Anti-abortion group start Lent protests near Glasgow hospital
A US anti-abortion group has started a series of Lent protests outside a Glasgow hospital but says it will not break Scotland's new buffer zone law.Campaigners from 40 Days For Life have pledged to stay outside the 200m (656ft) safe access zone around clinics. Last month a 74-year-old woman became the first person in Scotland to be arrested for protesting near the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital.The Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act came into force last year and prohibits anti-abortion activists from protesting near 30 clinics offering abortion services in Scotland.
Scottish Green MSP Gillian Mackay, who drew up the law, said the coming weeks would be a "real test" for the new legislation.
The group is planning to hold "vigils" on Hardgate Road, across from the hospital until 13 April, the Sunday before Easter.The area has been a frequent target for anti-abortion activists. Six people, including a woman with a baby, gathered from around 08:00 and began quietly praying.Some held signs that said "Choose life" and "Help is out there".An area of Hardgate Road, opposite the entrance to the hospital's maternity unit, has previously been a focal point for protests.But the 40 Days For Life group gathered further away from the building on Shieldhall Road.
Meanwhile, Mackay said she would work with Police Scotland and health providers to ensure the new laws are followed.The MSP added no-one should be subjected to "intimidation and harassment".Mackay said: "For far too long women have had to endure totally unacceptable abuse and obstruction outside hospitals. "It should never have happened, and my Act to stop it received the overwhelming support of our parliament."I urge anyone else who is planning to protest to look at the testimonies from people who have had to endure gauntlets of graphic banners and ask themselves if they really want to be responsible for causing even more pain and upset."
JD Vance comments
Mary Gilroy, who is organising the 40 Days For Life protests in Glasgow, previously pledged its members would not to breach the law during Lent.The period of six weeks from Ash Wednesday - 40 days not including Sundays - leading up to Easter is regarded as the most important festival in the Christian calendar.The group describes itself as "an internationally co-ordinated 40-day campaign that aims to end abortion locally through prayer and fasting, community outreach and a peaceful all-day vigil in front of abortion businesses".It was founded in Texas but holds demonstrations outside abortion clinics around the world.Last month US Vice-President JD Vance was accused of "spreading misinformation" about buffer zones at abortion clinics in Scotland.In a speech at the Munich Security Conference Vance claimed people who live within safe access zones had been sent letters by the Scottish government warning them about praying within their homes.Mackay said Vance's claims were "nonsense" and added that private prayer at home had never been impacted.A Scottish government spokesperson said no letters had been sent out saying people could not pray in their homes, and only "intentional or reckless behaviour" was covered by the new law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Police Scotland ‘dithering' over trans strip search guidance
Police Scotland has been accused of 'dithering' over adopting a 'common sense' policy that sees suspects searched by officers of the same sex. Following the Supreme Court ruling that 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 is defined as 'biological sex, not gender identity', the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) issued clear guidance on how to conduct body searches. In cases that involve a transgender person, the new guidance states that they should be searched by a police officer of the same biological sex and not their self-identified gender. Scotland's national force, however, has yet to adopt the policy. It said it is being considered and advice has been sought from an independent human rights adviser. Tess White, the Scottish Conservative shadow minister for equalities, said the way the force was dragging its feet over implementing the policy was 'troubling'. 'Basic common sense' Calling on the SNP Government to ensure that all public bodies, including Police Scotland, follow the law, she added: 'It's basic common sense that a body search of a suspect ought to be carried out by an officer of the same biological sex and, given the unequivocal ruling of the Supreme Court in April, this issue shouldn't be up for debate. 'The Supreme Court ruling was very clear and the public will expect the police to be among the very first to uphold it.' The NPCC, which brings together police leaders to set direction for policing across the country, circulated updated guidance to every force in the country last month. It followed a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court which came about after the Scottish Government included transgender women in quotas to ensure gender balance on public sector boards. Campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) argued that sex-based protections should only apply to people born female. The NPCC said its guidance is based on 'legal advice' and has been developed after seeking views across policing as well as those of other agencies. 'It reflects working practice which already happens every day across policing, where officers and detainees make requests about searches for a multitude of reasons,' the organisation stated. 'It makes clear that thorough police searches, such as those which expose intimate body parts, should be carried out by police officers and staff of the same biological sex as the detained person.' The guidance also states that a trans person who requests that a search be conducted by an officer of their stated gender may be considered. According to the guidance, it is 'explicit' that any search not conducted in line with biological sex must have the 'written consent of the detainee, the officer carrying out the search as well as the authorising officer'. Review is 'complex' Catriona Paton, Police Scotland's Assistant Chief Constable, said an ongoing review into sex and gender was 'complex, sensitive work, and the wellbeing of our people and communities is a priority'. 'We are operating within a dynamic and evolving landscape and it is critical that we take time to consider all the views, legislation, guidance and legal advice to ensure our proposals are well-informed and evidence-based,' she added. The force has been criticised for embracing gender self-identification and faced a backlash for allowing rapists to 'self-declare' their gender identity. A spokesman for FWS said: 'Like many public bodies, the police were quick to dance to the tune of trans lobbyists, going far beyond the law and adopting policies of self-ID. 'Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that equality law refers to biological sex, they are dragging their heels. The police, of all bodies, should follow the law – it really isn't complicated.' Kenny MacAskill, the former Alba Party leader and former Scottish justice secretary, called on Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority to act quickly to end the current practice of female officers conducting body searches of biological men who self-identify as women. 'Officers have to carry out stop and searches, but it is preposterous to expect a female police officer to carry out a body search of an obviously male person self-identifying as female,' he said. 'The Supreme Court [ruling] should be the clarion call for an end to the idiocy.'
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
You say we need more babies, rightwingers? Come back to me after you've fought in the trenches of soft play
I absolutely cannot fathom the number of populist rightwing politicians and commentators who have looked at the smouldering mess that is the world currently and thought: 'I know what this situation demands – more toddlers.' Population-boosting discourse and policies have spread across Europe (Hungary, Poland, Greece, Italy and beyond), while in the US an unholy coalition of tech bros, religious conservatives, blowhard podcasters and the politicians who pander to them have gone loudly pronatalist. JD Vance used his first speech as vice-president to proclaim: 'I want more babies in the United States of America'; Elon Musk called declining birthrates 'a much bigger risk to civilisation than global warming'; and Trump is considering various procreation-incentivising policies, including a $5,000 'baby bonus', which I believe is what a carton of eggs – hen, not human – costs in the US these days. Now Nigel Farage has hopped on the breeding bandwagon (tick that off your 'What fresh hell?' bingo card). Reform, he says, wants to go 'much further to encourage people to have children'. I needed to do something other than grind my teeth to stumps about this, so I've been brainstorming an entrance test for the role of publicly boring on about birth rates. Because having numerous children yourself (Vance lets the side down with a mere three; Musk tops the leaderboard with 14) doesn't qualify you to harangue others to do the same; you need to have actually walked the multiple-children walk – done the stuff parents without a flotilla of staff or a tradwife spouse have to do. Here are a few suggested 'canon' events politicians should experience before they're allowed to pontificate about our patriotic duty to breed. Your internal organs either feel like, or actually are, falling out; you can't sit down or lift anything safely (not sure how we simulate this for the bros, but it's 2025 – technology can surely assist). Unfortunately, the writhing newborn with its gums clamped to your nipple hasn't got the memo, and who's this erupting into the room, exuding the on-the-brink energy of someone whose world recently imploded? It's 12kg of inexplicably naked toddler barrelling towards a plug socket while intimating an urgent need to urinate, an open bottle of Calpol (where did they get that?) casually slung in one hand. Your move – oh, hang on, you can't move. Just regular, awful bedtimes: different, elaborate, multi-phase sleep rituals more complex than a Korean skincare regime for each child. A colicky baby. A toddler who fights sleep with the raw power of a heavyweight boxer. A child who waits until 11pm when you're on your very last nerve to ask the big questions about death. Standard stuff. You're hungover, sick or sleep-deprived (joke – you're always sleep-deprived) and desperate to crawl into a dark hole, but no, it's 9am, everyone's been up for four hours and you're in an echoing hangar with lighting, music and general ambience inspired by Guantánamo, having paid £10 per person for the privilege. One kid is attached to your leg, refusing to have fun without you; one has vanished entirely; another is headed straight into the ball pit, where they promptly have a screaming nervous breakdown. You'll need to retrieve them, knowing there's at least one rogue poo in there somewhere (worst lucky dip ever). How bad can it be, you say to yourself? Then the sweating and the flashbacks start. It's worse than 'Nam in Clarks and there's no way out but through. The cottage has vertiginously slippery stairs and surfaces full of low-hanging fragile knick-knacks, plus inadequate curtains, so everyone wakes at 4am. With no Freeview or phone reception, you can't outsource the early shift to Bluey. The intersection of allergy, intolerance and awkwardness is such that there is no food everyone will eat. It's day one and you're already praying for the sweet release of death. Guts in violent turmoil, you're physically unable to move more than a metre from your lavatory while being repeatedly called upon to clean up – probably even catch in your cupped hands! – your sick children's effluvia. Tell me again how more kids are the answer to the world's ills? Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Pope Leo criticises ‘exclusionary mindset' of nationalist political movements
Pope Leo has criticised the emergence of nationalist political movements and their 'exclusionary mindset', without naming a specific country or leader. Leo, the first pope from the US, asked during a Mass on Sunday with tens of thousands in St Peter's Square that God would 'open borders, break down walls (and) dispel hatred'. 'There is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, unfortunately, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms,' said the pontiff. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, was elected on 8 May to succeed the late Pope Francis as leader of the 1.4 billion-member church. Before becoming pontiff, Prevost was not shy about criticising Donald Trump, sharing numerous disapproving posts about the US president and the vice-president, JD Vance, on X in recent years. The Vatican has not confirmed the new pope's ownership of the X account, which had the handle @drprevost, and was deactivated after Leo's election. Francis, pope for 12 years, was a sharp critic of Trump. The late pope said in January that the president's plan to deport millions of migrants in the US during his second term was a 'disgrace'. Francis had already said Trump was 'not Christian' because of his views on immigration. 'A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian,' Francis said when asked about Trump in 2016. Leo was celebrating a Mass for Pentecost, one of the church's most important holidays.
