US carrier arrives in South Korea amid rising tensions in region
The arrival of the USS Carl Vinson and its strike group at the South Korean port of Busan was meant to display a solid US-South Korean military alliance in the face of persistent North Korean threats, and boost interoperability of the allies' combined assets, the South Korean navy said in a statement.
It said it was the first US aircraft carrier to travel to South Korea since June.
The deployment of the carrier is expected to infuriate North Korea, which views temporary deployments of such powerful US military assets as major security threats. North Korea has responded to some of the past deployments of US aircraft carriers, long-range bombers and nuclear-powered submarines with missile tests.
Since his Jan.20 inauguration, US President Donald Trump has said he will reach out to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un again to revive diplomacy.
North Korea hasn't directly responded to Trump's overture but alleged US-led hostilities against North Korea have intensified since Trump's inauguration.
North Korea said on Friday it test-fired strategic cruise missiles earlier last week to inform its adversaries of its military's counterattack capability and the readiness of its nuclear operations.
After watching the launches, the North's fourth missile testing event this year, Kim said the military must be fully ready to use its nuclear weapons
Experts say Kim won't likely accept Trump's overture anytime soon as he is now focusing on his support of Russia's war against Ukraine with provision of weapons and troops.
They say Kim could consider resuming diplomacy with Trump when he thinks he cannot maintain his country's current booming cooperation with Russia.
Kim and Trump met three times from 2018-19 during Trump's first term to discuss the future of North Korea's nuclear programme.
Their high-stakes diplomacy eventually collapsed due to wrangling over US-led economic sanctions on North Korea.
Recently, Russia's President Vladimir Putin met a senior North Korean official in Moscow, Pyongyang's state media said on Saturday.
The meeting on Thursday occurred on the same day that South Korea's spy agency said the North had dispatched more troops to Russia for its war efforts in Ukraine, without disclosing how many.
Seoul's intelligence also said North Korea had redeployed its soldiers to the front line in Kursk, where Ukraine previously said they had been withdrawn following heavy losses.
Ri Hi Yong, a member of North Korea's Politburo and secretary of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, met Putin in the Kremlin, the official Korean Central News Agency said.
During the meeting, Putin thanked North Korea for 'its positive support to the Russian Federation,' it said.
The Kremlin confirmed the meeting in a statement on Thursday.
Neither Moscow nor Pyongyang has officially acknowledged that North Koreans have been deployed to fight against Ukraine.
The two countries have boosted their military cooperation since Russia launched its 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
European leaders threw their support behind Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday after a televised spat at the White House between the Ukrainian leader and US President Donald Trump cast doubts over efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war.
Recently, North Korea's Defence Ministry alleged the US and its allies were ramping up more serious military provocations targeting North Korea since Trump took power.
It cited the recent US-South Korean aerial exercise involving a US B-1B bomber and other reported activities involving US military assets.
A Defence Ministry statement said North Korea will counter the strategic threat of the US with strategic means.
Agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
2 hours ago
- Al Etihad
US envoy Witkoff 'hopeful' for 'productive' meeting on Ukraine conflict on Monday
17 Aug 2025 18:20 Washington (AFP)US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin agreed to "robust security guarantees" for Ukraine during their high-stakes summit in Alaska, a top White House envoy said Sunday, adding that he was hopeful for a "productive meeting" with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders the next on CNN, Steve Witkoff added that Russia had agreed to unspecified concessions on five Ukrainian regions central to the fighting."We agreed to robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing," Witkoff added: "The Russians made some concessions at the table with regard to all five of those regions. And that discussion is going to specifically be detailed on Monday."Trump on Monday will be hosting Zelensky and a number of European leaders to discuss ways to end the three-and-a-half-year preparations come after Trump dropped his push for a ceasefire following the Alaska summit with Putin, something that had been one of Washington's core demands before the summit, to which Ukraine and its European allies were not Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on NBC Sunday that a ceasefire "is not off the table," but "what we ultimately are aiming for is an end to this war."In a brief post on his Truth Social platform, Trump hailed "BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA," without elaborating. The leaders heading to Washington on Monday include British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, among others.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Is strength the only language Iran, Israel and Russia understand?
This week, the Iranian leadership's strategic confusion reached a pivotal moment with further erosion of its prestige. The moment revealed cracks in its project founded on an ideology that uses Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen as tools in its self-declared 'Axis of Resistance'. Tehran thus now scrambles to gather the fragments of a waning hegemony that once made it a feared regional player, racing to regroup scattered proxies and summon traditional allies, including Russia. However, Moscow today finds itself in a reality of appeasement towards the only remaining superpower – the US – as it hopes for relief from crippling sanctions. Both of Iran and Russia's leaderships are walking a tightrope of anxiety, caught between yearning for the grandeur of regional and international influence and the sobering realities of today, which demand begrudging compliance with US President Donald Trump's terms. Iran's leadership appears rattled by the prospect of renewed US and Israeli military operations, and by the potential reimposition of European sanctions under the 'snapback' mechanism in response to its nuclear policies. This mounting economic and military encirclement has sparked panic across Iran's various power centres, who all ultimately fall under supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. That panic partly explains why Tehran has turned to its regional arms in a desperate effort to salvage its diminishing influence. Yet in Lebanon, Tehran's trajectory encountered a development it had not anticipated: it collided with a wall of newly affirmed Lebanese sovereignty, an outcome that defied expectations of an Iranian leadership long accustomed to Beirut deferring to its orders through its proxy Hezbollah. It has become evident that the majority of Lebanese no longer want their country to be used by either Israel or Iran as a proxy battlefield for their interests. During the visit of Ali Larijani, Iran's top national security official, to Lebanon, it was clear that Tehran's arrogance was breaking under the weight of a defiant Lebanese state and people. Indeed, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri took decisive steps towards a divorce from Iranian control. This is no minor development. Tehran had assumed it could wield Lebanon and Hezbollah as leverage in its negotiations with the Trump administration. Instead, it was caught off guard as the Trump team snatched that card from its hand. Iran's leadership today finds itself cornered by the declining value and effectiveness of its armed proxies. For Tehran, this signals a countdown to its own waning relevance in the regional balance of power. So what will it do? Will Mr Khamenei drink the cup of poison that his predecessor, the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, famously chose when he accepted the ceasefire with Iraq? Or will the current leadership keep its head buried in the sand, refusing to acknowledge the serious decline in its regional weight, shrinking options, diminishing capabilities and fading prestige? And what will the West decide in the face of Iran's rising panic, part of which manifested in the dangerous escalation by Hezbollah secretary general Naim Qassem, who resorted to threats against the Lebanese state and people should the government proceed with its decision to enforce the monopoly of arms? The time has come for Washington and Brussels to take Lebanon more seriously. The US is aware that the moment has arrived to raise the issue of Iranian proxies in backchannel as well as public bilateral negotiations. Tehran continues to believe it enjoys impunity for what it perpetrates in Lebanon because it assumes that the West cares only about the nuclear issue. Washington must now make clear to Tehran how wrong it is in that assumption. Some may argue that the burden falls squarely on the US, given its influence over Iran, just like with Russia and Israel. That is true. But European powers also have leverage. Their top priority over the past three years has been to contain Russia's influence on the continent, as well as its war effort in Ukraine. The Europeans have responded with economic sanctions on Moscow, the provision of advanced weaponry to Kyiv and the expansion of Nato. They are watching Mr Trump's moves vigilantly. At the same time, they are wrestling with their collective conscience over Israeli crimes against Palestinian civilians in Gaza and have waved the recognition of the state of Palestine as leverage. While recognition would be a positive step, it needs to be supplemented with concrete actions – including serious sanctions – against Israel. Without that, Israel will continue imposing its agenda in the occupied territories. Indeed, the weapon of sanctions might be the only effective means of altering Israel's conduct – just like it is expected to exert meaningful pressure on Iran. After all, had Washington not announced the scope of sanctions he was prepared to impose on Russia within a timeframe, would Moscow have rushed to request a summit with Mr Trump in Alaska?
Al Etihad
3 hours ago
- Al Etihad
EU chief hails Trump's offer of NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine
17 Aug 2025 17:17 Brussels (AFP)EU chief Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday hailed US President Donald Trump's proposal to offer NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine, as she hosted Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelensky ahead of a key meeting in the White House the next day."We welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to (NATO) Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine, and the coalition of the willing, including the European Union, is ready to do its share," von der Leyen said. On Monday, Zelensky has a meeting in Washington with Trump, accompanied by von der Leyen and other European leaders.
