logo
What Do Trump's Tariff Hikes Mean for Canada's Trade-Dependent Economy?

What Do Trump's Tariff Hikes Mean for Canada's Trade-Dependent Economy?

Edward Alden, a trade expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, was blunt in his assessment of President Trump's torrent of tariffs this week.
'The United States has destroyed the global trade system it created and left nothing in its place but a set of ad hoc arrangements,' he told Ana Swanson, my colleague who covers trade in Washington. 'For trade, the result will be long-term instability that will be bad for business, bad for consumers and bad for global growth.'
[Read: Overturning the Global Trade System, Trump Puts His Ideas to the Test]
For Canada, the week meant that Prime Minister Mark Carney was unable to deliver on his plan to eliminate U.S. tariffs against Canada through negotiations. Instead of a trade deal, Mr. Trump raised tariffs on some imports from Canada to 35 percent from 25 percent.
And, as I wrote, the tariff increase also came with slights against Canada from the president, who has repeatedly dismissed the nation's sovereignty and has called for it to become the 51st state. Mexico was also unable to reach a trade deal. But Mr. Trump postponed tariff increases against it for 90 days to allow time for more talks.
On top of that, Mr. Trump gave the other countries he hit with tariffs on Thursday night a one-week break before they take effect. But the increase for Canada started on Friday.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting
South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting

I never thought I would see the day when U.S. Senators John Thune and Mike Rounds and Rep. Dusty Johnson would sell out their South Dakota values and upbringing to become puppets of a president. Nor did I think I would see them damage institutions that are at the core of South Dakota's society. Unfortunately, it appears that President Donald Trump is so powerful that personal values no longer matter. Last week, all three voted to rescind $1.1 billion in funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — funding that all three had previously voted to approve. It's clear that National Public Radio was Trump's target. He believes taxpayer money shouldn't be going to support news he perceives as a challenge to his line of thinking. But often when we act hastily and with little thought, the grenades we throw miss the intended target and damage innocent victims. Such is the case here. Only 1% of NPR's operating budget and 15% of the Public Broadcasting System budget comes from the corporation, and both will survive. Most of the corporation's funding goes to support local public broadcasting systems, which likely will not. 'After the cut, NPR is still going to be NPR and PBS is still going to be PBS,' said Julie Overgaard, executive director of South Dakota Public Broadcasting. 'They are all going to continue to exist.' So will public stations in the major metropolitan areas. 'It's the places like us that will suffer the most,' Overgaard said. 'The reason the CPB was set up was so that rural communities can share in a collective public media. 'We don't have enough people and wealth to exist on our own. The very thing they were trying to eliminate will survive. Instead, it's something very important to our state that will be eliminated.' Programs like 'South Dakota Focus,' 'In the Moment,' 'Dakota Life' and 'Jazz Nightly,' along with statehouse coverage and broadcasts of high school sports and activities, may all disappear. What a legacy for Thune, Rounds and Johnson — the men who destroyed SDPB. Last week while casting their votes, they hid behind the need to cut the budget deficit. Funny. They found deficit religion only a few weeks after they voted for Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act that increases the deficit. The more talented politicians become, the better they are at creating alternative realities. Here's the reality of SDPB's future. The impending loss of $2 million in funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting may force SDPB to quickly cut up to 20 people from its 60-member staff. The damage likely will be worse. Even if SDPB could raise $2 million in three months, it probably wouldn't matter. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is essentially dead as of Sept. 30, severing the technical backbone of SDPB's network. It facilitates the sharing of programming from network to network. It facilitates emergency alerts and emergency alerts. It handles SDPB's website and negotiates music broadcast rights nationally. 'The situation is grave, fluid and chaotic,' Overgaard said. Rounds acted like he was the champion leading up to the vote, holding out to the last minute as he secured an agreement to find $9.4 million in funding elsewhere for communication towers on Native American reservations. That's not likely to be sustainable in the long-term. 'It's a nice gesture, but it is hollow in its result,' Overgaard said of Rounds' action. 'It will still result in the demise of tribal stations.' Programs like Native American News and other nationally shared music and talk programs likely won't be produced, and the national network that distributes it won't exist. Money and technical support for local programming also disappear. SDPB had just survived a funding fight in the South Dakota Legislature after then-Gov. Kristi Noem suggested cutting $3.6 million in state funding, also largely aimed at silencing NPR. Legislators were inundated with calls, and the result was an overwhelming restoration of funding. 'We know we are very important in people's daily lives,' Overgaard said. 'They trust us in moments of crisis and joy. This has nothing to do with whether we are a valued service. This is politics. I don't know that we ever had a chance to win this.' The only chance is for federal funding to be restored in the upcoming federal budget, perhaps absent taxpayer support for NPR and PBS. SDPB supporters will have opportunities to speak with their congressional delegates during the upcoming August recess. Looking at constituents in the eye can be uncomfortable. Trump puppets are not what we thought we elected. Thune, Rounds and Johnson, what have you become? EDITOR'S NOTE: Brad Johnson is married to a retired former employee of the nonprofit Friends of South Dakota Public Broadcasting. This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting

ITT Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags
ITT Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ITT Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags

ITT (NYSE:ITT) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$972.4m (up 7.3% from 2Q 2024). Net income: US$121.0m (up 1.1% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 12% (in line with 2Q 2024). EPS: US$1.53 (up from US$1.46 in 2Q 2024). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period ITT Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Falls Short Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 2.5%. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 3.8%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 5.6% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 4.3% growth forecast for the Machinery industry in the US. Performance of the American Machinery industry. The company's shares are up 1.6% from a week ago. Balance Sheet Analysis While earnings are important, another area to consider is the balance sheet. We've done some analysis and you can see our take on ITT's balance sheet. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

TELUS Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: CA$0.005 (vs CA$0.15 in 2Q 2024)
TELUS Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: CA$0.005 (vs CA$0.15 in 2Q 2024)

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

TELUS Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: CA$0.005 (vs CA$0.15 in 2Q 2024)

TELUS (TSE:T) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: CA$5.03b (up 2.7% from 2Q 2024). Net income: CA$7.00m (down 97% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 0.1% (down from 4.7% in 2Q 2024). EPS: CA$0.005 (down from CA$0.15 in 2Q 2024). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period TELUS Earnings Insights Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 3.0% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 2.0% growth forecast for the Telecom industry in Canada. Performance of the Canadian Telecom industry. The company's shares are down 4.6% from a week ago. Risk Analysis Before you take the next step you should know about the 3 warning signs for TELUS (2 don't sit too well with us!) that we have uncovered. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store