&w=3840&q=100)
Hooked on plastic: A timely probe into the brands and greenwashing
Harper Collins India
368 pages ₹599
The annual observance of World Environment Day on June 5 goes back to 1973. Led by the United Nations Environment Programme, it is a major occasion for governments and corporations to renew their commitment to environmental causes, take meaningful action and bring new people into the ambit of outreach. It is hosted by a different country each year. In 2025, the Republic of Korea will have that honour. This year's theme is #BeatPlasticPollution.
In this context, journalist Saabira Chaudhuri's book Consumed: How Big Brands Got Us Hooked on Plastic assumes tremendous significance, more so because we are just two months away from a meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee in Geneva, where a global treaty will be negotiated to end plastic pollution. An international, legally binding instrument of this kind seems like an ambitious undertaking but it is the need of the hour.
The author grew up in Bengaluru, obtained an MA in business and economic reporting from New York University, and now lives in London. The book focuses mostly on the United States and India while discussing the history of how plastic became an indispensable part of human life. This historical lens that she adopts is important so that environmental advocacy is grounded in solid facts and not based only on ideology and emotion. We need to have a clear grasp of why plastics became so popular across geographies. They did not emerge out of thin air.
Ms Chaudhuri writes, for instance, 'The Second World War had seen the largest influx of women into the American workforce on record. While many stopped working initially after men returned from the frontlines, a war-born desire for convenient weeknight meals, easy-to-clean surfaces and wrinkle-free clothes did not disappear.' The author's intention here is not to pin the blame for plastic pollution on women. Since the burden of housework was shouldered largely by women, the promise of more time for rest and leisure was understandably quite attractive. Plastic offered them a way out of monotony and drudgery.
In the Indian scenario, Manmohan Singh's decision as finance minister to slash excise duties on shampoo in 1993 put it within the reach of people who could not afford it earlier. Ms Chaudhuri writes, 'Taxes dropped from 120.75 per cent to 70 per cent, making sachets way more profitable.' She also points out that sachets were also appealing to women 'who typically were in charge of buying household essentials' because they 'offered built-in portion control — precluding wayward children or careless husbands from using too much, the way they might from a bottle'. These well-researched culturally specific insights from the author help us look at plastic not as a monster but as a material that has both pros and cons.
This book also helps us make sense of how and why businesses engage in greenwashing, which is a widespread practice of making false, deceptive and unsubstantiated claims of having a positive impact on the environment. Greenwashing is often a tactic used to appear environmentally friendly so as to win over new customers or retain existing ones.
The author examines in detail how in the United States recycling became a 'get-out-of-jail-free card in a situation otherwise riddled with reputational risk'. Instead of any real impact in terms of reducing pollution, it became a marketing campaign to manage public perception. By emphasising this, the author cautions us against being taken for a ride by businesses that are looking to make a quick buck out of our sensitivities that favour being eco-friendly.
Ms Chaudhuri's training as a journalist ensures that she stays cool-headed instead of peddling doomsday predictions. She reminds us that different kinds of plastic melt at different temperatures. 'Even today, mixed plastics recycling is plagued by collection and sorting problems; the resulting park benches and picnic tables have never commanded a high-enough price to justify collecting and cleaning big volumes of often highly contaminated plastics,' she adds. These are realities that people need to know as they grapple with systems that seem outside their control, and also make small changes in their own lives.
The book ends with a useful section titled FAQs, where the author addresses basic but important questions that many do not have reliable answers to. Some of the questions are: Why are plastics recycling rates so slow? What's greener: Cloth diapers or disposables? How can I protect myself against greenwashing? Isn't paper better than plastic? Are bio-based plastics a good alternative to fossil-fuel-based ones? The author offers explanations that are accessible but not simplistic. This book is not the last word on the subject but it is a good start.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
Rift between two blocs continues in Geneva Plastics Treaty negotiations
The deadlock between two blocs of countries on the best way to contain plastic pollution mirrors a shift in the global plastic and polymer-manufacturing industry, which in recent years has moved out of Europe and drifted towards South and Southeast Asia. Since 2022, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has been spearheading efforts to get countries to evolve, by consensus, a legally binding treaty that commits them to address plastic pollution on land as well as in oceans. However, two broad coalitions have evolved over four sessions of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) – the 'High Ambition Coalition' (HAC) chaired by Norway and Rwanda, consisting of nearly 80 countries, as well as members of the European Union (EU), and the 'Like Minded Countries' (LMC), which includes Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, China and Cuba. While the latter isn't a formal coalition like the HAC, it is a much smaller group of countries whose interests are aligned because they are all major petrochemical states. India on Saturday (August 9, 2025) had expressed solidarity with the LMC. Under the current rules of negotiation, countries cannot pass a proposal by a majority vote, and near-unanimous agreement is required. The fundamental rift between the two is that the HAC says plastic pollution cannot be contained without imposing cuts – or capping – production of plastic and its constituent, polymer. The LMC says plastic pollution can be addressed through waste management and imposing production cuts would only cause disruptions in trade, rather than a meaningful reduction in plastic production and use. An analysis in July by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) tracking the flows of the main chemical constituents of plastic – ethylene, propylene, styrene and their derivatives polypropene, low-density polyethylene, linear low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate – showed that Asia dominated the global trade in primary plastic polymers, with 11 exporting and 18 importing countries. In North America, the United States was the largest exporter of these primary plastic polymers, while several European countries served as both importers and exporters. Trade volumes in Africa and South America were negligible. This year, incidentally, the United States, which is part of neither coalition but had always pitched for a 'strong treaty', said that it would not support any proposals aimed at production cuts. Polymers of ethylene are the single largest contributor to plastic packaging and single-use plastics. The United States is a global leader in ethylene polymer exports, with China, Mexico, Canada and Vietnam being top recipients of these polymers. Saudi Arabia is the next largest exporter, with significant flows to China, India and Egypt. Both the United States (with natural gas) and Saudi Arabia (with oil) are rich in fossil fuels, positioning them as leading producers and exporters of ethylene. Their strategic locations, with access to major global shipping routes, further strengthen their roles in international trade, says the report authored by Swathi Seshadri, petrochemical specialist, and Abhishek Sinha, energy finance analyst at the IEEFA. In Europe, Belgium and Germany are major exporters and importers, highlighting their central roles in European and global trade. South Korea and Saudi Arabia export mainly to China, India, and other Asian markets. Polystyrene trade shows similar sub-regional dynamics: Taiwan exports mainly to China and Vietnam, while Belgium exports significant volumes to Germany, France, Poland, and Italy. The United States, also active in both exporting and importing polymers of styrene, primarily exports to Mexico and Canada. 'Petrostates lead trade in polymers and 10 countries form the top five exporters of monomers and 20 countries comprise the top five exporters of polymers,' the report added. India's support for the LMC echoes in a submission made by the All India Plastic Manufacturers Association, an industry lobby, to the Chair of the INC 5.2, Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso on August 5. 'We believe that any cap on the production of primary polymers will do more harm than good as its growing needs in a multitude of areas cannot be met with other materials in the quantities needed,' says their submission. 'We ask that the INC focus on helping countries increase their waste management capabilities... and build programmes for behavioural change to eradicate littering.' Independent observers said that the business case for petroleum and polymer refining in major economies was 'weak'. 'Look at China, for instance. Its petrochemical refining is working at 50% capacity. Several major refiners the world over are seeing that margins and demands for polymer products are declining,' said David Azoulay, managing attorney, Center for International Environmental Law, at a seminar on Monday (August 11, 2025).


The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
Divisions in testy Plastics Treaty negotiations underline global shifts in plastic production
The deadlock between two blocs of countries on the best way to contain plastic pollution mirrors a shift in the global plastic and polymer-manufacturing industry, which in recent years has moved out of Europe and drifted towards South and Southeast Asia. Since 2022, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has been spearheading efforts to get countries to evolve, by consensus, a legally binding treaty that commits them to address plastic pollution on land as well as in oceans. However, two broad coalitions have evolved over four sessions of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) – the 'High Ambition Coalition' (HAC) chaired by Norway and Rwanda, consisting of nearly 80 countries, as well as members of the European Union (EU), and the 'Like Minded Countries' (LMC), which includes Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, China and Cuba. While the latter isn't a formal coalition like the HAC, it is a much smaller group of countries whose interests are aligned because they are all major petrochemical states. India on Saturday (August 9, 2025) had expressed solidarity with the LMC. Under the current rules of negotiation, countries cannot pass a proposal by a majority vote, and near-unanimous agreement is required. The fundamental rift between the two is that the HAC says plastic pollution cannot be contained without imposing cuts – or capping – production of plastic and its constituent, polymer. The LMC says plastic pollution can be addressed through waste management and imposing production cuts would only cause disruptions in trade, rather than a meaningful reduction in plastic production and use. An analysis in July by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) tracking the flows of the main chemical constituents of plastic – ethylene, propylene, styrene and their derivatives polypropene, low-density polyethylene, linear low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate – showed that Asia dominated the global trade in primary plastic polymers, with 11 exporting and 18 importing countries. In North America, the United States was the largest exporter of these primary plastic polymers, while several European countries served as both importers and exporters. Trade volumes in Africa and South America were negligible. This year, incidentally, the United States, which is part of neither coalition but had always pitched for a 'strong treaty', said that it would not support any proposals aimed at production cuts. Polymers of ethylene are the single largest contributor to plastic packaging and single-use plastics. The United States is a global leader in ethylene polymer exports, with China, Mexico, Canada and Vietnam being top recipients of these polymers. Saudi Arabia is the next largest exporter, with significant flows to China, India and Egypt. Both the United States (with natural gas) and Saudi Arabia (with oil) are rich in fossil fuels, positioning them as leading producers and exporters of ethylene. Their strategic locations, with access to major global shipping routes, further strengthen their roles in international trade, says the report authored by Swathi Seshadri, petrochemical specialist, and Abhishek Sinha, energy finance analyst at the IEEFA. In Europe, Belgium and Germany are major exporters and importers, highlighting their central roles in European and global trade. South Korea and Saudi Arabia export mainly to China, India, and other Asian markets. Polystyrene trade shows similar sub-regional dynamics: Taiwan exports mainly to China and Vietnam, while Belgium exports significant volumes to Germany, France, Poland, and Italy. The United States, also active in both exporting and importing polymers of styrene, primarily exports to Mexico and Canada. 'Petrostates lead trade in polymers and 10 countries form the top five exporters of monomers and 20 countries comprise the top five exporters of polymers,' the report added. India's support for the LMC echoes in a submission made by the All India Plastic Manufacturers Association, an industry lobby, to the Chair of the INC 5.2, Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso on August 5. 'We believe that any cap on the production of primary polymers will do more harm than good as its growing needs in a multitude of areas cannot be met with other materials in the quantities needed,' says their submission. 'We ask that the INC focus on helping countries increase their waste management capabilities... and build programmes for behavioural change to eradicate littering.' Independent observers said that the business case for petroleum and polymer refining in major economies was 'weak'. 'Look at China, for instance. Its petrochemical refining is working at 50% capacity. Several major refiners the world over are seeing that margins and demands for polymer products are declining,' said David Azoulay, managing attorney, Center for International Environmental Law, at a seminar on Monday (August 11, 2025).


India Today
4 days ago
- India Today
Could Alaska see yet another major Russia-US real estate deal?
On August 9, President Donald Trump declared the date and venue of his highly anticipated meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The meeting, Trump announced on Truth Social, would take place on Friday, August 15, in Alaska.A Trump-Putin presidential summit has been in the works for several days now, ever since Trump stunned the world by announcing he would soon be meeting his Russian counterpart 'as soon as possible'. In recent days, Trump has tried hard to get Putin back to the negotiation table by targeting one of his largest oil customers, India, with higher tariffs for purchasing Russian oil, and by increasing US military sales to will host the first meeting between a US and a Russian President in four years. The summit could possibly herald the beginning of the end of the Russia-Ukraine war, Europe's longest since the Second World War. Yet, the date and the location of this summit are extremely significant, and a portent of what might follow. First, as the real estate hyperbole goes, location, location, location. Alaska was part of the Russian Empire until 1867. That year, Tsar Alexander II, scarred by the Crimean War, and worried by the possibility that the British could capture his empire's eastern-most tip (the British could do those things then), sold it to the USA for $7.2 million- over $10 billion in today's currency. It was one of the 19th century's most significant real estate transactions. The territory, rich in natural resources including gold, is nearly one-fifth the size of the the date. August 15 marks the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War, which ended when Emperor Hirohito announced the surrender of Imperial Japan. The Japanese Empire was besieged by the US atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the August 8 invasion of Japanese-occupied Manchuria by Stalin, where over 700,000 Japanese soldiers were captured. (Two years later, Lord Louis Mountbatten who was Supreme Allied Commander, South East Asia, suggested the date as the one when the British would finally pull out of India).Both Putin and Trump want an end to the fighting, but clearly, on their terms. Trump wants the big headline. Ending the Russia-Ukraine war, which is believed to have killed close to half a million soldiers, would boost Trump's claim for a Nobel Peace Prize as the 'Peace President'. He has, in recent months, repeatedly claimed to have brokered peace between India and Pakistan, a claim rebuffed by New Delhi. He claimed to have ended the Israel-Iran conflict with a massive bombing of Iranian nuclear sites on June August 8, Trump brokered peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House, a peace deal that will see the creation of a Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP). But Moscow could trip US plans for Russia to withdraw from all Ukrainian territories it has captured since 2014. President Putin is believed to have told Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff that he'll halt the war in exchange for eastern Ukraine. He also wants the withdrawal of all Ukrainian forces from the Russian-majority Donbas, a demilitarised Ukraine, and ironclad guarantees that Kiev will not join Washington grapevine suggests that Trump views the Russia-Ukraine war as yet another territorial war. Early in his second term, Trump wanted the US to prospect for rare earths and resources in Ukraine in exchange for a peace deal. If Trump leads a move for global recognition of Russia's territories, it would see one of the biggest redrawing of international boundaries in recent years, the kind that was seen in 1867 when the US purchased predecessor, Andrew Johnson, was pilloried in Congress for the Alaska purchase. Johnson had succeeded the assassinated Abraham Civil War ravaged US's purchase of Alaska, which was called 'Seward's folly' — for the US secretary of state who signed the deal, and Jackson's 'Polar Bear Garden'. The criticism ended when huge gold deposits were discovered in Alaska a few years later. Johnson's real estate gamble turned out to be a windfall. That's exactly the kind of story Trump, the real estate tycoon turned President, wants to see in 2025.- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch