STEVE FINAN: Why is modern road infrastructure right for everywhere but Dundee?
The last big traffic infrastructure project in Dundee was the construction of the Tay Road Bridge and creation of the inner ring road.
The bridge was completed in August 1966, the last dualled section of the inner ring (linking Lochee Road and Victoria Road) opened in September 1975.
There's been nothing that could be termed a major investment in the half century since.
The city needs an energetic, forceful character to change that.
Someone like Sir Douglas Hardie, who fought for the bridge and was never really given the credit he deserved.
Much needs done.
Dundee has an airport, train station and a poor excuse for a bus station that are ridiculously remote from each other.
Dundee FC could do with high-powered help to cut through the red tape around their new ground's junction problems.
We have the Swallow Roundabout debacle – which leaves the laughable situation of Glendoick Garden Centre having safer and quicker access from the A90 than Scotland's fourth biggest city.
We have the main route serving the whole north-east of Scotland reduced to a single lane bottleneck at the Forfar Road turn-off.
Only selfish cyclists – who think their hobby is more important than HGV access to a huge part of the country – think Dundee doesn't need a bypass.
Forfar has a bypass. Perth, Brechin, Stirling, Dunblane, Kinross, Ayr, Dumfries, Kelty and Bridge of Earn have bypasses.
Aberdeen got an impressive bypass. Edinburgh has had a bypass for 35 years.
The village of Glamis (population 1,000) has a bypass.
The M8, M77, M73 and M74 – easing traffic through the Glasgow area – have seen almost continual improvements in recent decades, costing hundreds of millions.
Why is modern road infrastructure right for all those places but wrong for our city?
Dundee never gets anything from Westminster or Holyrood.
Let's name names.
Trunk roads are managed at national level, so exerting pressure to improve them is a job for MPs.
The Swallow Roundabout is in Chris Law's constituency.
What are you doing about this, Chris? What do you ever say or do about anything in Dundee?
What of our MSPs?
Joe FitzPatrick has been virtually invisible his entire Holyrood career.
It's pointless asking him. He's been treading water waiting for retirement since he was first elected in 2007.
And Shona Robison long ago forgot Dundee put her into her job.
None of them will do anything, we must look to the future.
Heather Anderson is a prospective Dundee City West MSP. What are her thoughts on a bypass?
In a recent interview she stated she was a 'proud Dundonian'. Here's a chance to prove it.
Mind you, her time with the Ministry of Secrecy (some call it Dundee City Council) wasn't good training for speaking out on difficult subjects or challenging authority on the city's behalf.
This is a godsend for any wannabe MSP.
It's an easily understood issue to really get their teeth into.
Something the whole city (except self-absorbed cyclists) can get behind.
Anyone who wants to represent the city should take note.
To any 2026 Scottish election candidate – what's your opinion on a bypass?
Your answer could win, or lose, you thousands of votes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
25 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Achieving child poverty target 'could cost £920m a year in benefits'
'Laser-focused prioritisation' required by next Parliament to lift 100,000 children out of poverty Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland could meet its 2030 child poverty target - but a report has warned this could cost £920 million a year in benefits, with "significant additional" spending also required to increase the number of parents in work. Chris Birt, associate director at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) in Scotland , said its research shows: "Holyrood has the chance to prove that it's up to the task of not just setting lofty ambitions, but straining every sinew to deliver on them." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The think tank said there would be financial benefits from getting more parents into employment, and from helping those with jobs to work more hours. Doing this could increase tax revenues to the Scottish Government by £410 million, it said, while cutting spending on universal credit by around £500 million a year. Scotland could meet its 2030 child poverty target - but a report has warned this could cost £920 million a year in benefits, with "significant additional" spending also required to increase the number of parents in work | PA With 240,000 children living in poverty in Scotland, the JRF produced what it described as a "toolkit" for parties running in the 2026 Holyrood election, setting out the impact different policies could have towards meeting the target of having less than 10 per cent of youngsters in relative poverty by 2030-31. The think tank said it had "deliberately not prescribed an exact course of action" but had instead "shown the required scale of action needed". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To meet the target, the report said the next Parliament would need to "lift around 100,000 children out of poverty" - adding this would "require a laser-focused prioritisation". The Meeting the Moment paper stresses that none of the measures it considered would achieve the target on their own. "Even a near quadrupling of the SCP (Scottish child payment) to £100 a week per child at an annual cost of £1.14 billion would see a child poverty rate three percentage points above the targets," it said. However it found increasing the SCP - which is given to low-income families for every child they have under the age of 16 - to £40 a week would have "the best poverty reduction impact per pound". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This would cost an extra £190 million a year - but on its own would only bring the child poverty rate down to 18 per cent. However the research found that by supplementing the benefit for families with babies and for single parents, and by boosting take-up to 100 per cent of those eligible, when combined with other measures - such as boosting employment among parents in poverty - 90,000 youngsters could be lifted out of poverty, meeting the 10 per cent target. Tax revenues boosted by parental employment The report said: "This would cost an additional £920 million in targeted child benefits in Scotland (as well as other costs associated with increasing employment). "It would also increase tax revenues by £410 million because of increased parental employment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "Universal credit expenditure could also fall by £500 million as demand for it falls due to higher incomes through work." Mr Birt said: "Whoever forms the next Scottish Government has the chance to change what it means to grow up in Scotland . "To do so, they must meet the Parliament's child poverty targets. Not only for Scotland's children and their futures, but to show those who often feel overlooked and ignored by politics that trust can be rebuilt through actions. "This analysis gives each political party a detailed map to help them reach a Scotland free from child poverty. They may choose to take different routes to get there. But whichever route they take will require every ounce of determination and demand action at scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "The actions of Westminster governments may help, or hinder, but Holyrood has the chance to prove that it's up to the task of not just setting lofty ambitions, but straining every sinew to deliver on them." Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: "I welcome this report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation . "We are absolutely committed to meeting the 2030 child poverty targets and thanks to the actions we are already taking, families in the poorest 10 per cent of households are estimated to be £2,600 a year better off in 2025-26 and this value is projected to grow to an average of £3,700 a year by 2029-30. "However our policies are having to work harder in the current economic context and as a result of decisions taken by the UK Government, such as keeping the two-child limit on Universal Credit which are holding back Scotland's progress. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "While the Joseph Rowntree Foundation predict child poverty will rise in other parts of the UK by 2029, they highlight that policies such as our Scottish Child Payment, and our commitment to mitigate the two-child limit, are behind Scotland 'bucking the trend'.
The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
Nigel Farage told me exact moment he decided to run for PM – now he's marching to No 10 but EVERYTHING'S about to change
WHAT a difference a year makes. Just 365 days ago Nigel Farage was all but retired, sitting out the General Election. 2 2 As the BBC put it, he had 'announced that he wouldn't try to win a seat in Parliament. . . prompting a reporter from The Sun to tease him that he was a chicken'. A year ago to the day, he blew all that up. 'I remember it very well,' he told me over the weekend. 'I was sitting at home, I'd been thinking hard for 48 hours about it. I had a group call and I just said, 'F*** it, I'm doing it. Find me a venue for tomorrow, please'.' In an age of backtracks, that might just go down as one of the most important U-turns in British political history. He insists it was more a sense of guilt — 'a feeling I was letting people down' — behind the decision as well as the 'gap in the political market' that saw a dying Tory Party and a uniquely uninspiring Labour who were set to win by default out of pure hatred of the Conservatives. Either way he was right — and eighth time lucky an MP. Fast forward a year and he is edging a double-digit lead in the polls, nudging that crucial 30 per cent of the vote that could, remarkably, see Reform UK form the next government. Farage's keen instinct for the political mood of the country appears to have been spot on. In Scotland, where Farage was forced to hide in a pub 12 years ago from a nationalist mob, Reform look set to push Labour into third place at a by-election this week — to the bewilderment of the cosy Holyrood establishment. We absolutely know that Sir Keir Starmer was in 'serious mode' when he launched his latest salvo against Nigel Farage If you don't believe the numbers, just look at the reaction from his rivals. Struggling Kemi Badenoch's Opposition leadership has never got off the ground due to the massive looming menace on her right flank. Her attempts to mimic Reform have fallen flat, while her attempts to ridicule them just drive ever more disillusioned Tories into their arms. And a Labour PM — who not only inherited the fastest- growing G7 economy and on-target inflation, propped up by a state broadcaster and cheered on by the chattering classes — should still be enjoying a Blair-style honeymoon. But instead, after ten months, Sir Keir Starmer leads the most unpopular government in British polling history. And he's in a right flap, as Reform not so much parks its tanks on Labour's lawn but napalms the entire village. The PM's attempts to paint Farage as a Putin patsy who wants to sell the NHS have flopped, as will attempts to brand him out of touch with working-class voters — who voted Reform in droves just last month. 'I hope nothing changes,' says Farage. 'I hope Kemi stays, I hope Starmer keeps obsessing about me, the poor bloke — he'll have to go see a psychiatrist before too long. 'It has way exceeded in the space of a year even my most optimistic expectations.' Teddy bears' picnic But he would be mad to rest on any laurels yet. Everything IS about to change. The fight is only getting started, and Reform has a very long way to go before asking the people of Britain to hand this untested and unknown political force the keys to No10. There is still a minimum of three years until another election, and in any election contest the last place you want to be is out front early, with a giant target on your back. Old Dominic Cummings warned darkly this week that the deep state is already gearing up to trash Reform and protect the old system of the established parties doing what they are told. Parties, government departments, newsreaders, quangos, think-tanks, unions, charities — you name it — will all line up in an onslaught that will make the battle against Brexit, and latterly Boris Johnson, look like a teddy bears' picnic. And Farage agrees, though he hopes: 'I don't really think those voters that have come to us already actually give a damn about this stuff.' But he needs to win over plenty of waverers, too. So everything possible will be escalated to stop that happening and if the Government and their pliant friends across the establishment get their message right, that poll lead could start to look rather soft. So is it wise of Farage to be giving his opponents ammunition this early in the cycle? I make the arguments I believe in, and when I start they are usually minority arguments but I'm generally good at bringing people with us. Nigel Farage This week, Reform's first foray into detailed policy away from immigration gave their opponents their first real straw to grasp at in months. Some 59 per cent of Reform voters and 42 per cent of Labour voters support keeping the two-child benefits cap for larger families. Labour MPs may want the PM to scrap it, but from what I hear that is still far from a done deal, amid concerns the Government is walking into a trap on increasing benefits for foreigners who tend to have more kids. But punching the bruise of the division in Labour, Farage declared Reform would abolish it, as well as take anyone earning under £20,000 out of paying income tax and reinstate all Winter Fuel Payments. He insists it's about more than just money, boldly claiming he's 'not a populist'. He said: 'I make the arguments I believe in, and when I start they are usually minority arguments but I'm generally good at bringing people with us.' But it was a multi-billion-pound spending pledge made in seconds that has drawn easy comparisons to Liz Truss's relaxed attitude about making the sums add up. Farage insists both parties don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to dodgy maths and more detail is coming on what he would cut — but he has clearly given them both some flesh to target when they were struggling to land blows Harry Cole Right on cue came the Institute for Fiscal Studies, lapped up by the BBC, who Farage accuses of 'now criticising every thing we do'. He added: 'Well, ask the question, who funds them? The Government.' Dodgy maths He's not wrong there, with the apparently independent fiscal think-tank receiving £13million of taxpayer funding over the past five years. But simply saying 'scrapping Net Zero ' will cover the costs of these massive pledges is fag- packet maths and a free gift to his struggling opponents. Farage insists both parties don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to dodgy maths and more detail is coming on what he would cut — but he has clearly given them both some flesh to target when they were struggling to land blows. Which leads me to the other problem Reform faces, relating to numbers and the road to No10. With just five MPs, they can barely fill a taxi let alone a Shadow Cabinet table. Farage plans to step back from much of the day-to-day media, promoting party figures like Richard Tice and Zia Yusuf instead. And the hunt is on for 'high-profile' outsiders to stand for the party as an alternative government at the next election, before they even have a seat in the Commons. Well, why not start that process right now? Solve two numbers problems in one go and appoint a prominent, respected and credible figure to be Reform's Shadow Chancellor.
The Independent
10 hours ago
- The Independent
Farage as PM could push independence support close to 60%, poll suggests
Nigel Farage becoming prime minister could push support for Scottish independence to 58%, a new poll suggests. The survey by Norstat for the Sunday Times, which spoke to 1,007 Scots between May 27 and May 30, showed support for separation currently sits at 54% in Scotland. But if Reform UK were to win the next general election that figure could near the 60% level some believe should be the tipping point for another referendum. The figure rose from 50% in the last Norstat poll in January. The highest that support for independence has reached in recent years is 58%, in an Ipsos Scotland poll for STV News in the early months of the pandemic, as Nicola Sturgeon received plaudits for her handling of Covid-19. But the increase comes as support for the SNP continued to fall ahead of next year's Holyrood elections, with the party dropping two percentage points in both the constituency and regional list votes to 33% and 28% respectively. Labour's support rose slightly to 19% in constituencies and 18% in Scotland's regions. But Reform UK would see a surge, if the poll was to reflect the returns seen next May, with Mr Farage's party jumping to 18% in constituencies and 16% on the list – up two and three percentage points respectively. Meanwhile the Scottish Tories dropped two points to 13% locally and remained at 15% in the regions. The figures come ahead of a by-election in Lanarkshire this week, after the death of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie. According to polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice, in projections for the Sunday Times, John Swinney was on track to win an unprecedented fifth term in office for his party next year, securing 54 seats. Labour would drop to 20 seats, while Reform would win 18 in their first full political test in Scotland. Meanwhile, the Tories would drop from being the second biggest party to the fourth, with just 17 MSPs, followed by the Lib Dems on 11 and the Greens on nine. The poll also looked at Westminster voting intentions, with the SNP recording 31% of the vote, followed by Reform surging into second on 21% and Labour dropping 15 points from last year's election to 20%. The Conservatives sit at 12%, while 8% said they would vote for the Lib Dems. But despite leaping into second, Nigel Farage's party would not return a single MP, the polling expert said, with the SNP rising to 30, Labour falling to 16 and the Lib Dems and Tories remaining on six and five respectively. SNP depute leader Keith Brown said his party has 'momentum' and Labour has lost Thursday's by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. 'In government, Labour has taken away the winter fuel payment, cut £5 billion of support for disabled people and watched on as energy bills rose by £150,' he said. 'With an SNP Government, the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse are getting action on what matters to them: bringing back the universal winter fuel payment, record funding for our NHS and key costs lower, with peak rail fares scrapped and lower income tax for the majority of taxpayers. 'The Labour Party has let you down and Farage is trying to stoke division, but the SNP is always on your side.' Scottish Labour's deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: 'Scotland has been let down for too long by this tired and out-of-touch SNP government. 'After 18 years in charge, the SNP has left our NHS at breaking point, our economy flatlining and our schools tumbling down the international league tables. 'This week the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse will get a chance to call time on SNP failure and choose a new direction with Scottish Labour. 'It's clear the SNP does not deserve to win this by-election and only Scottish Labour can beat them.'
