logo
Rich Gain and Poor Lose in Republican Policy Bill, Budget Office Finds

Rich Gain and Poor Lose in Republican Policy Bill, Budget Office Finds

New York Times12-06-2025
The far-reaching domestic policy bill that Republicans recently pushed through the House would provide rich Americans with a financial lift while taking away government benefits from the poor, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said on Thursday.
The analysis is the first from the budget office that lays out how Americans at different income levels would be affected by the Republican legislation, which slashes taxes and cuts spending on safety-net programs like Medicaid and food stamps. Americans would, on average, gain from the bill, according to the analysis, but the consequences would be very different for poor Americans and for rich ones.
The bottom 10 percent, for example, would overall lose government benefits worth an average of $1,559, or 3.9 percent of their current income, each year over the next decade, according to the budget office. The bottom 30 percent of Americans would all, on average, lose more benefits than they would receive from the bill. In contrast, the top 10 percent would gain an average of $12,044, a 2.3 percent annual increase to their current income.
Middle-class Americans would see smaller gains. The middle 10 percent of Americans would on average net $514 per year if the measure were enacted, an annual increase of 0.5 percent in their current income.
Overall, the richer Americans are, the larger the benefit they would receive from the legislation. That is true for the bill overall over the next decade, as well as for each individual year through 2034 as provisions in the bill phase in and out.
While stark, the budget office's conclusion was not a surprise. Several other independent analysts had already concluded that the legislation would be regressive, meaning that its benefits would be skewed toward Americans with more income.
That is because of the nature of the agenda Republicans have pursued. In general, income tax cuts, the centerpiece of the bill, tend to provide their biggest benefits to the high-earning Americans who pay the most in taxes. The poorest Americans already often do not owe any income taxes, meaning they do not benefit from a tax cut.
At the same time, Republicans have targeted programs that help low-income Americans for cuts. Under the House-passed version of the legislation, nearly 11 million Americans are expected to lose health coverage, for example. The loss in those benefits would overwhelm the modest savings that Americans on the lower rungs of the income ladder would see from tax cuts.
Even with the cuts to safety-net programs, the legislation would still be costly, with the budget office previously estimating that it would add nearly $3 trillion to the debt over the next decade, including additional borrowing costs.
Republicans in the Senate are still working on the legislation, though the changes they are planning are not expected to alter the overall thrust of the legislation, meaning the final product is all but certain to favor rich Americans over poor ones.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Microsoft Cuts More Jobs in Washington as AI Spending Surges
Microsoft Cuts More Jobs in Washington as AI Spending Surges

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Microsoft Cuts More Jobs in Washington as AI Spending Surges

Microsoft (MSFT, Financials) trimmed another 40 roles in Washington, pushing local cuts since May to 3,160. Worldwide, more than 15,000 jobs have been shed as the company pours record sums into artificial intelligence. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with MSFT. The new reductions are separate from larger rounds earlier this year. Microsoft isn't detailing which teams were hit but says affected staff will receive severance and job?search help. Some have already found other roles inside the company. These moves come as Microsoft spends more than $30 billion this quarter on AI infrastructure a push that CEO Satya Nadella admits can feel at odds with cutting jobs. The company's headcount has held steady at about 228,000, even as it invests heavily in growth areas. Shares rose 2.2% Monday, giving Microsoft a $3.98 trillion market value after briefly topping $4 trillion last week. Investors will be watching how it balances AI bets with workplace stability. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

My Honest Opinion of Energy Transfer Stock
My Honest Opinion of Energy Transfer Stock

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

My Honest Opinion of Energy Transfer Stock

Key Points Energy Transfer operates in the midstream sector, using a largely fee-based model. The master limited partnership has a lofty 7.4% distribution yield. There are lower-yielding midstream companies that I prefer over Energy Transfer. 10 stocks we like better than Energy Transfer › I recognize that there are good reasons for investors to buy Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) today. I can even appreciate that the master limited partnership (MLP) has taken important steps to strengthen its business in ways that should appease the concerns I have about the investment. Yet, I still think alternatives like Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) and Enbridge (NYSE: ENB) are better. Here's my honest opinion of why Energy Transfer isn't the best option in the midstream space. What does Energy Transfer do? Energy Transfer helps to move oil and natural gas around the world. It owns a collection of energy infrastructure assets, like pipelines, that generate reliable fee-based income. Without the assets Energy Transfer owns, producers wouldn't be able to get their oil and natural gas to processors and refiners, or the end consumer. From this perspective, Energy Transfer's core business is pretty similar to that of fellow MLP Enterprise Products Partners and Canadian midstream giant Enbridge. But Energy Transfer's distribution yield is 7.4%, versus a yield of 7% for Enterprise and dividend yield of 6% for Enbridge. The yield difference here matters. You are taking a higher risk with Energy Transfer For starters, Energy Transfer is, in some ways, a much more complicated business than Enterprise or Enbridge. They all own a host of assets, but Energy Transfer is also the general partner for two other publicly traded MLPs. That's not the biggest part of its business, but it makes things a bit more difficult to track. This alone wouldn't be enough to stop me from buying Energy Transfer, but it does give Enterprise and Enbridge, which are simpler businesses to understand, an edge in my book. The big problem comes down to trust. Enterprise has increased its distribution annually for 26 consecutive years. Enbridge's dividend has grown for three decades. Energy Transfer cut its dividend in 2020, right when most income investors would have likely wanted dividend consistency given the pandemic and bear market at the time. If this were the only issue, since the dividend is back on the growth path and above where it was before the cut, I might be able to overlook it. But there's more. In 2016, Energy Transfer agreed to buy Williams Companies (NYSE: WMB). But an energy downturn at the time led to management getting cold feet. It scuttled the deal, which might have required taking on a huge amount of debt, a dividend cut, or both. This was probably the right move, but it issued convertible securities as part of the process of killing the deal. The CEO at the time bought a material amount of the convertibles, which appeared as though it would have protected him from a dividend cut if one were needed. Even years later, I still can't help but wonder if insiders get favored more than investors at Energy Transfer. There's no similar event at Enterprise or Enbridge and, thus, I trust these two midstream competitors more. Add it all up, and I can't justify buying Energy Transfer Yes, Energy Transfer has a slightly higher yield than Enterprise and Enbridge. But the added risk I'd be taking on, notably on the trust side of the equation, isn't justifiable in my book. I'm happier with lower yields and more trust. After all, it's not like Enterprise or Enbridge have low yields. They're just lower than Energy Transfer's yield, which makes sense when you consider the risks here. Should you invest $1,000 in Energy Transfer right now? Before you buy stock in Energy Transfer, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Energy Transfer wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $631,505!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,103,313!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,039% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Enbridge. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Enbridge. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. My Honest Opinion of Energy Transfer Stock was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump seeks sway over Los Angeles Olympics with new task force
Trump seeks sway over Los Angeles Olympics with new task force

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump seeks sway over Los Angeles Olympics with new task force

Donald Trump on Tuesday established a task force that he will lead on the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles, a Democrat-run city that has frequently clashed with the Republican US president. The group will engage the federal government to "ensure the Games are safe, seamless and historically successful," potentially offering Trump and his allies greater influence over the sporting event. Trump will serve as chairman and Vice President JD Vance will be vice-chair of the task force, which will encompass several other leaders in his administration. Signing an order to establish the group Tuesday, Trump said "we'll do anything necessary to keep the Olympics safe" -- including potentially deploying "our National Guard or military." He enraged Los Angeles and state officials in June with his highly unusual decision to deploy California's National Guard against the wishes of Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump claimed the deployment was necessary to quell protests that had flared up against federal immigration raids in Los Angeles, which has a huge migrant population. On Tuesday he doubled down on his feud with Karen Bass, the city's Democratic mayor, by labeling her "not very competent." Trump has previously criticized her response to wildfires that impacted Los Angeles in January. However, Casey Wasserman, the chairman of the 2028 LA Olympics organizing committee, gave no hints of animosity as he joined Trump for the task force announcement at the White House. "You've been supportive and helpful every step of the way. And we wouldn't be here without you," Wasserman said. Los Angeles was awarded the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games in September 2017, during Trump's first term. Wasserman also flattered the president with examples of gold, silver and bronze medals that were given to athletes the last time Los Angeles hosted the Games in 1984. And he offered Trump a chance to carry the Olympic flame -- something he has already done in New York ahead of the Athens Games in 2004. "For the first time in history, we are going to take the Olympic torch relay to all 50 states," Wasserman said. "And sir, if you'd like to run on Park Avenue again to revisit history, you're more than welcome," he told Trump. Trump's second term will coincide with the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Olympics -- two major global sporting events taking place in the United States. He has previously targeted transgender individuals, particularly athletes, and further stated on Tuesday that the "United States will not let men steal trophies from women at the 2028 Olympics." Asked about genetic testing for participating athletes, Trump said: "There will be a very, very strong form of testing and if the test doesn't come out appropriately, they won't be in the Olympics." aue/bjt/sla

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store