energy, European countries have continued to play their part in fuelling the war machine. Western sanctions have been severe but insufficient, and the additional sanctions President Trump threatened, as well as secondary tariffs, seem to have evaporated since Putin agreed to the Alaska summit. The net result of all this is that it seems the war will continue to grind on unless President Zelensky accedes to Putin's maximalist demands which, as the summit showed, have not changed since the day he launched his special military operation. Meanwhile, the Europeans have reduced themselves to spectators to Ukraine's fate – and their own. European leaders don't even seem to recognise that the cause of this entire situation, and whatever develops from it, largely falls at their own doorstep. Putin claims that a reason for invading Ukraine was Nato aggression towards the east. Yet it was the opposite. He noted that there was no price to be paid for his 2014 invasion of Crimea, notwithstanding Western guarantees that Ukraine would not be threatened by its agreement to give up its nuclear arsenal. Putin read the situation exactly right: it was Nato that was the paper tiger. Mr Trump has been discussing security guarantees with the Europeans as part of a final settlement. That would not include membership of Nato, which in any case would not be acceptable to Putin were he to agree any peace deal. It is unlikely to be any internationally binding treaty but rather a Nato 'article 5' type arrangement whereby participating states would agree to come to Ukraine's defence if it were to be attacked. That would amount to no more than political promises along the lines of previous guarantees given to Kyiv which were not subsequently honoured. Geography alone dictates that European countries should, theoretically, have greater investment in Ukraine's future than the US, and it is they who ought to be looking to bear the burden of security guarantees rather than always looking across the Atlantic. We keep hearing about the 'coalition of the willing', with European forces led by Britain and France to send in forces to guarantee a ceasefire or perhaps a peace agreement. Yet always this is accompanied by the caveat of a US backstop if it is to work. We also hear from European leaders how, if Putin gets his way in Ukraine, it will encourage him to further aggression. Well, it now looks likely that he may well get his way, or at least much of it. So rather than lamenting a dire situation that their own negligence has helped bring about, these European leaders need to get serious about defence – and fast. That means more than just promises to increase defence spending to repair their destitute armed services sometime in the future. It means hardening political thinking away from decades of flabby compromise, appeasement and accommodation and bringing about societal change so that when the Russian bear comes back for more there will be sufficient patriots ready and willing to get into the trenches rather than the hope that Uncle Sam will come to their rescue.
