Handloom sector gets a major boost in Andhra Pradesh
These measures include provision of 200 units of power free of cost to traditional looms and 500 units to powerlooms. The government has also decided to bear the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on handloom textiles.
Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu, who chaired a review meeting on Tuesday, outlined several initiatives that would come into effect starting August 7 (National Handloom Day).
Mr. Naidu emphasised that after agriculture, the handloom sector was the most critical source of rural employment and deserved focused attention.
The Chief Minister recalled a recent interaction he had with a weaver's family during his visit to Jammalamadugu, which brought to his attention the struggles faced by the community.
'As a response, the government has decided to offer 200 units of free electricity for traditional handlooms and 500 units for powerlooms. This move will significantly reduce operational costs for weavers across the State,' Mr. Naidu said.
The government also resolved to bear the entire GST on handloom textiles. 'This means, the government will pay the GST directly to the Centre, relieving weavers and handloom sellers of the tax burden,' he said.
Officials explained that the measure would help reduce the prices of handloom products, making them more accessible to consumers and increasing sales, which in turn would benefit the weavers.
Thrift fund
To further support the financial stability of handloom workers, the government would set up a ₹5-crore thrift fund. The fund was aimed at providing long-term social security and financial aid to those engaged in the sector.
During the meeting, the officials presented the Chief Minister with details of recent national recognition received by Andhra Pradesh's handloom artisans. The State secured 10 national awards for excellence in handloom production, including its first award under the One District–One Product (ODOP) initiative.
The Chief Minister reiterated his government's commitment to the uplift of traditional artisans and fulfil the promises made during the elections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
UK to deport foreign criminals immediately; expands ‘deport now, appeal later' scheme
Agencies The UK Government has announced plans to allow immediate deportation of foreign criminals right after sentencing. This change aims to speed up removals, reduce prison overcrowding, and improve public safety under the Government's Plan for Change. Currently, foreign prisoners can be deported after serving 50% of their sentence. New rules coming into effect in September will reduce this to 30%. The Government now plans to introduce primary legislation to enable deportation immediately upon sentencing for most foreign national offenders serving fixed-term sentences. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said, "This Government is taking radical action to deport foreign criminals, as part of our Plan for Change. Deportations are up under this Government, and with this new law they will happen earlier than ever before." She added, "Our message is clear: if you abuse our hospitality and break our laws, we will send you packing." Foreign national offenders make up about 12% of the prison population, costing taxpayers around £54,000 annually per prisoner. Since July 2024, almost 5,200 foreign criminals have been deported, a 14% increase compared to the previous year. The Government has invested £5 million to place specialist staff in around 80 prisons to speed up removals. Alongside immediate deportation powers, the Government is expanding a scheme that forces some foreign nationals to have appeals against convictions heard from abroad. The number of countries participating in this "deport now, appeal later" scheme will nearly triple to 23, as per a report by AFP . Under this plan, people from these countries will be deported before they can appeal their convictions, with appeals conducted remotely from their home countries using video technology. Countries added to the scheme include Latvia, Bulgaria, Angola, Botswana, Kenya, Uganda, Zambia, Australia, Canada, India, Indonesia, Lebanon, and Malaysia. The government is also discussing adding more countries to the list. Interior Minister Yvette Cooper said, "For far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on. That has to end. Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system." Terrorists, murderers, and prisoners serving life sentences will continue to serve their full terms before deportation is considered. The measures will apply to prisoners already in custody as well as those newly sentenced. These moves come amid growing political pressure on immigration policies, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government aiming to address public concerns and counter opposition parties focusing on crime and border control. The Government's broader Plan for Change includes building 14,000 new prison places, reforming sentencing laws, and introducing an immigration system designed to reduce dependency on cheap overseas labour and manage net migration more effectively. The immediate deportation powers require primary legislation, which will be brought before Parliament soon. Once enacted, these laws will help remove foreign criminals faster, save taxpayer money, and enhance the UK's border security. (With inputs from AFP) (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. 3 years on, Akasa's next challenge: Staying in the air against IndiGo's dominance Jane Street blow pushes Indian quants to ancient Greek idea to thrive Berlin to Bharuch: The Borosil journey after the China hit in Europe FIIs are exiting while retail investors stay put. Will a costly market make them pay? Stock Radar: TVS Motor breaks out from 1-month consolidation to hit fresh high; time to buy or book profits? FMCG sector: Both a consumption & tactical play; 7 stocks that have an upside potential of up to 30% F&O Radar| Deploy Short Strangle in Nifty for Theta decay benefits within index range These large- and mid-cap stocks may give more than 25% return in 1 year, according to analysts
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
From kitchen makeovers to balcony extensions: How home renovations can reduce capital gains tax for property sellers
In 2023, Neha Mehta sold her 1,020 sq ft flat in Pune's Kothrud for ₹78 lakh. Two years earlier, she had invested ₹6.5 lakh in major renovations, installing a modular kitchen, replacing old tiles with vitrified flooring, enclosing the balcony with sliding glass doors, and upgrading the plumbing and wiring to modern standards. Planning to sell property? For capital gains tax, home renovation or other capital expenses count as cost of improvement and can be added to the acquisition cost. (Photo for representative purposes only)(Pixabay) When calculating her capital gains tax, she included these expenses to her cost of acquisition as 'cost of improvement.' She kept detailed, itemised GST-compliant invoices and made all payments via bank transfer. The Income Tax Department flagged her return for review due to the sizable deduction, but the claim was accepted in full. Neha's case shows that well-documented, value-enhancing renovations can successfully reduce capital gains tax even under scrutiny. Capital upgrades, not routine repairs For the purposes of computing capital gains taxes, home renovation expenses or expenses of capital nature shall be regarded as cost of improvement of the asset and can be added to cost of acquisition. Such renovation expenses may include expenses relating to structural additions, alterations, and upgrades, further constructions and fixtures that increase the value of the asset. Such expenses should not be in the nature of routine repair, maintenance or cleaning. In essence, only capital expenditure improving or adding to the property's value can be added to the cost of acquisition/improvement as eligible expenses. 'Routine maintenance, repairs, whitewashing, painting (unless as part of a major renovation), property tax, utility bills, and expenses claimed under other tax heads are not eligible for offsetting capital gains,' says Alay Razvi, managing partner, Accord Juris, a law firm. Generally, the current owner cannot claim renovation expenses incurred by the previous owner as the same would already be claimed as cost of improvement while computing capital gains taxes for the previous owner. 'However, in case of inherited property, where the cost of acquisition of the previous owner is deemed to be the cost of acquisition of the current owner, then any renovation expenses incurred by the previous owner can be claimed as cost of improvement by the current owner, says SR Patnaik, Partner (head - taxation), Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, a law firm. GST bills must be clear Since 'renovation' is deemed as 'construction' under GST, vague or generic invoice descriptions can lead to denial of eligible credit. 'Composite invoices should be avoided, as they hinder segregation of eligible items. Clear, itemized documentation is crucial to substantiate ITC claims during GST assessments,' says Karan Sarawagi, Advocate, Bombay High court. GST Invoices with details may be helpful in proving the authenticity of capital nature of expenses helps identify and justify costs. 'Date of purchase justifying the indexation claim when it was purchased and proper documentation avoids disallowances of claims,' says Jain. Also Read: Planning to sell a property gifted by your parents? This is the amount of tax that you will have to pay Further, obtain municipal permissions, completion certificates. Take before-and-after photos if possible. 'Avoid claiming personal/lifestyle expenses as property improvement. Keep all banking/payment records,' says Razvi. Renovation expenses may include expenses relating to structural additions, alterations, and upgrades, further constructions and fixtures that increase the value of the asset.(HT Graphics) Big claims draw scrutiny There may be a likelihood of tax scrutiny if the renovation expenses are very high without any proportionate improvement of property and there are no adequate invoices or documentation to show such expenses. 'Claiming renovation expenses, especially large or unusual ones, can increase the likelihood of tax scrutiny, particularly when used to reduce capital gains on property sales. However, with proper documentation and strategy, taxpayers can safeguard themselves effectively,' says Vivek Jalan, Partner Tax Connect Advisory Services, a professional services firm. Anagh Pal is a personal finance expert who writes on real estate, tax, insurance, mutual funds and other topics
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
India's tax reform needs more economic focus, less political manoeuvring
Over eight years later, GST has fallen short of expectations, prompting the government to appoint Home Minister Amit Shah to lead negotiations for its reform Bloomberg Prime Minister Narendra Modi has often described the reform of India's indirect taxes as his landmark achievement. In 2017, a patchwork of national, state- and local-level sales and excise levies were replaced by a single goods and services tax that economists claimed would increase government revenue while also being business friendly. More than eight years on, it has become clear the GST hasn't met expectations. The government recently announced that Modi's right-hand man, Home Minister Amit Shah, would be put in charge of negotiations to fix it. This is both good and bad news. It's good news that Modi is willing to accept some reform of the GST is necessary — it isn't common for populists to admit that something they did needs improving. It's also interesting that the home minister, who is the establishment's go-to man for knotty political problems, has been put in charge. Shah has always been Modi's enforcer, and has never run an economic ministry; but he has a reputation for getting things done. For example, the government tried and failed for years to privatize state-owned Air India, and only managed when Shah oversaw the process. It had nothing to do with his official portfolio — he just had the political stature to push through difficult changes. The bad news, however, is that the GST reform doesn't need those instincts. It would benefit from less politics and more economics. Partisan compromises caused the system to underperform in the first place. Economists wanted India's mess of indirect taxes to be replaced with a single, national value-added tax that would apply to all goods and services across the country and be evaluated by a single bureaucracy. Unfortunately, the constitution assigns state governments the right to impose indirect taxes, and not the federal authorities. Officials in New Delhi eventually had to work out a messy compromise to get state governments on board. India doesn't have one GST, but three — one for the central government, one for the states, and one for in-between transactions. Each of these has its own officials, tax forms, and filing requirements. Worse, instead of a single simple rate, the GST eventually went into effect with four, five, or even more slabs depending on what you included. Instead of applying to all goods and services, some big-ticket items — fuel, alcohol and electricity among them — were excluded. As a result, the government never collected as much money from the new system as it hoped. It wasn't until last year that actual indirect tax collections crossed 6 per cent of GDP, the level they had been when the GST was introduced. For businesses, some things have gotten easier — exporters get quick refunds on the taxes they pay, for example. But fraud has also exploded. Almost 10 per cent of the tax that's collected is fraudulently claimed as refunds. Sometimes traders buy and submit counterfeit invoices for inputs that entitle them to tax credits. Other firms turn in bills that show goods being transferred from one company to another, their value being inflated every time — except these are all shell companies, and the goods in question don't exist. They then claim input tax credits on these high, imaginary transactions. On one occasion, fraudsters registered 246 separate dummy firms that investigators had to untangle. The multiple different tiers don't help, either. Fraudsters can also mislabel goods to evade taxes. The honest have to deal with absurd acts of categorization. Last year, for example, officials 'clarified' that sales of popcorn would be charged at a 5 per cent rate, unless it was sold in a pre-labelled package, when it would be charged at 12 per cent — except if it was caramel flavored, in which case the rate was 18 per cent. The economist who had served as Modi's advisor at the time the GST was introduced described this as a 'national tragedy, violating the spirit of the Good and Simple Tax the GST was meant to be.' The often-confusing nature of the system, as well as the poor digital infrastructure set up for payments and reporting, mean that smaller companies suffer disproportionately. Opposition politicians often claim that onerous GST requirements are driving small enterprises out of business. Not all big business is happy, either. Multinational companies can run afoul of complicated definitions of what counts as an exported service. Infosys Ltd. and some foreign airlines operating in India were hit with tax demands for billions of dollars last year based on an unusual interpretation of the code. (Infosys said in June that the demand had been withdrawn.) The deviations from economic common sense that have marred the implementation of the GST are a consequence of political compromises. State governments are given a say in rates, and nobody has an incentive to simplify taxes, only to win populist medals by reducing the tax applicable to one good or another. At the very least, one or two of the current tax bands need to be eliminated. Ideally, the entire system should be overhauled, and exemptions, such as for petroleum products, minimized. We should end up with a single tax, applied through a single form, and at a single rate for all transactions. If Shah listens to the economists, that's what he will push through. But the chances are that he will listen to the politicians instead.
