Scrapping the licence fee will force the BBC to excel
I have always argued that Britain deserves a national public broadcaster fit to showcase to the world the best of Great Britain.
We produce some of the finest talent there is. From the film and television industry, to theatre, sport and news broadcasting – British excellence can and should be broadcast.
Yet it is fair to ask whether the public broadcaster is fit for purpose. Could the concept be improved? Is the funding model sustainable? Does there need to be more scrutiny of impartiality?
One of the most disturbing developments is the increasing politicisation of the BBC. For a football pundit, on a taxpayer-funded salary of £1.3 million, to rant about immigration policy on social media and compare it to 'Nazi Germany', is unacceptable. Not only was such an episode outrageous, but it tested the public's patience and detracted from all the good work the BBC can do.
Take the sports coverage the BBC airs. This includes all kinds of pursuits from grassroots rugby to indoor bowls.
The boffins at other media networks may think giving airtime to these various sporting codes is commercially unviable, which is entirely their prerogative as the pursuit of profit defines all they do. But a sport can only grow if it can be promoted, and that entails it being seen. A public service broadcaster can meet this need.
The Wimbledon championships, broadcast around the world, epitomise this. The sporting talent, the insightful commentary, the strawberries and cream, and the Wimbledon whites are a fixture of the English summer and are wonderfully showcased by the BBC.
Wimbledon was first televised on the BBC in 1937 and has been so ever since, making the tournament the longest-running partnership between a sporting event and broadcaster.
And what about the joy of listening to the BBC's Test Match Special? Listeners receive hours of information and entertainment thanks to a charming mix of humour and expert analysis.
The promotion of the British countryside and rural living is also a great BBC endeavour. Programmes like Countryfile, Landward, and Springwatch all celebrate our natural world. Meanwhile, Farming Today remains important for those of us with an interest in agriculture.
All of this is exported around the world. So, too, is the BBC World Service, which provides a trusted news source to places which crave just that.
The BBC is capable of world-class work, but that doesn't mean a discussion about future funding is not needed.
In a technologically savvy world, where most have a smartphone in their pocket or multiple devices in the one household, the appetite to consume content has increased. New entrants in the market have soaked up this demand in the form of streaming services.
Yet according to the latest Westminster speculation, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy is now thinking of slapping the licence fee on people who never view live TV and only watch the likes of Netflix or Disney+.
A new report, 'Outdated, Outpaced and Out of Touch', from Defund the BBC, suggests that the Corporation finds itself at a critical juncture, perhaps facing an 'adapt or die' moment.
Increasingly the taxpayer questions the value in continually pumping money into a BBC which does not reflect their viewing habits. The TV licence is, for all intents and purposes, another tax many are unenthusiastic about paying.
So how can we guarantee 'our' BBC and enhance the product on offer for Britons in a world of endless technological disruption? The BBC has enough talent to be able to compete fairly in today's streaming world.
Surely the final destination must be a BBC which reflects the expectations of the public in both value and product, and above all, offers British excellence. For only then will it survive for another century and beyond.
Sir John Hayes is MP for South Holland and The Deepings. He is the chairman of the Common Sense Group of Conservative MPs
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil posts $1 bond after federal judge rules Trump admin can't detain him
Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University anti-Israel ringleader, has posted bond after the Trump administration was temporarily blocked from deporting him amid their continued effort to hold him on "foreign policy" grounds. Khalil posted his $1 bond on Thursday afternoon. He has not been released. The move came after U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz sided with Khalil on Wednesday, writing: "The government cannot claim an interest in enforcing what appears to be an unconstitutional law." The ruling was a significant legal setback for the administration's efforts to deport Khalil, who has been held at a detention facility in Louisiana following his involvement in anti-Israel demonstrations at Columbia University. The court's decision will remain on hold until Friday morning, giving the government time to appeal. Khalil, a green card holder, was arrested after leading student protests on the Ivy League campus. He has argued that his free speech rights were being "eroded" by the Trump administration. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorneys have argued that Khalil's free speech claims were a "red herring," saying that the 30-year-old lied on his visa applications. Khalil, they said, willfully failed to disclose his employment with the Syrian office in the British Embassy in Beirut when he applied for permanent U.S. residency. The agency also accused Khalil of failing to disclose his work with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees and membership in Columbia University Apartheid Divest. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has cited a provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to justify Khalil's removal from the U.S. The provision allows the Secretary of State to deport noncitizens if the secretary determines their presence in the U.S. "would have serious adverse foreign policy consequences." Rubio accused Khalil of participating in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities, which foster a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States." "Condoning antisemitic conduct and disruptive protests in the United States would severely undermine that significant foreign policy objective," Rubio wrote. Khalil has Algerian citizenship through his mother, but was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Arizona schools chief says history book (that he hasn't read) is too 'woke'
Just 40% of Arizona's public school students are proficient in English language arts, and a dismal 32% can pass a standardized math test. A consumer research company last fall analyzed data from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., in four key areas — K-12 performance, school funding, higher education quality and safety — and concluded that public education in Arizona is the worst in the nation. So, naturally, state Superintendent Tom Horne on June 11 blasted the Scottsdale Unified School District for being 'woke.' Horne and Maricopa County Sheriff Jerry Sheridan held a news conference to complain about the district's plot to teach a 'leftist' view of U.S. history to next year's high school students. Horne was particularly exercised by a passage that says some Black Lives Matter activists believe some deaths that led to the movement were 'the result of deeply embedded racism.' 'They present a one-sided presentation that's trying to get students, impressionable students, to believe that racism is deeply embedded in this country,' said Horne. Said Horne, who acknowledged he hasn't actually read the textbook in question. Said Horne, who is under fire from the hard right and now has Kimberly Yee and her handler Sen. Jake Hoffman nipping at his heels in next year's Republican primary election. Horne threatened to tell the Trump administration that Scottsdale is teaching 'diversity, equity and inclusion' in the hope that President Donald Trump will yank away all federal funding from the district. Better, I suppose, to penalize poor and disabled children who benefit from those funds than to allow high school students to be presented with a perspective that racism exists. The school board voted 3-2 on May 13 to adopt the U.S. History Interactive High School Curriculum by Savvas Learning Company. The curriculum was chosen in a public process and at the recommendation of a committee comprised of five teachers, one high school administrator and one community member. The school district says no parents applied to be on the committee. Some parents later objected at last month's school board meeting, however, saying the textbook contained anti-police 'propaganda.' That was enough for Sheridan, who at the June 11 press conference called it 'counterproductive for schools to push a misguided and inaccurate narrative that will make students fearful or suspicious of their local law enforcement officers.' Said Sheridan, who like Horne did not actually read the book. Superintendent Scott Menzel called Horne's and Sheridan's accusations 'simply untrue and unsupported by fact.' Opinion: Republicans can't define DEI in Arizona, much less stop it 'We would never adopt a curriculum that was anti-police,' he told a reporter. 'We do have, historically, situations where some people argue that we should defund the police. Here in Arizona, we had people who removed school resource officers. That's not something that we would ever contemplate, but from a historical perspective our students should be able to wrestle with why someone might have made that argument.' Ironically, Menzel didn't catch the livestreamed news conference. He was, at the time, attending a party honoring Scottsdale's retiring police chief. Having not read the 1,200-page textbook, I can't say whether the Scottsdale school board is engaged in a dastardly plot to turn out far left activists. My guess is the district is trying to grow young adults with critical thinking skills. My further guess is there are a plethora of school choice options open to any parent who objects to exposing their teens to the fact that some people believe racism is still a problem in this country. I get it. We don't like our history to be messy, even though our history is, you know, messy. Kind of like how rioters in 2021 can be 'patriots' as they attack police officers on the steps of the U.S. Capitol, even as rioters in 2025 can be 'vicious criminals' as they attack police officers on the streets of Los Angeles. Yeah, better if the kids don't get a chance to wonder about that. Reach Roberts at Follow her on X (formerly Twitter) at @LaurieRobertsaz, on Threads at @LaurieRobertsaz and on BlueSky at @ Subscribe to today. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Tom Horne blasts Scottsdale history book. But is it 'woke?' | Opinion
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
FTSE 100 closes at record high as Trump's tariffs shake faith in US
Britain's main stock market index closed at an all-time high on Thursday as investors seeking refuge from America's market slump turned towards the UK. The FTSE 100 index of London's largest companies ended 0.2pc higher on Thursday at 8,834.92 points amid a backlash against Donald Trump's economic policies, which investors fear will hinder American companies' profits. The flagship British index, which had performed poorly in recent years compared with the US, is up by 8.7pc since the start of the year, beating America's S&P 500's which has risen by 2.7pc. Neil Wilson, of Saxo Bank said: 'We have clearly seen a rotation in global equity markets as investors have for the first time in years questioned the 'Tinata' – there is no alternative to America.' He said clients were talking about 'reducing exposure to the US'. The FTSE 100's record high came as the value of the dollar plunged to a three-year low after President Trump sparked fresh fears about global trade. The US currency sank on Thursday to its lowest level since March 2022 against a group of major peers, leaving it down by nearly 10pc so far this year. Investors have turned away from the dollar after the US president said he would send out letters to countries outlining the terms of trade deals. That sent the pound to a three-year high above $1.36 and pushed the euro to close at $1.16, its highest level since 2021, as the president's comments renewed concerns that US tariffs could hit global growth. In a further sign of his mixed signals on trade, President Trump sought to calm nerves by talking up the prospects of a US-China trade agreement, following two days of talks between Washington and Beijing officials in London this week. He wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'THE CHINA DEAL IS GREAT!' He later told reporters: 'I love China. We just made a deal, and I respect President Xi a lot, and we made a deal that's good for both countries. The deal we made with China good for both countries. Going to be a lot of money made, and it's going to ultimately open up China, which is the ultimate thing.' Charu Chanana, of Saxo Bank, said: 'Markets may have no choice but to respond to Trump's tariff threat – even if it's just posturing to bring others to the table.' The dollar was also hit by a flurry of data, which showed the global economy was beginning to show signs of strain. Britain's goods exports to the US plunged at a record pace after President Trump launched his tariff onslaught in April, official figures showed. UK exports to the United States fell by £2bn compared with the previous month, according to the Office for National Statistics, which was the largest drop since official records began in 1997. The value of goods exports to the United States during the month – totalling £4.1bn – fell to its lowest level since February 2022. The US president hit Britain with 10pc tariffs under plans announced on April 2, a date which Mr Trump had long touted as his so-called 'liberation day'. Businesses dramatically changed their investment plans in response, bringing forward orders in an effort to get ahead of higher import taxes before they were announced. Official figures showed UK manufacturing output fell by 0.9pc in April, a further drop from 0.8pc in March but a sharp reversal from a 2.4pc surge in February. This was despite the high-profile announcement by Sir Keir Starmer of a trade agreement with the US last month, which is yet to be finalised. Robert Wood, an economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said: 'Exports should begin to stabilise in May now that the front-running has unwound and after President Trump began walking back some of his more ruinous tariffs. 'That said, the UK-US trade deal 'agreed' in May is yet to fully come into force so there could be further export weakness still ahead.' In a further sign of strain in the US, wholesale inflation ticked higher last month. The producer price index — which measures inflation before goods hit consumers – rose by 2.6pc in May, according to the Labor Department. This was up from 2.4pc in April but in line with expectations. Separate data showed US filings for jobless benefits were unchanged last week.
